Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 10/26/2018 (2)BOULDER I FORT COLLINS I WINTER PARK JVA, Incorporated 213 Linden Street Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Ph: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6923 Toll Free: 877.444.1951 Web site: www.jvajva.com E-mail: info@jvajva.com September 26, 2018 Mr. Wes Lamarque 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Village on Horsetooth – Site Certification JVA PN: 2595c Dear Mr. Lamarque, JVA has completed the review of the as-builts and completed the Certification Form & Checklist for the Overall Site Drainage for the Village on Horsetooth project, located at 1506 West Horsetooth Road in Fort Collins, CO. Based on our site visit observations and the topographical information received, the overall site drainage characteristics as constructed are in substantial conformance with the approved utility plans and drainage report. The constructed improvements to the site adhere to the design intent in regards to detention pond, inlets, storm drains, and LID basins as shown in the attached checklist and plans. Final landscaping efforts are on going at this time of this certification, and erosion control measures remain in place in all areas still to be planted or reseeded. Contractor is coordinating with the City Erosion Inspector until work is completed and stabilization is achieved. Please contact us if you have any questions, or need any additional information. Sincerely, JVA, INCORPORATED By: ______________ ___________________ Brian J. Campbell, P.E Regional Manager Enclosures: Executive Summary, City of Fort Collins Overall Site Drainage Checklist, Approved Original and As-built Grading & Storm Drain Plans, PLS Stamped Pond Survey CC: Kristin Fritz, Housing Catalyst Accepted 10/26/2018 WL BOULDER I FORT COLLINS I WINTER PARK JVA, Incorporated 213 Linden Street Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Ph: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6923 Toll Free: 877.444.1951 Web site: www.jvajva.com E-mail: info@jvajva.com September 26, 2018 Mr. Wes Lamarque 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 Executive Summary: Village on Horsetooth – Site Certification This letter is intended to summarize the design of the Village on Horsetooth grading and drainage improvements and demonstrate that the constructed facilities are in substantial conformance with the approved plans and Final Drainage Report for the Village on Horsetooth, dated May 8, 2017. A. Detention, Drainage Facilities, and Common Open Spaces 1. Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Certification a. Design Summary: As per the Foothills Basin Master Plan design, the site was graded in an attempt to capture all site runoff to be treated and detained in three bioretention basins and an extended detention pond located along the east side of the site. The detention pond has an outlet structure that ties into the City’s existing storm sewer system on the south side of Horsetooth. All onsite runoff, besides the detention pond, is directed to one of the three LID ponds. The basins capture the site’s entire required water quality volume with the assumption that the detention pond is a mostly grass area which acts as a filter for the pond’s water quality needs. The filter areas for each include 12 inches of growing media, 6 inches of pea gravel, and at least 10 inches of CDOT Class C filler material with a 6” slotted underdrain pipe along the bottom. The underdrain system is connected with storm drains and ties into the outlet structure’s micropool. The on-site storm system was designed to convey the 10-year storm event with the 100-year storm event overflowing into the parking lots and sheet flowing into a LID Pond or ponding until flow can by conveyed to an LID Pond. b. As-built verification of water quality and detention facilities: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the elevations and dimensions of the constructed concrete outlet structure, LID basin concrete overflow weirs, and tops and bottoms of basin slopes. Redlined as-built plans as well as the PLS stamped survey of the ponds have been provided for reference. Scour stop mats are to be installed in lieu of riprap, and will be placed with final landscaping. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 2. Swales a. N/A 3. Pipes a. As-built verification of storm pipes: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the invert and rim elevations of storm manholes, inlets, and cleanouts. Size and material type Village on Horsetooth September 26, 2018 Page 2 of 4 were verified with engineer reviewed and approved product data submittals from the contractor. Per the approved plans, some pipes were installed below the minimum 0.4% slope due to tight site constraints and shallow cover. As-built pipe velocities have been verified at a minimum of 2 feet per second and capacity to convey the 10-year storm event. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 4. Concrete Pan Channels a. As-built verification of pans: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing flowlines of concrete pans. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 5. Inlets a. As-built verification of inlet structures: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the invert and grate/flowline elevations of all storm inlets. Inlets types were installed per plan and verified with engineer reviewed and approved product submittals from the contractor. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 6. Culverts a. As-built verification of culverts: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the as-builty invert “in and out” elevations and sizes of storm culverts. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 7. Sub-drains a. As-built verification of sub-drains: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the rims and inverts of underdrain cleanouts, and underdrain system outfalls. Per the approved plans, underdrain pipe slopes are not designed to meet the standard minimum of 0.4%, but are flat, as indicated on the drawings. As this underdrain functions by capturing and conveying minor storm runoff that has infiltrated through the bioretention bed, the perforated pipe functions properly to meet the design intent. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 8. Curb Cuts a. As-built verification of curb cuts: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the opening width and elevation curb cuts. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 9. Sidewalk Chases and Culverts a. As-built verification of sidewalk chases: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing the opening width and elevation of curb cuts. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. Village on Horsetooth September 26, 2018 Page 3 of 4 10. Site Grading a. As-built verification of site grading: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing grading of all common areas and rear property corners. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. 11. Riprap a. Per the approved plans, scour stop mats are used in lieu of riprap. Mats were sized per manufacturer’s recommendations, and are to be installed 6” below topsoil. At the time of this certification, scour stop mats have not been placed and landscaping efforts are on going. 12. Permanent Erosion Fabric a. N/A. 13. Post-Construction Site Cleanup a. Street sweeping and gutter cleanup has been performed daily. Smoothing of ruts in disturbed areas along with final landscaping is in progress at the time of this certification. Reseeding and stabilization will be coordinated with the City Erosion Inspector. 14. Certification of Other BMPs a. N/A. 15. Certification of LID and Water Quality Features a. As-built verification of LID basins: Topographic records were provided by R&R Surveyors detailing basin elevations, side slopes, bottom area and volume, spillway weir size and elevations, and underdrain inverts. Constructed improvements are within substantial conformance with the approved plans. Required inspection checklist provided with this certification. 16. Certification and Erosion Control Measures a. At the time of this certification, erosion control measures remain in all areas still to be landscaped or reseeded. Landscaping efforts are ongoing and erosion control measures will be removed upon stabilization. Contractor is coordinating with City Erosion Inspector. Village on Horsetooth September 26, 2018 Page 4 of 4 Please contact us if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, JVA, INCORPORATED By: ______________ ___________________ Brian J. Campbell, P.E Regional Manager Attachment A: City of Fort Collins Site & Drainage Certification Checklist 8/16 Page 1 OVERALL SITE and DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION Commercial, Multi-Family and Subdivision Certification Form and Checklist Project Name: Date: Building Permit Numbers: (Commercial or multi-family) Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Volume 1, Section 6.11, please fill in all applicable items in this Certification Form for Commercial, Multi-Family and Overall Single Family sites. NOTE: several items must be verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted with the as-built grading plan. (As-built elevations must be written in red next to the approved elevations.) •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. Attach an explanation or description of the as-built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but shown on the approved construction plans. Provide an as-built redline or Mylar drawing with the following: I.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Certification - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.10 For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately: A. Volume: As-built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage volume. 1. Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state of Colorado. 2.Both proposed and as-built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for proposed and solid lines for as-built). 3.All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and the as-built elevations are shown on the plan sheet. 4.Stage-storage-discharge tables are provided on a separate document. 5.Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92- 602(8) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal (tinyurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include: a.The cover sheet from the approved drainage report b.The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report c.As-built topographic survey d.Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification e.PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet PDF output included with this package; documents will be uploaded upon acceptance of this certification. 8/16 Page 2 B.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: Attached is as-built verification that there is a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of the detention pond. If there is a “soft pan” in the flow-line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2% grade requirement. 1.Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable: a. Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin. There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow-line(s) of the detention basin. The flattest as-built grade is . b.Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin. There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction plans. (Show as-built spot elevations.) c.Soft pan for low flow in detention basin. •Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineer’s statement of visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.) o There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations, bends, cleanouts, etc.) o There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical engineer. NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-. 2. Side Slopes: The as-built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown. Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re- graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process. 3.Spillway Certification: The following items must be field verified: a.The location of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. b.The width of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. c.The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as-built plan. d.A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway. e.There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate type: (riprap size “D50” gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried riprap with inches of bury, etc.). f.There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape features, rocks, etc. Per approved drainage plan, minimum 1.0% fall in turf swale. Per approved drainage plan, minimum 1.0% fall to turf swale. 8/16 Page 3 4.Outlet Structure Certification a.The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of the orifice. b.The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of rows and columns of holes. c.The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate so no water ponds in front of the plate. d.The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans. e.100-year overflow grate elevation is . (Elev. A on detail D-46) f.The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is . (Elev. B on detail D-46) g.Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the top and bolted at the bottom. h.The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet. II.Channels/Swales - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sect.3&4 A. Capacity: The as-built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans. 2.Longitudinal slopes and side-slopes (cross-sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side-slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed. 3.As-built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations shown on the approved construction plans. 4.All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used as part of this verification.) 5.All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.) 6.The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on the cross-sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.) 7.The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees, shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.) Per the approved plans, there is a water quality sump in the bottom of the box (as-built elev is 1.76' below the 15" outlet pipe invert). 8/16 Page 4 III.Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 4 A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: The as-built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All storm drain pipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.) Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size. 2.The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet. 3.The as-built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of the approved construction plans. B.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: All pipes are installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations. 2.All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met. 3.Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.) IV.Concrete Pans - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.1.3.4 A. Construction/Installation: All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or justification by separate document. 3.The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross- section is “V” shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.) 4.The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4 inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved construction plans.) 5.The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as- built drawings. 8/16 Page 5 V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 3 A. Construction/Installation: All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction plan. Indicate by writing “Verified” on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is other than the one on the approved construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or better capacity. 2.The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.) 3.The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans. 4.The as-built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation. 5.The as-built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or justification is attached. 6.All Type C, R, 13 and 16 inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following (or an equivalent) designation: NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO POUDRE RIVER. VI.Culverts - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.9 A. Construction/Installation: All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as-built construction plans as correct. 2.The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is indicated on the as-built plans. 3.The as-built invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built construction plans. 4.The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as-built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative. An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM). VII.Sub-Drains A. Construction/Installation: All sub-drains shown on the construction plans have been installed in accordance with those plans. Sub-drains installed with the sanitary sewer are to be verified on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE: Indicate any sub-drains installed after the plans were approved on the as-built plans.) 1.The size of the sub-drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as- built plans. 2.The type of sub-drain, in particular the perforated and non-perforated sections of the drain, are as indicated on the approved construction plans. 8/16 Page 6 3.The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided. 4.The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations marked.) 5.The backfill materials for sub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This includes the type, depth and width.) 6.The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub-drain and the permeable backfill material unless shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub-drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material is accepted only if approved prior to installation.) VIII.Curb Cuts A. Construction: All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The curb cut openings tie into a downstream swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb cut. IX.Sidewalk Culverts & Chases A. Construction/Installation: All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 3.The sidewalk culvert invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built plans. 4.The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 5.There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert. X. Site Grading A. Construction: All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and the as-built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as-built plans. Sidewalk chase in central turf play area is not completed in order to allow access for landscaping work still ongoing at the time of this certification. 8/16 Page 7 2.The as-built contours for “overlot grading” are shown on the as-built construction plans for all common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.) 3.All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans and the slopes are stabilized. XI.Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A. Construction: All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. XII.Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A. Construction: All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. 1.All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans. XIII.Post-Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.7 A. Construction: All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from drainage paths. 1.All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s). 2.All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas. 3.All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note the area needing stabilization in the narrative. XIV.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.The construction of channel drop structures is in accordance with the approved plan both in location, horizontal dimensions and cross-section. XV.Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.4 A.Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation. 8/16 Page 8 XVI. Certification and Erosion Control Measures A. All temporary erosion control measures shall be removed upon stabilization. If at the time of preparing this certification there are any erosion control measures still remaining on the site, please note them in the narrative and verify that they need to remain at this time. If in doubt as to the need for any control measure, please consult with the Erosion Control Inspector at 970-221-6700. XVII.Statement of Compliance A. This certification is signed and stamped. By signing this form, the engineer(s) attests that he/she has visited and observed the site, and to the best of his/her knowledge, the as-built conditions of the drainage facilities are as described in the above form and in the enclosed as-built plans. B.Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and prevent the release of any and all Stormwater Utility permit holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy within this development. XVIII.Signature and Stamp by a Colorado-Registered Professional Engineer Engineer’s contact information: Name: Email: Phone: Company: Address: PE Stamp 2018-09-25 12/15 Page 1 DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST To be completed by Construction Superintendent This checklist is to be completed during construction and included with the Overall Site and Drainage Certification. •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. I.Compaction A.All berms and embankments meet the compaction requirements as specified in the project geotechnical report or comply with the City’s standard, which is “soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 2% below to 2% above optimum moisture content and compacted to 95% of the Maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).” Compaction requires verification during construction. Provide testing log from contractor/engineer. II.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements A.The pipe trenches have been compacted in accordance with Section 02225-3.07.A.1. of the Fort Collins Development Construction Standards (e.g., the trenches in the roadways are to be 95% of maximum density and all other areas are to be at 90%, both in accordance with ASTM D698). III. Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A.The riprap bedding is a granular bedding of the gradation and thickness indicated on the approved construction plans. B.A filter fabric was installed instead of granular bedding and is the material shown on the approved construction plans or was an approved equal. Provide documentation for an approved equal. C.The riprap is the gradation shown on the approved construction plans with a D50 of . D.The riprap thickness is as shown on the approved construction plans and extends to the horizontal limits shown. E.The riprap is buried to the depth indicated on the approved construction plans. (A minimum of 6 inches of soil is required.) IV. Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A.All fabric was installed per manufacturer’s specifications. V. Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.All cut-off walls have been installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. (Cut-off walls are required for irrigation ditch crossings of storm drain pipes and at the end of flared end sections.) 12/15 Page 2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Post-excavation infiltration rates are consistent with design infiltration capacity (for “full or partial infiltration” designs) Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed and checked for water-tightness. Meets specifications for: -Dimensions -Reinforcement -Footings Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test Base coarse (e.g., #2/4) has 90% fractured faces Bedding coarse (e.g., #89) is thoroughly washed Sub-base materials are installed and compacted according to manufacturer’s specifications PICP area is protected from construction site sediment, including runoff from the upstream catchment and Close Out 12/15 Page 3 Bioretention Cells Heavy equipment did not travel over bioretention cell during excavation Bottom of cell was “ripped” after excavation Photograph before/after “ripping” Bottom of cell is flat and level Photograph Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff control BMPs during construction Photograph Overflow inlet elevation is set above bioretention media per plan (typically 12 inches) Overflow inlet invert elevation is at least 3 inches below containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet) Measure/record distance between inlet and top of containment wall/berm Upstream catchment drains to inlet Forebay is installed according to design specifications Forebay has flat, concrete bottom Outlet structure/overflow elevation is confirmed Measure/record distance from overflow to top of media filter Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test 12/15 Page 4 Filter Media Filter media composition is per design specifications Filter media was “machine mixed” by supplier prior to delivery Filter media installed flat and level Other Structural Components Containment wall/berm is continuous and level Landscaping Final landscaping does NOT include sod Final landscaping (wood/rock mulch) is flat and level Vegetation is planted according to landscape design specifications Verify that weed barrier is not installed Temporary irrigation installed If N/A, then verify that permanent irrigation is installed to establish/maintain vegetation Close Out Upstream catchment stabilized prior to diverting runoff into bioretention cell Signature: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Company: Address: Landscaping work in ongoing at time of this certification Permanent irrigation system will be installed with final landscaping Attachment B: Original Approved Grading Plans Attachment C: Redlined As-built Grading Plans X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DRAWING NUMBER: 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 phone 970.224.5828 | fax 970.225.6657 | www.ripleydesigninc.com ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ ISSUED PROJECT No.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: SEAL: PREPARED BY: No.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS No.DESCRIPTION DATE Pl o t t e d B y : Ka r e n R . B r i g m a n La y o u t : C1 . 1 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g P l a n 2 4 x 3 6 Pr i n t e d O n : 9/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 8 3 : 5 9 P M Fi l e N a m e : 25 9 5 c C 1 . 1 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n _ a s - b u i l t . d w g ORIGINAL SIZE 24X36 RIPLEY DESIGN INC. Project Manager 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.224.5828 f. 970.225.6657 HOUSING CATALYST 1715 W Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.416.2910 CIVIL ENGINEER ARCHITECT APPLICANT JVA, INCORPORATED 25 Old Town Square, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 p. 970.225.9099 OZ ARCHITECTURE 3003 Larimer Street Denver, CO 80205 p. 303.861.5704 OWNER/DEVELOPER VILLAGE ON HORSETOOTH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS, CO JVA, Incorporated 2 1 3 L i n d e n S t r e e t Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6963 E-mail: info@jvajva.com JVA Project #2595c CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 FDP 10/26/2016 R16-028 EJK/KRB BJC/CRH 2 12/14/2016FDP #2 3 01/13/2017FDP PDF 4 03/24/2017MYLARS 1 09/27/2017MINOR AMENDMENT C1.1 DETAILED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: Date Date Date Date Date Date City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Parks and Recreation Traffic Engineer Stormwater Utility Water & Wastewater Utility City Engineer CHECKED BY: APPROVED: Date Environmental Planner CONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO 5110.20 5104.55 5110.44 5104.47 5104.47 96.41 LF 0.08% DRAWING NUMBER: 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 phone 970.224.5828 | fax 970.225.6657 | www.ripleydesigninc.com ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ ISSUED PROJECT No.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: SEAL: PREPARED BY: No.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS No.DESCRIPTION DATE Pl o t t e d B y : Ka r e n R . B r i g m a n La y o u t : C1 . 2 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g P l a n 2 4 x 3 6 Pr i n t e d O n : 9/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 8 4 : 0 3 P M Fi l e N a m e : 25 9 5 c C 1 . 1 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n _ a s - b u i l t . d w g ORIGINAL SIZE 24X36 RIPLEY DESIGN INC. Project Manager 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.224.5828 f. 970.225.6657 HOUSING CATALYST 1715 W Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.416.2910 CIVIL ENGINEER ARCHITECT APPLICANT JVA, INCORPORATED 25 Old Town Square, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 p. 970.225.9099 OZ ARCHITECTURE 3003 Larimer Street Denver, CO 80205 p. 303.861.5704 OWNER/DEVELOPER VILLAGE ON HORSETOOTH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS, CO JVA, Incorporated 2 1 3 L i n d e n S t r e e t Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6963 E-mail: info@jvajva.com JVA Project #2595c CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 FDP 10/26/2016 R16-028 EJK/KRB BJC/CRH 2 12/14/2016FDP #2 3 01/13/2017FDP PDF 4 03/24/2017MYLARS 1 09/27/2017MINOR AMENDMENT C1.2 DETAILED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: Date Date Date Date Date Date City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Parks and Recreation Traffic Engineer Stormwater Utility Water & Wastewater Utility City Engineer CHECKED BY: APPROVED: Date Environmental Planner CONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO 5104.17 5104.17 5109.53 5109.63 5104.17 5104.17 29.34 LF 26.67 LF 5109.53 5104.05 5104.05 0.45% 53.65 LF 5109.67 5104.05 5104.05 5108.99 5103.57 5103.57 159.73 LF 0.30% ON L Y DRAWING NUMBER: 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 phone 970.224.5828 | fax 970.225.6657 | www.ripleydesigninc.com ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ ISSUED PROJECT No.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: SEAL: PREPARED BY: No.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS No.DESCRIPTION DATE Pl o t t e d B y : Ka r e n R . B r i g m a n La y o u t : C1 . 3 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g P l a n 2 4 x 3 6 Pr i n t e d O n : 9/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 8 4 : 0 6 P M Fi l e N a m e : 25 9 5 c C 1 . 1 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n _ a s - b u i l t . d w g ORIGINAL SIZE 24X36 RIPLEY DESIGN INC. Project Manager 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.224.5828 f. 970.225.6657 HOUSING CATALYST 1715 W Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.416.2910 CIVIL ENGINEER ARCHITECT APPLICANT JVA, INCORPORATED 25 Old Town Square, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 p. 970.225.9099 OZ ARCHITECTURE 3003 Larimer Street Denver, CO 80205 p. 303.861.5704 OWNER/DEVELOPER VILLAGE ON HORSETOOTH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS, CO JVA, Incorporated 2 1 3 L i n d e n S t r e e t Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6963 E-mail: info@jvajva.com JVA Project #2595c CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 FDP 10/26/2016 R16-028 EJK/KRB BJC/CRH 2 12/14/2016FDP #2 3 01/13/2017FDP PDF 4 03/24/2017MYLARS 1 09/27/2017MINOR AMENDMENT C1.3 DETAILED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: Date Date Date Date Date Date City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Parks and Recreation Traffic Engineer Stormwater Utility Water & Wastewater Utility City Engineer CHECKED BY: APPROVED: Date Environmental PlannerCONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO DRAWING NUMBER: 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 phone 970.224.5828 | fax 970.225.6657 | www.ripleydesigninc.com ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ ISSUED PROJECT No.: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: SEAL: PREPARED BY: No.DESCRIPTION DATE REVISIONS No.DESCRIPTION DATE Pl o t t e d B y : Ka r e n R . B r i g m a n La y o u t : C1 . 4 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g P l a n 2 4 x 3 6 Pr i n t e d O n : 9/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 8 4 : 0 8 P M Fi l e N a m e : 25 9 5 c C 1 . 1 D e t a i l e d G r a d i n g & D r a i n a g e P l a n _ a s - b u i l t . d w g ORIGINAL SIZE 24X36 RIPLEY DESIGN INC. Project Manager 419 Canyon Ave. Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.224.5828 f. 970.225.6657 HOUSING CATALYST 1715 W Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 p. 970.416.2910 CIVIL ENGINEER ARCHITECT APPLICANT JVA, INCORPORATED 25 Old Town Square, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 p. 970.225.9099 OZ ARCHITECTURE 3003 Larimer Street Denver, CO 80205 p. 303.861.5704 OWNER/DEVELOPER VILLAGE ON HORSETOOTH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORT COLLINS, CO JVA, Incorporated 2 1 3 L i n d e n S t r e e t Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Phone: 970.225.9099 Fax: 970.225.6963 E-mail: info@jvajva.com JVA Project #2595c CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 FDP 10/26/2016 R16-028 EJK/KRB BJC/CRH 2 12/14/2016FDP #2 3 01/13/2017FDP PDF 4 03/24/2017MYLARS 1 09/27/2017MINOR AMENDMENT C1.4 DETAILED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: CHECKED BY: Date Date Date Date Date Date City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Parks and Recreation Traffic Engineer Stormwater Utility Water & Wastewater Utility City Engineer CHECKED BY: APPROVED: Date Environmental PlannerCONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO 5109.88 5103.74 5103.74 39.4 3 L F 0.30 % 20.0' Attachment D: Redlined As-built Storm Drain Plans N:1439317.4 E:3110123.0 N:1439250.6 E:3110122.6 N:1439068.3 E:3110157.0 51 0 6 . 5 7 0.87% 51 0 3 . 6 2 51 0 5 . 3 8 51 0 9 . 2 6 51 0 4 . 8 3 51 0 4 . 7 3 51 0 7 . 0 5 51 0 4 . 5 0 0.11% CERTIFICATION I, STACY LYNN JACOBS, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AS-BUILT DIMENSIONS OF THE FACILITIES AS SHOWN, ARE BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND, AND THAT THE FIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON AUGUST 24, 2018. STACY LYNN JACOBS, PLS COLORADO REG. NO. 38495 FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF: R&R ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS, INC. 710 W. COLFAX AVENUE DENVER, CO 80204 (303) 753-6730 09/17/2018 CONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO 51 1 0 . 1 6 51 0 7 . 8 6 51 0 9 . 3 4 51 0 7 . 5 0 51 0 9 . 3 4 51 0 7 . 2 8 51 1 1 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 9 5 51 0 7 . 5 0 51 0 7 . 2 8 NOT MEASURED NOT MEASURED 113 LF @ 0.29% 51 0 6 . 9 5 51 1 1 . 3 8 51 0 6 . 7 8 51 0 6 . 7 8 51 1 1 . 0 0 51 0 6 . 6 2 51 0 6 . 6 2 51 1 0 . 9 0 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 0.16% 0.59% 0.47%0.31%0.39% N:1439645.3 E:3109761.8 N:1439594.7 E:3109841.3 N:1439524.5 E:3109840.7 N:1439485.8 E:3109901.0 FL 5100.00 INV 5100.00 N:1439442.4 E:3109917.8 N:1439413.1 E:3109894.9 N:1439385.8 E:3109895.3 N:1439349.5 E:3109914.9 NOT FOUND CERTIFICATION I, STACY LYNN JACOBS, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AS-BUILT DIMENSIONS OF THE FACILITIES AS SHOWN, ARE BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND, AND THAT THE FIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2018. STACY LYNN JACOBS, PLS COLORADO REG. NO. 38495 FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF: R&R ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS, INC. 710 W. COLFAX AVENUE DENVER, CO 80204 (303) 753-6730 09/21/2018 CONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECOCONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified N:1439317.4 E:3110123.0 N:1439295.4 E:3109665.1 N:1439343.8 E:3109676.7 NOT MEASURED 0.27% 96 LF FL 5110.11 INV 5107.81 FL 5111.59 INV 5107.89 N:1439345.6 E:3109800.0 N:1439349.5 E:3109914.9 N:1439294.3 E:3109875.4 N:1439321.2 E:3109895.0 FL 5109.82 INV (FULL OF DEBRIS) FL 5111.59 IN(SW) 5107.36 OUT(NE) 5107.0932 LF 32 LF 1.69% N:1439332.6 E:3110075.8 N:1439293.7 E:3110055.4 N:1439295.0 E:3110082.7 1.11% 1.33% 27 LF 44 LF FL 5110.81 INV 5106.95 FL 5110.68 INV 5106.59 5106.10 5110.33 FL 5110.82 INV (FULL OF DEBRIS) CONFORMED TO CONSTRUCTION RECO 51 1 1 . 0 4 51 0 7 . 5 5 51 0 7 . 5 0 51 0 9 . 4 2 51 0 7 . 0 4 51 0 6 . 9 6 0.35%133 LF 51 1 0 . 9 0 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 51 0 6 . 5 5 0.38%108 LF 51 0 6 . 2 5 NOT MEASURED 167 LF @ 0.18% CERTIFICATION I, STACY LYNN JACOBS, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AS-BUILT DIMENSIONS OF THE FACILITIES AS SHOWN, ARE BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND, AND THAT THE FIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON AUGUST 24, 2018. STACY LYNN JACOBS, PLS COLORADO REG. NO. 38495 FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF: R&R ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS, INC. 710 W. COLFAX AVENUE DENVER, CO 80204 (303) 753-6730 09/17/2018 Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Inlet verified Attachment E: PLS Stamped As-built Pond Survey Attachment F: PDF Output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet Stormwater Facility Name: Facility Location & Jurisdiction: User Input: Watershed Characteristics User Defined User Defined User Defined User Defined Watershed Slope =0.010 ft/ft Stage [ft] Area [ft^2] Stage [ft] Discharge [cfs] Watershed Length =590 ft 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 Watershed Area = 7.96 acres 1.00 2,054 0.80 0.04 Watershed Imperviousness = 52.6%percent 2.00 12,652 1.00 0.12 Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A =percent 3.00 30,669 2.00 0.29 Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B = 100.0%percent 4.00 46,936 3.00 0.55 Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D =percent 5.00 63,839 4.50 1.02 5.00 2.21 UDFCD Default 17 WQCV Treatment Method = 12.00 hours After completing and printing this worksheet to a pdf, go to: https://maperture.digitaldataservices.com/gvh/?viewer=cswdif create a new stormwater facility, and attach the pdf of this worksheet to that record. Routed Hydrograph Results Design Storm Return Period =WQCV 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 50 Year 100 Year One-Hour Rainfall Depth =0.53 0.95 1.34 1.64 2.32 2.61 in Calculated Runoff Volume =0.112 0.299 0.507 0.683 1.178 1.405 acre-ft OPTIONAL Override Runoff Volume =0.42 0.69 0.90 1.48 1.72 acre-ft Inflow Hydrograph Volume =0.112 0.419 0.686 0.903 1.476 1.724 acre-ft Time to Drain 97% of Inflow Volume =12.5 19.6 24.4 28.1 36.2 39.1 hours Time to Drain 99% of Inflow Volume =14.3 23.2 28.4 31.9 39.4 42.2 hours Maximum Ponding Depth =1.58 2.46 2.90 3.19 3.81 4.04 ft Maximum Ponded Area =0.186 0.481 0.662 0.773 1.004 1.089 acres Maximum Volume Stored =0.090 0.370 0.621 0.826 1.376 1.612 acre-ft Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths (use dropdown): Workbook Protected Worksheet Protected Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Sheet Village on Horsetooth Detention Pond 1506 West Horsetooth Road, Fort Collins, 80525. Jusridiction is City of Fort Collins. 2595c - SDI_Design_Data_v1.04, Design Data 9/27/2018, 9:02 AM Doing_Clear_Formatting =Yes CountA=1 0 1 2 3 #N/A #N/A 0 1 2 3 #N/A #N/A Check Data Set 1 Check Data Set 1 Area Discharge Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Sheet 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0.1 1 10 FL O W [ c f s ] TIME [hr] 100YR IN 100YR OUT 50YR IN 50YR OUT 10YR IN 10YR OUT 5YR IN 5YR OUT 2YR IN 2YR OUT WQCV IN WQCV OUT 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.1 1 10 100 PO N D I N G D E P T H [ f t ] DRAIN TIME [hr] 100YR 50YR 10YR 5YR 2YR WQCV 2595c - SDI_Design_Data_v1.04, Design Data 9/27/2018, 9:02 AM