HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/31/200310/30/2003 09:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
RECEIVE�D R
ffSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineeroCT -0 Q
S 1 Ett'EAWIN
OCT W4-
CLMNT
SCA TMA Wr.-
D�Tp. 10-Z4-03
LEGAL: r-•or %/ �: a _ �s s� �4 Z 1NSP.
...--eRAD1NGPLAM /` 4VWV J ��SSi.00
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general cunformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
o During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
d� Su the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include;
Other comments and/or observations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with oftte flows unless the grades
ate cbanged or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by divertin or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle overtime
and allow ponding to occur on walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that P o�y m the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on yr • •111 plan. Daher minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by MtA'c Clio am beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed
5110 CrarNkliA SATWV'= h~, Colorado 80536 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660
offices in • Boulder - Longmont - Loveland'
10/30/2003 09:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02103
s 0 � •
lit g
13 = 5-169 ROUND ROCK COURT
9 m"�
A
1
• ♦ g
0
I ism a.
a
uj
lid
r
• p ':
r
r
urp 4 1
MO
a� $
M;G
�+ 1 o
10/30/2003 09:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03
...
>',. � .�'' •`A ; � �.: >Ya ' a A♦.�� >. •' ww � 4 w•`
MM
+riwu. '-
�iM+ +1rhb r ,
wre ' ww..M�lr�
♦+},.
�y/1►' r 7•
dpo
0
�
0 �
C; l
03�
q
mo
o;u
M
�
A�
1