Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 09/28/2006FROM :KIVR ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Sep. 25 2006 NZ75tmctctrpU 9epacf.nr:f:at OVERY OT GRADING OBSERVATION civil SEP 2 5 2006 1 7 DATE: —415— tSe, KIVA JOB #; LISGAL : LQr io1 B�ocr Z �s [Ii�aJeef Z�' INSP. BY; ADDRESS: 33Z:� G-n�G �n'E-tC ✓� �`/� SITED RARING PLAN: ((dF�t7l,.iC t 1'. a. t I�'if tn��d tEr1C�,L lei 95�W Fe� � 4^3�0% T— We have measured rtlative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared in the GradingPlen referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. ❑ The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Gradl rig Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. 19 During our observations our representative noted that the as mcasuted elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our op•i�nioo the griidl s as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. {. 8r•S� sac-_ ap mez cktp N'w rs �.ptJ• OL See the attached "As -Built" grading plan, ❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations: 2 3 Limitations: 11 is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with otfsitc flows unless the grades are changed or barriers ate created such as fences, garden terracing, aidewalle, and/or any landscaping which may change the estahliOod flowpauems by diverting or slowing nmofIflow. Back611 adjacent m the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur around the foundntion walls. 7ht backfiII adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that mnof3. the foundation, 71u grades measured were compared anlymUretequitementsahownnntheahnvorefamotadgradingplan.( �1�t�uiromentawhich maybespecified inthe soils report or by office construction da-tqtra�to am beyond the seope of this p .- • F Reviewed Main Olflte , Ksq1 e-,j F7 5110 Granite Street, Suite D Loveland, Colorado 80538 Phone; (970) 663-0138 Fax:(970)663•]660 love, Ian ttekivaenginee.ring.Cotr t Branch Ofrice ,c 500 Klmbark Saver, Suite 101 Longmont, Colorado80501 rn nrq Phone: (303) 702-0661 Pare (303) 77"13 inngmotttgkivaezigineering. rrnn 11 jb13 jt6 FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Sep. 25 2006 12:33PM P2/3 s z z FIEVATIONS SURVEYED 9-•15-06 03.11 03.6 L�J 04.2 v v_ u•— _ T.O.F. _ .TOP OF FOUNDATION TBM-1 a TEMPORARY BENCH MARK #1 B.O.W. m BACK OF WALK T.O.W,W, - TOP OF WINDOW WELL SILL - BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS WALKOUT = BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR XX.X = ELEVATIONS SHOT X[J = SEE KIVA LETTER 1092-87-4-7 DATtD 9n9LOG 05.1 r—r— • T=. (T.O.W,W.) 05.8 (T.O.W.W,) 04.9ji. 05.5 TOF = 06.2 05.7 (T.0.W.W.) 05.3 05.6 05.7 (T.O.W.W,) Or rr (BRK) 05.0 05.5 05.8 (SLAB) � ' 04.3 - :". . 03.'7 3320 �ON� (B.O.W.) CREEK I)RIVF_ 01.8 09.102. / 0,51 3.5 0 (BRK) 8 03.0 TBM-1 02.5 (B.O. W.) SEP 2 5 NOTE; THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON ARE BASED ON THE SIRVLY PERFORMFD ON 9-15-n6 AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS %iVA, Zvt1it unft9, Inc. E3 R O N S F R T 1092-B7. 4,-7 Wort 9 19 06 ._ 6trmtsmrU 9mballw C.ioil LO'f 10, BLOCK 2, FOSSIL LAKE RANCH 2ND 1" SCALE 0110 Granl4a Street, Suite D Phonr, (970) 883 — 0138 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO =AWN. Lavwmd, (40rodo 8009 rar (970) 063 •- loco _ CPH _ www.kivamg1neer1n9.c m 10w1and9kkam01loaing.aam"'-"— FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC rig ' 1 9 1 M I Im ti, iL IN FAX NO. :9706631660 Jot --,-- JOE-Mif r•' Sep. 25 20e6 12:33PM P3/3 m 1�