HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/12/2001STONYBROOK HOMES INC 970 667 2342 P.02
Do-" >s�y
SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCA�Ly62-11-I ►-aI
CLIENT.
DATE: _4 —1 ?--of
LEGAL: /34pL K Cd Q5StL- (..4.lC-� I sr rNSP. BY:Qd,';�k_
GRADING PLAN: rJ.0_3 R F'r4Gg— !i C:531L0-;o FLif= : D"r4-zo-99
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During ourobservations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners. top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our.findings it is our opinion:
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
15f, The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is'our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
❑ During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion thegrades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute. to the above referenced grading scheme.
g See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
-Other comments and/or observations:
Limitations
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns bv,Q ``� erting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
a ia9ffYft(
and allow ponding too `c�Yarbun �t(td�)gndation walls. The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensur�jti3 Suh0� tJ) 1p�t may from the foundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements show r Jt r t og Biding plan. Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report r c 11Q �s Oeugtenm are beyond the scope of this report.
Rc%,lowedby 0' / i�� Date: 7 -01
�Ad e �1in,:•4I;8 Far �'9 ;•'�e0
street.5uaeb
//i. /i.a�`k�,P C.�1�1D(.tito\•rgh Olfi[!K �(f 30i u(IS•r ..�tlpV�Vnl • LOb01011
STONYBROOK HOMES INC 970 667 2342
P.03
FI FYOTInN5 511VYF7Fn
15.1 T.
ca-
� ►o�} -Z�-- I i- o l
TBM-1 11.3 (B.O.W.)
0:M1551NG DOLLN15FOUTS
14.5
(lwst)
14A
(lwst)
14.2 Top o oundation-15.5
12.6
Owst)
TWIN WASH SQUARE
13.4
3
13.2
142
14.5
Clwst)
14.2
12.6
I
11.9
10.9 (B.O.W.)
NOTE!
THE ELEVATIONS SHOUN HERE ON ARE BASEO AS -BUILT GfZADING ELEVATIONS
ON THE 5URVE7 PERFOPMED ON 4-10-01 _
STONYBROOK
9C.OTf, GOX t A890GIATE9, MG
a-10-m1 Coneulting Englneae LOT 5, 6LOGK 6, FOSSIL -LAKE 1ST
SCALE Silo &OAI . Mr«4 a,n. o • Lo jjr I. Coloade OdM35 FORT COLLfNS• COLORADO
1 • ,: 20.0'
DRAWW. (tic) 66) - 0138 G:rGIVILARADi1+0 CCRTppf�Tp1¢O0KA"1-? .II•I
DAP e...g eera•ie.worr� .. e..w • t.�o• . �e.w.a d �
STONYBROOK HOMES INC 970 667 2342
P.04
3'
W
o-
� .• s ' •J 'YS�`•� �Y. ��i � iris
' •L '��'• Ki �. rr � . . J . •. :. f` o- • • ai it �� r . •f.
(- w.•� t.•. -.,.•. .. .'►' •ter. .. .A+rr. ');. �i.�■.�.�p �,r� }�v. 7�' rr.
•••���?_lip-' ���•'.i r�r •,r•.�l'r��.I Jv�r�"�e:�•;.�� ``fir•'-': a�`jp�l•��;�
'� .+' + N ~�'• \, �N1=.1 51,7'*4`��/'1r�•c� ���r?t �i�-Z/i�i
��r.7� !rt • . • 1'.,�� ♦ }. •i•'. .• .!ifi:�:'./�•Y:yl�i► ��.•'J` ?/'V cr�J•�► : • �iTs+�
•�-�•�..J",,. •.'�:... .a.'s.vr•�.tr. .r::�4.'�'- aV.�Fi►a..liel4lK+'.�:rr-+rrGs .
No Text