HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/04/2002 (2)FROM
Scott Cox & Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Sep. 27 2002 10:25AM P2
i��SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCAB sera-r�►-or�n
CLIENT
LEGAL
I
:A D A IF
:LoT— � j ; 1QSS1L_ L41eL 24,Jri-F TNSP.
GRADi_*JG PLAN #9cvi Z-cD� L- 7—o'
sa
We have pleasured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. burin, our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and cumcrs, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Platt.
❑ The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should nor adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced gliding scheme, j� SE-4 D J y_� Cyr ir,r e
}� See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
o The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations
A
Z6
2.I'
C' 5
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the -rades
arc changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting oXslowang runoff flow. Dackfrl1 adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow pending to occur around: fotinr-ai6i> i lls. The backtill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runofFidh`flgw-away 56i6fhe foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
rcquircrllents shown on the abbi"esetelan.Othc7 minimum grading requirements which may be specified
n the soils report or by o[hrtc trtiGtion do
c.L= i;ts`Eirebcyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed by:
5-im cz=
cx ..:.
5110 L'ranire 5[recG:". 11. , I glr-rated ;"roPorado 80538 • (970) 663-013A • F;Ix (970) 663-1666
�'Q ; ;
saw,,, •tea , r ksisdati rth ofllees h-boulder Lungmui I�wr, ld�id
ID tu'�eT�
Scott Cox 8 Associates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Sep. 27 2002 10:26AM P3
-LEGEND-
= TBM-1= TEMPORARY BENGN MARK Of
S.O.W.= BACK OF WALK
LWST= LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF WIN. WELL)
ELEVATIONS 5URVETED i,J- 51LL= BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
9-23-02 WLKOUT- BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
T.OF = TOP OF FOUNDATION
p = MISSING EXTENSION
� LvJST
j w
r'L
Fil
BEY-E.va o�
OL
JJ 11 i"
I Z 6 /�
s. /
4j Z.
?t-E ELEVATICNS 8;4CLN NEF9 ON ARE SABEp
ON TiaE SURVET FEFW-C� CN 5-U-02 �..L.?.�
AS -BUILT GRADINrz ELEVATION5
5317-1-I-9
e-z' 3-02 �� SCOTT, COX ! ASSOCIATES, INC. EL IZ45ETH BERRY
SCn� Cormultln9 "lne LOT So, BLOCK IO, FOSSIL LA'eZ
r1w Geniis glue{, guR. D . L""16"L i.b,.ecia ad yg FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
DRAWN, (9TD) 663 - ow q� Q,Gy
CPH e..en ra' M .. 0
° FROM Scott Cox & Associates,lnc. FAX NO 9706631660
QQ
QD
Dk
00
LON
19
00.0
LOT
cm