Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 05/22/2003 (25)05/12/2003 08:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03 COTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers Jr7s OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA r,.,.0 EGAL: L-OrT�� i3�o -- I t F nasi cj Z � INSP. C GRADING PLAN � TI N`AC! "< 9 OO �fr �a°`rf'A We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lotsides and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: L 0 0 1� Other The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. Ct�lF.nk 5 PTA' See the attached "As -Built' grading plan. The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns b slowing mnoff flow. Bacldill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur tn(jtt $' S on walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure th y�� Will, a s om the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown o �pv < plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified in the soils report orb o e�as rctiocrTffi is are. beyond the scope of this report Reviewed 5110 Gram t��'.rSgjt� �'� d , Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660 .UIYFS radowith offices in • Boulder , Longmont • Loveland 6 (7 o3 05/12/2003 08:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03 ELEVATION& &Me SYW BMO3 Q143 �I - 0.1i) TOP. - TOP GF FOL ATION TSM-I ■ le A°ORARY MENW MARK 9 BOLL - BACK OF U14LK LA &T. - LORMT OPENM (TOP OF. UEIDQU DELL) SILL - DOITOM OF U60M GLASS W-KOUT - OO?TOM OF WALK.= OOOIi )bcx a BLEVATIONS SNOT ❑X ■ SEE SGA LETTER 14b 14.2 r + f 155 13.9 ° 151 (8pjU LUST 15b i 5 15.E 145 13.0 14b TOF 1-6J T55M--112.1 ° d 'A_ , � ,4 LUJST 15b 1 o I a 5.1 a � LUl. T SO Li I NOTE. TI-E ELEVATIONS &NOUN 1 ON ARE ea&W AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS .ON TFE &lRv£Y PEMr0WW ON 5AWS b"2' 2m-i BCOTT, Cox 4 A88=AM, WG ABBGO 5/6/03 LOT 10, BLOCK t FOSSIL LAKE M 1' 208' Soo oraCorwAtIve Dorm" w c-Torah emn FORT COLLUdS, CO ra�vw ESTe� tsa - ow GF'1I a..yor.rranr...rar•u�r•v rr wo 05/12/2003 088:444 970631660 c]n 5r. 0a z. F0 15 t Tf= 1- 0 e)� ' 2 I SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03 A 3 -1 .o. /+ y _ lo/, f� 15.0 _ /co A n 12. 14.3