HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 11/02/2006 (6)FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Oct. 30 2006 04:01PM P1/3
`Kfi.va T n. t ceermi, ri,�c-
StrtutarAf Cgt:at&Ck"iCPj e'ivil
OVERLO'I' GRADINS G QR.RVAlION DATE: p•3;f
CLIENT: t R.E.a L— —I~— , _ 'I IUVA JU8 �
LfiGAL: LoPT (. t oeet.11. I�oS. t� L44s F•P � 1iV5)E'.RY:
SfI'FsJGRADING PLAN:
We have measured relative elevations at the above memionod location. The observed elevations were coropured to the
Grading plan tefa(;nced above. Dori og our observations ourrepresentative measured thcn:hacivo elevations at the lntsidcs
and comers, top of fi,nudatibq and lowest opuninga. lieucd upan our (Indinge it is our opiniont
0
A
9
The elevations as measured ere in general conformance with the above noted GradingPlan.
The elevations as measured are in genoml coofonnanec with the above noted erading Plan with the following
wr w..�finnc.
Itis our opinion these oxoeptians, noted above, sbouldnot adversely change the grading scheate as shown on the
above referenced plan.
Dut'ing our observations our fgmmwtativc noted that the ee measured elevations do not conform to those
iodleatcd on the above referenced grading plea. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitot.e to the above rcferenced grading schema.
See the attached "As -Built" Fading plao.
The elevations andmurod afro not in conformance to the shove referenced grading plan, Deficiencies include:
Oil= comments and/or observations:
ratnitadara:
b u maropiaioo tl:tit the subjaet lot, as graded (MUM above cue, stmuld not Inwme wi th of Ute flo ws eniass tiro Umda arc eta noW or barn.+■ we
ermatod such u fences, garden terracing, sldtrvealkA, and/or any ldndscapinp wWb may ahanpa the established flow pmems by dlvcting or stowing
runoff flow, Raekflll 4acmi m the residoncc may iculoover time and allowpuading to occur around the ftrtmdadon walls. The bacM tAa=t
to theraida m must be rtwiUwad and Tmiaralpm to mane that rytttQ>;w111 saw away from the tuunUaUou.'nmyrUc. utaaieacd were compared
cudyto111orcqu(tomoushow andbaboverefcr=ccdgradingplltl4OthQT umgtaAin$requiaamealewhiohmaybes¢deitieAinrhosoilsmpntt
or by other conmuction d to art beyond the •,,��j j
Reviewed by ' u: :1w
, 7 y,
Main Office Y 1_ / ,.• Br�eh Offiice
5110 Granite bin ut, Suite Y.)7�1; f. .•dy ; t30o Ritrd+erk Strec!
t o .r...a r• �. »..;., w1aaR `i i •`r;• . L ongmrmt Colomdo 80501
ZO 39Vd 3S3SIadd- N3 73aIWGi:I 0909090L6I 0" 5966/Iolll
FROM :KIUA ENGINEERING INC FFIX NO. :97066316613 Oct. 30 2006 94:02PM P2/3
3527 COPPER SPRING DRIVE
TBM-1 93.5
94.4 (B.0.W.)
lim (B.O. W. )
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
10-27-OE 'r
91.
96.5
95.
tmr. u TOP w FtlUNoatlgl
TBM-�1 n riMPOR w BkTWN NARK #1
RO.W. . BADN OF WALK
TAUK . TM ac rumrwr va 1
SAL - Borrow OF wNDOW GLASS
WALIOM . eOTra„ OP WAUMUT COOK
xx x . aCVAM5 Kro-r;-a uAno 1ano�ue
®� 9EE OVA LEl-fFJt .33_
(B O.W.)
95.6 93.4
(B.O.W.)
95.9
SLAB
T, O. W.)
( 0.W.
95.9
TOfr /�
^{
{/a���0J7.6
t
97.4
(T.O.W.W.)
95.2
(T.O.W.W.)
95.2
97.3 (T.O.W.W.)
(T.O.W.W.)
96.4 87.0 �- 95.3
96.5 1,
x
96.6
(BRK) 9r, --.,1.
96.8
0
O
Ly
U
Z
92,8
(0,0.W,)
97.2 2.2
Nor:- Cni;3
THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ON ARE BASED
ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON 1D-27_00 AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
10/3� III NM %iUcc Zn IrlIn j, Tnc.. R A M I R EZ LLC
5rl*aArA4 gate ";w awil ILOT 1, $LOCK », FOSSIL LAKE RANCH ZND
EO 3JGd 3S3SI8d8MN3 Z38IWV8 LD9090SOL6T EO:6Z 9006/TO/TT
r�
11/01/2006 22:03 19705060647 RAMIREZ ENTERPRISESE PAGE 04
"" �'� .uoo 0uI.�WSWa1bOPwelo^ol Wos 11gnsulbw.wgv.�w two
T oen - eae (ace) —.I olmot **APO Pwwb7 ".*Xq
OOV?JOlO3 'SNI'11O3 lWJ1 W10 - C98 (0") ;owou.l 0 Duna 'woos wuu0 041 uids
11/01/2006 22:03 19705060647
RAMIREZ ENTERPRISESE PAGE 05
/ AID I N
Or,
l f
ol
1
� 11�
� #il
d'td'P��j v i
gZ
ocr
I
I�
f .
it
# f
£i£d Wdz0:ve 92W 0£
T M1.�J
099i£990LS: 'ON XUA
Ps
ONI UNI69BN10N3 WAIN: W0bU
11/01/2006 22:03 19705060647 RAMIREZ ENTERPRISESE PAGE 06
k--j \ I 'all "I"
U4! qo:&