Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 07/05/2016Date: 07/05/2016 Subdivision: TRAIL HEAD Address: 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE Permit Application #: _B_1_50_5_3_8_5 ________ _ Larimer County Parcel#: _8_7_04_3_2_1_0_0_2 _______ _ Lot: _2 ______ Block: _1_7 _____ _ Larimer County Reception#: 20120056934 & 20120093290 (on development agreement) I, (print) KURTIS W. WILLIAMS a Colorado registered professional engineer, verify that construction of all stormwater facilities and grading is complete and hereby submit this certification. Please answer the following questions by initialing the appropriate response. For each question initialed "No," attach an explanation detailing how this will affect stormwater drainage for this lot and any adjacent lots. 1. Certification includes attached Stormwater-approved grading plan. (NOTE: City's Building Department does not approve grading plans). 2. Certification includes attached as-built survey dated 06/22/2016 (must be within 60 days of date of certification) accurately and truthfully depicting elevations for: • Top of foundation/finished floor • Finished grade on each side of the structure • Quarter points along each lot line (not more than SO feet apart) • Break points/high points • Swales • Berms • Retaining walls • Air conditioning pads • Window wells • Any other appurtenance(s) within an easement 3. All elevations are within a 0.2 foot tolerance of the approved grading plan. 4. The top of foundation is at least 6 inches above the highest grade surrounding the structure. 5. There is a minimum grade of 5% away from the structure within the first 5 to 10 feet adjacent to the residence. 6. All slopes meet or exceed the minimum requirement of 2% (1% is acceptable on single family lots when the swale is draining the runoff from only two adjoining properties) and are not steeper than 25% (4:1). 7. All flow lines of stormwater drainage swales are a minimum of 6 inches below the elevation of ground adjacent to the structure and will direct drainage as shown on the Stormwater-approved grading plan. 8. All downspout locations and discharge directions are shown on the as-built survey. Runoff is not directed toward neighboring properties. 12/15 No Yes /LJ No __ Yes /L-J \ No /t-> Yes No __ Yes L/J. No Yes /~ No __ Yes JiJ No_Yes.tt) No __ Yes /t.J Page 1 9. A smooth transition (no grade break) is provided to all adjacent properties. No Ye/J 10. The grading of this lot does not adversely affect neighboring properties or City infrastructure. No __ ve&l 11. Landscaping has been completed prior to survey. If not, please indicate who will be No~ Yes __ responsible for completing landscaping: _B_A_T_H_L_A_N_D_S_C_A_P__E _______ _ 12. Final site cleanup has been completed. 13. I personally visited the site as part of the certification process, and in my professional opinion, the as-built survey is an accurate representation of the site conditions. NoL/J Yes __ No __ Yes ~ 14. Based on this information, I certify that (check one): ~ The elevations and drainage patterns of the lot/site are in substantial conformance with the City approved drainage and grading plan for the property (information attached). D The elevations and drainage patterns of the lot/site as measured are in general conformance with the City approved drainage plan with exceptions (information attached). In my professional judgment the elevations and grading of the lot/site as constructed are functionally adequate and equivalent to the specifically approved drainage plan, and will affect stormwater drainage on and off the lot/site in a manner consistent with the approved drainage plan. PE Stamp Sign and date Name: KURTIS W. WILLIAMS Email: KWILLIAMS@JRENGINEERING.COM Phone: 303-267-6190 Company: JR ENGINEERING Address: 7200 SAL TON WAY SUITE C400 CENTENNIAL, CO 80122 NOTE: A complete certification must be submitted at least two weeks prior to a request for a Certificate of Occupancy for the lot/site, including, but not limited to, drawings of the lot/site showing the approved design and as-built surveyed elevations of all structures, drainage and grading features, written information/explanation of discrepancies, and other information necessary to confirm the above certification to: Email (preferred) WaterUtilitiesEng@fcgov.com 12/15 Mailing Address Fort Collins Utilities ATTN: Water Utilities Engineering 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Questions? 970-221-6700 City of k ~~'~'~!~s Page 2 MEMORANDUM ~ J·R ENGINEERING A Westrian Company To: City of Fort Collins, Bldg Dept. From: Kurtis Williams, PE Date: 7-05-2016 Subject: 3209 Green Lake Drive - Drainage Certificate Supplement Certification of Lot Grading - Supplement Item: 3. Not all elevations are within 0.2' of the approved grading plans, but the drainage intent has been met without impacts to adjoining properties. 11. It is industry standard to certify the grades prior to landscape installation. The landscaping was not complete at time of survey. 12. The site is not at the stage of "final clean-up" at time of survey for the drainage certificate. D 7200 South Alton Way, Suite C400 Centennial, CO 80112 303-740-9393 • Fax 303-921-7320 D 3930 Sinton Road, Suite 219 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-593-2593 • Fax 303-921-7320 D 2900 South College A venue, Suite 30 Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-491-9888 • Fax 303-921-7320 @ JR ENGINEERING JOB NUMBER 39145.38 A Subsidiary of Westrian CLIENT TR ITON COMMU NITIES SUBDIVISION -TRAIL ---'=HEAD -'--=------- FI LING __ BLOCK _1Z_LOT_1_3 __ _ 7200 S. Alton Way, Suite C400• Centennial, CO 80112 DATE 06/23/16DRAWN BY CD 303-740-9393 • Fax: 303-721-9019 • wwwJrengineering.com ----- ~'"f:, ~O ""S--~ DRAINAGE CERTIFICATE \,t,.~ 0 ~ ~ G0 \ ~~ , ?-· ,-_\\) ~t,~ ( ej:J \>S" G '- c0~0 74.9- 75.2 HP START 6"PERF.PIPE UNDER ROCK LANDSCAPE N10"28'36"W 123.95' LOT 1 ~ <== ~ I I 74.0 i~ I I ~ I x 74.8 76 .0 LOT 2 76.4 6,437 SF .._.: z TWO STORY j WOOD AND SIDING 75.8 I\ TOF=77.2 76.8 76.6 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE 76.2 TOS=76.4 JI ~ [,,,,,--76.0 I~ XL-Ii -~ 76.3 l I \ CONC. l ~ I DRIVE I S04"04'31 141.97' 76.3 ---- w-WELL 75.9 HP 75.2 LOT 3 A Subsidiary of Westrian @ JR ENGINEERING JOB NUMBER 39145.38 CLIENT TRITON COMMUNITIES SUBDIVISION TRAIL HEAD FILING BLOCK __ll_LOT_2 __ _ 7200 S. Altm Way, Suite C400• Centennial, CO 80112 303-740-9393 • Fax: 303-721-9019 • wwwjrengineering.com DATE 06/23/16 DRAWN BY _C_D __ _ 20 10 0 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE LOT 1 I I I I I __I }-: 1--- _,.,- __,,...-- I I I I --- ./ ....i-----1 __,,...--II~ _,.,L----' I /~II /~ : \ LOT 2 6,437 SF ~ I I COVERED 1 1 20 PORCH IJ LI . 12.9' I r-'---:-"'T"",-.......::.:..=......-t 0 ___ .,....-----:--' cxi lB.O' TWO STORY WOOD AND SIDING ;..... 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE 14.0' I U) 0) 4.0' 0 c:i N 20.0· U) N U) O> 7.0' ' ' RECOVERED ' REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP ""' ~TAMPED ""' ""' " ""LS28J,-, ,85" ''. , 6' PRIVATE " j " ""' IRRIGATION " EASEMENT LOT 3 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" = 20' / \ \ \ \ \ +\ - COMMENTS: TRITON COMMUNITIES SITE LOT 2, BLOCK 17, PLAN TRAIL HEAD 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE LOT 1 74.4 FG 74.6 HP 74.0 FG ~E~T=5' UTILITY \- EDA 73.1 EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT \ ', --- -- i \ --- I ss-\ -I ----- - LOT ------- ---2 ---- -~ ~ ~I II 6,437 SF 75.8 12.8' 14.0' 10% 5702-B N BASEMENT HOUSE=1,521 SF HOUSE HEIGHT=28.0' 0 ~r, . ,....,..., . N • v 74.6 FG 75.2 FF=77.6 TOF=76.4 -~ p v 0 (/) LOT 3 :,:: _J <( 3: "o 0 ci z N 0 u \.() LO n N {O .... (/ _HIGH P01 T 11 - PER PL lOCAT . Al V, lllfS l \l - ..J lJ. .; ,\. D l l 12% - MAX. I I PLAN VIEW VARIES 90' @ 2% FINISHED GRADE ff '14.~''\ \" (2% -MIN.-- ) J - a --OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "A" LOT NO SCALE -·-------------------·-------- - - . -- -- .J 0. VARIES @ 2% 45'-50@ 2% FINISHED GRADE (2% MlN ) \ - - - (2%MJN.) \._OVERLOT GRADE ® TYPICAL "B" LOT NO SCALE 2% (MIN.) VARIES 45"-50'@ 2% 16'+ 0 @ ~ 4: 1 FINISHED ., MAX. GRADE :":' , (2% MIN.) _J_ ,.,: - 4"+ 0 4'.i MAX:u '" ~OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "GARDEN LEVEL" LOT NO SCALE OVERLOT AND FINISHED GRADING TEMPLATES -- - . 2% (MIN.) (2% L- MIN.) 2'+ @ 4: 1 MAX. ""~zy-~ o'fu J~~ "., ""· 12% - ~ ' 45"-50' "0 ?' i ."~ ..' . @ 2% 5 FINISHED GRADE .,..----- v 8'+ @ 4:1 MAX. OVERLOT GRADE @) TYPICAL "WALK-OUT" LOT D I I 12% - ~x I l ~ 0: PLAN VIEW "ci ' "w ' "' .:>.:.:· . , VARIES 0 0 90'@ 2% <z ( ro 4'4~- 't,"C (-2% -FINISHED MIN.--)_-/ GRADE - a a:: OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAi "A" LOT NO SCALE VARIES -----==~----! 0 :i VARIES@ 2% FINISHED GRADE 45'-50 @ 2% :r (2% M\N.)' - - - (2%M/N.) LavE.RLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "B" LOT NO SCALE a CJ I 2% (MIN.) 12% ~ ci ai "t:! ' VARIES ti ~ 45"-50' @ 2% (!) 0 ~ 16'+ @ 4: 1 FINISHED ! MAX, GRADE u (2% MIN.) ~ .. J - 1/,,- 4'+ @ 4: 1 MAi'° ~OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "GARDEN LEVEL" LOT NO SCALE OVERLOT AND FINISHED GRADING TEMPLATES I - . - -. ·---~ -------- ·· .. ---- , --. -, -........ ______ 2% (MIN.) (2% L- MIN.) 45" -50' @ 2% "ci ai ' 5 ."~ ... ' 32'+ @ 4: 1 ,FINISHED MAX. I GRADE OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "WALK-OUT" LOT NO SCALE D l l 12% - M:X, ' ' PLAN VIEW VARIES go· @ z:,; FINISHED GRADE ~ is ~;" -,= (2; ;;7.J-- \_OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "A" LOT NO SCALE ~ & p • " < ~ ~ I ;:: r -;:~ ~ "• <,,\ , ' i ;~ ;; ,l E 1 rl • e c ~ " ;0 ;; ;~ ;; ~ ~ ;8 0 ;; "x ' VARIES VARIES @ 2% 45'-50 @ 2% FINISHED GRADE (2% MIN.)~ - - (2% MIN.) OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "B" LOT NO SCALE 2% (MIN.·- ) 16'+ @ 4, 1 MAX 12% ~ - FINISHED GRADE @ TYPICAL "GARDEN LEVEL" LOT NO SCALE OVERLOT AND FINISHED GRADING TEMPLATES O') CV) 1- w w I (f) w w (f) J ' , > J "- ' ' ' ' ' ' ', ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' ' : ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' j ' \ \ \ DI I 12" l l ~ - PLAN VIEW VARIES 90' e 2" FINISHED GRADE J: ,,_ ".,".-,., . • 2" - (I.IIN.) - - ~ 12" - - '?o-.;."' 1 <; ' VIEW VARIES VARIES 2" FINISHED GRADE (2% -;,,;\, - - - (2i<,iiN) \__OVl:.RLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "B" l OT NO SCALE '< ci "' ~ "' i3 0 ~ '<' '?i,J-.,. ,;,' ,,,1 ·"-· 2" (I.IIN.- ) .cf.'t 12" - - ~ - '? o-.;.",# ' ,# .,,1 ' ~<; PLAN VIEW VARIES 45• -50' 0 2" 16' + 0 z 0 < 4. 1 FINISHED ID MAX GRADt is 0 (27. MIN ) /'- n 0 I I 12% ~ - ' ' PLAN VIEW VARIES 90'@ 2% ,_,,FINISHED GRADE ~;--- ---r= (2;-,;;,, )J - \_ OVERLOT GRADE @ TYPJCAL "A" LOT NO SCALE if! a ' ' ' \ \ ' ' \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' • • ' • • , • . / / , I I_.' '!-''"' ) -'"'l,-."'--,-1 -1-~-}-i-, l ' VARIES VARIES O 2% 45'-50 @ 2% FINISHED .GRA7 ..fo'----=::-::--- (2% MiN.1, - - - (2%-Mw.f '-ovERLOT GRADE @ TYPICAL "B" LOT NO SCALE 2% (MIN.) VARIES 16' -t· @ 4;1 MAX. 12% - ~ - 45"-50' 0 211 FINISHED GRADE C) 0 z < ":m :' , (2% j MIN.) F- 4'+@ 4:1 M2 " ~ - \_ OVERLOT GRADE © TYPICAL "GARDEN LEVEL" LOT NO SCAU: 2% (MIN.) (2% L- MIN.) ' 'ii "' 0 ~ ti 45" -50' 0 2ll: (t 32'+ @ 4: 1 MAX FINISHED GRADE --8'+-@ -4:- f MAX -DVERLOT GRADE @) TYPICAL "WALK-OUT" LOT NO SCALE LEGEND D • v EXISTING PIPES & INLETS PROPOSED PIPE FLARED END SECTION ----------- -~ ®- PROPOSED INLET OR OUTLET STRUCTURE PROPOSED INLET LOCATION GRADING LIMIT EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ANNEXATION BOUNDARY RETAINING WALL A GRADED LOT TYPE B GRADED LOT TYPE LIMITS Of GRADING DRIP LINE SILT FENCE AND LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FENCE SEE DETAILS SHEET 94 NOlES: 1. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS MAY VARY, BUT THE GENERAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS MUST BE MAINTAINED. 2. HIGH POINTS ANO FLOW ARROWS ARE SHOWN TO DEPICT DRAINAGE PA TIERNS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AT THE TIME THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITS LOT CERTIFICATION. THE ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THE TOP OF FOUNDP,TION ELEVATION ANO THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IS GRADED PER APPROVED GRADING PLANS. 3. THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION FROM THE 100-YEAR STORM. MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ABOVE THE 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE IN STREETS, CHANNELS, DITCHES, SWALES, OR OTHER DRAINAGE F AGILITIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY A MASTER GRADING PLAN ARE TD BE SHO\ltN. 1. THE MINIMUM ANISHEO GRADE ON EACH LOT, ANYWHERE ON l>!E LOT, SHALL BE 2% MINIMUM. OYERLOT AND FINISHED GRADING TEMPLATES A B G w FG TF TW GARDEN LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE WALK OUT LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE FINISHED GRADE 2. WINDOW WELLS ARE ALLOWED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, HOWE\,£R DRAINAGE NEEDS TO STILL PASS ALONG SIDE LOT LINES WITHOUT INUNDATING ANY STRUCTURES. A SWALE CROSS-SECTION SHOWING FLOOR DEPTH PLUS FREEBOARD WILL BE REQU1RED AT LOT CERTIFICATION. \ ,. \ .\ .\ \ \ \ \ \,. . \. \ ·, . \ \ . \ ' \ \ \ I \ . I ' ,f \ . I ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 512 O c.J..: -c,,ID< ~ . 0-~O? 0 o,.~I ~lii< i~ 00 f.11 ;;; < ~~ .-f.11 8ii! lii-<-- ~ ~~ 0 .oo .... \0 liii-< \ \ ~· ~ \ \ \ ·, \ \ \ \ \ \ "o' ~+ '' ~I ;-J 5 • 9, I I I I i I I ' I • • ' ' I ,-l • • I ' ' ' ' ' I • ' o, • ~t I ' ' I ' + ' \~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -- - ------r--,.-_ ~-t, , 1t J-- 11 ; I ' I :j • ' ---- ..l la,i~ I ' / I ' ' ' I I~ i I I I i it -o' , I I ' '\ I I I I ' ' J I , I I I ' I I ' + I ' ;? I l f ' ~--.l.--- TOP OF FOUNDATION TOP OF RETAINING WALL SEE SHEET 43 ----+- ' .. BLANKET DRAINAGE EASEMENT, RECEPTION NUMBER 2004-0072260, 07 /23/04 ·190 lF 2' 'MOE / f. TRICKLE. CHANNEL I 310 LF 2' WIDE / l TRICKLE" CHANNEL\ . ' I · _\ I I - --- -1 ' r----------------------------------------------------------- ~- f , I I . I f ' , , I J . ,, . ' • I • \ ' . ' ' ' ' ' r . I ' ' ' I ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' I • ' ' • . ·i ' ' ' ' I ' I I : ' ' ' ' ' ,. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' "{. ' '·I I ' t . ., I ' ' L-' ---~-' ' - , t ' ' - 1 ' I r • i r' ! I I I i • .I l 1. I I i 1. : ! I yJ . I I 1 : , . I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ' . ' 'ts , .s . ' . ,1 ''./ IL! ", I rt· 11 . I I• I 1. ' • 1 I I / . ·f f " I, I ' . , . "I ' ' : ' 1 f' I J f I, jfl I, I i . I ' , ' " I ' Ji J • J i '· . , ' ;;, .· ';/ ··l : : . I .· : f . . , •. t I • . ; .· ! J r I : : .., 11 . : :J I : I l ' . . . r : I j .J. f! · • ;1 ,O')RI i l vh, l~ I r ' ' & I I ') '. \ ·\ ' 'I I I I /. "' r·-! {? ~r·· .·· .• ... ,l·.~.' •, ,f I . . . ~· ' . KEY MAP N.T.S. 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE: r· = 50' PREPARED UNDER lHE DIRECT SUPERWllON Of TIMOTHY JAMES HALOPOFF 12.• /OAlE J'JLA COLORADO P.£. NO. 37953 FOR ANO ON BEHALF OF SI ENGINEERING Boxelder Sanitation District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: Dote Eost Larimer County Woter District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: _________ _ - Dote Lorimer and Weld Reservoir Compony UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVE~li,/_.IUll- /r i/fl# ie APPRO CHECKED /,J,~,4-=-- Watef' .t Waslewater Utility CHECKED BY: ,Stormwoter #/,. 1.& utflity J..11..,t, Date - //-J-11./ Date lllJ.p'1 Dote CHECKED BY: __ /1,1 //, "'-6 Porks le Re.::reutioo - iY 0 LL- 0 w er: <1'. o_ w er: o_ (>[- ) z 0 (/) w > a:: 0 z 0 t() II ~ w .. / <( u V) I I <z !) ; ~ -z ~ ~ I ~ 'l; i ~ ... .., ~ • ""~ ' ' ' .... 0 <{ '-. I '-. ,...., ..., z -::::.. I- 0 >- w ([) _J <( w 0 () ,... w (/) <( z :ct 0 Cl i7i w z <( --' 0... 0 C) <( z w 0 I <( __J 0::: C) <( 0:: w I- I- <( ~ I- __J ::J I 8 8 Ji. "' 05 ~! u:• : $ffi I ; ;lij §'f !;; § ~ ct: w S?i' ! s:i ~~f (.) I- ..., >- >(D - ill 0 z w <3< ( "() ' er w 0 :r () CHECKED BY, rn,_,En:;t/,1,::-.- ... --,,00~,. .--1 SHEET 41 OF 104 CHECKED BY: 7'!1~ -,,I--------~ 39145.11 2037 4'+ .1- // @ 4 1 MA7'" ~OVERLOT GRAUi:. @ TYPICAL "GARDEN LEVEi • LOT NO SCALE OVERLOT AND FINISHED GRADING TEMPLATES \ \ SEE SHEET 42 ' \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' "-\ ' ' ' \ ,,.,,' . . /,, .!'.!' ' //' .I' \ / \ \ ' . I ' ' \ ' ' ' \ ' / ' /' I , I ( . -, "I l . . j ' ' . I ' / . ' : ' ' ,' . ' ! J ) I IQ J I \ : 1XJ r I I I 0) I : \ I I .... l I \ f I ' I , , ' ,' \ ' . ' ' 1 ' . ' ' . I I . ' ' ' ' . ' . ' ' : . . ' ' ' ' I ' ' I ' ' . • I I • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' : ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' • • • • ' //''di ' ' ' ' ~ !-< /~/ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I I lq~ .,., Iii j!·~ : Ii! IL < I 22+ 0 it 01 I ' + I I I I I I I I I I } I I I rt' l • • I I I -----:--_._._-r-- ' • I I . • I I ' ' ' ' I I I I -I I I I I I I +--· I 0 7."'· .. ~ 2" (lollN.- ) ,-..,1 .cf', 12" - '?- o-.;.",,' ,.,,. .... 1 ' ~ - ~<; VARIES 32' r 45"-50' 0 2" " 0 z @ < 4. 1 FINISHED ID MAX. GRADE .::. , (2% MIN.) (.) L // ~ 8'+ @ 4·1 MA....X. .... - - 1. \__ OVERLOT CRAOF ,fill TYPICAL "WALK-OUT" LOT \!!,I NO SCALE LEGEND D • \.I EXISTING PIPES & INLETS PROPOSED PIPE FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED INLET OR OUTLET STRUCTURE PROPOSED INLET LOCATION GRADING LIMIT EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ANNEXATION BOUNDARY RETAINING WALL A GRADED LOT TYPE B GRADED LOT TYPE GARDEN LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE WALK OUT LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE FINISHED GRADE TOP OF FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS MAY VARY, BUT THE GENERAL DRAINAGE PATIERNS MUST BE MAINTAINED. 2. HIGH POINTS AND FLOW ARROWS ARE SHOWN TO DEPICT DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AT THE TIME THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITS LOT CERTIFICATION. THE ENGINEER IMLL VERIFY THE TOP OF FOUNDA TJON ELEVATION AND THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IS GRADED PER APPROVED GRADING PLANS. 3. THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION FROM THE 100-YEAR STORM. MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ABOVE THE 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE IN STREETS, CHANNELS, DITCHES, SWALES, OR OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY A MASTER GRADING PLAN ARE TO BE SHOWN. NOJE ro QQNJBACJIS 1. THE I.IINII.IUM FINISHED GRADE ON EACH LOT, ANY'MiERE ON THE LOT, SHALL BE 2" MINIMUM. 2. V.,NOOW WELLS ARE ALLOWED IN DRAINAGE EASElolENTS, HOWEVER DRAINAGE NEEDS TO STILL PASS ALONG SIDE LOT LINES v.lTHOUT !NUNDA TING ANY STRUCTURES. A SWALE CROSS-SECTION SHOV.,NG FLOOR DEPTH PLUS FREEBOARD IMLL BE REQUIRED AT LOT CERTIFICATION. KEYMAP N.T.S. 0:: ,0 . 0 w (Y <( [l w (Y ()_ A B G w FG TF TW TOP OF RETAINING WALL --v---v--._._-SEESHEET43 50 25 0 50 100 1t l t ' ' ' -- -------- -- ~- r ' . 310 LF 2' WIDE 190 LF 2' WIDE TRICKLE CHANNEL BLANK~E"'T"'D""R"'A"'1N'"A""GE-"'EA"'s"'E"'M"'E"'N'"T.~~ - TRIC~LE c~~N:~ I RECEPTION NUMBER 2004-0072260, 07 /23/04 .._,___ __ _ -- 7 ' ' ' I ct I ;' I I ' ' ' ' ' j ' • ' ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' I '' ' • ' ' ' L---1-- ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' I I r I ' I I I I I I I I : / ' ~ I 1! I I I I ' I ' 00 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I , ' ' ' i 11.~1 ,J 1Z• l~t I I I I I I ' It,,, , (<'f I 1: I , :, I ,, ,, I I I I I,' ' ' ' . I ! I:: i I I' ~: -tr Ii: ' JI ,' 1,'j: , I 1; : I ii' I' i ' I I t ' I ' ' I I I l' : ,'I,: : I :._ I I •. : ' :1 /41 1 1 / :: ( I I I ' ' ' J.i: ' • I (, ' 'Q IC . :/'I' :' : ' ' 'Si/' ii ' I ,, ' . ' /I' : ;' r Li • fl . ' I• ' I• I ,I ,! • I I I I I I i; . I I I , I I I '1 • ' I ' ' I I I 1, ' It I I I r I :, I . ' , j 1 '1· \'l : ., I : I\ I I I J I I . '1•' '" ~·, ·1 I ~l : I "--. '-._ ,_I . I I I I 1 1 j1,., ' ' . \,' ' '. ,', '/ I , , . / ' ''- \ i I \·,~~ ' I ' I ' I '' ' , ' I \',I I l \'' \~ I •' I ' ' I '' l ' I ' ' \ ' ' ' I ' J II) I I I I /'"I " <' o • I '• ' SCALE: 1 • = 50' 40' LOT W/ COMBINED GARAGES ROW HOUSE COMBINED GARAGE NOTES: I~ N I>"0 < ' COMBINED GARAGE HOUSE 1. A SWALE SHALL BE GRADED FROM THE ROW BACK ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE AT 2.0% TO THE GARAGE . 2. THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION SHALL BE SET BY ADDING .5' TO THE ELEVATION ESTABLISHED AT THE FL-HP. 3. ALL AREAS SHALL DRAIN AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVE DETAIL AND ON THE FINISHED GRADING PLANS . 4. ALL GARAGES HAYE THE SAME TF AS THE HOUSE UNLESS OTHERIMSE NOTED. PR£PARED UNDER THE DIRECT --OF REV.1~ .l/fl'/r.~ REV.2 ·~ TIMOTHY JAf.lES HALOPOFF DAlE COLORADO P.E. NO. 37953 FOR AND ON BEHAlF OF ~ ENGINEERING BoXllldw Sanitation Dlllb let UTV.JlY Pl.AN APPAOVAL APPRO't£D: Eaat _LG~ _ ..-. =County ==Wal« --- Dlatllot - UTILITY Pl.AN APPROVAL APPROIIED: _________ _ - Larfm« and w.lcl R111rJIDlr Company UllUTY PLAN APPROVAL APPRO::/J'(~IJ' 14"1:'(f City of Fort Collin, Cola. adD UllUTY lff'ROV CHECKED APPRO CHECKED BY: -M ·- ,r. G--d 1/llt>-(- - J--J.." l'i CHECKED BY: #,!: CHECl<EO BY:~ c.z , ; µ.:i c.µ.z "z ":" , i ' 0 i • c ~ • "' ~ • ! .~ . ~ "< ' ~ !<:'! ( ' " 0 CD Cl ' "' >- 0 (/J ID <( n- }- • •, :i i1 z (.'.) ci "(<.'.' ( ) !<:'! ( :::; F :_:.:.J , .• . "- ~ • 0 1 z z ,., 0 0 (/J vi ., "5 w ' "5 w ' 1 z 0 ~ v 0 0 II) <{ '-I"') . I II '-. -:, ' z '-~ . f- 0 ~ >- w w ID _..J _..J <( <( w 0 0 0 I- w (/J if) <( z I I 0 <:> I > if) w z <( _J CL 0 c., <( - z w 0 I <( ...J a:::: c., a:<( : w I- I- <( ~ I- ...J :::) REVISEDC-3 i 8 ! s ,I §i Si ~~ !<~ £ ii bi ~ I 8 u f- -:, >- ID }- ID 0 ~ <( "0 w ' "' w 0 I 0 20J7 ' 8 lt•90.60 FG-89.90 8 6 lf-91.40 FG-90.70 A 5 TF=90.90 FG-90.20 A 4 TF=91.60 FC-89.90 A . ,- ' ' 2 1F-.as.70 fG,,,89,00 A \\ . l' '' 1 Tf..,89.30 FG•88.60 A I: , .. Ii I' H ·' 11 + "' I ' T I ' ,I IJ '1 ! 2% (MIN) VARIES (7% MIN.) -L ' 32'+ @ 4,1 MAX. 12% MNC. - I I• i 0:: 0 ~ 0:: ~ 45"-50' @ 2% « 0 z "' FINISHED ID GRADE :":' , '-' ~ // 8'+ @ 4:1 MAX'."" L.. OVE -R L OT GRAD[ @) TYPICAL "WALK-OUT" LOT NO SCALE 8 lt'"91.30 FG=90.60 B 7 33+00 34+00 ---·· t ·-·-- -- -1 ·--·---·- -+-.\- - 35+00 O') I- CV) I I w w ,, I ,,, : (f) ' ' ' (w w f) .." . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' SWITCHBACK -------- --- RD. \ - ; r-------------- 6 TF•86.70 FC-86.00 A -~ -c--f---- - ---1-- - - . ~+ y I ! .. ' L I ' g! I j I ~t ' I il ii "~1 ' I ' ' I ' ~i: -{--t·-"-..-.. ,; ' I ".- I,,.. ! ! ! ;; LEGEND • v A B G w FG TF TW 15 Tta89.00 FG,,,88.30 w 16 lt=BB.70 FG=w 88.00 17 'lF=BB.20 FG-87.50 w 18 Tf.,87.80 FG-87.10 w 19 TF~87.40 FG=-86.70 w 20 TF•86. FG=86. 0 w EXISTING PIPES & INLETS PROPOSED PIPE FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED INLET OR OUTLET STRUCTURE PROPOSED INLET LOCATION GRADING LIMIT EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1. CONTOUR PROPOSED 5• CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ANNEXATION BOUNDARY RETAINING WALL A GRADED LOT TYPE B GRADED LOT TYPE GARDEN LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE WALK OUT LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE FINISHED GRADE NOTES: 1. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY FINAL TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS MAY VARY. BUT THE GENERAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS MUST BE MAINTAINED. 2. HIGH POINTS AND FLOW ARROWS ARE SHOWN TO DEPICT DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AT THE TIME THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITS LOT CERTIFICATION. THE ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION AND THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IS GRADED PER APPROVED GRADING PLANS. 3. THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION FROM THE 100-YEAR STORM. MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ABOVE THE 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE IN STREETS, CHANNELS, DITCHES. SWALES. OR OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY A MASTER GRADING PLAN ARE TO BE SHOWN. NOJE JO CQNJBACJQR 1. TI-IE MINIMUM FINISHED GRADE ON EACH LOT, ANY'MiERE ON TI-IE LOT, SHALL BE 2% MINIMUM. 2. 'MNDOW WELLS ARE ALLOWED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, HOWEV(R DRAINAGE NEEDS TO STILL PASS ALONG SIDE LOT LINES 'MTI-IOUT INUNDATING ANY STRUCTURES. A SWALE CROSS-SECTION SHO'MNG FLOOR DEPTH PLUS FREEBOARD Will BE REQUIRED AT LOT CERTIFICATION. TOP OF FOUNDATION TOP OF RETAINING WALL SEE SHEET 38 I ' i I. I I :,/: N \'~ . \ . I \\ \ \ I . . I \ I I \ \ I I I ' I \ \ I ) '· l ,.I . I\. I I I I I f> I I I I I I . I I I I I I r i --: l , ., r---- l I ____ j l / / / \ KEY MAP N.T.S. 50 25 50 100 SCALE: 1 " 50' PREPARED UNDER lHE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF n//f{rl TIMOTHY JAMES HALOPOJT DATE COLORADO P.E. NO. 37953 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF .R ENGINEERING Boxelder Sanitation District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: -Dote East Larimer County Water District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: -Date Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: ___ H~IA~-- --D~ Dote CHECKED J/-3-;'I Dote CHECKED BY, ,t.,,11 ':-{ Parks & Recrecition O'.'. 0 LL 0 u.J [)'.'. <( CL u.l O'.'. o_ w I- < 0 >- (0 z 0 v; 5 w Cl:' z 0 0 I.() II ' ~ w ..J <i 0 (fJ I I z c., ; ~ .z ~ .... c c., i ~ z ,:: IJ.l '6 ~ ~ i .a ~ • ".~ . ' ~ -'( "-.. z w ...J <i 0 v, I > Q w <( ::t: <g: -_J ( 'SI- 0 "-.. I n -, ~ I- "-.. 0 ~ >- CD w 0 I- w <i z 0 " v; w z <( ...J 0... (z .'.) 0 <{ 0::: (.'.) ~ &1 8 ! i'75 '.~! • :' Si § I et~ g ~~, ~ ,6 ~ - .g, ,,. ~ Si I (_) I- -, )- )- CD CD 0 z w 3: <i " 0 er. w 0 I 0 SHEET 40 OF 104 JOB NO. 39145.11 C-3 2037 LEGEND D • v A B G w FG TF TW ~ \ \ I EXISTING PIPES & INLETS PROPOSED PIPE FLARED END SECTION -~ @- PROPOSED INLET OR OUTI..ET STRUCTURE PROPOSED INLET LOCATION GRADING LIMIT EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ANNEXATION BOUNDARY RETAINING WALL A GRADED LOT TYPE B GRADED LOT TYPE GARDEN LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE WALK OUT LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE FINISHED GRADE TOP OF FOUNDATION TOP OF RETAINING WALL 25 lF•88.70 FG-88.00 23 lF•88.20 FG-87.50 B G---f~ ,"- ' 1 TF•90.60 FC-89.90 A 30 TF•S0.30 FG-119.60 A 31 lF-89.80 F'G-89.10 A 33 lF•89.10 F'G-88.40 34 lF•88.80 FG-88.10 LIMITS OF GRADING DRIP LINE Sil T FENCE ANO LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FENCE SEE DETAILS SHEET 94 NOTES: 1. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHD'ltN ARE FDR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS MAY VARY, BUT THE GENERAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS MUST BE MAINTAINED. 2. HIGH POINTS AND FLOW ARROWS ARE SHOWN TO DEPICT DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AT 1liE TIME 1liE CONTRACTOR SUBMITS LOT CERTIFICATION. THE ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION AND THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT IS GRADED PER APPROVED GRADING PLANS. 3. THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION FROM THE 100-YEAR STORM. MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ABOVE THE 100-YEAR WATER SURF ACE IN STREETS, CHANNELS, DITCHES, SWALES, OR OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY A MASTER GRADING PLAN ARE TO BE SHOWN. NOJE m mNJB!GIPR 1. THE MINIMUM FlNISHEO GRADE ON EACH LOT, ANY\11-iERE ON THE LOT, SHALL BE 2% MINIMUM. 2. WINDOW WELLS ARE ALLOWED IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, HOWEVER ORAINAGE NEEDS TO STILL PASS ALONG SIDE LOT LINES WITHOUT IN UNO A TING ANY STR\JClllRES. A SWALE CROSS-SECTION SHOWING FLOOR DEPTH PLUS FREEBOARD WILL BE REQUIRED AT LOT CERTIFICATION. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' t, I ' ' i ' ' ': ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' l l ' I I ' ' I ' I I • ' ' ' • : • I I . I • ' ' ' I 'I ' ,' . . . . ' I ' I ' ' " " ,, : I I ' I i..I ' ' ~ ' ' I ,,, , I I I : I I I ' I : • I I I ~l ~i ..I ' . J;6 r~ i~ I Cl I I i5 ii: t I • ' I ' I I I I I I 0 50 I- """' w w I (f) w w (f) 31+00 32+00 33+00 I---- ---1-- - --- +----- -+- - --"f'---+----- t ·--·- · ---- + ~t o' ll lF•88.50 F0-87.80 A ' I T I al o, ' ~1 +- I o r cf I SEE SHEET 43 ,,11 , , ,: ' ' ' ' sv.,· ---- - r----- 1 i=•.<!.. Jt I ·~ I ·.·.·.' ·n· ' . . ' ._. '. ; SCALE: 1" ~ KEYMAP N.T.S . 50 100 50' tif,'1/• TIMOTHY JAMES HALOPOFF DA TE COLORADO P.E. NO. 37953 FOR ANO ON BEHALF OF .R ENGIN£ERING Boxelder Sanitation District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: __ _:===--- -Date East Larimer County Water District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: ________ _ -Oote lcrimer ond Weld Reservoir Company UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVE:µ~4/t,(_ &#/ft APP RO CHECKED CHECKE BY: BY: £ '""'"' " lt-'"0\NA J "";[jj,L :t, - Stormwoter tltlty Dote JI-S-t!fl Dote j/jJf)/,1.f ' 6ate CHECKED BY: //,/,A "'.'!/ Porks & R.e<:reaU,;in (}:' 0 LL n w n.:: <{ Q_ w rt' Q_ >- CD z 0 (/) 5 w a:: z 0 0 l[J , II ~ w -' <( u v, I :r c.z , ;: ~ .z z c.~ ..., . i ~ ~ ~ I ~: ~ . j ~ ~ <{ '-.. z w -' <( u (/) I > 0 w <( :r: .....I <( ~ v 0 ....:.:..:..:..:., .._ . 11- -I· , 0 >- ru w Cl I- <( 0 w z (,!) Ul w z <( _J Q_ c., z 0 <( 0::: c., i 8 ~ "' ~, ~~ u:• '. ! I Ii~ ~t·l ci M § i~f u I- -, >- w >- w 0 ~ w er <( "0 w ' 0 :r () CHECKED BY: ~JI.- CHECKED BY: ;n,Ji~,.- --- 0"'•"'•·-·• SHEET 39 OF 104 ~YJ!6 11-fl.(I/, Date JOB NO. 39145.11 C-3 NO SCALE I ~ ' ' \ \ \ \ r61+zr \ o' 1t ,,., I \~ j ij ~ ' : ' J ' ' J ' J J I I I I l ,G 1/l l g\ +-I r gl I T I ' : ' ' I ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ·1 I J ' ' ' ' ' I J I I ' ' I ' I ' I J J J I I I ' I LEGEND - -· --- -- -- ·"- =- D --• v -- A B G w FG TF EXISTING PIPES & INLETS PROPOSED PIPE FLARED END SECTION ~ ----®- ------- PROPOSED INLET OR OUTLET STRUCTURE PROPOSED INLET LOCATION GRADING LIMIT EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR ANNEXATION BOUNDARY RETAINING WALL A GRADED LOT TYPE B GRADED LOT TYPE GARDEN LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE WALK OUT LEVEL GRADED LOT TYPE FINISHED GRADE TOP OF FOUNDATION TW TOP OF RETAINING WALL • I . ..------... +I -:::r--.,;. 2 rr-86.30 FG-85.80 w 10 lF•87.10 FG-86.'40 I A , 8 -11"- •90.,. .. -60 - LIMITS OF GRAOING DRIP UN£ SILT FENCE AND LIMITS OF" CONSlRUCTION FENCE SEE DETAILS SHEET 94 N01£S: 1. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS MAY VARY, BUT THE GENERAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS MUST BE MAINTAINED. 2. HIGH POINTS AND FLOW ARROWS ARE SHOWN TO DEPICT DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS AT THE TIME THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITS LOT CERTIFICATION. 11-JE ENGINEER WILL VERIFY THE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION AND THAT EACl-i ,ilDIVIDUAL LOT IS GRADED PER APPROVED GRADING PLANS. 3. 11-JE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION FROM THE 100-YEAR STORM. MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVA TlON ABOVE THE 100-YEAR WATER SURF ACE IN STREETS, CHANNELS, DITCHES, SWALES. OR OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES AS ILLUSTRATED BY A MASTER GRADING PLAN ARE TO BE SHOWN. NQ1E TO GCMlRWTI 1. THE MINIMUM FlNISHEO GRADE ON EACH LOT. ANYY,1,ER£ ON THE LOT. SHALL BE 2% MINIMUM. 2. WINDOW WELLS ARE ALLOWl:O IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, HOWEVER DRAINAGE NEEDS TO STILL PASS ALONG SIDE LOT UNES WITHOUT INUNDATING ANY STRUCTURES. A SWALE CROSS-SECTION SHOWING FLOOR DEPTH PLUS FREEOOARD "'1LL BE REQUIRED AT LOT CERTIFlCA TION. KEYMAP N.T.S. 50 -25 -SCALE: 0 - 1" = 50 50' 100 PREPARED UNDER lHE DIRECT SUP£R\1SION OF TIMOTHY JAMES HALOPOFF COLORADO P.E. NO. 3795J 11.• /OAT£ ri/6,f FOR AND ON BEHAI.F OF ..R ENGINEERING Boxe!der Sanitation District UTILITY Pl.AN APPROVAL APPROVED: ________ _ -Date East Larimer County Water District UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: ____- _____ _ Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED· AL Y: ,\J,4- Woter &: Wastewater lllity CHECKED BY: Stormwoter £1.& Utility J:44 CHECKED BY: A// A 4/ Parks & Recreation /1/I )oo..\/e /~ ).,!~ ... !.d ~- Oo<• J/-.1-Dote t?'I IIM,.., Dote - O'.: 0 LL 0 w ();' <( 0... Lil !Y 0.. l:=' <( 0 ;,- (D z 0 if) 5 u.J Q:'. c5 z 0 l!) II ' ~ w _, <( 0 (/) I I -··· ·-· .<....( ._ z w _J <( 0 (/) I > Cl w <( I ...J <( ~ .... st .0 ....._ CC) I -:, ..~ ...._ I- 0 ,w _ <( 0 ;,- (D 0 w z C) (w 7) z <( __J CL (z .'.) 0 <( O:'.'. (.'.) (.) I- , ;,- (D ;,- Ill i <( "0 0 w ' Q:'. w D I () Dot• SHEET 38 OF 104 11-cr.:w JOB NO. 39145.11 C-3 2037 75.9 TOS=75.2 20.0' 75.2 CONC. DRIVE i; ~t tF5"47'46 1 R=306.71' L=31.03' -10.---0% - ~1 75.3 HP SETBACKS 74.5 FG 73.4 EOA 73.3 EOA TRACT N ALLEY 20 10 0 I I I 20 1. 5702 ARCHITECTURAL HOUSE PLANS DATED 07 /01 /08 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" 20' 2. 5702 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION PLANS PLOT DATE 01 /23/08 3. SETBACKS ARE PER TRAIL HEAD FINAL DEV. PLAN DATED: 10/13/04 4. UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHOWN ARE PER DESIGN (NOT AS-BUil T) AND SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION JOB NUMBER: 39145.38 DATE: 06 /9 /2015 SUBDl~SION: _T_R_A_IL~H_E _AD~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LOT: 2 BLOCK : 17 ADDRESS: 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE CITY /COUNTY: FORT COLLINS/ LARIMER MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT: 20' GARAGE / 15' BUILDING REAR: 8' SIDE: _ 5'_ CORNER: 15' NOTE: FRONT SETBACKS MEASURED FROM BACK OF WALK NOTE: 1. BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLOT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL AND FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT. REFER TO APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS. 2. THE DRAINAGE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS PLOT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL, MODIFICATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF THE FINISHED SITE. ~ JR ENGINEERING A Westrian Company Centerrial 303-740-9393 • Colorado SJJrgs 7'9-593-2593 FD1 Cdn; 970-491-~ • www·r L_ -, CONC. DRIVE I I I -1 I -===EDGE =OF =ASPHALT =~~~~,~~=6=5"-I 47'46n =-~====-- R=306.71' IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE L=31.03' TRACT N ALLEY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED FOR TRITON COMMUNITIES OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 2, BLOCK 17, TRAIL HEAD, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO; (PER CLIENT) ALSO KNOWN AS 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE. AND THAT IT IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, AND THAT IT IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER FUTURE IMPROVEMENT LINES. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE JUNE 22, 2016, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER SUBDIVISION PLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 20 10 0 LEGEND : I n 10.9% n: I / 74.o ORIGINAL SCALE: 1'' W- WELL WINDOW WELL :V AVG. V: I I DOWN SPOUT I I I I I 72.9 I I I ==~~~~~,~~~~~ EDGE OF ASPHALT 72.4 tFS.4714611 R=306.71' L=31.03' TRACT f\J AL U:. Y 20 20' THE PROPER TY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 2, BLOCK 17, TRAIL HEAD, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO; (PER CLI ENT) ALSO KNOWN AS 3209 GREEN LAKE DRIVE. DRAINAGE CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THE ELEVATIONS AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS SHOWN WERE DEVELOPED FROM SURVEYING THE PROPERTY ON JUNE 22, 2016 AND ACCURATELY DEP ICT THE ELEVATIONS EXISTING DURING THE SURVEY. THE ELEVATIONS MAY CHANGE SUBSEQUENT TO THE SURVEY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE, UPHEAVAL, EROSION, ACTS OF MAN OR OTHER FACTORS. THEREFORE, TH IS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT THE ELEVATIONS AND DRAINAGE PATTERN AFTER THE DATE OF SURVEY. TH E UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/SURVEYOR, CERTIFY I HAVE INSPECTED THE SURVEY DATA AND HAVE CONCLUDED THE LOT WI LL DRAIN ADEQUATELY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE OVERALL SUBDIVISION DRAINAGE PLAN AND INDIVIDUAL LOT GRADING PLAN . BY: KURTIS W. WILLIAMS, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER COLORADO P.E. NO. 34270 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF JR ENGINEERING, LLC