HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 11/19/2001FROM : Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Nov. 20 2eei 08- 53AM PI
J47rscon.. COX & ASOOAUSr INC. cDnsuSting engineers
.,IN
BIKS�.� .....
CLIENT
LEGAL
oArE:.f I--1� —oL
ASP. BY:
�QQi2 dg �c� .; 1� �2-0•-99
GRADI,rG PLAN: t`�
We have measured relative elevatiots at the above mcotionad location. The. observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. Dtsringourabsecvetionsducrs'presar!$tivemrasvrrd�ere/ativrrJevatinnsatthelotsides
and corners. top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
a The elevations as measured arc in genera) conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
)d The elevations as measured are irr general confotrruatcrtvuhthe abtyvenotsd Gtaditlg 4ianwitbtlteSoilawit�
S
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above should aotaDvrrse)y c)tange76re gredin� stbtanLassbvantxtd�
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above rofesencedgrading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
Ttt- See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies iarlude:
Other comments and/or observations:
-- t =s Te Q i' is p�
La• saw <...
Limitations:
it is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with otisite Flows unless tYte gsadeS
are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracin& sidewalks, and/or anY landscaping, which maY change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may seek over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation waits. The ek ill:adjacen[ to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will t10w away from the fo}iiit3ahan. Tke:gi s measured were compmrrd only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan: Oilier'minimum.grading.requirernentswhich may be syecrhed
in the soils report or by outer construction documents are begaad thescope:oi this report.
viewed by:
%i / u
Ete
- `'' •j:: "' : a'M u6)i1ai�. fax..ct-C. yin:• "c6a
� [ in Cranite Street. Scare D • Loveland. CO)
wrp,ornitYV'jAvrt,nd
�n�Cabrufo won oif¢er m�'t .3qu4!r: -.:... �
FROM : Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Nov. 20 2001 W*.53AM PI
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OvER.O1GRADING_USERvAIM SCAsm/S-z4-9z_f� r-o3
CLIENT; DATE:
r
LEGAL: %.� I �-`,tj �aL �'oSSr r. .A d� ^ INS?. BY:
- GRADIvG PLAN: N�P�ii�P�n� t Z 00L.ffnI� �ZQ•-��
v
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The. observed elevations were coatpated to the
Grading Plan refemaced above. Duringourcbsm vations ouropresmrative measumdthe relativeelevationsatthelotsides
and comem top of foundation, and lowest openings. Baud upon our findings it is our opinion:
a The elevations as measured are in genera) confwmww with the above noted Grading Plan.
jd 77re elevations a mesw=6 No ingenue canintmtsits`»Mtv%atvoveMVA lavt 4g 1KM40W69- oft.My lm
J»sangaievaotbrseotions.notedabove. shoui6ttataa'vase(gck(watr3taodcrt�s tto'atrh+awaardar
above referenced plan.
FROM :
Scott,
Cox & Assoc.
FAX NO. 970 663 1660
Nov. 20 2001 08:54AN P2
•Ffi*
• ' • • -
TCPld. T�"t?�ORlOtt---l
!
LUST. OMACK cP LLL6TAL O(SHOT O�� GP tIRN R�W-L•
p rOK of dLAft
XGVI LtiGY.R
059
OS�
sca
.
p5'S trt
rS2b^•z� N-03
11-�9-v1
O�3
� of�o.trl4P'Rvti1
08.3
09.3
0�35 �
t
�
-
08�
Lr3ST OS'l
_
CKOS10
•
08:4
0
Oro,
c7 �-•4
Q
G z
OQ} _ ELEVAMNS SURVEYED
O o� 3 R46.01
i
NOTE:
THE ELEVATIONS SWOW WERE ON ARE BASED - AS —WILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON II-16•01.
15i67 -254-s SCoTT, COX 4 , SWCATES, Na ABBCO
1143-®1 comul�1g Engirma" Lot 11, Block 1, Foeet> Lake Ranch
Sr ALE vo rnutl%8 want. 6AIN O • L.o`.4.4g. 6ob.d0 60636 Larimar Count ,Colorado
I'.2D.O (9tm)bN - omp E:ncti�w..a c�u�noeconsu as•u-�puo
DRAY W
CPW c.a.m.. a w. «. s.r.. • �.R... • ..w
:0
1t?
I