HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 01/08/2004 (2)01/06/2004 10:14 9706631660
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
PAGE 01/03
Jr,rr"SCOTT,
COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.. consulting engineers
CLIENT
DAXE• i 2 31-03
LEGAL : r' a; jj1�. •oc K. l _ _ bS�r"LA cFi ( INSP.
GRADING PLAN- 1�i0r, a' n r- •ft 99s-,5 • co Ft 1F rat mo 4 —10 'v f .
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comets, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
B:
AL
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is, our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan- Deficieucies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by divertin or slowing runoffflow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur am walls. 1The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that o the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
roquircmcnts shown on the @a an. Other minimum grading requirements which maybe specified
in the soils report or by_o ,cdon e,beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed
5110 Granite 9W0'C7"?l:o Wolorado 80538 (970) 663-0138 •Fax: (970) 663-1660
ofto in • Boulder • Longmont • Lw,*and
01/06/2004 10:14 9706631660
SCOTT COX LOVELAND
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
PAGE 02/03
I �e
16.2
I"
ChO.�
14J3 K
x
14s
x
LWST
Sh
LWST
�T TAF. 19,4 14B
i
14J LW6T MAP
19 SAP
14.9 1
• 14J!
• � 139
G o
!38 x 131 WASE 131
e
:— TM-1
12A
p, Y�1i9
CSAJU�
5200
0,4 ELEYATIMO B{MiWYEP
I U-29-M
1-LE CaEND- I
TAP. • TOP OF FOLMATION
DADA ■ PACK OF WALK
L"T. . LOU£6T OPENOO f QP OF MXV U6LL)
81LL • 'DOTTOM OP WS'IDOW OLA66
-®?
ULK jEI = ■ •OT1oM GF WALKOUT COOK
8E8 8CA L6TRsR
�.
Tm m"AMM GHOON ARE E
1526-2'I- DAT6P TI-91
01/06/2004 10:14 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03
��`"
14.GS
t� „• FG= i
WOL
Y
� r
i - tea'- t •• � t ^9`°:
• r— 4e a _ as � ' .��a -
�a • f
■ i
P • . r1``�^ �a � � e f
,ter -"�+y *�'" �` J.�` � J . �•� +
445 M` t