HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/13/200308/12/2003 09:33 9706631660 SCOTT CW LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
SCOTf, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
. l!
OVERLOT'GRADING OBSERVATION SCATohd
CLIENT
� �•T u•i-.-..— ter•-- �—���
LEGAL: LET 1 �r fro C 1L rsSSilr L E Z�° INSP.
GRADING PLAN: L4 *4LC)4 i5q-0Q
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentativemeasured the relative elevations atthe lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
0 The elevations as measured are in general confoYtiyauce with the above noted Grading Plan.
0( The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
❑ During our observAtions our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
W' See the attached "As-Built",grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan, Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such arden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by div noff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding t0 oaw aro o>lph The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that ram �C,pt flt�W>>�frQ�? oundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on $ta ab e?eced gra ,Flerd. er minimum grading requirements which maybe specified
in the soils report or by offer are yond the scope of this rcpo5
Reviewed
5110 C=Jte $treet, SulW4&r4_l olorado 80538 • (970) 653-0138 • fax:1970) 663-1660
serving Colorado with offices in • Boulder • Longmont • Loveland
00/12/2003 09:33 9706631660
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
PAGE 02/03
032
03�
QgvATO)iD 6lAiVET®
-
0-��
CONga?TE SLAB.
025 x=1
03A, �\
. • o CHASE
035
.,
n <
< '
LWBT e •
. e
043
OL8
(PATIO)FAno
022 �
x'
T.DF
LUOT OSA
OW
04.3
VX5
mu
02.5
02.0
LU15T
o
m39
v C veno
°
a
POFWA
poptq
01b
mob
e
e
LAW
(9A1W e
. CHASE
03.%
e
A
}•
"•
4 n1salN 013
b
EXT6N ION
CHASE
THM-1
002
worF�
74M ELEVATI" 410M HEM aN ARE BABHD
aN Tw HURvTT PfiRFORd w oN 0-4-D3.
TAP. ■ TOP CF FOWDATION
TaM-I r TRINNORAW ORMCJ•I MMIK 41
Mont SAM OP U "
LLIBT LOU6aT OP6Nm (Tap aF WMDW u&LU
SU•L ■ BOTTOM OF IMMMI GLA66
WLKolilr • COTTOM OF U14L I(CM DOOR
gX • 6LIVAU" SNOT
A5-15UILT GRADING ELSVATIONS
t�626MM_-25- - SCOTT, COX 4 A"OCIATES, Na ABBGO
8.11.03 (�J Goneuhmg pgmmm LOT 10,15LOM 1, FC891L LAIC F W M)
1' 20ID sum anms su»a suns c • uv■Iw� eobndo mass FORT COLLM
mnw► rno� sea • ooe acnn awnona ri
RIIVGPi-I �..New.rawa.•�r.e.es.•�.�..•�.wYr '-
5>
08/12/2003 09:33
! d.
9706631660
r
B
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
CR
10'%
wl s-
.o
Fm
PAGE 03/03
h"w
.sue' �G,
►,wMww�ww�, o •
ti
•t ti
ti
Y
It
IN