HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 02/05/2016a-s-)b
Project Name: 2107 South College Avenue C"r" K` VA'L�
Date: 2016 �-(/
Building Permit Numbers: B1503145
(Commercial or mufti -family)
Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Volume 1, Section 6.11, please fill in
all applicable items in this Certification Form for Commercial, Multi -Family and Overall Single Family sites.
NOTE: several items must be verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be
submitted with the as -built grading plan. (As -built elevations must be written in red next to the approved
elevations.)
• Use "Yes" for items completed as described.
• Use "N/A" for items that are not applicable to the site being certified.
• If any blanks are "No," attach an explanation referencing the item number below.
Attach an explanation or description of the as -built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but
shown on the approved construction plans.
Provide an as -built redline or Mylar drawing with the following:
I. Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Certification - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.10
For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately:
A. Volume: NIA As -built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and
volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage
volume.
1. NIA Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state
of Colorado.
2. NIA Both proposed and as -built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for
proposed and solid lines for as -built).
3. NIA All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and
the as -built elevations are shown on the plan sheet.
q NIA Stage -storage -discharge tables are provided on a separate document.
S. N/A Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92-
602(g) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal
(tinvurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include:
a. The cover sheet from the approved drainage report
b. The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report
c. As -built topographic survey
d. Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification
e. PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet
12/15
Page 1
B. Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: N/A Attached is as -built verification that there is
a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of
the detention pond. If there is a "soft pan" in the flow -line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2%
grade requirement.
1. Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable:
a. NIA Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin.
There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow -lines) of the detention basin. The flattest as -built grade
is -
b. NIA Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin.
There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction
plans. (Show as -built spot elevations.)
C. N/A Soft pan for low flow in detention basin.
• Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified
during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineers statement of
visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.)
o NIA There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved
construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations,
bends, cleanouts, etc.)
o NIA There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil
type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical
engineer.
NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-.
2. Side Slopes: N/A The as -built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown.
Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed
is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re-
graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process.
3. Spillway Certification: The following items must be field verified:
a, N/A The location of the spillway is indicated on the as -built plan.
b. NIA The width of the spillway is indicated on the as -built plan.
C. NIA The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as -built plan.
d. NIA A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway.
e. NIA There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate
type: - (riprap size "D50" gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried
riprap with inches of bury, etc.).
f. NIA There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape
features, rocks, etc.
12115 Page 2
4.Outlet Structure Certification
a. WA The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of
the orifice.
b. WA The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of
rows and columns of holes.
c- WA The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate
so no water ponds in front of the plate.
d. WA The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans.
e. WA 100-year overflow grate elevation is ' . (Elev. A on detail D-46)
f. WA The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is - . (Elev. 8 on detail
D-46)
& WA Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the
top and bolted at the bottom.
h. WA The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain
runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet.
It. Channels/Swales - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sect.3&4
A. Capacity: WA The as -built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet
or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project.
1. NIA All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans.
2. NIA Longitudinal slopes and side -slopes (cross -sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires
longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side -slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these
criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each
instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and
are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed.
3. NIA As -built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations
shown on the approved construction plans.
4. NIA All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction
plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used
as part of this verification.)
5. NIA All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the
system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.)
6. WA The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved
construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on
the cross -sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.)
7. NIA The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees,
shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.)
12115 Page 3
Asbuilts not provided or reviewed by
Civil Engineer, however, storm
construction has been verified by
III. Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Vol.l. Ch.6, Sec. 4 Contractor to have been constructed
per approved construction plans.
A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: Yes The as -built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been
verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study forthis
project.
y Yes All storm drainpipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the
approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.)
Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was
changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply
them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity
equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size.
2. Yes The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The
acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans
must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet.
3. Yes The as -built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of
the approved construction plans.
B. Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: Yes All pipes are installed in accordance with the
approved construction plans.
1. Yes The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved
construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations.
2. Yes All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met.
3. NIA Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans
have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.)
Per Contractor, all concrete pans have been
Concrete Pans - FCSCM VoLl, Ch.7. Sec.4.1.3.4 constructed per the City Inspector. Pans may deviate
slightly from approved construction plans.
A. Construction/Installation: Yes All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans.
1. Yes The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans.
2. Yes The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The
certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless
a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or
justification by separate document.
3. Yes The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross-
section is "V" shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.)
4. Yes The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4
inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide
documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved
construction plans.)
5. Yes The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as -
built drawings.
12/15 Page 4
V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 3
A.Construction/Installation: NIA All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans.
1. NIA The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction
plan. Indicate by writing "Verified" on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the
inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is otherthan the one on the approved
construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or
better capacity.
2 NIA _ The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.)
3. NIA The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as
indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans.
q NIA The as -built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan
and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide
justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation.
S. NIA The as -built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or
justification is attached.
6. NIA All inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following designation: NO DUMPING— DRAINS
TO POUDRE RIVER.
VI. culverts - FCSCM Voi2, Ch.9
A. Construction/Installation: NIA All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with
the approved construction plans.
1. NIA All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as -built construction plans as correct.
2. N/A The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is
indicated on the as -built plans.
3. NIA The as -built invert "in and out' elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as -built
construction plans.
4. NIA The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as -built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to
the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative.
An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM).
l Asbuilts not provided or reviewed by Civil Engineer; however, storm construction has
VII. sub -Drains been verified by Contractor to have been constructed per approved construction plans.
A. Construction/Installation: Yes All sub -drains shown on the construction plans have been installed In
accordance with those plans. Sub -drains installed with the sanitary sewer are to be verified on the
sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE: Indicate any sub -drains installed
after the plans were approved on the as -built plans.)
1. Yes The size of the sub -drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as -
built plans.
2. Yes The type of sub -drain, in particular the perforated and non -perforated sections of the drain, are
as indicated on the approved construction plans.
12115 Page 5
3. Yes The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided.
4. Yes The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are
accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations
marked.)
5. Yes The backfill materials forsub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This
includes the type, depth and width.)
6. Yes The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub -drain and the permeable backfill material unless
shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub -drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material
is accepted only if approved prior to installation.)
Vill. Curb Cuts
A. Construction: WA All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction
plans.
1. NIA The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans.
2. NIA The curb cut openings tie into a downstream Swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth
transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb
cut.
IX. Sidewalk Culverts & Chases
A. Construction/Installation: NIA All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the
approved construction plans.
1, NIA The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans.
2. NIA The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the
detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City's detail.
3. NIA The sidewalk culvert invert "in and out" elevations have been verified and are indicated on the
as -built plans.
q NIA The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City's
detail.
5. NIA There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no
obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert.
See attached Grading Plan Asbuilt and approvals of grading
X. site Grading L deviations from the owner/developer and City Inspector.
A. Construction: Yes All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved
construction plans.
1. Yes The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and
the as -built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as -built plans.
12115 Page 6
2. NIA The as -built contours for "overlot grading" are shown on the as -built construction plans for all
common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the
situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be
required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site
Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is
backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.)
3. WA All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans and the slopes are stabilized.
XI. Riprap - FCSCM Vol. 1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3
A. Construction: NIA All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved
construction plans.
XII. Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.l, Ch.7
A. Construction: NIA All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved
construction plans.
1. NIA All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans.
XIII. Post -Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.7
A. Construction: Yes All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from
drainage paths.
1. Yes All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s).
2 Yes All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas.
3. Yes All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been
coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note
the area needing stabilization in the narrative.
XIV. Certification of other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8. Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2 Ch.12
A. N/A The construction of channel drop structures is in accordance with the approved plan both in
location, horizontal dimensions and cross-section.
XV. Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.4
A. Yes Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and
other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation.
12115 Page 7
XVI. Certification and Erosion Control Measures
A. All temporary erosion control measures shall be removed upon stabilization. If at the time of preparing
this certification there are any erosion control measures still remaining on the site, please note them in
the narrative and verify that they need to remain at this time. If in doubt as to the need for any control
measure, please consult with the Erosion Control Inspector at 970-221-6700.
XVII. Statement of Compliance
A. This certification is signed and stamped. By signing this form, the engineer(s) attests that he/she has
visited and observed the site, and to the best of his/her knowledge, the as -built conditions of the drainage
facilities are as described in the above form and in the enclosed as -built plans.
B. Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and
prevent the release of any and all Stormwater Utility permit holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates
of Occupancy within this development.
)Mll. Signature and Stamp by a Colorado -Registered Professional Engineer
Engineers contact information:
Name: Erin L. Griffin, PE
Email: edn.griffn@kimley-horn.wm
Phone: 303-228-2307
Company: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Address: 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500
Denver, CO 80237
PE Stamp
Sign and date
Cltyof
Fort Collins
12/15 Page 8
. . .
z
u°
d
U 6 w S
v
m
a
N
N
N
10
a
r
V
u
c
u
U
an
c
Y
u
O
L
d
i+
C
.0
ro
Gl
a
N
Y
C
N
£
d
V
Q
1
d
yA
Y
E
a
c
0
m
Y
c
m
o
�
Z
N
Z
_O
}
"O
O
m N
C
N
\
m
C
00
—
O
3 c
v
a
J
m
m
c
c
`
N
GI
�Q+I
N Y
N
Vcl
n
N
C
c
u
c
Om
d
v
3
E
O
O
O Y
U A
U
d
N
U
g
y
O
U
t5
m
u
u u
O
c
a
m
u
n
3
o
A
ao-
O
m
w
w
o
N
E
a
w
"O
v
,c,
m
w
w
*
L
c
v
N
O
p
N
f
O
w
O N
N
V
a
a
a
to
M
_
v
H
01
An
C
U a
a
C J
w
d
71
L
£
N
0
y
V
O
M
u
Y
m
a
Y
Yi
L
O1
C00
O
Y
is
v
H
i
w
2
w
U
Y- L
C
N
O
W
C
L
y0,
Y
3
Y
W
[t
it
`I
Y
v
a
J
Y
a>
Y
r
to
O
C +_'
'
N
G1
N
3
a
C
E
C
C
N
H
O
N
U
h0
tt
G/
y n
tp
U a
Y y.
N
E
U
c m
C
C
C
C
Y
N
O
d
U
N
y
ry
N
i
Z
:_
m
N
J
O. Q
L E
O
___
w
U
W
w
N
N
Y 1_
O Ul
Y
�'
.. Iap
4!
G!
OJ
.�
?t
C
O
w
c
Q
u
d
o.
>
N�
._
o
C
._
H
m w
Q c
aU+
>
m
m
m«
y
E
o
c
c
'EL
u
c
c
c
`
o
E
'-' q
"
>
Y
c
O
Gl
N
N
O1
aui
O.
W
O
N
O
Y
Y
m
m
y
m N
u
Y
,J..
fO �'
,}n
E
x�
U
o
LL
o
y
p_
Q
E
E
E
ac, v
N
�
vY,
o
o
v
v
v °'
c
m w
v v
�.
�' �
�
a u
+N•
v
o +«
a
a
n
y
w
c
c
c A
m�
a rco
u u
a o
E
E
E¢¢
w
m
m
u
u>>>
3
vi £
a°
D c
a
r,
N
U
c
O
.Y
c
v
v
O
v
w
E
o
0
n
o
o
i
+'
0
O
C
(p
0
O
Y
C
Y
w
O
E
C_
.e
w
L
U
�
c
N
0
>
i
c
Q
3
o-
v
o
�
a
n
v \
v
0
�°
v n
�
p
a
`0 3
0
Y
U Y
V
n
n
a
w
E
0
e0
3
0
0
O
N m
H
01
C
o
L
d
L
2
L
d
CO
G °U
G V
Q
C
O
Z
y
N
m
C
m
O
N
O
m
N
w
c
E
m Y
N
c
3
m
O
N
C
u
c
C
"O
w
Y
L O
u Y
u
�F
w
vl
E
L
U
M
N
m
C
w
C C
U
1
O
m
Y
a
N
v
0
a
v
m 3
a
`c
,
a
N
o
v
Lto
v
c
O
m
O
N°
N
°y
U
W
'Y
t
i+
a
m N
m
C
O
'O
u
'o
a
w
L
h •�
`
u
N
u
>
>
>
Y o_
w
c
1 n
c
u
a
3
.01.
«
m
°
w
`m
O c
O
m
U
o
O
N
n
v
O
w
m
a
t o
0
'^ v
o
m
c
a
y
w
"O
'i+
'^
"O
Y
>
L
N
a
N
%
N
N
N
"O
w>
ii C
O`
V
O
3
L
w
�'
O!
O,
O
't
m
a
C
N
0
n
°u
C in
4!
—w E
w
O
�"
U
°c
'O
=
n
w
h
a
°'
g t
v-
u
u`
't
v
m
n,
c
m
to
.N
m
O
>
m
.
N
O
O
n c
> C
w\
w
'�
=
m ry
c-
E
m
�o
e�
0`i
w`
fl-
u
u
d
.n
.�
c
w
n
O
c
C
C
0
0
o
m m
0.
E
"-'
'c
w
.m
0c
Y
3
3 E
'0
.�
w
w
a
a
E
E
0
0
0 c
m
E
E
E
n
o'
o
v
a
v
o
o
c0
E
u c
w e
w
N
m
m
,°—
c
a
n
v
v
m
v
a
v«
°u
Y
S w
m
m
w
O n
O u
LL
W
O
�¢
u
U»>
3
O
Y
a
v
N
j
c
M
c
0
i
v
f0
0
E «.
•
d Y
a
Y m
m v
L 1
Y C
'ry
N C
7 ry
c E
m �
L S
4i N
da
Z Y
� w
�
W
�
�
o
O
+-
c
a
0
O
O
N
Y
.o
a
—
—
a
c
u
4-
N
N
m
a
w
u
v
a
�
�
N
T
O
C
wo
L
N
O
N
L
C
N
-p
�>
C
j�
5
Y
C
a
a
E
C
U
O
a
C
d
N
-
G
0
r
O\
o
N
C
O
C
t
Y
0
E
Z
a
N
Y
G
O
w
N
o
N
'c
•-
vYi
M
y
v
o
a
p
I
c
a
a�
�
c
3
m
u—
a,
c
N
m
u
a
a
a
E
N
N
E
v
E
m
E
a
E
m
m
.4
fo '-'
Y
v v
oCL
LL
LL
LL
U
m
lL
a
r
7 L
3
tY0
c
E
Z
Y
~
E
W
c
o
L
a
m
m
O.
y
oa
o
�n
v
U)
O
oV
up
LL
m
a
c
v
E
a
cr
c
_cm
E
N
a
m
a
A
c
0
c
m
Yo
6.
Y
y
w
C
C
d
E
>
>
O
p
c
Z
O
x
y
Z
x
c
x
c
0)u°
c
o
v
,�
Z"
d
x
c
x
to
m
O
>
u
M
£
}
yX
N
x
X
(U
X
x
X
x
X
1
Q
x
X
x
x
U
O,
E
'0
C
c
O
—
oD
u
c
v
o
m
O
p
C
0
3
v
v>
o
a
v
u
-0a)
@
Y
C
Y'o
N
E
U
`
C
^
v
c
y
u
v
v
c
o
-0
v
a)'o
o-
r
o
y
OD
j
Ul
u
O
N
X
7
O
Y
D
O
fya
O
v
v
u
w
v
3tLo
v
U
L
u
V U
o
c
u
a
-�o
-
E
o-
c
u
0)
a�
-0
-o
v .c
hD0
w
v
in
U
al
r i
a,
O
b
0_
O
@
C
N
E
m
O
L
y
al
O-
yO
N
h m
Y
VI
y O
a) .y
Y
Ql
U
al
O
-6
Vl
`
v
VI
C
a
V
VI
v
.0
Ql
C V
y
VI
°
y
fl
'Lr-v
O
y
#
y=
a E v
.
`D
E
E
m
a
D
y
3
a>
au
c
v
v
'�
Yt
in
C C
v
C
C_
v
C_
a/
c
M
c
�n
0
r=
y
OD
nl
_.5
y ,F
E
---
O.
v
-
N
Z
.`
v v
y
al
'C L/
O v- 6
U
O
'p,
u
v>
�n
O
y
C
4i
i
v
O v
v
y
> w
S)
n
a
C
rL
'a
O
C
C
C
p
U
D.
CO
U>
'm
h
E
i
rr
u
a1)i
w
of )i
b
o
y
.�..
�
3
u
,'�°
M no u
E a
a
x°
E
E
E
N
o
o
-o
o
m
N
v o
m u
v ---
ai
-0
'a
c
w
v
v �
o
"
M ,a
`a v
a
E
t
a`)
a`)
v
O
ns
c
N
-O
v
U-0
v
v
n E
d O "'
d
0
0
v
v
vO
o
u u c
vy O
ar
O o
E
E
E
c
y
c
c
c c
m
v�
o
j
.+
d
�Quu>>>
D
ED
n$
a c
Griffin, Erin
From:
Robert Mosbey <rmosbey@fcgov.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 06, 2016 10:25 AM
To:
Wayne Lenard; 'bryan.cooley@mccauleyconstructors.com'
Cc:
Griffin, Erin
Subject:
RE: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
Based on the constraints of the existing curb and gutter and stairs section the sidewalk can be accepted that it was
constructed to the maximum extent feasible. In addition, it does appear that there's a section of 4' wide sidewalk that
would meet the 2%cross-slope and would meet our PROWAG requirements for accessibility.
Therefore, they can proceed with lot certification.
Rob V. Mosbey
Chief Consbucbm Inspector
nnosbey(cQfcoov C=
(970) 221-6659 (office)
(970) 21 "587 (cell)
From: Wayne Lenard
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:39 AM
To: Robert Mosbey
Subject: Fwd: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
Sen! from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTG DROID
--- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
From: Bryan Cooley <bryan.cooley(d),,mccauleyconstructors.com>
To: Wayne Lenard <wlenard(r_),fcgov.com>
CC:
Wayne,
I am currently in a meeting in Timnath. I am unable to make loam meet at Thomas English. Please call me with your
thoughts regarding grade.
Thankyou,
Bryan Cooley
Superintendent
McCauley Constructors Inc.
P.O. Box 200
650 Innovation Circle
Windsor, Colorado 80550
970 1 6866300 Office
970 1686-6320 Fax
970 1 4206441 Mobile
www.mccauleyconstructors.com
From: Wayne Lenard [mailbo:w1enard0fcnovcoml
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 7:16 AM
To: Bryan Cooley
Subject: RE: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
Bryan
will be out there at 10,,00 am with a level and see how far out this is if it is to steep does not look like a very long stretch
let me know if you can make that thanks Wayne
From: Bryan Cooley [mailto:brvan.mole (c�mccaulevconstructors.coml
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:37 PM
To: Wayne Lenard
Cc: Russell Duve
Subject: FW: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
Wayne,
Per our conversation this moming, please see attached As -Built regarding the >2% cross slope out front of Mattress Firm
(Thomas English). Per our discussion would you please send an acceptance email to Erin Griffin below as to
proceed/complete Lot Cert. erin.ariffinCaillkimlev-hom.com
Thank you so much for your help in this matter...
Happy New Year!
Bryan Cooley
Superintendent
McCauley Constructors Inc.
P.O. Box 200
650 Innovation Circle
Windsor, Colorado 80550
970 16864" Office
970 1686-6320 Fax
9701420-6"1 Mobile
wvom mccaul eyconstructo rs. com
From: enn.ariffin(akimlev-hom.com rmailto:erin.ariffin(o)kimlev-hom.com
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 2:12 PM
To: ieremiahloPlat40ols.com
Cc: kvlerPlat40ols.com: brianr(a)lat40Dls.com: Bryan Cooley
Subject: RE: 2107 5 College Ave -Drainage Report
Jeremiah -
Thank you for the follow-up grades/slopes. Attached is my review.
Bryan -
There are still 2 cross slope issues on the sidewalk along College. Has the City signed off on the public sidewalk with
cross slopes greater than 2%. 1 can not sign off on the certification unless I have confirmation from the City that they
accept the >2% cross slope and from Thomas English that they accept the grades at the NW and SW corners of the
building that drain towards the building. Please let me know on the couple of outstanding issues above.
Thank you.
Erin L. Griffin, P.E. (CO), CPESC
Kimley44om 14582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237
Direct: 303-228-2307 1 Mobile: 720-979-85971 www.lunlev-han.com
From: Jeremiah Burroughs[mailto:ieremiahbCdlat4Opls.coml
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 3:50 PM
To: Griffin, Erin <erin.griffint@idmlev-hom.com>
Cc: Kyle Rutz <kylerOIat4Opls.com>; Brian Rottinghaus <brianr(allat40pls.com>; Bryan Cooley
<brva n.coolev@mccauleyconstructors.com>
Subject: 2107 S College Ave -Drainage Report
Good Afternoon Erin,
Attached is the newly revised Asbuilt Drainage Site Certificate. We had a crew go out to the site and check
your questions using a Level. We've added more information and updated others.
Please take a look and let us know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Jeremiah Burroughs
Lat40°, Inc.
Professional Land Surveyors
6250 W. 10th St, Unit #2
Greeley, CO 80634
0:970-515-5294
www.lat40pls.com
0 Lot4at40', Inc
Professional Land Surveyors
6W. 10th St, Unit 2
Greeley, CO 80634
0: 970-515-5294
ASBUILT DRAINAGE SITE NOTES
1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE RELATIVE TO PROJECT
BENCHMARK CP-13 PROVIDED BY KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT ELEV= 5007.09
THE NAVD 1988 ELEVATION FOR CPA 3 IS 5012.66
2. ADD 5000 TO ALL ASBUILT AND PROPOSED SPOT
ELEVATION.
3. ASBUILT ELEVATIONS ARE REPRESENTED IN RED.
4. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS WERE GIVEN BY KIMLEY-
HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GRADING & DRAINAGE
KEYNOTES.
5. ASBUILT ELEVATIONS WERE TAKEN DECEMBER 16,
2015
ABBREVIATIONS
BUD COR
BUILDING CORNER
CO
CLEAN OUT
EOP
EDGE OF PAVER
FL
FLOWLINE
SW
SIDEWALK
TOA
TOP OF ASPHALT
TBC
TOP BACK OF CURB
Kyle E. Rutz -On behalf of Lat40', Inc.
Colorado Licensed Professional
Land Surveyor No. 38307
ASBUILT DRAINAGE SITE CERTIFICATE
23
TOWNSHI
TOWNSHIP: 7N
2107 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE
RANGE:69W
ALL OF LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BANKCENTER SQUARE FIRST FILING
LARIMER COUNTY, Ca
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
10.06 8.05 9.61 NO 9.74
5.85
5.41
9.99 9.27 7.94 9.50 EX.WALL 9.50
FL
5.38
F 9.18 FL gyp SW
LIP
FIL
10.86
-.
4.54
10.90
g 80
9.60
5.48
FL
FIL
10.41 9.53 ® 8.94 9.68
-(�8.97 9.51
5.48
10.83
10.37 .SW
9.46 8.67 SW Z T
FL
10. F9
8.75
.. CO ° 9.19
7.13
°
IL
9F70 8.85 9.55
8.00
5.10
q 2
FL 19 29 8.9.69 39 BLD COR BLD
�9.92 TOA FL'
COR
TBC
4.16
FIL
9.16 .
`9.81 8.90
FL
4'.20�
11.91
CO CO 10.32
TBC
4.74
FL
a 10.21
TBC
v
4.57
BLD CDR REVISION COMPLETED
FL
9.S8 DECEMBER 21,
2015
2.7%
FL
4.67
a
5.18
17.18
11.29
10.21
`TOA 5'
f L
10'
TBC
10.54 •
FL
f EDP
10.11 A Al1U
5.24
5.73
44.4% °
10.03 10.41 2�1 10.52 2107 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE
SW580
�-
5.36
514
EDP FL
10.50 FORT COLLINS. CO
TBC
FL
10.51 SW
°
° .
10.52
Talc 10.52 10.50
'6.10
5.67
12 74
10.50 FINISHED FLOOR
_ ; -
d13C
5.45
FL
SW ELEVATION
°
FL
10.47 �
°
10.41 - 2.6 10.41
6.29
1r
10.88 FL 4. TBC
/-
78
°
11.46 i TOA 5.5'
SW
Q°
11.97
v
11.95
C0�
12.35 a°'
12.38 10.49
13.23
SW 10.47
12.50
13.19
10.37 a SW 11.
12.47 °
FL
Fri FL 7
SY100.4411.91
°
10.05 7
) 1013
12.72 97 1010 SW
12.83 4 10.10 CO 10.41
FL TBC
8.05
FL 10.40
9.00
13.75
12.65 11.45 10.23 10.50 BLD
COR
` a
6.79
13.76
11.36 10.11 BLO COR
12.92 12.61 .41
7.58
7.39
,3g
6.69
SW
12.99 SIN F 10.41 ° a
SW
dam"
dam"
F
.
'11.371U.43 °
` A.
a
G-2 Q%
0 t5
° a ° 11.3fp ° _ d SW44 .a '
.°
4 A
13.91 13.10 10.55 ® 9.20
°
8.00
7.78
a
= 15
13.82 12.96 12.62 11.44 10.50 10.36 9.34
11.512
7.84
7.49
a
SW SW 5W67
SW 1SW40 SW
SW
SW
°
DATE: 12/21/2015
PROJECT/: 2015091