HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/22/2005 (3)FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Rug. 22 201215 08:19RM PI
`1Gcya �n�tiv�eerih�, Ivcc�f�C�C a��
`' Stnit:turwl ' �Ceotec�.siscq.l Gi:Util D
s AUG 2 2 2005
U T GRAD FNG OBSERVATIONDATS: u.
CLIENT: IUVA JOB
LEGAL: J&C.P rN9p.BY•
ADDRESS:
SrrVORAAING PLAN: o/Z / # e�q
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading plan referenced above. During our observations orarepresontative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
d The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
0 The elevations as measured arc in genentl conformance with the above noted Grading plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan, IIOwcver, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme, �%j' ,eA.,e• j&acrtt6zCAa r It ,iaA1-;-'5-
� See the attached "As-built"grading plan, 73ECs1.
The elevations measured arc not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Z r1k LAIC t Cas ' [ ti RA-1.
3 eke t c r — ' e p�s
r< p nXA Utii rcrl�l.
♦/ ci - 2 z ' J� 'f'rba,nt
.� 1
I3m1>3g¢p3t
� E:C, W-1O i T>r Gritcl'i InX� f Gr k� iL°r L.uT lS /a[ OL7L� .
It is our opinion chat -the subject lot, as graded on the above da with offs; to flows unless the grades are changed or baniem are
created such as fonees, garden terracing, sidewalks, ondfor A change the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing
runoff flow. ttackM adjacent to the rtaidw= may seul �fodallo}y nocur around the foundation walls, The back$]) adjacent
to the residence must be monitored. and maintained in ��W am the foundation. The grades measured were compared
oolrtotheratuircmctitastwvmontlteabovereferonc tithernid rl n grcquirementswhich muybespecifiedinthe soils npmt
or by other comttuenon doc art of p rL
Reviewed by:
Mai 1 C N� Bich otsu
Loveland,
nd,Cite Street Suite 8 a - 300 Munbark Street, 9Sr&lf
Loveland, Colorado 80538 Longmont, Colorado 80501
Fax:PhL(9 0) 66 -16 0138 www.klvaengineor'rlg,cum Phone: (303) M-0661
Pax: and kivea 60 Fax: (.M3) 77"13
InVeland�ukivtrestgrneeting.mm Iongmunt0kivaertginaering.com
9� �'c•�t/DS
FROMY:KIVR ENGINEERING INC FRX NO. :9706631660 Aug. 22 2005 08:20RM P2
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
s-16-05
AUG 2 2 2005
BM-1
9.0
3.0.W.)
U10.2
09.3(B.O.W,)
10.7
�BRK)
o
NOTE:
7HE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON ARE BASED
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 8/17mr,
10.6
lit.T.O.F. r TOP OF FOUNDATION
TBM-1 - TEMPORARY BENOH MARK i1
B.O.W. BACK OF WALK
T.O.W.W. r TOP OF WINDOW WELL
SILL - BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
WALKOUT - BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
X - ELEVATIO M SHOT
SEE KIVA LETTER 1n25-n-1e-1 DA7® ene/o5
04.3
05.1 _
LL1
06.3
(T.0 W W.) o •'
(T.07W. W. )
E-�aj
TOF = 12.5
10
(T.O. .W.)
E.
DOWNSPOUT
(T 0O�y3 yy) %• TO CHASE
(BURIED)
(TYP.)
10.4 Yr�
ME
x 05.9
.8
06.7
07.1
05.
04.2
AS —BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
im
B-78-L �iVa tineeri , rnt. AB B CO
SCALE Strslctwral gaebGA,aKwt e4sa LOT 14. BLOCK 4, FOSSIL' LAKE RANCH 2NO
10m20' 5110 GmItt sbwt, Bulls 0 Phan•, (070) 083 - 0138 FORT COLLINS, COLORAOO
ZRAWM.` Lo*ana, Cdcweda W538 Fmo (070) 663 — 1880
CPH w-.,khusnyM..rinaoan IsvdondOklvassgNseMg.smn
FROM,:KIVA ENGINEERING INC
i�
F � f 1.6
TF— 1 .3
1
FGw 11.7
TFa 12.4
FAX NO. :97e6631666
Fr*m 11.5
TF= 12.2
Aug. 22 2005 68:2eSM P3
! 1 ml M
��i
AUG 2 2 Zppb �
1