HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 10/15/2001FROM : Scott, Cox & Assoc. FAX NO. 970 663 1660 Oct. 18 2001 06:58AM P1
�i-506�3
"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATYON SCA-Inhd/sZ(--ZSVO -fad
CLIENT:
LEGAL:
GRADING
DATE:
INSP. BY:
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations our representative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners, top of foundation, and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
t7 The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
04
K
C
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
During our our representative. noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. However; it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide
an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme.
See the attached "As -Built" grading plan.
The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations:
— /_r- iI, t?a�'
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
are changed or barriers are created such as fences. garden terracing, sidewalks. and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow, Backfill adjacent to tAe�.Fes+tl#Aee may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The backfill adjacent to,. e:restdencit-be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoffwill flow away from the foundation. The grade's'tne9surtd.were`cotr�,R�red only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan. tither minimum gradtOB:regiuremzh i"'%' hicphi be Specified
in the soils report or by�hereonstn eigrt documents are beyond the scope oFthis rtpOrt,
Reviewed bv: - _Date �dL/b/ D i �z' e ^4
r, t if) Cranue Street, Su,te D • Loveland . Colorado SOS'A •n'rn nu;a)) ;8 .; Fax:•?=0) oirJ ' ibD
ien m�j COIOra,tp wilt+ �1IfKe$ m $Uulrlet ;gut@Wool lAhlt.Ylfl � '' i : `� \ i `'
FROM : Scott, Cox 8 Assoc.
FAX NO. : 00 663 1660 Oct. 18 2001 06:58AM P2
ELEVATIONS SURVEYED
i0nv®I
TBM-1 10.1 (B.O,W.)
9E
12b
—LEG5ND—
TBM- I ■ TEMPORARY ®ENGN MARK O
B4O.W, ■ BACK OF WALK
LWST• LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF WIN. WELL)
SILL• BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
WLKOUT• BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
O ■ MISSING DOWN SPOUT -
s
V.4'QL�
a v
\•� ' a ' ' 09.8 CB.O.WJ
Top or Foundation=14.3
120 13.1
Q(LWST)
13.1
(D 12.8
1 �Z to- ZS Imp,¢
(0•/5-0
13.8
(LWST) 13 8 • ` 13.5
a
13.8
11.4
10.6
09.1 (6:0.W.)
_13B
(LWST) 09.1
18.0_W.)
\' //05. o (
09.5 (B.O.W.)
NOTE:
ON WE SURVEY
ERFOWOUN HERE N ARE BASED ,GAS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
ON T'HE SURVEY PERFORnED ON IB�V®I
526-25•I0•4 ABBGO BUILDERS
1®/12/01 LOT 12. BLOCK 6, FOSSIL LAKE RANCH
SCALEConeulUng Englroers
51IQ1 maniN hrwt. lwto O • Lvvwlad, Gatoeeo ewx FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
G4GVrk l91� 663 • m13D 6vLIVIL.�RnDY'16 GER7B[CDGiGonf70.7 •�•�Dtttl
DAP e�.wg caves ww aner w. eb.tu� • �o ps. • bo NM 6 /
Cl