HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot Certifications - 04/29/2002 (17) FROM Scott Cox & Rssociates, Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Rpr. 26 2002 09:25RM P1
"SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION $CA Tabli - 1 h--of-��
CLILNT: �iL1`'( ���� rr �` S DATE
3515 C,oc_�
LEGAL:—
or�f�S wry. Z—O NSP. �.
GRADING PLAN'
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above.During our observations our representativt measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners,top of foundation,and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion;
in The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan_
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions,noted above,should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan.
j� During our observations our rcprcxentative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme_ 1jc�
9, See the attached"As-Built"grading plan.
n The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan.Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations'
A -TYPE C3
��.tD ,J o,2_' !-44
e
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot,as graded on the above date,should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
arc changed or barriers arc created such as fences,garden terracing,sidewalks,and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow patterns by diverting or slowing runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur around the foundation walls. The back-fill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
maintained to ensure that runoff will flow away from the foundation.The grades measured were compared only to the
requirements shown on the above referenced grading plan.Other minimum grading requirements which may be specified
in the soils report or by other construction documctrts are beyond the scope of this report.
Reviewed by:� Date: O L
5110 Granite Stseer,Suite 0 •Lowland,Colorado SOS38 • (970)663-0138 • Fax:(970)663-1660
St rving Colorado with offices in • Boulder Longmont • Loveland
r
FROM Scott Cox & Rssocialtes, Inc. FAX NO. : 9706631660 Apr. 26 2002 09:25RM P2
JT7sCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers
OVERLOT GRADING OBSERVATION SCAlabli ifu--`/9-pr03
DATE-
CLIENT: Sift`-1 rl � DATE• �_�z
3�15 Ci"X.J -0�r YA
LEGAL : Lem,- C)3' rI 1 ;21-rO5. �-c t��ZA40'74 Z-INSP.A
GRADING PLAN G> ' Wc�`D 19 17P� .•� `"��
We have measured relative elevations at the above mentioned location. The observed elevations were compared to the
Grading Plan referenced above,During our observations ourrcpresentative measured the relative elevations at the lot sides
and corners,top of foundation,and lowest openings. Based upon our findings it is our opinion:
• The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading Plan.
❑ The elevations as measured are in general conformance with the above noted Grading plan with the following
exceptions:
It is our opinion these exceptions,noted above,should not adversely change the grading scheme as shown on the
above referenced plan_
jib During our observations our representative noted that the as measured elevations do not conform to those
indicated on the above referenced grading plan.However, it is our opinion the grades as measured should
provide an adequate substitute to the above referenced grading scheme. X16AISC C" G-aw� e--o"MC^11-5
X, See the attached"As-Built"grading plan.
❑ The elevations measured are not in conformance to the above referenced grading plan.Deficiencies include:
Other comments and/or observations-
c ,-TYPE A
�o-� idsr Cow 45-le _ 0,Z''
Limitations:
It is our opinion that the subject lot,as graded on the above date,should not interfere with offsite flows unless the grades
arc changed ar barriers are created such as fences,garden terracing,sidewalks,and/or any landscaping which may change
the established flow pattcrrrs by div �- runoff flow. Backfill adjacent to the residence may settle over time
and allow ponding to occur arou. � The backfill adjacent to the residence must be monitored and
t ensure that run �w . foundation.The des measured wcrc compared only to the
maintained o o��t1t+ .frc> e� grades mp Y
requirements shown on the abaj0, eJ?-Ze1>l ectgr 4g 1pther minimum grading requirements which maybe specified
in the soils report or by other onst ion docum tare*yond the scope of this report_
Reviewed by: Date: A-
_'
5110 G,anite Stree[, � bi orado B0538 • (970)663-0138 Fax:(970)663-1660
S«rvmgC�n w,th offces in
Boulder • Longmont • Loveland
FROM Scott Cox & Rssociates, Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660 Apr. 26 2002 09:26RM P3
N
TBM-1■ TEMPORARY DENGN MAW M
moia■ BACK OF WALK
LWST• I.OWEST OPENW-X (TOP OF WIN. WELD
SILL.■ BOTTOM OF WINDOW GLASS
FI E,aT1"GURVEYM WLKOUT■ BOTTOM OF WALKMT DOOR
441-02 T�OF = TOP OF FOUNpATION
�sOwa ® - MI831NCx EXVNSION
Tw
CotjEEN HELL ,r..;; :+. :•;•....
�
LUJ6T .'.,
931 82 802
.i
8l1 1-U)ST
82 832 OMNJ DECK
LUll6T -ro
` 833 4L�T ���
t.•` 813 7�9
BI2 82.0
8il
•
79.E
81.4
aREE N 5ELT
NoTr �S5
THE�A-ri*a swmN HEM CIN ARE PASW AS-BUILT GRADING ELEVATIONS
ON'ME 5URYSY rE1 ORH&A ON 4-V-Q*-
1122�_ SCOTT, GOX i AMOCIATES, MC. CUSTOM ENVIRONMENTS
4-16-02 Corwukting egmsare LOT W,7+& PONDS AT OVERLAID TRAIL 2ND
1 20�' sno<sr+�sw ,.►,aut.�•LOVVW 00k-ee 9MM EORr COLLIN6,COLORAPO
(e-t®)sea-otss
D rwAy eew.aa W,0"Ie 1A.096% 1 1 l a pm•La.wud
FROM Scott Cox & Rssocidtes, Inc. FAX NO. 9706631660 Apr. 26 2002 09:27RM P4
00
r.
fC,
� f