HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 05/14/2002FROM Scott Cox & Associates.Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660
"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CLIENT
LEGAL
May. 10 2002 07:08A11 P1 ill
it
ae-
consulting engineers
D • 5:-L>- C2—
ISP.
GRADING PLAN: _ SST T-- 342- oocd I! -19-00
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed cicvations were Compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above. During our observations ourreprescntativcmeasumd the relative cicvations at the lotsides
and corner;, top of foundation, and lowest openings, Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the shove noted Chuding Plan.
fif The cicvations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
It is our opinion these exceptions, noted above, should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
El During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan. however, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grafting scheme.
See the attached "As -Built' grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan. Deficiencies include.
Other comments and/or observations:
ems' �7C.lc� Coy-tD. *1 I�aflScaP,,.iG,
LAT �'yrtoCC.�Pj Cf-A -
Limitations:
it is our opinion that the subject lot, as graded on the above date, should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
arc changed or barriers are created such!V%m•en terracing, sidewalks, and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by dive xtf ' ,ei " gffflow. Aackfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow pending to occur aroumdF oupdxtwn� �,94; backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to casure that mnofif'v� ' o3atJaj�=fm t�f�oundation. The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the aboin {f}n. Ot cr minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by other cnstucit'doffire beand the scope of this report.
S110 Grams Street Scita ^ ,;cS�u��,otorado 8OS30 • (970) 663.0138 • Fn.: (970) 663•1660
5arvin1CubndovAthoftkasin • 8wddw • I.wxt snf • lnl giland
FROM Scott Cox & Associates.lnc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 May. 19 2992 67:69AM P2
= Ir
TBM-I ■ 101PORARY BENCH MARK N
6.0-LILs BACK OF WALK
L mT• LOWEST OPENING (TOP OF WIN. WELL)
MZVATkMe>bV#lffW SILL• BOTTOM OF WINDOW Q A88
d-e-oo WLKOUT■ BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR
R TOP ■ TOP OF FOUNDATION
TISH _ FL,a i L.IrJf-
®• MI88MU EXTENSION
OF
--r&-t-cFx 83.E
Pies
g3.9
M.
� L(b�tSi
ro2r.t'+
�►�Sr
TqP a-
F,,,I,srtC
o
O
7#00
535�-o}-a�C�1
Hare,
TM ELEVATIMO GWMN F&M ON ARE SAGM
oN Tm GuRy=r r9Iworaroav Cm 0-9-M
r
VT,i--rry
pZpjyrALA-,p
AS -BUILT GRADING ELEVATION$
-- t CA5TLE5TONE DEVELOP.
FGOTT, COX A9o30GIATl=B. MG.
c�c� Gonwiting Ergrros• LO? 8, tam COWIPM at Cot.{.INP46
I•.JIDID bee of" a++&. sane v • Le..I.ed. Pe,e.i ORi GOI.LINB, GOLORADO
—p�--- I trw bas -eon
-Alp�r
j
-- x
r~ -
off
"� r o
!4w LC
03
left
OIL
��.
e,
/ ~ -46
Q It
�d WFi01:Li 0 0i pW / 099i E99OLS 'ON XUA -oul's;xpepc