The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLot Certifications - 03/20/2001 (3)STONYBR,OOK HOMES INC.. 970 667 2342 P.02 "SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consufOng engineers CLIENT: S'cb►-``Y(�IE'oo�- - _ DATE: LEGAL • L xr4l &'C:Ie� �, �SS;r_" LAt� 17-E>w�C.E4 IMP. BY: CA GRADINGPLAN:j�� GQ: 9�1Z.00 �L�:T�A't7trl� �ZD—Olt We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plait referenced above. During ourobservations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevationsatthe lotsides and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Baud upon our findings it is our opinion: o The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. pL The elevations at measured ere in general confortuanee with the All noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions: It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. a During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those ind icated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion thegrades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. See the attached "As -Built' grading plan. The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include: ether eo r%.nwnla nwrtln. ni .ww w, nw.• Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot• as graded on the above date. should not interfere with otfsite floNs unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow panems by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Baekfill adjacent to the "itQm Y settle overtime and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill adjacent to the tutored and maintained to ensure that runoff wilt flow away from the foundation. The grades m eeR p1tly to the requirements ihown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum grdding� �vitfecified in the soils reporto y other cogaRpcdocuments are beyond the scope of this �o�n Reviewed I t6 CrlNte Street. Su.te O • ldveland . Colorado S05.3•8 a"Ot •m :1st VR -Di,. vn,nq colerade wth offices in • inlddrt •'.VIIrn4W Ln1.e6114V//y V�QArAL STONYBROOK HOMES INC 970 667 2342 P.03 z z ELEVATIONS SURVEYED l-19-01 - 1Z .8 C600) 11') 13fG IZ.4 143 mo ►4.5 i �.i • 155 NOTE. THE ELEVATOON5 SNOYN NERe ON AM BASED AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS ON TUE SURVEY PERFORMED ON !•19.0� per' Scott. CNaCOX t ASWCIATES, STONE EBP,00 3-20-01 C� —J NCons�lt;ng Englnecr� LOT 4, BLOCK 1, F0981L LAKE RANCH SCALE 510 Granite gut, 50no o • Ldv*WA Co�awOD3 o e0 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO I'.20.0' f9imi is] - aDO m:.Cwi TCxT •2+•e-� CPuA.vp OMv- e0 anlw • . esYv • Ls1rVl lwW V • f di at Or '"m A tw rm m From is.t *0 wm I" �lDi '}1fPE , A FROM`: Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. : 970 663 1660 Mar. 21 2001 09:37AM P4 SCOT -I, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers CLIENT LEGAL tl a� -AIn M We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plan rcfamwed above. Duringourobsmvationsourreprmntative measured the reladveelevationsatthelotsides and comers, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Greding Plan. AL 711e elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured devotions do not conform to time indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is ouropinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. )k See the attached "As -Built^ grading plan. The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include. Other comments and/or observations - Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot. as graded on the above date, should not interfere with oflgite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fencm garden terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing nutoff flow• BackBll adjacent to the resld hay settle overtime and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backftll adjacent tos`` n�gosp' nitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow awayfrom the foundation. The des " A� / nl to the requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum grading' wlif� w ! y ified in the soils report qp<Y other copmawtiptl documents are beyond the scope of thi Reviewed bv: t tl Gamre Smear. 5�ire p • LSvel°nd . Culorsdo 505; °'rft nol+)I 4. `✓;� 9711' in3•' 4nrpC°terulo..td+ofrKesin --older • ''woowafr . ur•eio.{(ij� SIS" r' FgOi� : Scott, Cox & Rssoc. FRX NO. : 970 663 1660 Mar. 21 2001 09:36 M P5 i i ELEVATIONS $UWSYSIP 3-15-01 12-,a c aow) 13.E 143 14.E 15.l� 1?- 4 ,_..•,.,. IS,,.� 1Z•8 9 13 °� Li i OHM 15S NOrEI ONE WE SURVEY 5WOMINERFO WERE ON ARE-M- BASED AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS ON rNE gURVEr PEfa'O�HD ON 3-l9-0! .02 w0. 1 ,-2i•5.1 5TONYBROOK — scow, cox . aaaociaa, INC. _! cd Ming Engineers LOT 4. BLOCK 1, F098lL LAKERANCH I • =i0.0• Stan asnn. wm.lulls 0 • Lovme Mn de ee6)o FORT GOLLIN9, COLORAGO {ytAYfC (IV) 66) • 01110 Cc GIN -6 GPii `1n10 GOIVIJOIgrlplWr..(tY111�.LAO. •lOMMO ^ I �8 w p•-cam Scott. Cox & ' � 7 Nit • �! wR � t-lot Ur TM!* A 1 30 ISM FC= WI �w wm fps � �1fPE A f �s 1 VI\ 1 ORVVR IIV I'IC•l. 1lY lr "J /b b1> ( :If 64;e P. el Agba STONY/BROOK �Ll�1�L�f FACSIMILE COVERSHEET TO: _ _ rr eDLU/I/J5 L STd�Mtyip Q U7�i/.icy ATIN: di9 y FAX NO: ZZ/. 64/9 FROM: arr'I�4�'► DATE: '3 ' • D Number of Pages Including Coversheet: ( ) Hard copy to follow via mail ( ) Hard copy to follow via overnight mail No hard copy to follow Comments: 3/73 e(!.99 A615el- Gi, ids 6 rh�," ph": 970.667.8018 - Jar, 970,667.2342 - PO BOX 242S - LOVELAND, CO 80539 5IUNYMMUUK NUME5 INC 970 667 2342 P.02 a "SCOTL COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers DMAR11 01_RM1 1 17� a_ •:. CLIENT LEGAL DATE: ISP. BY: GRADING PLAN: ��'�� F-�GQ% �9�IZ.00 �f_�:�Q'Yllrc� 41o'9 , We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading Plat referenced above. During ourobservations ourrepresentative measured the relative elevations atthe lotsides and corners, top of foundation. and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: o The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan. The elevations as measured arc in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. A See the attached "As -Built" grading plan. The elevations measured arc not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies Include: Other cornmenrY and/nr ntleerVftinna- Limitations: It is our opinion that the subject lot as graded on the above date. should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades are changed or barriers are created such as fences, garden terracing, sidewalks. and/or any landscaping which may change the establishcd flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff Flow. Backfill adjacent to the re�i,Qt4fIftAI11 y settle over time and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backFlll adjacent to the \ •monitored and maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation. The grades m tf l 9 ly to the requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. Other minimum grading�� t:lTf eciFled in the soils report other copa%rVct1p1 documents are beyond the scope of this Reviewed t th Cranite Street. Sude 0 • lSeland .Colorado yU5 t9 - -N •m :�)t ".<r�t, 4-9` o6. <Y^,n%Cutmub wnh a•Rtes M - i tddrt une6tnii%ignI IVAL rG STONYBROOK HOMES INC 970 667 2342 z ELEVATIOHS SURVETEO 19 01 12•5 c ,00) 31 3 K„�U �► 5,� C.zn.*�- -qqw� 1`aS NOTE. THE ELEVATIONS SWOUN WERE ON ARE BASED ON TWE 6UWET KRFORr1E0 ON 3'-M'01 —T►3M-1 C1� �) no IZ.4 9D AS -BUILT GRAVING ELEVATIONS J�� e � 5TONY13tROOK BGOTT GOX t A81ATE8 INC, �PTF~r /''/ ' LOT 4, BLOCK 1, F0551L LAKE RANCH 3-70-01 O°^sWu"g Efiglno r' FORT COLLINS, GOLORADO SCPL-C pllo aeon. Bww4 5„n. a • le�tlPn¢ Cob�Oo e0610 /910i LOD•Sne a:ICwlLKJ"0&6C pgrGr+� •fir• •I CPWyyya OP1>Ii N tlllvw M . OP�tl. • LO•'01 ' LwYW �i� • R ST0 YE OOK HOMES NC 970 66T 2342 4 low, AK A4- . .df Twe A .T w, mod A Fcm IT�I16.M i MM1 MIN VFw wm is* LOT iip I y T� 74e A . tji.Di T1IPE A