Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/07/2003-•10/14/2003 08:54 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03 l SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION scA.Tam /M-zs -23-07) CLIENT: DAMloL�3 ( �.2 'S3 Rootee.EJ?-'%r FOAD) LEGAL : f-07 Z.2 Z. t a X M f—m!;SA- 4--4hce _ Dw._..-- GRADING PLAN:L6mxg,!--oc-..-E ' z&-,:sQ 4' Zo -9h We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: E So.e-ri4i f AS-r- ?Copse --re C'b"IX2 nt 0- e l—C .Je _ It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. ❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. 3X. See the attached "As -Built" grading plan. ❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations: Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns by di ' or slowing'runoffflow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur on walls. The baekfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and ;..aintaincd to ensure that 1 o d' m the foundation. The grzdes-ezr_-c' viere =mparcd _rly requirements shown on OV '�reFi£o¢�d plan. Other minimum grading requirements which maybe specified in the soils report or b tstructio _ are beyond the scope of this reporn Reviewed Silo Ganes;SuiW15,~,Colorado 80538 - (970)663-0138 • Pax: (970)663.1660 with offices In • Bou)der • Longmom • Loveland 2� io(7q6-�) 10/14/2003 08:54 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 02/03 b © � .. _ =.- gi 4-'Y o _