HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 06/13/2006 (4)STORMWATER
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2006 G
5ttuct;4W 0j"Otec!>K W � EtVEO Y 22 20
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION DATE$=16-0j
cLtENr: �b n 5V xrvn JOB#:
LEGAL: xw8. PIss1tt /4,c.s. Zia INSP.BY:
ADDRESS: S f c
SITE/GRADING PLAN: J.(c� * 9 g 5--t) . 07 r-LF / DA-ZO q -30-01
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
GradingPlanreferenced above. During ourobscrvations ourrapresentative measured the relative elevations atthelot sides
and comers• top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
P1
u
LEI
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevariolts as measured are m general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exception, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
buring our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. however, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
Provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include
Other comments and/or observations:
t_trtdncons:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are
created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which maY change the established flow paucrm by diverting or slowing
runoff flow. Bacldill idjacent to the resldeaee may sane over time and allow ponding to Deno around the foundation wags. The backfill adjacent
to the residence must be monitored and rosin that runoff will flow away from the foundation. The gtadea measured were compared
only to the requirements shown on theaboveere 94. Other minimumgradingrequirementswhich maybe specified inthe soils report
or by other construction d000ptents are b ai;m
Reviewed by: cRr'"-Y1 Date:Main
Burtch Office
Ce t
5110 Granite Street Suite b 500 TUmbark Street, Suite 101
Loveland, Colorado 805as ti �'�..,,,,.•' t Longmont, ColoradoSMI
Phony. (970) 663-0138 « tYA4 1Cvaengineering.com Phone: (303) 702.0661
Fax: (970) 663-1660 11ax: (303) 7744413
lovelandOldvaettgmeeting.com longmont®kivaenprteerine.com
l A 1969'uN S8301f(l9 0099V MOM 9001
�
p���j�
g un�
STORMWATER
RECEIVED
z
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
5-11-05
TBM-1
94.9
(B.O. W. )
95.1
95.3
96.
95.8
96.4
✓I
99.8
JUN 0 9 2006
—L It. V
t N U—
T.O.F. =
TOP OF FOUNDATION
T13M-1 o TEMPORARY BENCH MARK #1
B.O.W. =
BACK OF WALK
T.O.W.W.
= TOP OF WINDOW WELL
SILL =
BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
WALKOUT
= BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
—
ELEVATIONS SHOT
,�C,X
u = SEE KIVA LETTER 1526-27-15-7 DATED 566Zoc
3415
47G ORE,�K DRIVF
+ r.
Qc,p.�s
TOF = 98.3
97.4
(T. o. W. W.)
(T,0.W.W.)
97.1 `, 97.4
L 1
a
(BRK)
96Z�Z
94.2
(B.6.W.)
' S
1
94.4
96.9
(T.0.W.W.) / 94.9
97.2 /
(T.0. W. W.
97.3
x x / 95.9
96.4 96.1 /
95.6
95.3
'` u �Z-
�
NOTE:
THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON ARE BASSO 99.3
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON s/„/os AS —BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
sE 7�iva n1marinq, Inc. A B B C 0
5/16/06 Stma,, pd (jeopetiaiitay d4vil LOT 3. BLOCK 8. FOSSIL LAKE RANCH 2ND
SCA
20• 5110 Granite street. nuke D Phone: (970) 663 — 0136 FORT COLLINS. COLORADO
DRAVro Loveland. Colorado 60530 Fax; (S70) 663 — 1660
CPH wwwAlvaengineering.00m loveland9kKoengineering.c--
8 'd— 1969'ON Sa341If18 0�99d Wd10-9 _900d '8 'unf=
sto
97w5
CWR iJ
now 14m..
c
9741
V
STORMWATER
RECEIVED
F
` JUN 0 9
91 *Q j
TF @7 '40
m � • i FG= 95.9
T'F= 96as A
91.4
a
r �
4
�= 9
' F= 97.3
3 d • a w • \
1969.ON Sd3011(l8 0099d, WdlO 9 9001 '8 unr 4L