Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 12/04/2002FROM : Scott Cox & Rssociates,Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 "SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. Nov. 29 2002 03:37PM P1 I�G f1'G STORMWATER RECEIVED consulting en +vep� 9 2002 OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION CLIENT LEGAL SCA ►„r,u 129-hZ�-zs-oi 1) TF•1I—nr67 rSP. GRADING PLAN• 1'40=W-=^l f' 9S"'1. oG P%-F 7.>14Tr0 4-A—,o- Ol We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the GradingPlan referenced above. During our observations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations atthe lot sides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion. ❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. AL The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. ❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. A See the attached "As -Built" grading plan. ❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: Other comments and/or observations: Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as f den terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns by div off flow. Aacklill adjacent to the residence may settle over time and allow ponding to occur aro nn est The baekfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and .ae�ooe maintained to ensure re that aa tty1� undation. The grades measured were compared only to the requirements shown on the aboSie tefe>eped er minimum grading requirements which may be specified in the soils report or b e� yr are t yand the scope of this report Reviewed 5110 Cranite Street, 4wdporado 80538 • (970) 66M138 • Fax: (970) 663.1660 Serving Colorado with offices it, - soulder • Longmom • Loveland FROM : Scott Cox & Associates,Inc. FRX NO. : 9706631660 Nov. 29 2002 03:38PM P2 tBM-I 8�✓.3 (BOW) 4A IV25/02 ' � ,DRIVE •� •. 81.1 a IJo S�c� va'TIa►S SIB 86A oA YAOS I PORCH alto 88.1 81.2 STOOP tA. = 88.9 813 J SlA /// LWST 88.1 '..:. 8b.1 81.8 C44ASE . "•• PAtlo • '' • S6Z 86.7 81.9 LWST W.1 LWST 88.1 86.0 SbA I 1 MISSING rj t EXTENSION Oak 89.$ G MOP, TOP OP POUNDATION TOM-1 TEMPORARY B6NCN MARK 4 190111 BACK OP UALK L&S.T. L011HGT 0F%MMp (TOP OF WINPM WELL) 913..E - BOTTOM OF WM CW GLASS WLKOUT • BOM M OP WALKOUT DOOR )OC x ■ ELEvATI" Shot ❑X . SEE 8CA LETTER b NOTE: ON„�''tYPY CHMM aD AS-IBUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS in hn M3 -25-1 $COTT, COX 4 ASSOCIATE33, INC. STONYBROOK II/21AD22 Cora+h We= D� LOT 2, BLOCK 14, FMOL LAKE 2ND •30m' b0 GNMW ate..L Wis Lavwir4 CaW .do AWSM letml are . m+i PORT CCLLMS �yy, iatm-iam rwy at..�dra+r. r. r.r..trr•.1.,.IYd ..FROM Scott Cox & Associdtes.Inc. R FAX NO. : 9706631669 Nov. 29 2002 03:38M P3 • ' • , .• • 1 . 10. 4goo • .ti + •r J VOL It It �m� f �• SS.3 30 W ) 7, r-7--wwo wen1w wqwba+ qNsp •�-� ::J �. I' r _�' I �,,Lp w gr-)Si. w F,-F f-3o-Q / C,,R ,P-VA P"-d I"Ia•4. g3. S ram.