HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 06/06/2001 (2)FROM Scott, Cox 8 Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Sun. 08 2001 12:49PM P4
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING -OBSERVATION SCA labs l�uo-ss� -o3
CLIENT
DATE: Cow fo-0 I
LEGAL: I..aC ;17Jt_GCX3�
`,mow q.
Stt_
twPV -�•--a
G}}
INSP. 8Y:C��....._._.
GRADING PLAN:
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. Duringourobservations our representative measured therelative elevations atthelot sides
and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Baud upon our findings it is our opinion:
O The elevations as measured are in general-oonformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
The elevations as meaattted art= in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should notadversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan..
❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
04- See the attached "As.Buili grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan- Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations:
it is our opinion that the subject for, as graded on the abov
are changed or barriers are created such as fences- gardeiia
the established flow patterns by divettingo[ sluwi44.9
and allow ponding to occur around' the 'fgtcdation walla
maintained to ensure that runoff.3vi flew away from thi
requirements shown on theabov se-rWed,vrading-plait.
in the soils report or by Aar coii;trygti9rfdgcU1117 rs are
Reviewed by
dam should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
racing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
-4w: Backfill adjacent to the residence may Seale over time
7>cbaeitfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
ounaation. The grades measured were compared only to the
hlrarininimum grading requirements which may be specified
eyorid the scope of this report -
6-6--of
r If) Gramre Street. Sude 0l.;l' Brand°•rCulorado 90i;8 a-nr u1iS-cn iti pax: 9"0' do]•:660
jcrvmq LVlnfaCo with aficet in . 30uktrt L.nhrlpunt Lrner.intl
f
FROM Scott, Cox & Assoc
FROM Scott, Cox 8 Assoc.
ELEVATION$ SURVEYED
6.5.p1
T5N -1 11.6 (B.O.W.) 9
FAX NO, 970 663 1660
e •.
o
D
• e
•
119 13.3
12A
Top of Foundation=15.0
121 13.8
14,4
I •13.2 (]wet)
13 8 I3.4
o •
12,150
Jun, 08 2001 12:50PM PS
12A
-14,4
Owst)
12.6
�r
f
I 13.2
13.E 13.0
NOTE:
THE ELESURVE 9 RF;Q HERE N ARE BA5EP AS-IBUILT GRAr)ING ELEVATIONS
GN rHE SURvEY PERFORnED dJ 6.5•0I
Joe NQ
1526-25-3-3 ABBCO
6- SCrCiTT, Cox a A3 TE3r NC.
SCALE-mI JL�awIL;ng Engkiew5 LOT 6, BLOCK 3, FOSSIL LAKE
1' a ZO.O' 6% wL 6w4.-0 • Lw�nd, Color m e W FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
9Revw. 0-r MLKPADI•G GERT6/I,BaCd�4fL.19.3-)DUC
DAP. _ ....,�.a.Wa.:. �.s....L..y.
OZ/ I �_ -,� 1 m ��
?- gL 14 14�
O
1374 -� V
til —
Ilk
� ti
I �O
m
mr
• i�all
r + A
`D
D
meOw:
r
r' II N
I ��Zr
rn
•2 � I + K
7
ttA %
+ ,• j�ti• I r3;Z I SO
J �ZZ 0
'! r;;
es
F=
_ y .I DAw av�a
�0� w N
m
pW T S
22
r t C Y 1
m
r' m
I �CDN= I z �•
_I
f-.
rzz ZZ
m 73
N
��zz .� - m •�
y o i D4ro
r ,
f"' rj I D Vr �p�
/)IIf111I1n1t111 I If
i -yIIrI11I- �, •-1 Z Z