HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 01/04/2005 (3)01/03/2005 11:37 9706631660 KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 01/03
Inc.
. str-tactytrA.l C�retech.nscat G:vi.1
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE:
CLIENT: AW- 0 DIVA JOB #:
LEGAL: i .+ �S, i�F P�O�•i a{cSSti La,� �`�,: INSP. BY:
JQN-
ADDRESS: _ 7j�0LOJ
SM/GRADING PLAN: ,l "/ ewCle
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations atthe lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings, Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
O The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
X
U
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions; noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our obeervations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not M conformance to the above referenced grading plan: Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
r n riJ.lStar,�s S E vE i
' 'nations:
It is our opinion -that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offaite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may cbange
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Eacicfill adjacent to the residence may settle overtime
and allow ponding to occur undat on walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintain to ensure tha ay from the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown o vF>x£eiQ° ding plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or cs it@tt O cuts are beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed by: Date: '0
Main Office '•••••••• Branch Offict
11 tarok Sceet Suite 500 Kimball( Street, Suite 101
Lovelaad.Colorado 80538 Longmont CoIoradv80661
Phone (M) 663.0138 www.ktv&tngin=ring.com Pheme: (303) 702-066r
74-8413
Pax (970)663.1660 Fax:(303)7
lovelandaktvaenginersing-con longmont®krveengmeering-com
g.com
01/03/2005 11:37 9706631660 KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 02/03
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
1z/27/04
T.O.F. = TOP OF FOUNDATION
TBM--1 = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK (A
B.O-W- BACK OF WALK WINDOW WELL)
LW.S.T. a LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF
SILL = BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
WLKOUT s BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
XX.X .. ELEVATIONS SH0�q�5-30-3.7 DATED 1z/29/04
_1 - SEE SCA LETTER
*NOTE MISSING GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS
f9R4) QZ
93.
93.2`r
93.1
92.
TOM-1
91.2
(B.O.W.)
TOF r 4
n4
02.4
x
92.1
2 92.0
91.0
3608 WILDVIEW DRIVE 90.5
THE 1HE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON AM BASED AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 12/27/04
6 3D-3-7 SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. ABBCO
n LOT 2, SWIFT ADDN W FOSSIL LAKE RANCH
fis•IG SVbat. 9uNb D LpMun
Consulting Eow0a re CalervOo 80539 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
[ 9110 d 320-30^ bwo
••i -40.0� (970) 563 - 0135 a
(.' p,y� pwrw�.N� 00" r -9aW� •lagm,t LwrM
01/03/2005 11:37 9706631660
ev ammmmg�
M . ! 4PAPY
KIVA ENGINEERING PAGE 03/03
07
z
owe
`)I.Z WILD
R