HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 11/19/2003 (2)11/18/2003 14:46 9706631660
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
PACE 01/03
"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
ERVATION SCA Tn1
CLIENT: ►-twee DA't'F-
LEGAL: ' 10 I oc tc Co. fs sss 1 �- i �� INSP.
GRADING PLAN'
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
a The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
o The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the* grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. 7U.4 G OTFI x-
Cor N" I F,�" �cLo-j.
l: See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
O The elevations measured art not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or
t- I ` OF--Qjr orm
L_1�44 CaKN9M-jC-V 6.4-0
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offstte flown unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewallo , and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing•runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle overtime
and allow ponding to occur ar rdation walls. The b' '6 adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to epsure that ij♦� from the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on a pfc-MAIC plan. Otheiminimum grading requirements Which may be specified
in the soils report orb ' , is are bryond the scope of this report-
Reviewed by. Date:
�--,
3110 Cr O •-r4gite_ .,••l., Colorado 80538 - (970) 663.0138 Fax: (970) 663-1660
oBicn In • Boulder . Lon:mons • Loveland
11/18/2003 14:46 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03
-1IBuILT giZZ!rs ELEYA
�IPVAf10N8 BWaY6YBD
n-a-ms
„ ,.
STONE
=LUr N 02.8
(SWALE) UTILITY "'
03.1 02j4 PEDISt4L9��Jb
.(SWALE) 0 \OPEN PATIO O
04.1 3 03.0 .. \
03A
/1��f 04.S 018 2
LWST v
04�
03.1 013
TOF
LWST MALE)
043 04.0 02.1
01B
LWST 01.0
04Z (SWALE)
1020
02.1 ova
m0B
MAILS)
• i .° ..
M-I
(BOW)
3402 GREEN SPRING: DRIVE
00.4
(BOW)
for, ■ Tor or rowuATM
7BM-1 TMIPORARr MOW MARK 9
B4OAAL BACK ar WAM
LAMT • LCWEBT oPENN4 ITOP OR WmOW WELL)
GILL ■ BOP a CP WNPOW 01.Abe8
UJCWT ■ BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
TimN M"All" SWOM MM oN AM BASED � ` ELEVATIGHs b1 IGi � N a� nit® tau ea
aTw &AtveT PHA ON B-u-M. X ■. eM BC.A LETTER
026 .9COTT, COX A980GIATEB, Na 2"-1 Q88GO
117E t
I1-14-03 Ge�wktrg D+A1f■■r■ LOT 10, BLOCK B P09GIL LAKE RANCH. 21�
®b%w cwmm. ftrmm aFORT COLL". COLORADO
leis! ■+� . w -
11/18/2003 14:46 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELANDD PAGE 03/03
Itz - it
loo t r,-, , . tlwo4w
-- 016 ,.—
0*1
^ Al
o
LW
�O r�
F
f ` tt", �G