HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 06/20/2008 (10)06/17/2008 07:52
9702781910
ADVANCED ENGINEERING
PAGE 01/03
A
Now
3105 Sumac
CONMMITIMMO 111M)C
Street Fort Collins, Colorado B052t+—�
/
Y
Phone: (970)
88-M—A Fax:1970) 4984339 �7��
berm!theme+ol.com
�v
OVERLOT
GRADING
OBSERVATION DATE:
CLIENT:
n%SF2�'
/�
t onlSJ MEM JOB #.- SZOrJ- O!—oSL�
LEGAL:
L-,rr 8,
«—%�; ,<o5�.t— Lr4re Z' INSP. BY:
ADDRESS: 3503
SITE/GRADING PLAN:
C,CAa, 44 e -'t9"00 F
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
D The elevations as measured are In general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
R9. The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
l7 - 1.14►t P,,J—. Pr. &044 YnRo rlwta 5s,ent :-:t0.4' 060r jM -ntMr 1,40ACA t&D or,t Ra-1.
10A.P o-m-e eo&- rQ t e.¢'tdue.2. -rYe,.l ,..rersvrse r,r.1 A..L.
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
D During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As•Buile' grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not In conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations!
It Is our opinion that the subject lot as graded on the above date, should net Interfere with offsite flows unless the grades arc changed
or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow
patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backflll adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow pending to occur
around the foundation walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runof)'will llow
away from the foundation. The grads measured were compared only to the requirements shown an the above referenced grading plan.
Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified in the soils report or by other construction documents an; beyond the
scope of this report.
Reviewed by: Advanced Engineering, LLC
Jason E. Baker, P.E.
S OMAIATER
RECEIVED
JUN 17 2008
33739
• •-17-4
IA&4 Ov, M
06/17/2008 07:52 9702781910 ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 02/03
LEGENDi
-
T,Q,F. = TOP OF FOUNDATION
W.W = WINDOW WELL
B.O.W. = BACK OF WALK
T.B.M.-1 = TEMPORARY
BENCH MARK 1
H.P. = HIGH P❑INT ❑F
SWALE
FX PLEASE REFER TO
MEM LETTER
BRON-01-05A / DATED
6-16-08
2
H
a
97.2
Z
CB.❑.W.)
96.7
<B.O,W.)
96.7 350
�B.❑.w.) "24,0
`fFk,
o,vIt�
\ CHASE E
.....
97.2
�Q GARAGE
=<v W,W, SLAB
`O 97,2 99.6 99.0 98.`_
� CBA.WJ
W w T,Q.F, a 99.9
99.4 99.6 /
W.W,
W W 99.6 97.1
99.6 i
99.2
97,4
99.4
} 99.1
H.P. � 97.6
d
97.8
TBM-1
96.1
(B.O.W.)
96.8
RTIMD
L"C .JDSCAXP
NOT$. TNI$ INFORMATION IS BASED ON
THE SURVEY PERFORMED DN 6-12-08.
aSITE PLAN AND GRADING INFORMATION
VAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT.
98, 3
"AS -BUILT" OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATIONS
DATEi 6-13-08 MEM CONSULTING, LLC BRONSERT CO,
LOT 8, BLOCK 12, F❑S STSIL LAKE 2ND
SCALE, 1'=20' 3105 SUMAC STREET FORT COLLINS, CO
DRAFTEDRBY C1PH5A / FORT
`9 ❑0)- L98897 780526 �—
=ERING PAGE 03/03
Fc ma 99.0
7F= 99. 7
o .
FC o M.2
a�6 r
TF= 99.9 s
8,7 ` if
y /
r _ Fom 98.3
TFm 9g_60,
8 • �` A / /
0000
fiV�
-7 /93,2 doe
4000