HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 12/26/2006 (3):2/18/2006 15:33 9702781910
ADVANCED ENGINEERING
RECEIVED
DEC 1 g 2006
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE: 12'
CLIENT: lafg= j&,, MEM JOB'N:
LEGAL: Ht 6sfatg- Iawk Zr& INSP. BY: �
ADDRESS: YIvSI Aq-
SITE/GRADiNG PLAN: Z�„aP,. .q (5+( doo—T4► .44 r;44
4" We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentativemeasured the relative elevations atthe lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
o The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
l
it is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversoly change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
O During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
ML See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
O The elevations measured are not in confbinwee to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
It is is our that the subject lo4 as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsltc flows unless the grades are changed
or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow
patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur
around the foundation walls. The bw*fll l adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow
away from the foundation. The gtadesmeasuredwere compared onlyto therequirementsshown onthe above referenced grading plan.
Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified In the soils report or by other construction documaits ate beyond the
scope of this report.
Reviewed by: Advanced Engineering, LLC
Jason E. Baker, P.E.
3105 Sumac Street
Port Collins, Colorado 80526
Phone: (970) 988-9774
Pax! (7m) 49d-0339
hermithsmwaol.com
12/18/2006 15:33 9702781910 ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 02/03
H
Z 00.0
'0
99.2
99.1
SWALE t LOX
a
98.6
(SWALE)
99.2'
98.0
99.3
TBM-1
97.8
i
LEGEND
T.D.F. = TOP OF F❑UNDATION
W.W st WINDI3W WELL
B.O.W. = BACK OF WALK
T.B.M.-1 = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 1
NOTE. THIS WopmATmN IS DAM ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 12-12-0&
SITE PLAN AND GRADING INFORMATION WAS FROVIDED BY CLIENT.
Q
00,3
.99.9
$ ) &o 2,3
W.a
99.5 �� x
x
99.5
x
00,7 99.3
W.W. = 01.0 99,2
00.5 W.W. = 01.0
a
T,O.F, = 01.2 98.9
W.W, s 00,8
W.W. = 00.700.7 98.7
SLAB 00.9
00.4 "
9810
3408 MUSKRAT C4tr, DRIVE
(B.O.W.) 97.7
(B.O.w.)
'AS —BUILT" ❑VERL❑T GRADING OBSERVATION'
ABBC❑
DATE: 12-14-06 MEM CONSULTING, LLC LOT 14, BLOCK 8 FOSSIL LAKE 2ND
SCALE: 1'-20' 3105 SUMAC STREET FORT COLLINS) CO
JOB # 1000-01-01A / FORT COLLINS, CO 80526
DRAFTED BY: CPH ' (970) 988-9774
• " 22/18/2006 15:33 97027B1910
WIN 2' tc. pAM
ADVANCED ENGINEERING
r
9� 5�9. oo Fi.F
M'• .
`1
vw '
m00.8oft
i� 01.5 i
5
TF"
PAGE 03/03
~!r
I