Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 08/25/2005 FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Aug. 24 2005 07:52RN P1/3 Inc. • Strctct�rra.l C�eotecG>rv�icc�l C-i�it �_� � .�rf, , ()VERLO"T GRADING OBSERV.ATI DATE: �:,•���= 200b CLIENT. KIVA JOB 61-01 C_- � U� LEGAL: lI�1SP.BY: ADDRESS: Z SITE/GRADTNG PLAN: We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the Grading f'latl referenced above.During our observations ourrcpi sentative measured the relative Elevations at the lot sides and corners,top of foundation,and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion: E The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Crrading Plan, 0 The elevations as measured are in general eonforntancc with the above noted Grading Plan with the following exceptions; It is our opinion these exceptions,noted above,should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the above referenced plan. Daring our observations our rcpresentative noted that the as rncasUted elevations do not confoirn to those indicated on the above referenced grading plan, However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme, Mtn C,-r ra Sec the attached"As-Built"grading plan. ❑ The elevations measured arc not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan.Dcfieien.cies include: other comments and/or observations: i -'C�� �r ^ .,,.iL'r? :.d � .L -�^t G r��,� rt 1 r•.1�) � ( ` 4. it /'rii �lr c..)r •:.y{' 7a W = , �E<- t C_+ YC ' I,4rl A 4. f we n 7 >-n— .-� .C= �� •>. �.L• d'` •�� .Js� C... 7 �u� b�•�l d r3( r� L 1 rJu;-, �_c<<�C� C7r���=.„fit.; ry t � s•�i I„imitations; It ix our opinion that the subject lot as graded on the above date,shrnild not interfere with offaitc flows unless the grades are changed or banticrs are crested such as fences;garden terracing,.sidewalks,and/or any landscaping w the e;;tablishcd flowpatterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow, Dackftil adjacent to the residence may settle over time and �9 Lind the foundation walls, 711c hacktill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and maintained to ensure that run w ttWpy Ot ndabon.The grades measured were cornpal cd onlyto the requirements shovmon the aboverrferenced grading plan, "-)ni tswltich may lxspecificdin the soilsreport J .'CYO• •"" or by other Ci)n9trilction documcnls ate beyond the pope of this r 'A • ,, Reviewed by: kJ at )ffice `-�t' ^•.,..«�•'�6�\r\y• Etrtnc, l)P.ica 5110 a— r�s ^ ` 500 Kimbark Street,Su 101 r 5110 Crarute Street,Suite D Suite 0 t'L`_ 1,ongmont,Colorado 80501 Loveland,Colorado 80539 ��w. Phone;(303)702-0661 Rhone:(970)665 0138 www.kivaengineeri t Fax:(303)774-803 Fax:(970)663-1660 l lovelandakivapngineering,com ongmontt�kivncngitrc+ering•conl s FROM :KIVR ENGINEERING INC FAX NO. :9706631660 Aug. 24 2005 07:53RM P2/3 _L E F N D— T.O.F. Top OF FOUNDATION TBM_j TEMPORARY BENCH MARK #1 F BACK OF WALK T.O.W.W, TOP Of WINDOW WELL SILL . OF GLASS ELEwnoNS SURVEYED RECEIVE0 BOTTOM WINDOW WALKOUT . BOTTOM OF WALKOUT DOOR 8-22-05 XXX - ELEVATIONS SHOT SEE KIVA LETTER 1092-82-3-6 DATEDAUG 2 4, 2005 r Z-1 El (BRK) TBm_l 22.4 23.6� 24.3 25.0 24.7 23.8 22,5 21.8 is- _10- (B.O.W.) 25.0 25.2 ..25.1 40 LA TOF = 25,8 0 25 0 (T.0.dw.) 25.4 MITSING,OOOOM 04 (T.0.W.W.) 24.81 24.5 ad _ 7­7-1107! 21.8 21.2 22.4 23.2 23.7 23.4 22.8 (B.O.W.) (EIRK) [3:] C) NOTE; THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ARE BASED ON THE SURVEY PERFORMED ON B-22-05 AS-BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS jo" Nl BRONSERT 1092-84-.3-15 LOT 105, THE GATES AT WOODRa)GE 47H _4tmctv DATE roll 50aw iw kn iuvil 8,/23/05 SCALE triMIP52 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO I =, , blio o�mtt street, suite 0 Phone. (970) 683 035 20' cl, C.1—do 80530 Fox; (970) 663 1660 DRAW* Lovelan w CPH . _k)vmangln&&lmq,c*m FROM :KIVA ENGINEERING INC FAX N0. :970 6631660 Rug. 24 2005 07:53RM P3/3 7 l 1 M 4 «- mr 117, , ' r LL r r 4�ri �' i b• r. • .; wry � �'� � � � " ••' � ww!rw wiT"Fa V7s+ri- +�%, rv» f i •+n �1 1 wwr• ',Wr1M"`+.4i..:: .a,..,.e rn••-idy�� 1, fit. p�..4� a �