Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 01/06/2003 (6)FROM : Scott Cox & Rssociates,ine. FRX NO. : 9706631660 Dec. 04 2002 02:19PM P1 rSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers 0-YERLOT GRADViG OBSERVATION SCAB 15Z(O-zs--rig CLIENT DATE IZ 2—GZ LEGAL: J —oT- Ilan INSP. GRADING PLAN• �1S�i. t7G ELF '1PA lW Q I We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading plan referenced above. During our observations our represaatative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. At - The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. ❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. however, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. A See the attached "As -Built" grading plan. O The elevations measured arc not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations: Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are ores K qs, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns �ctiti?Qnj�iA n runoffflow, Back ill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to oecu.. s_* -d.lht'fotmda`t it `walls. The bac)�ll adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained in ensure that:iiuroffv�ili'IIo`uy {rgthe foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on the above referenced -�adij?sgzplan. Other minimum grading requirements which maybe specified in the soils report or by on 3oDumenta.am beyond the s .opc of this report. Reviewed bY:— � .�^�� � ...•.f::" Date- JU3/OZ.- 5110 Granite Svee-Mioaa^-rteoe!and , Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (97o) F's3-1660 Serving Colorwdo wb offices m • Boulder • Longmont • Loveland FROM : Scott Cox & Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Dec. 04 2002 02:19PM P2 ELEVATI" &JZvEYED II-26-02 LEGEND TOF = TOP OF FOUNDATION TSM-1 = TEMP BENCH MARK #1 BOW = BACK OF WALK LWST = LOWEST OPENING SILL = BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS WLKOUT=BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR • MISSING DOWNSPOUT o = MISSING EXTENSION ;xx.x) = ELEVATIONS SHOT .11-Z�r(Z 8�} (XI = SEE SCA LETTER s:' Wlm G .rD•g� x MA X gs.s P� X r $$,S © 90.-+ .ro,Z- NOTE. THE ELEVATI" 8140M HEas aN APO VARY ON T44E auRvEY PERFORMED ON u-26-01 t r r 6 GA*a no Few g-+.4 m C mw [�.23 AS -BUILT C4P-.ADM ELEVATIONS iu SC'.OTT, COX A350GI,4TE8, MG a8BG0 . 12 � ep —k" mw%9r• LOT 16. BLOdG 19, F0981L LAKE IQANCt 12Np E ', mm' as doom a...t s m o - i-mt-A eebwdo amass FORT COLLINS, COLORADO r9Tm� ii8 - ®9s ltmLws mnei CPFI �.y erg �aad �. •ooq� -up.. • le.J.d 63 FROM Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660 Dec. 04 2002 O2:2OPM P3 .. C — wol� / � r 4-30-0 � qZ:z do r � 1 10.5 4Wr FG r 8g •� ... IRIS �...� Pas woo CAD� ' �f