HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 11/19/2001 (4)FRO41 Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX N0. : 970 663 1660 Nov. 20 2001 0S:55AM P4
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING O$SE YAM scAiahlfla2:Z2-/l �
CLIENT: of th/ �OQg DATE: I ^ I9^ �/
7
LEGAL:
GRADING PLAN:
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. 'tile observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentativemeasured the telative elevations atthe lot sides
and corners. top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is out opinion: '
a The elevations as measured ate in general coatbrmance with the above noted Grading Plan.
p[ The elevations as mratisured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the fottowing
Acceptions•
y �.3
So ! = O.S�%
of V.L.-Sr-1 G JE 15 r
It is our opinion these exceptions. noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
a During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the abovereferenced grading plan. However. it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
jt( See the attached "As -Built" gtadimg plan.
e The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observat ons:
IIDA_I CN__�a 7/_'O.e_-_1 RLL—
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot. as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offstte flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle overtime
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation wails. The baekf%a adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the.foundstion, The grades measured were compared only ra the
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan Other riiinimufit4rading requirements which may be spear <ed
in the soils report or by othcr construction documents•are-beyood'the.scope afthis report.
Reviewed by / ' . -.Date; .4Co
;'.:•) Cranue Street Swte 0 •Wieland .:fubrSdo SOi;A =,o,M i_W-M)a Fax: A-0) 6;,)-:660
;�-
.'i•.
jrnln¢Calpra,ddvr :.tic i.ni ln�dand
tlo ,th or .rftEs)R �"'aC •Cl!N,
FR0V : Scott, Cox 8 Assoc. FAX N.C. 970 663 1660 Nov. 20 2001 08:56AM P5
'.' PQ'f-f• Tf�'C'�O�G1R1' O& Ci1MAW 11
DG1LL• 6iA= Op UA"
LMT• LcMST OI' to (TOP Cr Wal. ULL1
6(LL• Dorm" Or WHDod 8LA6A
uL=ff DOTToM GP W+ XrUT DOOR
z
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
QDSEE �A• - � .
to V•�-z•'�-I�•ol
f r9.4
u
l s,4
Lo
` } �Y 0S7
ZI9 1) S
Zt.co 71,A-
•p .
zo, l
® o
zn. co
ort•3
t {
0
NOTE: L'
THE ELEVATIONS 5NOWN uERE ON ARE BASED Arm• -5UILT GRADING ELEEVATIO`i'
S
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 11-16-OL
JOB 6ii Ston brook Nomes
3(:01T, COX lL S Ergo C1ATE3. ING. y
1l-I9-et Gorroutting Engtneme lot 22. Block U. Foeell Lake Ranch
SCx.E gum G•e•it� , SWw D • Lp 61614 CUvdp OVS58 Lar imer County, Colorado
1.20.0' re�m� 6,63, - 018 eaewnA.m crlus� opumr iaun.�ua
CPN
f..
�O-Icv 1., 2.1 �p M. *1JwlwZ(.
0✓mp;Ar rR
A
6