HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 01/28/200301/27/2003 14:55 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers I /
CLIENT: mO-Awtra DeM-J — = -03
LEGAL : Lo Z S i t^�rrC I iv t� s Z INSP.
GRADING PLAN- ` ¢ plSSt7C. 'kIsS/ . ,;fo ;-wa—r- <"ei.f..f
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our represlntative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
o The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grafting Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion those exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as rnemured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. t-t"4 56a Cri 4Wr—
fA See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations treasured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Tr
x
Z n/
SO .
OATH VJ sj t:kQPCAr?-. co¢+,Ie,4S gnm-Au ta. b rp d.S
Limitations:
It is ow opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere witb affsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow pending to occur around the foundation wall( t to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away 4 .zH s measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced QQ��RtnSZri# f requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by�[her coaistructic d )cum axe. is �otmd the sc
35SIS
Reviewed by:
5110 Granite SVM suite D • Loveland,
serving Colomdo with 9e1w In
SALinmeant
3a • Fax:(97o)663 1660
Lo4and
01/27/2003 14:55 9706631660
TAR ■ TapQ101ltpkrm.
t GC • pip GPIA&KODION MNK
Do=
' 4111 WA LRrto! @1
153
C�ow�
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
PAGE 02/03
i -
1-21-03
130 TBM-1
(BOU!)
•r e• e 1 13.1 Z
.e q , - • 13RK
�r a e• d
(BOW) `
.ee i
.4. •e e�
6.4 r
e d 1113
16.4 16,8 « ' • en
(80W) r J
;..
IBO
I6WJ 11.0
T.OF. - 183
0
WOK -OUT
LUlss
,16.1 � i�g•�
11.6 `t
oil
r093
0-13
05.E
UN a
(130W) a 0'~ — 02B
15.9 15.0 123 OWE) 06B
Hare:
THE ELEvATlc*& swam 4 EM CN Ape DAGM
C&I hE czar oN 1-21-M. AS-51JILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
NM
-r SCOTT, cox 4 AssoclATm, Na 5CHROEDER INVE5TMENTS
I-23-m3 cor"Itke Bgkwm LOT 28, PDX WILLS 2ND
r sno ak..na w..� &Am e • to++w4 mWmdo go)* PORT COLLIID, C.OLORADO
,.3 ow rill
-
,,n,t
01/27/2003 14:55 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03
/. L ,
a;.
it
Z.Yr
1 _
13.
r 15
i 113
,
;/ar.R M;Ir
it
y 1✓ a
! r I pDIla
f
LA
g.
4 t � ' � ; ;.. � i � :.. !. � � .: ":..: -; :.. G ors , � �. � ;�:. ` � �• � ....... .