HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 05/22/2003 (25)05/12/2003 08:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
COTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
Jr7s
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA r,.,.0
EGAL: L-OrT�� i3�o -- I t F nasi cj Z � INSP.
C
GRADING PLAN � TI N`AC! "< 9 OO �fr �a°`rf'A
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lotsides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
L
0
0
1�
Other
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. Ct�lF.nk 5 PTA'
See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns b slowing mnoff flow. Bacldill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur
tn(jtt $' S on walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure th y�� Will, a s om the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown o �pv < plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report orb o e�as rctiocrTffi is are. beyond the scope of this report
Reviewed
5110 Gram t��'.rSgjt� �'� d , Colorado 80538 • (970) 663-0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660
.UIYFS radowith offices in • Boulder , Longmont • Loveland
6 (7 o3
05/12/2003 08:44 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03
ELEVATION& &Me SYW
BMO3
Q143
�I - 0.1i)
TOP. - TOP GF FOL ATION
TSM-I ■ le A°ORARY MENW MARK 9
BOLL - BACK OF U14LK
LA &T. - LORMT OPENM (TOP OF. UEIDQU DELL)
SILL - DOITOM OF U60M GLASS
W-KOUT - OO?TOM OF WALK.= OOOIi
)bcx a BLEVATIONS SNOT
❑X ■ SEE SGA LETTER
14b
14.2 r +
f 155
13.9 ° 151
(8pjU
LUST 15b i
5 15.E
145
13.0 14b
TOF 1-6J
T55M--112.1 ° d 'A_ , � ,4 LUJST 15b 1
o I
a 5.1
a �
LUl. T
SO
Li
I
NOTE.
TI-E ELEVATIONS &NOUN 1 ON ARE ea&W AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
.ON TFE &lRv£Y PEMr0WW ON 5AWS
b"2' 2m-i BCOTT, Cox 4 A88=AM, WG ABBGO
5/6/03 LOT 10, BLOCK t FOSSIL LAKE M
1' 208' Soo oraCorwAtIve Dorm" w c-Torah emn FORT COLLUdS, CO
ra�vw ESTe� tsa - ow GF'1I a..yor.rranr...rar•u�r•v rr wo
05/12/2003 088:444 970631660
c]n 5r. 0a
z.
F0 15 t
Tf= 1-
0
e)�
' 2
I
SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03
A 3 -1
.o.
/+
y _
lo/,
f� 15.0
_ /co
A
n
12.
14.3