Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 07/18/2008O-t 15/2008 09:54 �997702781910 ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 01/03 Y 3205 Sumac Street Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 qv Z(0 Y Phone: (970) 988-9774 Fax: (970) 498-W39 yu �� OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE: 7_ o CLIENT: �O MEM JOB if: LEGAL: Lori 4.0, G _ /3, ZOS IC_ 441eG Zk.,44 Z`� INSP. BY: ADDRESS: SLI9 1a"wj SITE GRADING LAN: roe,,tLiqlaE2drt�� 00 _30_0� e40 ICY G-,O.tr. We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. a The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: //��� ' 0 -(^ iw4 Peel,r _ AT- &AepL �6 2 = oA' 1>�'LaaA -airy l inine-ATS0 onf /Z*j. © so. ' C3] O. S 0,gAw t7.1 S�tatEs_ar&Asr I t�la v Ar.2�v c...iaS /. Z In /.or., . M AKAPmoAaT*_ L�4t La.Ax L..Ot5 AT- 545'r t "T- ; SA.71+ FkWCAW AMO 4-AMOSCAPAO, It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. ❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. M See the attached "As -Built' grading plan. o The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments andior observations_ Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades arc changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the cstablishud flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow, Backfi11 adjacent to the residence may settle overtime and allow pond ing to occur around the foundation walls. The backfilI adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff*will flow away from the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified in the soils report or by other construction documents arc beyond the scope of'this report. Reviewed by: Advanced Engineering, LLC Jason F. Baker, P.F.,. 331739 ��� 117el 0415/2008 09:54 9702781910 ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 02/03 LEGENDi T.O.F. = TOP OF FOUNDATION W.W = WIND❑W WELL B.O.W. = BACK OF WALK T.B.M.-1 = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 1 HIP, = HIGH POINT OF SWALE QX PLEASE REFER TO MEM LETTER PAJEJ-01-01A / DATED 7-14-08 NOTES THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 7-12-08. SITE PLAN AND GRADING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY CLIENT. GUTTERS AND DOVNSPQUTS WERE NOT IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY, 0 90.6 ; C=0.4] 88.5 (B.❑,W.) 88.7 89,0 �(90.6 W.W, 89,3 91.0 3529 GREEN SPRING DRIVE TBM-1 87.7 (B.❑.W.) 87.9 GARAGE g0 7 88,1 'I SLAB 91,1 T.❑,F. = 91.5 W.W. 91.1W. 90.8 !' �-._ iJi`R91.1pi -' 9110 /1819.7 991.0 k 90.7 9 0.0 HIP. C-4-'4 90.5 0 89.1 90,2 0 C--o- s] "AS —BUILT" ❑VERLOT GRADING ❑BSERVATI❑NS DATE: 7-14-08 `��/ MEM C❑NSULTING, LLC JOHN PARKER s SCALE: 1'=20' Ci/� 3105 SUMAC STREET FORT COLLINS, LOT 4, BLOCK 1C FOSSIL LAKE 2ND ❑ AB < ❑Y CPH1A / F❑RT970) 988-9❑780526 DRAFTED --� ..07715/220008 09:54 tg 5/` 9702781910 ADVANCED ENGINEERING PAGE 03/03 f � All`��� FG= 9f.7 TFa 92.4 FG 4 i 90 a 9105 A T ~mow•.. � 1 —• fr ! i 90-3100* - qow ! 88 3 Mom 89.8 jMW TF= 90.* TF 1-01 89.3 88.2' C) l ` / BLO , . IT, . syFe�te� o- xov \