HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 09/28/200409/23/2004 07:59 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 01/03
STORMWATER RECEIVED 7
COTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
SEP 2 3 2004
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATZO SCAkM " 44- za-Sa,--2)
1 3509 1�\i1JVr6 .►-
LEGAL: L-o r 4 15� c1� 4GS-NIL L-A V-x 0.-S a INSP. /
GRADNG PLAN- �QX`-TFiE. 9 IZ'9 Av FD� =f ��Q 3 O -•0 1
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lotsides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
El The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
R� The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan witb the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
aboverefcrcnced plan.
0 During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. however; it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
2k See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
D The elevators measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are cbangod of barriers arc cleated such as fences, garden terracing; sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the cstablisbed flow patterns by wing runoffflow. Backn"11 adjacent to the reLsdence may Settle over time
and allow puding ro occur Syf wails. The backfill adiacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to. ensure that 11 the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown onth p� ® an. Other minimum�adingroouirementswhichmay bespecined
in the soils report or by o er cptrtrction doepren beyond the scope of this report.
I
Reviewed by; bate: �! 2 y 6 `�
5':rOGraniteSt,s�'""Si
,L �r ;Colorado8053s (3701663-0138 Fax: 1970)663 660
Servingnder whh offirm In • Boulder Longmont • Loveland
J ,t,-rW& '� I zf �a 1
09/23/2004 07:59 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND
PAGE 02/03
Izs
As -BUILT GRADNG ELEVATIONS
Rs i
13.2 \
Ell
-vM.2
R9
CD.OLJJ
m
ElI2B
ELEVAT!" GURVEYW
3 s-*-u
3
� wiLo�i
LUST / f u
Kc /
012
L
TWA
ns
(aowu
STORMWATER
RECEIVED
SEP 2 3 2004
Tar - TOP OF FO MATM
TOM-1 ■ THNIPORAW BFNW MARK N
IMMIL - PACK OF Ui4LK
WIMT. - LOUMT OF NNG fTOP Op WMPOW I .)
SILL - 8070M OF WINDOW CdLAdb
ULWCW - DOTTGM OF ULALKM DOOR
Nom 6LMVATI" SHOT
T"M E3_$EVA11CN& SW=N MW ON ARE' RYBED �"S �- no �d �W 026-2j-01-OS DATED 9-21-04
ON T►E BU2n£T FEIFOMM ON 12-n-02, LN
M26 z�-'1-9
Mik---- 8GOTT, COX a ,4S30GIA?ES..
9/21/m4 �u1epg ��� LOT 'I, BLOCIG 9, FOSSIL LA10E FUD 2ND
ow &W" $vest, &A0 v • Lvma Cvw*do mam FORT COLLINS
Pv-
Mwy en raft MD l 1. snru • WF4 s • LVOMWA
09/23/2004 07:59 9706631660 SCOTT COX LOVELAND PAGE 03/03
t,'i.`r lH' TL! �t �li•� F- • ~ �I Tt,,J •. .
AAl
Y-
�t�=� ^, •~ �' .r v ';jam
�F v/ At. yid
Vim 14.0
POW
14Z6
1
From
TAI
ek
_ - 12-2-
vE
r ,.e
'! SEP 2 3 04
10,7
FK;=- 1 4r
OA