HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/20/200704/18/2007 08:01 9702781910
ADVANCED ENGINEERING
�j Kel
•1�•
CLIENT:
t Fort Colli ts, Colorado $0526
APR 1 8 2007
�� --!� DATE: 4-11 04.
A [��tt �W 'Sui-4 s4s MEM JOB #%. A66C7,0
LEGAL: 4ar 5. }:,- rormw. L&eA Z.40- iNSP. RY: _�•st'i� • 7�/�
ADDRESS: 3 $t;09 N'10Sma.0rr C"&tL &tVrc r
5i%F,/GRADING PL N: �lo�,ctt � MKS 14" s9 Op IF't � poTr.A 4�s p
�G 2 C Pk'WV*P90 aY 4�3
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
04
X
Othe
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations es measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our o inion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. . s$6 5 ft 80h M&4TS
See the attached "ArBuilf' grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above re*renced.gtading plan. Deficiencies include:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with of}'site flows unless the grades aro changed
or barriers are created such as fenoes, garden tcn=ing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow
patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Baokflll adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur
around the foundation watts.The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow
away from the foundation. The grades measured were compared onlyto the requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan.
Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified in the soils report or by other construction documents are beyond the
scope of this report. -ec-"Z�
Reviewed by: Advanced Engineering, LLC
Jason E. Baker, P.E,
33739
04/18/2007 08:01
9702781910
ADVANCED ENGINEERING
;• i1-<AAit
RECEI
PAGE 02/03
TBM-1
96.7
(B.O.W.)
11509
8 20kORMWATER
RECEIVED
Tc
RFFk
IF
96.9
APR 1 8 2007
96.4
(B.O.W.)
LEGEND,
T.Q,F. = TOP OF FOUNDATION
W.W = WINDOW WELL
B.O.W. = BACK OF WALK
T.B.M.-1 = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK i
NOT[ THIS INFORM MN IS BASED Tf1E SURVCY
02.3 PERFORMED ON 4-13-07.
SM KAN AND GRADING INFORNATMN WAS PROVIDED BY
Q�CLIENT. ,
T
"AS --BUILT" OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATIONS
DATE, 4-17-07 /ItMEM CONSULTING, LLC ABBCO
LOT 5, BLOCK 7, FOSSIL LAKE 2ND
SCALE: 1'=20' 3105 SUMAC STREET FORT COLLINS,CO
DRAFTED BY, C1PH3A / FORT C9 O'LI88,-977405'c6
04/18/2007 08:01 9702781910
•
lcue-T t1.J "f-. Sq
99 S`� ca FtF:
003.2
13,7
)4,4
4
Fact 99..7
TF= .4
FG= $
TF= ID 6
0 1
,- ly
ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 03/03
-. � i
y
_ r - . �1i Y2?O`• • •-,E�yp'��(.�J
�:
key
�x•y tYl-f'i�"'r
Gc.�E.•1 r
- � ,
A ;
v
gs.ls
g9.9 �► �
9
OZ4 O
00,,2�
/0
7
FG= 00.3
TFmv 01.0
0 ,