HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/19/2002SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA 1r,1A 3344-03-o 1-c C8
CLIENT: DATE V—I rTv�
130! /" te:nlTEkil:�
LEGAL: L_ F INSP.
GRADING PLAN: �C _4,
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
0 The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
3
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. BackfiI! ad' idence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill a • . must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation. compared only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other mini •gitng requirefeq ch may be specified
in the soils report or by other construction documents are nd & eaf this re ort. 9 ;O
Reviewed by: Date: D — Z
5110 Granite Street, Suite D • Loveland , Colorado 80538 • (9 3-1660
Ali-
5erving Colorado with offices in • Boulder • Longmont (1 o,
r b
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
8-14-02
/05
�c o9'3
Sca
° ' x 11,3
Io.S
oP o
7
RiW-
X 09.5
C6,-J
NOTE:
THE ELEVATIONS S440M HERE ON AREE BASED
ON THE SURVEY FEWC)FRI"ED ON 0-14-02
4x'
7e1-1- TH-PCPWW Metal wva 41
Mom. BACK ar UAX
L MT- LCMU Cream troy Q UK ue.0
GILL- MOMM a WMM GLAGG
wxaur- Morrat Q 91OLKOa DO=
Tor - TM Q rC110ATICN
o - MGM mtletewt
I I, 2
10.9 lo,o
/0 L
t t,� x
x /�•3
c6 w�
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
3344-3-1-8
FRISINGER
�
SCOT?, COX t ASSOCIATES, MC.
8-14-02
Consulting Engtneme
L07 19, EVERGREEN PARK 2ND
SCALE
FORT COLLN8 COLORADO
I'=30.0,
8110 Grwltw 8trost, 8ults 0 • Lowland, Colorado a0838
IRAWM
(910) 663 - 008
FILE &Z-171MMM. CERMARtIoN aER3
CPH
e..� Cab .e- w ar a.. e . e--1d. •lap.,- . La rd
-14-Ce-
2tJ
rt
�
n(
'f
.1
0
n
ge�� o�oo
a =� Y� LL LL W N
Z
4 QLLU-
v
a
r
_ V1 9 Jl r '
"s !� a
a s S S S gym/
FLAN VIEW
SECTION A-1
Geofabric cover (Mirafi 40 or
similar) to limit entry of fines
Into gravel. Geofabrlc should
penetrate one root below
grade on all sides.
Excavate Upper 511tV Clay and Replace with Free
Draining Gravel (3/4 Washed Gravel or
Equivalent)
° e —
.dd a
e L—lI I
e.
d° a
0�00000 O O V V 0`J00000000
00000000000000000000000000000
D000000000000000000000000000C
�000000000000000000000000000�
DR�rWELL RETENTION DETAIL
//// SCOTT, COX 4 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Loveland, Colorado
6' I Approx. 4B' to
Drywell 55' of Natural
Slc'Itty Sandy Clay
Natural Sand with
Gravel and
Cobbles (SP/SG)
County: Larimer, Colorado
Project: Lot IS Evergreen Subdivision
Approximate Scale: n/a
Project No. 3344-3-1-7 Fig. No: