HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 02/01/2001FROM : Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 979 663 16W Feb. 61 2991 98:44RM P1
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
v>TOPE -: 11n TER
FEB 1)1 2001
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date: 6V - / - o l
To:. ja�-'Y
Company: S fog,.-, wal fe
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
X
From: R0d i h
Phone Number: (970) 663-0138
Fax Number: (970) 663-1660
Number of Pages: to
Message: is X C-�p r T. for
fitLs Lot--
r
3110 Gunite Street, Suite L7 • Loveland, Colorado ROS38 • 1970) 663.0138 • Fax: (970) 663-1660
Ser,ie8Comadvwithallkesin • 8o,ddar La"m • Loveland
FROM : Scott, Cox 8 Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Feb. 01 2001 08:45RM P2
�JrSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
06< ha, C
IVERLOT GRADING ORSERVATIO SCA Thu IWk -°`}-
CLIENT: DATE: Z^' C) l
T t 4
LEGAL: 4 [NSP. BY:
GRADING PLAN: d2linWAd G�1Ql�tW� fisr� &b5I2.00., 4=ZQ-99
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation. and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are In general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as measured ate in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As-Builf' grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other
Limitations:
it is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsitc flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/orany landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the,si le over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill adjacent to the �v itored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation. The grades a �Jy to the
rcquirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum gradin ents whit cifted
in the soils report or , ther constru ion is are beyond the scope of thin r
V� C
Revicwcd by: Date: Ez
Granite Street. Suite D • Loveland, Colorado SD538 • 070-
Senvts Culowlo with officer in • aoulder • Lonvwnr • W.,Iand
FROM : Scott. Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Feb. 01 2001 08:46PM P3
m
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
1.30-01
TSM-1 11.0
(BAIIJ.)
10.4 (®.OIU.)
11.5
1
NOTE:
THr ELI!VATI" &O&AM WeM CW ARS BABED A3_51ILT GRAONG ELEVATIONS
ON THE W VEY PEFWORMED ON 1-M-01
atom, Cox 4 aseocl V8, be ABBCO 5U(LDER9
1 famulttng E�tmero LOT 9, 5LOCK 4. FOOSIL LAKE RANCH
0�. sro rrn1u Svc. sots o - Lawmia a OelaJAa OMM PORT COLLINS. COLORAPO
AVNe MW 4*1 • e6s MA
OAP "�serr.lw cros-. GRAW•�� urw
No Text