HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/10/2001 (2)FROM : Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO._ : 970 663 1660 Aug. 14 2001 08:12AM P1
f�SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.
consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION sc.A�ho o4
CLIE`T:
LEGAL:
GR.ADf\'G PLAN:
DATE: 3"I0-0
INSP. BY:
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location: The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation. and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
a The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. Sit— COMM954.CtS 'i5at<x>,J•
}� See the attached' As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above. referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/'or observations:
AIr
r
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offske rlows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing. sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
:he established tlow.parterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may sertic over time
and allow pondin; to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill adjsceit i6�ihi.residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure :hat runoff will flow away from the foundation.,�T-he tades �ritessured;were compared only to the
requirements >hown on the above referenced grading plan. Other miiirhiLdii{ 6dv%&;ictjtirreintites hich may be specified
in :he ioils report or hvNther con .ru on documents are beyond: hge; caps"61 this repo¢:`>.;';::
Rev " iewed by: t' �— Dsiei: S `fo'r'i
11 !': Crzn.te Street, Sole 0 • LoLeland , Cclorado S05
6o)•'000
yen �n� wl0+dd0 •�rth gllKdi ro 30u1n.�
-RUI'I • JUOLL, l.ox 6. h1750C.
i O
.ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
a/1/O$
SEE SEC
15Z6- ZS og.oq.
8•�D-o1
0
09.9
09.5
ii —
08,6 (B.O.W.)
NOTE:
TUE ELEVATIONS SUOUN HERE ON ARE BASED
ON TI.IE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 8/1/01
1526-75-6•a ABBGO BUILDER°v
oa—YE °vGOTT, COX t ASSOCIATES, fPIG.
8/1/01 Consulting Engimawbgineare LOT 71, BLOCK 1, F0551L LAKE lel
Sc4E 500 Qnsnitr Svwb Suns 0 • LowUw, ooiwede 06036 FORT COLLINS. GOLORADO
I 20.0'
CA•VW (9lm/603 0I30 G:/GIV�L.GNAGi CERTB/AOECOI15T6.D.a.aDLLO
DAP w•e calsam No ovw. w . Door • toym -1~0 cioo t
t-HA NU. • 7 r10 ddJ IMDU
14 :WW1 Ud:1,5H'I rod
—y 09.1
-TBM-1 01.1 CB.O.W.) J
TWIN HERON COURT
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
•
M WA
14
owl,
YAr ♦•