HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 09/14/200409/13/2004 12:00 9702041212 ABBCO BUILDERS PAGE 02
u
RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2004
�SCoTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION sCA.tr,1A /sz~n_•
CLIENT
LEGAL
GRADING PLAN: (-1 T(X.•i a,-2 "o-Moo ELL- D97CD 4-3o• ZJI
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot Sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
it is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. f w S_< Sse o17+C-4 C'vr�r Ic r►rS
'38uaJ .
K See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or
r}
14JShiaL& CA4t=0 1'—Z' W4tw of rail L-ii^ 7tr 13 �.►Y-�OAQ7&
Limitations: t'sr r,.k� LsP.0SCAP1'4i A:--- Lor 1-4, r3 W-k 4--
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed orbarriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow pare r slowing runoffflow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
in and allow por g to ® 11 tion walls, The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to cnstu rnSf, fvj{>7pi; from the foundation, The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements she 0. ;/e re fei nGec r ins Plan. Other minimum grading requirements which maybe specified
in the soils report by0. c c i are. beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed
5110 Grall�ai��tc B�iCgveland , Colorado 80538 (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663.1660
Serving fnlorado with offices In • Boulder - Lon3rnont • Loveland
�L-� `�l J6G•b.l
09/13/2004 12:00
9702041212
ABBCO BUILDERS
PAGE 03
A6-13UILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
033
jpl �- L `
Al
022
r
02m sty,
02.
00 LWST LUST
03m 03A
T,OF-
03
012 MIMNa LUST
DOIW9POUT _... _ 033
p012cN
01�
(B.OJIU
0Q
A� O
TBM-1
992
(Baw.)
Nome
THE ELRYATIONB 81 =W I DN ARE DA W
ON THE SURVEY P910olaED oN S/7/m4,
OPEN PATIO
ELEVAlk" SW2v1AYY7315
W1104
GANTILCYERED
WALL (TYPIrAL) 00b
00$
010
/ s (SWALE)
01) �L!
9a1(GWALE)
'00\ A
13 99b (SWALE)
MA (SWALE)
- N -
TAF. • TOP OF FOWDATWN
TBM-1 TEMPORARY BENCH MAW 1
BOA1. ■ BACK OP WIAI K
LJUINT. • L MVW OPe*O (TOP OF WIDOW WELL)
81LL - A0T70f°1 OF WDDOW GLA88
WUC= - BOTTOM OF WALKC01lT pom
»(x • ELHvATlON9 BMOT
❑X • On SCA LETTER 526-21-m9-m9 pA7= 940(04
lL-SCCrrt, COX ,,IATB, Na I A55cO
eeeroulcrrg Engtnsar• LOT 10,13LGGK 6, P0581L LAKE F'UD 2ND
fta t &me c • Lovelal4 charade mpW FORT COLLiN5
rsm) 6" • am T a-aoua
SWAG •m-.do ••.amw • . Bad.. LOOM • la da d
09/13/2004 12:00 9702041212 ABBCO BUILDERS PAGE 04
E ' ' ..Es•n�
-�'GA
AT LO.L
COO
' �tuivr
Fn
F 7 .3� -
i _IL A. .
J
r.ri L rO rL� � n"'•d �• r� ... .. ..f
Ok
► yy.,
`����' �'L,�'9�'y.,�!�',` •e � M� - "� - � - mil?
a "r °
" � � et�y � � ' ~• i lY3
ii��J,
*g cc� / g rT y�FX s . rk 1
p J`%� /'�iU \ti� A .fir :ii� r- F�_�2y1'^4 �i Y_.« _