The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSite Certifications - 11/27/2018 FORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521 | 970.221.4158 GREELEY: 820 8 th Street, 80631 | 970.395.9880 | W EB: www.northernengineering.com September 20, 2018 Mr. Dan Mogen City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility 700 Wood St. Fort Collins, CO RE: Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision 2nd Filing (The Elizabeth Hotel and Old Firehouse Parking Garage) Dear Mr. Mogen: This drainage certification letter is provided to verify as-constructed conditions for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision 2nd Filing (The Elizabeth Hotel and Old Firehouse Parking Garage). Northern Engineering completed survey work March 16, 2018 to verify general compliance with the Final Utility Plans for The Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision 2nd Filing, dated 4/16 including revised drawings dated 12/16 by Northern Engineering. Included in this drainage certification submittal are the following: Attachment 1 - City of Fort Collins Overall Site and Drainage Certification Form. Attachment 2 - City of Fort Collins During Construction Inspection Checklist and photographs provided by contractor. Attachment 3 - As-constructed rain garden calculations. Attachment 4 - As-constructed record drawings for Grading and Storm Drain Plan and Profile Sheets. Based on the calculations shown in Attachment 3, the as-built water quality pond volumes are in Table 1. The as-built rain gardens will provide water quality treatment within the site. Description of Rain Garden Top of Rain Garden Elev. Design Vol. (cu. ft.) As- Built Vol. (cu. ft.) % of Volume West rain garden on Chestnut Street in front of hotel. 4976.50 252 222 88% East rain garden on Chestnut Street in front of hotel. 4975.00 161 277 172% Rain garden on east side of Old Firehouse Alley (Parking Garage #1). 4974.19 60 55 92% Rain garden on west side of parking garage entrance (Parking Garage #2). 4973.44 75 56 75% Rain garden on east side of parking garage entrance (Parking Garage #3). 4973.20 92 119 130% Rain garden at intersection of Chestnut and Jefferson (Parking Garage #4). 4973.00 128 121 95% South rain garden on Walnut Street. 4975.96 159 200 126% North rain garden on Walnut Street. 4976.94 119 103 87% Total 1044 1154 110% FORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521 | 970.221.4158 GREELEY: 820 8 th Street, 80631 | 970.395.9880 | W EB: www.northernengineering.com We have concluded, based on the attached information and personal site inspection, that the drainage features for the project site have been constructed in substantial compliance with the above referenced Final Utility Plans, with the following exceptions: • Item I.B.4.f: The top of the rain garden elevations, as shown on the Record Drawings, are included in Table 1. • Item III.B.2: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unable to verify encasements and clearances were constructed per the approved construction plans. • Item III.B.3: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unable to verify the storm sewer joint types and construction methods. • Item V.A: The 18” storm inlet at the east corner of the hotel, at the intersection of Chestnut Street and Old Firehouse Alley, was constructed with a storm sewer wye at the northwest invert instead of the inlet configuration within the approved construction drawings. According to the contractor, there was not enough room to connect the north and west inverts into the inlet. Therefore, the north and west inlets were connected into a storm sewer wye, and the wye connected directly to the inlet. Northern Engineering have no concerns regarding this change to the 18” storm inlet. • Item V.A: The existing storm inlet at the west corner of the hotel, at the intersection of Walnut Street and the service alley for the hotel, was removed during construction. • Item V.A: The trench drain and roof downspout at the west corner of the hotel, at the intersection of Walnut Street and the service alley for the hotel, was connected to the underdrain system under the rain gardens in Walnut Street. The underdrain was upsized to a 12” pipe to accommodate the increased flowrate. • Item V.A.4: The inverts to the 18” storm inlet at the east corner of the hotel, at the intersection of Chestnut Street and Old Firehouse Alley, are not within 0.20’ of the approved construction drawings. However, the resulting steeper pipe grades are capable of safely passing the design flow rates in the approved drainage report. • Item VII.A.1: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unable to verify the size of the underdrains in the rain gardens. According to the contracto r, the underdrains were installed per the approved design drawings except for the underdrain in Walnut Street. The underdrain in Walnut Street was upsized to 12” to accommodate the increased flowrate from the trench drain and hotel downspout. • Item VII.A.2: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unable to verify the perforated and non-perforated sections of the underdrains. • Item VII.A.3: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unab le to verify the cover over the underdrains. • Item VII.A.5: Northern Engineering did not observe construction. Northern Engineering was unable to verify the backfill methods and materials used in the underdrains. • Item VIII: A curb cut was added to the landscape bed at the north corner of the hotel, at the intersection of Old Firehouse Alley and the hotel service access, to facilitate drainage from the landscape bed. • Item VIII: Steel plates were added in front of the rain garden curb cuts on Walnut Street to provide forebays per the direction of the City of Fort Collins. FORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521 | 970.221.4158 GREELEY: 820 8 th Street, 80631 | 970.395.9880 | W EB: www.northernengineering.com • Item X: The approved construction drawings called for drainage to be directed along the Chestnut Street curb and gutter towards the existing inlet at the intersection of Chestnut Street a nd Jefferson Street. As constructed, the calculated Major Storm Event will remain within the gutter with no freeboard between the top water surface and the elevation at the entrance to the parking garage. Deviations from the modeled storm, including but not limited to hail, snow and ice during the winter, debris blocking curb cuts, insufficient maintenance of the rain gardens on either side of the parking garage entrance, and rainfall in excess of the Major Storm Event all have the potential to impact site drainage conditions. Minor Storm flows will continue to travel along the Chestnut Street gutter according to the approved construction drawings. Additionally, some nuisance flows within the immediate vicinity of the parking garage entrance will flow into the parking garage. While items inside the parking garage are outside the scope of this site certification, we have noticed the following items during our site investigation. The owner may want to analyze the impacts of these items on the drainage infrastructure within the parking garage, as well as standard operating procedures within the garage itself. o An ADA access, not part of the approved civil drawings, was installed to the south of the main vehicular access. o The Architect’s first floor grading and drainage plan was designed to allow up to 5 -inches of ponding within the parking structure during heavy rain events. o The ramp leading to the upper floors slopes towards drains on the first floor with a low clear opening ratio. The ramp may increase the expected stormwater to these drains. o A masonry wall along the south side of the parking garage was installed without any weep holes. This masonry wall will restrict any transfer of storm waters between the parking garage and Chestnut Street to the vehicular and ADA access openings. Because the first floor of the parking garage does not sheet flow towards the south, and the lack of freeboard for the Major Storm Event within Chestnut Street, it is expressly noted that ponding inside the parking garage is an exception to the overall site drainage certification by Northern Engineering Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Frederick S. Wegert, PE Project Engineer Attachment 1 12/15 Page 1 OVERALL SITE and DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION Commercial, Multi-Family and Subdivision Certification Form and Checklist Project Name: Date: Building Permit Numbers: (Commercial or multi-family) Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Volume 1, Section 6.11, please fill in all applicable items in this Certification Form for Commercial, Multi-Family and Overall Single Family sites. NOTE: several items must be verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted with the as-built grading plan. (As-built elevations must be written in red next to the approved elevations.) •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. Attach an explanation or description of the as-built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but shown on the approved construction plans. Provide an as-built redline or Mylar drawing with the following: I.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Certification - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.10 For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately: A. Volume: As-built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage volume. 1. Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state of Colorado. 2.Both proposed and as-built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for proposed and solid lines for as-built). 3.All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and the as-built elevations are shown on the plan sheet. 4.Stage-storage-discharge tables are provided on a separate document. 5.Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92- 602(8) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal (tinyurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include: a.The cover sheet from the approved drainage report b.The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report c.As-built topographic survey d.Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification e.PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet Fort Collins Downtown Hotel May 5, 2018 B1508799, B1603095 Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A 12/15 Page 2 B.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: Attached is as-built verification that there is a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of the detention pond. If there is a “soft pan” in the flow-line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2% grade requirement. 1.Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable: a. Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin. There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow-line(s) of the detention basin. The flattest as-built grade is . b.Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin. There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction plans. (Show as-built spot elevations.) c.Soft pan for low flow in detention basin. •Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineer’s statement of visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.) o There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations, bends, cleanouts, etc.) o There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical engineer. NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-. 2. Side Slopes: The as-built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown. Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re- graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process. 3.Spillway Certification: The following items must be field verified: a.The location of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. b.The width of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. c.The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as-built plan. d.A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway. e.There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate type: (riprap size “D50” gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried riprap with inches of bury, etc.). f.There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape features, rocks, etc. Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12/15 Page 3 4.Outlet Structure Certification a.The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of the orifice. b.The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of rows and columns of holes. c.The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate so no water ponds in front of the plate. d.The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans. e.100-year overflow grate elevation is . (Elev. A on detail D-46) f.The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is . (Elev. B on detail D-46) g.Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the top and bolted at the bottom. h.The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet. II.Channels/Swales - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sect.3&4 A. Capacity: The as-built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans. 2.Longitudinal slopes and side-slopes (cross-sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side-slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed. 3.As-built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations shown on the approved construction plans. 4.All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used as part of this verification.) 5.All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.) 6.The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on the cross-sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.) 7.The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees, shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.) N/A See attached letter. N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A 12/15 Page 4 III.Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 4 A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: The as-built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All storm drain pipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.) Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size. 2.The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet. 3.The as-built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of the approved construction plans. B.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: All pipes are installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations. 2.All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met. 3.Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.) IV.Concrete Pans - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.1.3.4 A. Construction/Installation: All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or justification by separate document. 3.The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross- section is “V” shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.) 4.The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4 inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved construction plans.) 5.The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as- built drawings. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 12/15 Page 5 V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 3 A. Construction/Installation: All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction plan. Indicate by writing “Verified” on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is other than the one on the approved construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or better capacity. 2.The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.) 3.The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans. 4.The as-built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation. 5.The as-built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or justification is attached. 6.All inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following designation: NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO POUDRE RIVER. VI.Culverts - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.9 A. Construction/Installation: All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as-built construction plans as correct. 2.The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is indicated on the as-built plans. 3.The as-built invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built construction plans. 4.The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as-built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative. An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM). VII.Sub-Drains A. Construction/Installation: All sub-drains shown on the construction plans have been installed in accordance with those plans. Sub-drains installed with the sanitary sewer are to be verified on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE: Indicate any sub-drains installed after the plans were approved on the as-built plans.) 1.The size of the sub-drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as- built plans. 2.The type of sub-drain, in particular the perforated and non-perforated sections of the drain, are as indicated on the approved construction plans. No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No No 12/15 Page 6 3.The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided. 4.The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations marked.) 5.The backfill materials for sub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This includes the type, depth and width.) 6.The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub-drain and the permeable backfill material unless shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub-drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material is accepted only if approved prior to installation.) VIII.Curb Cuts A. Construction: All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The curb cut openings tie into a downstream swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb cut. IX.Sidewalk Culverts & Chases A. Construction/Installation: All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 3.The sidewalk culvert invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built plans. 4.The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 5.There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert. X. Site Grading A. Construction: All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and the as-built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as-built plans. No N/A No Yes No Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Yes 12/15 Page 7 2.The as-built contours for “overlot grading” are shown on the as-built construction plans for all common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.) 3.All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans and the slopes are stabilized. XI.Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A. Construction: All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. XII.Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A. Construction: All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. 1.All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans. XIII.Post-Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.7 A. Construction: All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from drainage paths. 1.All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s). 2.All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas. 3.All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note the area needing stabilization in the narrative. XIV.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.The construction of channel drop structures is in accordance with the approved plan both in location, horizontal dimensions and cross-section. XV.Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.4 A.Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation. N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Attachment 2 12/15 Page 1 DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST To be completed by Construction Superintendent This checklist is to be completed during construction and included with the Overall Site and Drainage Certification. •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. I.Compaction A.All berms and embankments meet the compaction requirements as specified in the project geotechnical report or comply with the City’s standard, which is “soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 2% below to 2% above optimum moisture content and compacted to 95% of the Maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).” Compaction requires verification during construction. Provide testing log from contractor/engineer. II.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements A.The pipe trenches have been compacted in accordance with Section 02225-3.07.A.1. of the Fort Collins Development Construction Standards (e.g., the trenches in the roadways are to be 95% of maximum density and all other areas are to be at 90%, both in accordance with ASTM D698). III. Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A.The riprap bedding is a granular bedding of the gradation and thickness indicated on the approved construction plans. B.A filter fabric was installed instead of granular bedding and is the material shown on the approved construction plans or was an approved equal. Provide documentation for an approved equal. C.The riprap is the gradation shown on the approved construction plans with a D50 of . D.The riprap thickness is as shown on the approved construction plans and extends to the horizontal limits shown. E.The riprap is buried to the depth indicated on the approved construction plans. (A minimum of 6 inches of soil is required.) IV. Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A.All fabric was installed per manufacturer’s specifications. V. Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.All cut-off walls have been installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. (Cut-off walls are required for irrigation ditch crossings of storm drain pipes and at the end of flared end sections.) 12/15 Page 2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Post-excavation infiltration rates are consistent with design infiltration capacity (for “full or partial infiltration” designs) Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed and checked for water-tightness. Meets specifications for: -Dimensions -Reinforcement -Footings Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test Base coarse (e.g., #2/4) has 90% fractured faces Bedding coarse (e.g., #89) is thoroughly washed Sub-base materials are installed and compacted according to manufacturer’s specifications PICP area is protected from construction site sediment, including runoff from the upstream catchment and Close Out Areas were flagged for pedestrian and equipment traffic. Rock Socks were placed at the head end to divert any sediment runnoff. All upstream runoff was diverted down garage alley. No liner was required per the design documents. 12/15 Page 3 Bioretention Cells Heavy equipment did not travel over bioretention cell during excavation Bottom of cell was “ripped” after excavation Photograph before/after “ripping” Bottom of cell is flat and level Photograph Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff control BMPs during construction Photograph Overflow inlet elevation is set above bioretention media per plan (typically 12 inches) Overflow inlet invert elevation is at least 3 inches below containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet) Measure/record distance between inlet and top of containment wall/berm Upstream catchment drains to inlet Forebay is installed according to design specifications Forebay has flat, concrete bottom Outlet structure/overflow elevation is confirmed Measure/record distance from overflow to top of media filter Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test Geo fabric was ram-set to perimeter concrete curbs and sidewalks Geo textile fabric was installed per approved submittal Cleanouts were not specified in the contract documents Water test performed and water was observed running through drain pipe down to storm manholes Attached Attached Attached Per plan elevations 12/15 Page 4 Filter Media Filter media composition is per design specifications Filter media was “machine mixed” by supplier prior to delivery Filter media installed flat and level Other Structural Components Containment wall/berm is continuous and level Landscaping Final landscaping does NOT include sod Final landscaping (wood/rock mulch) is flat and level Vegetation is planted according to landscape design specifications Verify that weed barrier is not installed Temporary irrigation installed If N/A, then verify that permanent irrigation is installed to establish/maintain vegetation Close Out Upstream catchment stabilized prior to diverting runoff into bioretention cell Signature: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Company: Address: Installed per approved submittal The grading per the drawings is not flat and level in the bio areas The grading per the drawings is not flat and level in the bio areas Attachment 3 Bottom Area (sq ft) Top Area (sq ft) Average Area (sq ft) Depth (ft) Volume (cu ft) Bottom Area (sq ft) Top Area (sq ft) Average Area (sq ft) Depth (ft) Volume (cu ft) Depth (ft) Volume (cu ft) West rain garden on Chestnut Street in front of hotel.220 423 321 0.50 161 0 220 110 0.56 62 1.06 222 East rain garden on Chestnut Street in front of hotel.88 432 260 1.00 260 0 88 44 0.38 17 1.38 277 Rain garden on east side of Old Firehouse Alley (Parking Garage #1).32 172 102 0.49 50 0 32 16 0.32 5 0.81 55 Rain garden on west side of parking garage entrance (Parking Garage #2).36 193 114 0.44 50 0 36 18 0.33 6 0.77 56 Rain garden on east side of parking garage entrance (Parking Garage #3).29 163 96 1.20 116 6.74 29 18 0.20 4 1.40 119 Rain garden at intersection of Chestnut and Jefferson (Parking Garage #4).23 214 119 1.00 119 0 23 12 0.22 3 1.22 121 South rain garden on Walnut Street.119 372 245 0.46 113 0 119 175 0.50 88 0.96 200 North rain garden on Walnut Street.87 316 201 0.44 89 0 87 43 0.34 15 0.78 103 Total 1154 Upper Half Pond Bottom Total Rain Garden Description Attachment 4 G T TECT V C.O . G T TECT V C.O . 1.5" W 1.5" W 6" F 6" F 6" F SS X X SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T T T T T TTTTTTTTTTT T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T D S VAU L T ELE C ELE C ELE C S S S S D TRA F F I C VAU L T VAU L T ELE C CON T R O L IRR CO N T R O L IRR VAU L T ELE C CO N T R O L IRR GG EEELE CBRK R ELE CBRK R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V SS D ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST D W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ELE C W W ST ST G G G G G G GGG CSW ELEC ELEC MH CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR ST D ST ST ST ST ST ST X X SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T T T T T TTTTTTTTTTT T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T D S VAU L T ELE C ELE C ELE C S S S S D TRA F F I C VAU L T VAU L T ELE C CON T R O L IRR CO N T R O L IRR VAU L T ELE C CO N T R O L IRR GG EEELE CBRK R ELE CBRK R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V SS D ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST D W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ELE C W W ST ST G G G G G G GGG CSW ELEC ELEC MH CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR CON T R O L IRR ST D ST ST ST ST ST ST SS T E G 6" F C G G G G G G G G G G SS T T G G GGG G 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 2" W 2" W 2" W C UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 12.9'11.8' 5.0' 8" PVC 22.5° BEND AT INVERT ELEVATION 4972.31. N: 131573.44 E: 195685.32 8" PVC 90° BEND AT INVERT ELEVATION 4969.66. N: 131428.42 E: 195849.51 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4972.17 N:131556.62 E:195704.36 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4971.81 N:131536.76 E:195726.85 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4971.44 N:131516.90 E:195749.33 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4971.35 N:131497.04 E:195771.82 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4970.44 N:131461.90 E:195811.60 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4970.16 N:131446.78 E:195828.72 CONNECT 6" UNDERDRAIN TO STORM SEWER AT INVERT ELEV. 4969.89 N:131431.66 E:195845.84 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / S ELE CT T S ELE CT T CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 0 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20 20 40 60 MO U N T A I N A V E N U E JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T PROPOSED HYDRANT EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 326 WALNUT STREET 300 E MOUNTAIN AVENUE 314 E MOUNTAIN AVENUE 130 CHESTNUT STREET EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C300 UTILITY PLAN WA L N U T S T R E E T (1 0 0 ' R O W ) EX . 8 " W A T E R EX . 8 " S A N I T A R Y S E W E R EX. 1 0 " W A T E R EX. 1 2 " S A N I T A R Y S E W E R EX. 8 " S A N . SEW E R EX . 6 " S A N I T A R Y S E W E R CONNECT TO EX. TELEPHONE PER UTILITY COMPANY'S STANDARDS & REGULATIONS CONNECT TO EXISTING GAS EXISTING 42" STORM SEWER PROPOSED 2" WATER METER AND VAULT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 4975.88 INV SW = 4969.28 (8" PVC) INV NE = 4969.28 (8" PVC) EX. INV NW = 4969.08 (8" PVC) EX. INV NE = 4969.08 (8" PVC) E 20' WIDE ACCESS ,UTILITY, DRAINAGE EASEMENT EX. 6" GAS MAIN E G SS 1.5" W 6" F T CTV SS W VAULT ELEC HY D CONTROL IRR FO G T ST E NOTES: PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL) PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING STORM INLET RIM ELEV. = 4977.48 OUTLET PIPE GOES STRAIGHT DOWN CTV 66.82 LF OF 8" HDPE STORM SEWER @ 1.0% CONNECT TO EX. MH @ INVERT ELEV. 4971.71 (CORE & SEAL) PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL) HOTEL ENTRANCE AND DROP-OFF CHESTNUT STREET (100' ROW) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED 10' WIDE SIDEWALK PROPOSED 10' WIDE SIDEWALK PR O P O S E D 7 . 6 ' WI D E S I D E W A L K N4 8 ° 3 2 ' 2 4 " W 2 0 0 . 0 0 ' N41°36'48"E 189.82' S4 8 ° 3 3 ' 4 8 " E 1 9 9 . 9 8 ' S41°35'18"W 189.93' N4 8 ° 3 3 ' 4 8 " W 2 4 9 . 9 0 ' N41°37'05"E 190.00' PROPOSED 13' WIDE SIDEWALKPROPOSED 10.5' WIDE SIDEWALK S41°36'30"W 189.90' INSTALL 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AT INVERT 4969.52 AND MINIMUM 1% SLOPE. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION EX. 24" STORM SEWER EX. 8 " S A N I T A R Y S E W E R EX. SANITARY SEWER MH RIM=4975.28 INV NW=4968.28 (8" PVC) INV E=4968.55 (8" PVC) INV SW=4968.18 (8" PVC) EX. SANITARY SEWER MH RIM=4978.82 INV SE=4973.42 (4" PVC) INV SE=4972.37 (8" PVC) INV S=4972.49 (8" PVC) INV W=4971.87 (8" PVC) CONNECT PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER (CORE & SEAL) RIM = 4975.45 PRPSD. INV NW = 4968.63 (10" RCP) EX. INV SW = 4965.92 (24" RCP) EX. INV NE = 4965.92 (24" RCP) EX. 8" SANITARY SEWER EX. 8 " W A T E R EX. 24" STORM SEWER 5 6 8 7 9 10 8" HDPE ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEVATION 4971.00 AND 3% SLOPE. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING TREE (TYP.) 1 2 1 3 3 4 PROPOSED 45° HORIZONTAL BEND WITH THRUST BLOCK INSTALL 90° BEND WITH THRUST BLOCK EX . 3 0 " S T O R M S E W E R EX . 8 " W A T E R EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCHING GEAR PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED GENERATOR (RE: MEP) BUILDING COLUMN (TYP. - RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED DOWNTOWN HOTEL PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE CONNECT TO EX. ELECTRIC MAIN PER FORT COLLINS STANDARDS & REGULATIONS RELOCATED CABLE PEDESTAL AND REPLACE CABLE (NORTH AND SOUTH) INTO PEDESTAL PER COMCAST'S STANDARDS & REGULATIONS. RD RD 29 . 1 3 L F O F 1 0 " H D P E ST O R M S E W E R @ 3 . 0 % 40.68 LF OF 8" HDPE ROOF DRAIN @ 1.0% 8" HDPE ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEVATION 4972.80. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. 8" HDPE 90° BEND AT INVERT ELEV 4972.76 30.45 LT OF 8" HDPE STORM SEWER @ 2.5% 242 LINDEN STREET 252 LINDEN STREET PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS AND PATIO COORDINATE WITH CITY (SEE NOTE 14). 65 . 6 4 L F O F 1 5 " R C P ST O R M S E W E R @ 8 . 0 % PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 4975.45 PRPSD. INV W = 4968.07 (15" RCP) PRPSD. INV W = 4970.50 (6" PVC) PRPSD. INV N = 4972.65 (6" PVC) EX. INV SW = 4967.30 (24" RCP) EX. INV NE = 4967.30 (24" RCP) PROPOSED 18" DIAMETER NYLOPLAST INLET GRATE = 4975.00 FINISH GROUND = 4974.17 INV W = 4970.25 (8" HDPE) INV NW = 4970.25 (10" HDPE) INV SW = 4971.97 (6" PVC) INV SE = 4969.50 (10" HDPE) DRY UTILITY NOTES KEY NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 INSTALL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE (RE: ELECTRICAL PLANS) 12 13 8 9 10 12 13 12 13 INSTALL TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE (RE: ELECTRICAL PLANS) T T 14 14 PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6'x12' AREA FOR COMCAST AND/OR CENTURLINK FOR VAULTS, PEDESTALS, POWER SUPPLIES, AND HAND HOLES 11 11 ss INSTALL 2" WATER SERVICE. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION INSTALL 6" FIRE SERVICE. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION POTENTIAL FUTURE FLEX SPACE POTENTIAL FUTURE FLEX SPACE RELOCATED CABLE AMPLIFIER AND REPLACE CABLE (NORTH AND SOUTH) INTO AMPLIFIER PER COMCAST'S STANDARDS & REGULATIONS. LEGEND: EXISTING DRIVEWAY SEE DETAIL A ON SHEET C301 SEE DETAIL B ON SHEET C301 RD 8" HDPE 90° BEND AT INVERT ELEV 4972.43 3.00 WIDE EMERGENCY ACCESS & ACCESS EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VARIABLE WIDTH) DRAINAGE EASEMENT SEE DETAIL C ON SHEET C301 UD INSTALL 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AT INVERT 4969.43 AND MINIMUM 1%. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION 2" W MINIMUM 4' BETWEEN EXISTING GAS MAIN & UNDERDRAIN (TYP.) CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE AND VERIFY DEPTH OF EXISTING GAS. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ENGINEER IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN EXISTING GAS, PROPOSED UNDERDRAIN, AND PROPOSED STORM SEWER. UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED 12" DIA. NYLOPLAST INLET N:131266.38; E:195695.10 GRATE = 4977.83 INV NE = 4975.19 (4" PVC) INV NW = 4975.19 (4" PVC) 1 PROPOSED RETAINING/SEAT WALL (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED PATIO BAR (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED RAISED DECK (RE: ARCHITECT) 1 76.89 PR O P O S E D W A L K S4 8 ° 3 2 ' 5 1 " E 2 4 9 . 8 0 ' PR O P O S E D SI D E W A L K 1 EXISTING 30" STORM SEWER 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING INLET AT ELEV. 4969.58 (CORE & SEAL) PROPOSED STORM SEWER AREA INLET GRATE = 4975.74 INV NE = 4972.57 (8" PVC) N: 131581.53 E: 195664.59 1 1 1 UD UD UD UD UD UD UD DAYLIGHT 4" PVC DRAIN PIPE INTO PLANTER BOX AT INVERT 4975.63. PROVIDE 1-FT WIDE TAPERED CURB CUT INLINE WITH DRAIN PIPE. (N: 131302.65; E:195665.03) OL D F I R E H O U S E A L L E Y (2 0 ' R O W ) DAYLIGHT 4" PVC DRAIN PIPE INTO PLANTER BOX AT INVERT 4975.15. PROVIDE 1-FT WIDE TAPERED CURB CUT INLINE WITH DRAIN PIPE. (N:131271.83; E:195699.91) 20.58 LF 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 0.50% PROPOSED 12" DIA. NYLOPLAST INLET N:131280.00; E:195679.67) GRATE = 4977.77 INV SE = 4975.29 (4" PVC) PROPOSED 12" DIA. NYLOPLAST INLET N: 131297.19; E:195660.22 GRATE = 4977.75 INV NE = 4975.67 (4" PVC) INV NW = 4975.67 (4" PVC) 20.10 LF 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 0.50% PROPOSED 12" DIA. NYLOPLAST INLET N:131310.50; E:195645.15 GRATE = 4977.86 INV SE = 4974.77 (4" PVC) 7.28 LF 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 0.50% 7.28 LF 4" PVC STORM DRAIN @ 0.50%1 1 1 1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER. SEE PROFILE ON SHEET C404.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSTALL STORM DRAIN TO FLOW TOWARDS RAIN GARDEN UNDERDRAIN REMOVE STORM DRAIN BETWEEN STORM MH AND TRENCH DRAIN 3 CONNECTION ALTERNATIVES 1.MAINTAIN APPROVED CONFIGURATION 2.CONNECT TO PROPOSED 15" RCP USING INSERTA-TEE. 3.DEMO AND RECONSTRUCT EXISTING INLET. CONNECT UNDRAIN TO NEW INLET. UPSIZE UNDERDRAIN TO 12" CONNECT ROOF DRAIN TO UNDERDRAIN WITH 12" HDPE 12"ELEV. = 4973.40 NYLOPLAST INLET NYLOPLAST INLET CONNECT STORM PIPES INTO WYE. CONNECT WYE INTO NYLOPLAST INLET THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING 2 77.9376.48 77.77 76.07 76.07 77.8476.49 77.78 76.04 76.04 8.75 8.76 25.2 20.9 1.6% 2.1% 2 2 2 2 2 2 69.67 75.7772.73 2 75.20 76.48 70.61 66 . 2 5.8 5 % 75.60 67.84 71.72 69.18 74.7473.7369.13 2 2 2 2 10" 12" 12" 12 " 30 . 2 4. 4 % 73.35 2 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 69.46 69.45 75.93 69.41 69.26SE 2 6.2% STORM INLET WAS REMOVED 2 G G G GT T T T CSW W W W W ST ST ST ST ST ST ST G G G GT T T T CSW W W W W ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 1.5" W 1.5" W 1.5" W 1.5" W 1.5" W 1.5" W 1.5" W 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 8" PVC 22.5° BEND AT INVERT ELEVATION 4972.31. N: 131573.44 E: 195685.32 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T TTTTTTTT D D E E E E E E E E E E H2O VAU L T ELE C VAU L T ELE C D MH HYD H2O XX X X CS VAU L T ELE C W W W W W W W W W W W W W ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T TTTTTTTT D D E E E E E E E E E E H2O VAU L T ELE C VAU L T ELE C D MH HYD H2O XX X X CS VAU L T ELE C W W W W W W W W W W W W W ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F 6" F UD UD UD UD SS T T T T S E E E E E CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V SS T T T T S E E E E E CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V SS SS ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C301 UTILITY DETAILS CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 010 10 20 30 1 INCH = 10 FEET E G SS T CTV SS W VAULT ELEC HY D CONTROL IRR FO G T ST E NOTES: CTV LEGEND: TIE INTO EXISTING 16" WATER MAIN WITH 16"x6" TAPPING SADDLE, THRUST BLOCK, AND 6" GATE VALVE. CONNECT TO 16" WATER MAIN PER CITY STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS (SEE DETAIL 203 ON SHEET C602) EX I S T I N G 1 6 " W A T E R M A I N (A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N CO N T R A C T O R T O F I E L D V E R I F Y ) EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 1 1 2" WATER METER AND VAULT INSTALL 1 1 2" WATER SERVICE. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION INSTALL 6" FIRE SERVICE. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE PR O P O S E D SI D E W A L K PROPOSED SIDEWALK LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EX I S T I N G 1 2 " S T O R M S E W E R (A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N CO N T R A C T O R T O F I E L D V E R I F Y ) JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T WATER AND FIRE CONNECTIONS FOR PARKING GARAGEA UTILITY CONNECTIONS AT INTERSECTION OF CHESTNUT AND JEFFERSON STREETSB TIE INTO EXISTING 16" WATER MAIN WITH 16"x6" TAPPING SADDLE, THRUST BLOCK, AND 6" GATE VALVE. EX. STORM SEWER MH RIM=4973.53 INV NW=4966.10 (30" RCP) INV NE=4963.82 (24" RCP) INV SE=4966.39 (12" RCP) INV SW=4963.95 (24" RCP) EXISTING STORM INLET RIM=4972.52 INV W=4969.23 (12" RCP) EXISTING STORM INLET RIM=4972.40 INV NW=4967.58 (12" RCP) INV E=4968.65 (12" RCP) CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM INLET (CORE AND SEAL) EXISTING GRATE: 4973.85 N: 131401.84 E: 195858.20 PROPOSED INV IN: 4968.25 12" HDPE (NW) PROPOSED INV IN: 4969.0 6" PVC (SE) EX. INV IN: 4967.00 30" RCP (N) EX. INV OUT: 4967.00 30" RCP (SE) CONNECT PROPOSED UNDERDRAIN INTO EXISTING STORM INLET (CORE AND SEAL) RIM: 4973.30 PR. INV IN: 4969.58 8" PVC (SW) EX. INV OUT: 4969.58 30" RCP (S) EXI S T I N G 3 0 " S T O R M S E W E R EXISTING 24" STORM SEWER EXI S T I N G 1 2 " S T O R M S E W E R EX I S T I N G 1 2 " S T O R M S E W E R EX I S T I N G 3 0 " S T O R M S E W E R EXISTING 24" STORM SEWER PROPOSED SIDEWALK PR O P O S E D SI D E W A L K PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T EX I S T I N G 1 6 " W A T E R M A I N (A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N CO N T R A C T O R T O F I E L D V E R I F Y ) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EX. STORM SEWER MH RIM=4973.43 INV NW=4965.34 (12" RCP) INV NE=4963.23 (24" RCP) INV SW=4963.29 (24" RCP) CHESTNUT STREET EXISTING 24" STORM SEWER RD 12" HDPE ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEV 4968.60. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. 31 . 4 L F O F 1 2 " H D P E ST O R M S E W E R @ 1 . 0 % EX. SANITARY SEWER MH RIM=4977.73 PR. INV NE=4970.08 (6" PVC - SEAL EX. HOLE) EX. INV SE=4969.75 (8" PVC) FUTURE GREASE INTERCEPTOR. SEE APPROVED MECHANICAL/PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS. PROPOSED 6" PVC 45° SANITARY SEWER BEND AT INVERT ELEVATION 4970.11. PROPOSED 6" PVC 45° SANITARY SEWER BEND AT INVERT ELEVATION 4970.35. OL D F I R E H O U S E A L L E Y LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOR PARKING GARAGEC EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE CONTRACTOR SHALL STUB AND PLUG A 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AT 1% MINIMUM FOR FUTURE GREASE INTERCEPTOR. PROPOSED 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER STUB AT INVERT ELEVATION 4970.37. EX I S T I N G 1 2 " S T O R M S E W E R (A P P R O X I M A T E L O C A T I O N CO N T R A C T O R T O F I E L D V E R I F Y ) UD 1.5" W 6" F 3" W PROPOSED STORM SEWER AREA INLET GRATE = 4975.74 INV NE = 4972.57 (8" PVC) N: 131581.53 E: 195664.59 1 1 1 69.67 68.36 68.15 2 75.7772.73 2 2 VAU L T ELE C C.O . MH MHX W W ST ST ST 100-Year BFE 4975.68 100-Year BFE 4978.19 75.8 7FL 76.2 6FL 76.4 8FL 76.9 8FL 77.6 1FL 78.2 4FL/H P 78.0 0FL (78.3 3 ) (78.1 7 ) (77.7 7 ) (77.2 8 ) (76.5 9 ) (76.4 1 ) (76.3 1 ) (76.2 0 ) 1.3%1.0%2.0%1.0%1.0%3.0% 5.2% 77.8 9 FL 78.47 8. 1 % 6.4% 2.0 % 3.0% 2.2 % 2.0%2.7 % 2.9% 3.9 % 2.2 % 1.7 % 2.2 % 2.1 % 4. 5 % 2.2% 2.4 % 78.15 76 . 2 2 76.5 4 76.5 1 75.7 9 79. 0 0 GRD 78. 5 0 GRD 78.3 3 TC 76.2 8 TC 77.2 5 76. 4 8 76.7 9 TC/F F 76.7 9 TC/F F 5.8 % 77.7 4 TC 77. 1 1 TC 76 . 4 0 TC 77.9 7FL 1.3% 2.8% 5.7% 3.2 %2.2 % 3.9 % 3.8 % 76.33 (78 . 4 2 ) (3 . 1 % ) (0.7%) (2 . 9 % ) (2.5% ) 1.3% (7 . 5 % ) (2.6 % ) (1 . 6 % ) (4 . 5 % ) (4.0 % ) (3 . 4 % ) (3.4% ) (2.7% ) 17.7% 77.6 0 FL 1. 4 % 4.1% 78. 1 2 78 . 3 1 78 . 1 8 77 . 9 5 77 . 6 0 77 . 0 5 76. 7 4 76. 3 8 75. 9 5 78.2 8 2.3%1.6%76 . 3 8 0.9% 77. 6 9 76 . 5 1 76. 9 4 76. 7 1 76.8 3 76.8 476. 9 9 76.52 2. 0 % 5.0 % 5.8% 6.4% 76. 2 8 77. 7 8 78. 7 6 78. 1 9 77.99 78.21 0.4 % 1.3 % 77. 5 8 1. 0 % 75. 9 3 76 . 3 0 2.5 % T E G UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST FO FO FO FO FO D VAU L T ELE C ELE C ELE C D TRA F F I C VAU L T VAU L T ELE C VAU L T ELE C GG EEELE CBRK R ELE CBRK R D ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST D ELE C ST ST ELEC ELEC MH ST D ST ST ST ST ST ST 100-YEAR BFE 4976.72 100-YEAR BFE: 4978.15 100-YEAR BFE: 4978.31 10 0 - Y E A R B F E 49 7 4 . 3 5 10 0 - Y E A R B F E 49 7 4 . 9 7 10 0 - Y E A R B F E 49 7 5 . 1 6 100-Year BFE 4977.43 100-Year BFE 4977.11 2. 0 % 2.0% 3.0 %79.0 0 GRD 78.5 0 GRD 77.2 5 GRD 76. 4 8 GRD 76.7 9 TC/F F 76.7 9 TC/F F 74.7 5GRD 74.5 0GRD 75. 4 7 GRD 76.0 0 GRD 75.00 GRD 74.2 5GRD 5.9% 5.8% 4.6% 9.4 % 6.3% 5.1% 9.3 % 74. 3 0GRD 73.8 5 1. 1 % 1. 7 % 2.0% 2.0% 2. 0 % 7.1% 74. 4 8GRD 76.15 GRD 7.5% 1. 1 % 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 0.7% TC: 7 8 . 0 0 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 76.3 1 77.2 2 HP/ F L 76 . 9 3 FL (77 . 1 0 ) 74.8 0 LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4978.00 75.2 6HP (77.48) FL 76.0 9FL 76.5 2HP/ F L (76 . 5 5 ) (76.04) (74.78) 76.4 4HP/ F L 75.6 4HP/ F L 76.3 0FL 76.5 7FL (74 . 8 4 ) FL 75.2 7FL 77.5 6 FL 78.2 1FL 75.3 6 73.44 FL 73.29 FL 73.5 0 TC/ F F 73.5 0TC/ F F 73.5 8 FL 73.2 8 FL 73.5 1 FL 73.8 5 FL 73.4 4 FL 73.7 8 FL 73.3 6 FL 73.1 9 FL 74.4 1 FL 74.0 6 FL 74.3 0 FL 74. 3 1 FL 74.6 0 FL 74.1 8 FL (77 . 6 8 ) FL 78. 1 4FL UPPER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4979.00 TC: 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 75.9 9FL 76.7 6FL 73.7 3 FL TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:79 . 0 0 77 . 3 1 1. 5 % 3. 5 % 2. 0 % 2.0 % 0.6 % 1.0% 1.0% 2.1% 2.1%1.0% 2. 4 % 3.0% 4.5 % 0.9 % 2.2% 1.3% 1. 9 % (1 . 0 % ) (0 . 6 % ) (1 . 0 % ) (1 . 0 % ) (2 . 7 % ) (1.3%)(1.8%)(0.7%) 1.2% (0.8%) 0.6% (1 . 9 % ) (1. 5 % ) (1 . 7 % ) (0. 9 % ) (0.8 % ) (0 . 5 % ) 1.0%0.5% 3.2 % 3.8 % 2.4% 0.7% 3. 3 % 2. 6 % 2. 6 % (3 . 4 % ) 2. 0 % 2. 2 % 2. 0 % 1. 4 % 1.2%2.0% 3.8% 2.5% 1.1% 3.2% 2.9% 1. 8 % 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 2. 8 % 1. 6 % 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 1. 0 % 1. 8 % 0.7% 0.6 % 0.8 % 2.0% 1. 2 % 2. 0 % 1.9 % 1. 1 % 1. 1 % 3.4 % 3.1% 2.9% 3.6% 1. 1 % (3.6%) 1.5%0.7% 3.3% 1.3% 1.8 % 1.9 % 2.8% 5.4 % 2.9 % 3. 4 % 3.3%4.3 % 1.7% 3.0% 3.0% 2.8 % 2.3% TC : 7 8 . 7 5 FF : 7 9 . 0 0 TC: 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 (74 . 0 2 ) FL74.6 7FL TB C : 7 7 . 2 4 FL : 7 6 . 6 2 76.7 0 FL 76 . 7 8 FL 76.7 5 FL 79.00 TC 79.00 TC (75.0 6 ) TBC(75.3 2 ) TBC 74.4 5FL (74.7 4 ) TBC 74.1 5FL (74.2 0 ) TBC (74.0 9 ) TBC 79.00 TC 77.5 4 TC TW:79.35 BW:77.54 78.00 TC 79.00 TC 76.5 2 FL 77 . 3 1 FL 2. 2 % 2. 1 % 3.5 % 3. 5 % 3.2% 1. 7 % 78 . 3 5 FL / H P 0.6% 3. 7 % 1.4 % 1. 0 % 2.4% 2.1 % 77.9 7FL 78.86 TC 74.7 5 GRD 75.9 5 TC/ F F 75.9 5 TC/ F F 75.3 9 TC 76.0 0 GRD 77.2 1 TC 76.3 3 TC 5.4% 8.6% 8.6% 17.7% 5.3% 3.7 % 76.05 FL 77.1 8 FL 2.0% 1. 0 % 1. 0 % 74. 6 1 FL 75.3 0 75.48 FL TW:81.50 BW/TP:75.49 75.1 1 FL 2.0%2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 75.0 3 TBC : 7 7 . 7 2 FL:7 6 . 7 4 TBC : 7 7 . 2 8 FL:7 6 . 8 2 74.81 GRATE 74.81GRATE 74.8 6 FL 2.1% 75.25 FL75.3 7 TP 75.71 TP 78.89 TS 78.84 TW 76.8 7BS/ B W 76.81 BS/BW 78.89 TS 77.22 BW 78.84 TW 78.0 0 TC77.9 3 TC78.0 0 TC 75.8 5 75.8 5 75.0 3 2.0% 74. 0 0 76. 9 4 76.8 3 76. 2 8 76.2 4 11% 75. 8 4 75. 3 1 8.5% 73. 3 8 73.7 0 74. 2 1 4.9% 74. 2 6 74. 1 0 73. 9 5 73. 4 9 73. 5 6 73.4 4 73. 6 8 73. 9 0 73. 6 1 73. 8 1 73.2 6 73. 3 4 73. 5 1 73. 3 4 73. 2 9 74. 6 874.86 76. 1 1 76. 0 5 76. 0 5 75. 9 8 75. 9 6 75. 2 0 75. 2 8 78. 7 6 78. 1 9 77. 1 1 76. 3 0 76 . 5 7 FF 76.0 2 FF 75.8 4 FF 77. 1 3 1. 3 % 75.8 8 75.5 4 75.3 3 74. 8 0 75. 1 6 75. 4 3 0. 9 % 1. 7 % 1. 2 % 74.85 74. 4 2 74. 9 0 4978.07 78.0 7 FF 74. 3 2 73. 7 6 74. 0 9 74. 4 0 74.2 274. 5 8 74. 3 9 77. 1 9 1.4%0.6% 76. 3 5 77 . 3 0 77 . 0 1 1.8% 76. 7 7 76. 5 6 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 7 73. 9 6 73. 9 9 74.3 8 74.4 2 74.6 6 75.0 7 75.4 7 74. 1 7 74. 6 0 74. 9 4 75. 2 5 75. 6 8 75.99 76. 5 2 76. 7 8 77 . 0 5 76 . 7 4 77.3 0 76.7 8 76. 7 9 77.2 1 76.6 9 77 . 1 8 76 . 6 4 78 . 7 2 78 . 6 9 78 . 7 278. 7 0 78. 7 2 78 . 7 2 78 . 1 9 78 . 1 2 77 . 9 6 1.3% 0.9% 77.46 79.04 79.0 2 79.0 2 77.43 79.03 78.01 77. 3 3 77.8677.20 76. 6 2 76. 4 6 0. 6 % 76. 2 8 76. 7 0 1. 9 % 0. 6 % 78.8676 . 9 0 78.92 78.9176.86 4979.02 0. 4 % 0.5 % 1. 4 % 1.4 % 3.4 % 0.5% 2.5 % 1.0% 5.3% //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 73.7 4 TC 73.5 3 TC 1. 6 % 1. 8 % 73.9 1 ST D D MH X X VAU L T ELE C W W W W W ST ST ST ST 100-Year BFE 4973.71 VAU L T ELE CT T (4 . 1 % ) (3.2 % ) 78.0 0TC77.8 4 BS/ T W / T C 78.8 4 TS/T W / T C 76.7 1BW 77.8 4BS/T C 78.8 4 TS/T C 76. 7 9 77. 8 677. 9 1 78. 8 5 78.8 8 ( IN FEET ) 0 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20 20 40 60 MO U N T A I N A V E N U E PROPOSED DOWNTOWN HOTEL OL D F I R E H O U S E A L L E Y (2 0 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) CHESTNUT STREET (100' ROW) JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T 20' WIDE ACCESS,UTILITY, AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT PRO P O S E D SID E W A L K SIDEWALK 326 WALNUT STREET 300 E MOUNTAIN AVENUE 314 E MOUNTAIN AVENUE 130 CHESTNUT STREET EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C400 GRADING PLAN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVIDE BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS (RE: ARCHITECT) EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET RIM = 4975.42 INV OUT = 4973.46 (12" RCP) 77.71 (77.90) 1.8% (1.8%) PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE (SEE SHEET C300) HOTEL ENTRANCE AND DROP-OFF EXISTING DRIVEWAY PR O P O S E D S I D E W A L K PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED SIDEWALK LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR O P O S E D S I D E W A L K PROPOSED SIDEWALK N4 8 ° 3 2 ' 2 4 " W 2 0 0 . 0 0 ' N41°36'48"E 189.82' S4 8 ° 3 3 ' 4 8 " E 1 9 9 . 9 8 ' S41°35'18"W 189.93' N4 8 ° 3 3 ' 4 8 " W 2 4 9 . 9 0 ' N41°37'05"E 190.00' S4 8 ° 3 2 ' 5 1 " E 2 4 9 . 8 0 ' S41°36'30"W 189.90' PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN EXISTING PROPERTY LINE WA L N U T S T R E E T (1 0 0 ' R O W ) PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING TREE (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE (SEE SHEET C300 FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SEE SHEET C300 FOR DETAILS) STAIRS ST A I R S EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING DRIVEWAYEXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING SIDEWALK & DRIVEWAY MATCH INTO EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB MATCH INTO EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB MATCH INTO EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB MATCH INTO EXISTING MATCH TOP BACK OF CURB INTO EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING TRANSFORMER PROPOSED CURB AROUND TRANSFORMER PADS PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED GENERATOR (RE: MEP) PROPOSED LANDSCAPING BEDS (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SEE DETAIL A ON SHEET C401 SEE DETAIL B ON SHEET C401 UD MATCH INTO EXISTING MATCH INTO EXISTING MATCH INTO EXISTING RD RD 10" RCP ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEVATION 4972.80. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) 242 LINDEN STREET 252 LINDEN STREET PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS AND PATIO LEGEND: CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C RD T SEE DETAIL C ON SHEET C401 REPLACE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER AT MIN. FLOWLINE OF 0.5% AND VARIABLE CURB HEIGHT (SEE PROFILE ON SHEET C203) 0.5%0.5%0.5% EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY MATCH INTO EXISTING EXISTING PARKING LOTEXISTING UNIMPROVED PARKING LOT EDGE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED RIBBON CURB (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SEE DETAIL D ON SHEET C401 SEE DETAIL E ON SHEET C401 GRAD E BREA K PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB C C C C C C C C PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR GARAGE FIRST FLOOR GRADING - SEE NOTE 14) POTENTIAL FUTURE FLEX SPACE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS - SEE NOTE 14) NOTES: PROPOSED AREA STORM INLET PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED 30" OUTFALL CURB AND CUTTER (SEE DETAIL) BE G I N V A R I A B L E CU R B H E I G H T EN D V A R I A B L E CU R B H E I G H T 3' WIDE EMERGENCY ACCESS & ACCESS EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT EDGE OF ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VARIABLE WIDTH) DRAINAGE EASEMENT C C C POTENTIAL FUTURE FLEX SPACE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS - SEE NOTE 14) RETAIL SPACE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS - SEE NOTE 14) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT VARIABLE CURB HEIGHT AT THIS LOCATION (SEE TREE CROSS SECTION DETAILS AND NOTES ON SHEET C606)TT UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 1 1 STEP 1 KEY NOTES: 1 2 1 2 4 3 4 5 5 5 3 4 6 1 2 SEE DETAIL B ON SHEET C404 SEE DETAIL C ON SHEET C404 1 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED EDGE OF RAISED DECK (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED EDGE OF RAISED DECK (RE: ARCHITECT) STAIRS PROPOSED LID TREE WELL (TYP. - SEE DETAIL) 4 4 6 4 4 6 THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 UD UD X 2.0% 1. 1 % 1.0% 2.9% 2.0% 1.5% 2.0% 5.5% 2.0% 2.0% 1. 7 % 3. 8 % 1. 1 % 1. 1 % 1. 1 % 2.0% 5. 0 % 2.0% 1. 2 % 1. 2 % 5.0%2. 0 % 2.9 % 3.3 %4. 3 % 4. 5 % 5. 4 % 3. 8 % 2. 8 % 77.7 7HP/ F L 77.26 FL 77.4 9FL 77.9 1FL 77.8 0 FL 77.7 4FL 78.0 6 FL 77.7 3 BS 78.8 5 TS 77.8 9 BS 78.8 5 TS 77.7 7BS 78.8 5 TS/T C TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:7 9 . 0 0 77.6 6 TBC 77.1 6 FL 77.3 6FL TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:79 . 0 0 TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:79 . 0 0 77. 3 6FL 78.0 8BS/ F L TS:( 7 8 . 9 1 ) BS:( 7 8 . 5 2 ) 77.8 7 TBC77.54 FL TW : 7 9 . 3 5 BW : 7 8 . 1 2 TC: 7 8 . 2 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 (78 . 5 7 ) 77. 3 7 TBC UPPER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4979.00 GRD : 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 2. 2 % 78. 2 9FL 77.9 2 FL TBC:78 . 4 3 (78.43 ) TBC : 7 8 . 4 6 (78. 4 6 ) TBC : 7 8 . 5 2 (78. 5 2 ) TBC : 7 8 . 6 0 (78. 6 0 ) TC:7 8 . 6 2 FF:7 9 . 0 0 78.4 1 FL TBC : 7 8 . 4 2 (78. 4 2 ) 78.2 3 FL TBC : 7 8 . 6 9 (78. 6 9 ) 2. 0 % 78. 0 6FL 0.7% TW : 7 9 . 3 5 BW : 7 8 . 1 4 2.1 % 2.0 % 2. 0 % TC: 7 8 . 2 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 78.1 1 2.1 % 2. 0 % 1.1% 2. 0 % 2.0% TW: 7 9 . 3 5 TC:7 8 . 8 5 77.9 0BS/ B W 79.3 5 TW 78.8 5 TS/T C 78.8 5 TC TW : 7 9 . 3 5 BW : 7 7 . 5 6 TW : 7 9 . 3 5 TC: 7 8 . 8 5 TW : 7 9 . 3 5 TC: 7 8 . 8 8 77.76 BW 77.7 4 GRA T E 77.7 5GRA T E 0.7% (77.48) FL 77. 5 6 FL 78. 2 1FL (77 . 6 8 ) FL UPPER FINISH FLOOR TC : 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:79 . 0 0 1. 1 % (3.6%) 1.5%0.7% TC : 7 8 . 7 5 FF : 7 9 . 0 0 1.4 % 77.9 7FL 79.0 2 79.0 2 77.46 1.3% 78 . 7 2 78 . 7 5 78. 7 2 78. 7 0 77.51 77. 8 6 77. 7 6 77. 9 6 77. 9 6 78. 1 1 78. 2 9 78. 4 2 78. 4 8 78. 1 9 0.9% 78. 0 4 77. 9 2 77. 7 8 1.3% 3. 0 % 2. 5 % 5. 0 % 78 . 2 378. 4 2 77. 7 1 78 . 1 0 77 . 8 7 1. 3 % 1. 5 % 78. 8 4 78. 8 2 78. 8 2 79.0 2 78.9 4 1. 9 % 78. 8 377. 7 4 77. 7 2 77.31 0. 6 % 0. 7 % 3.2% 3.0% 77. 2 4 77. 5 7 77. 8 1 1.5 % 77. 3 5 77. 3 5 77. 6 9 77. 3 5 78.8 9 77.69 78 . 8 5 79.0 1 79.0 2 4979.02 77 . 4 3 79. 0 3 79.0 4 79.0 2 4. 0 % 78. 0 1 7. 3 % 78.6 1 78.6 1 78.5 1 78.5 1 78.7 6 78.7 6 78.8 9 78.8 9 79.0 2 79.0 2 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// T G XXX ELEC ELEC 1.0% 3. 0 % 0.7% 2.1% 2.1% 3. 8 % 3. 5 % 5.6 %2.8 % 3.7 % 3.7 % 4. 4 % 2. 3 % 2. 6 % 3. 7 % 3.9 % 2.4 % 4. 3 % (78 . 1 6 ) TS:7 8 . 9 0 BS:7 8 . 4 0 TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:7 9 . 0 0 TS: 7 8 . 9 0 BS: 7 8 . 4 0 TC:78.0 0 UPPER F F : 7 9 . 0 0 TC:7 7 . 7 6 77.7 5TC (78 . 1 7 ) (77 . 8 8 ) (78 . 3 7 ) (78 . 3 1 ) (78 . 4 5 ) 78.0 0FL TBC:(7 8 . 4 1 ) FL:77. 5 3 TBC:( 7 8 . 5 3 ) FL:77 . 8 5 UPPER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4979.00 (78 . 5 0 ) (78 . 5 4 ) 77.8 9FL 4. 9 % 4. 3 % TC : 7 8 . 7 5 FF : 7 9 . 0 0 TC : 7 8 . 5 0 FF : 7 9 . 0 0 5. 1 % 4. 5 % TC: 7 9 . 0 0 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 77.7 5 FL TC:7 8 . 0 0 FF:7 9 . 0 0 2.3%0.7% 78.2 4 TC:7 8 . 0 0 FF:7 8 . 0 0 TC:77 . 9 8 FF:78 . 0 0 2.0%LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4978.00 77.8 5 TS/T C (78 . 4 9 ) (78 . 4 4 ) 78 . 3 2 FL 0.6% 1. 2 % 3. 7 % 3. 9 % 1.8 % TW:8 1 . 5 0 TS/TC : 7 7 . 8 5 77. 4 9GRD 5.9% 5.8% 4.6%2.4%2.0% 1. 0 % 6.5% 1. 0 % 2.0% 2. 3 % 2.0%5.0% 2.0%2.0% 2.0%2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 76.94 TP 77.1 8 TP 77.0 2 TP 76.9 1 FL 77.0 6 FL 77.2 6 77.3 7 FL 76.4 7 76.1 8 FL 76.7 4 FL 76.3 5 BS 1. 0 % 76.5 0 TP 76.26 TP 76.5 0 TP TP:76. 2 5 FF:78. 0 0 2.0% 5.1% 77.4 4 TBC 7.6% 77.5 2 TBC 77.68 TBC 77.0 0 TP 77.00 TP 77.00 TP 2. 0 % TBC:77 . 7 5 1. 0 % 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 76.7 3 TP 1.7% 76.2 7 FL 76.5 1 FL 2. 3 % 76.3 5 BS TW: 8 1 . 5 0 TC:7 7 . 9 3 78.0 0 TC TC: 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 78. 1 4FL UPPER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4979.00 TC: 7 8 . 7 5 FF: 7 9 . 0 0 0.6% 77.2 1 TC 76.3 3 TC 76.05 FL 77.1 8 FL 2.0% 1. 0 % 1. 0 % 78. 2 2 78. 1 2 78. 4 7 4979.02 78 . 7 2 78 . 6 9 78 . 7 2 1. 3 % 77. 1 3 77 . 1 1 76 . 5 7 FF 76. 3 0 4979.02 78 . 3 6 78. 5 0 78 . 7 3 78 . 7 3 78 . 7 3 78 . 7 3 79. 0 3 79. 0 3 79. 0 3 79 . 0 4 79 . 0 3 78 . 3 8 79 . 0 4 79. 0 3 77. 9 8 77 . 9 7 77. 8 8 77. 6 9 77.98 1.4%1.9% 77. 2 7 78. 1 3 77.79 7. 0 % 77. 9 6 6.9% 2.5% 3.9% 9.0% 4.8% 2.8% 77. 0 4 77. 6 5 78 . 4 6 78.27 0.0% 1.0% 77. 4 0 76. 8 0 77. 3 4 77. 8 7 77. 8 3 0.9% 77.94 79.02 76. 6 4 76. 3 8 77.02 77.02 76. 7 6 77. 4 8 76. 2 7 2. 0 % 1. 8 % 3.0% 2.8% 3.0% 3.0% 75.8 8 76.1 6 0. 8 % 0. 8 % 76.27 76. 2 9 79.5 6 79.56 77.8 978. 0 2 78.0 1 78.0 3 78.0 376.2 4 76 . 3 077. 8 7 4978.07 7.0% 6.0% 77.72 76.99 0.0% 2. 5 % 5. 0 % UD UD UD UD ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST STD ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 2.2% 2.1% 1. 4 % 6.8 % 1.0% 1.2 % 1. 2 % 2.4 % 1.0% 4.3%3.3 % 3. 2 % 3.1% 2. 8 % 3. 3 % 3. 5 % 2.7 % 3. 7 % 1.0% 2.0 % 2. 1 % 4.5% 3. 1 % 1. 0 % 2. 6 % 2. 6 % 1. 6 % 0. 8 % (3 . 8 % ) (2.4%) (4.2% ) (73 . 2 4 ) FL (72 . 7 3 ) FL 72.9 2 FL 73.1 4 FL/H P 73.0 9 FL 72.9 7 FL 73.1 7 FL 72.7 7 FL/H P (72 . 4 1 ) 72.4 8 FL (72 . 5 2 ) FL 72.8 6 FL 73.0 8FL/H P (73 . 6 8 ) (73 . 1 7 ) (73 . 3 5 ) 73.6 5 73.5 0 73.0 8 FL 72.8 1 FL 73.2 3 (73 . 5 7 ) (73.55) (73 . 0 4 ) 73.8 3FL/H P 73.8 3 FL/H P 73.6 2 FL/H P 73.2 7FL/L P 72.9 2 73.4 7 FL 73.5 6 FL 73.6 0FL (72 . 7 4 ) (73 . 4 4 ) (1.3%) 0.6% (1. 5 % ) 1. 4 % 2. 8 % 73. 5 2 73. 3 3 73. 7 3 73. 1 4 73. 7 0 73. 6 7 73. 6 4 73. 6 0 73.6 4 73.5 7 73. 3 9 73. 3 0 73. 3 773. 1 6 73. 0 5 73 . 3 0 73.1 7 0. 6 % 3.5% HP/ 0. 9 % 0.6% 2.0% 3. 0 % 1.0% 73.1 4 FL6.0% UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 76.0 4 FL (75 . 4 2 ) FL/L P TC : 7 8 . 0 0 FF : 7 8 . 0 0 2. 0 % 2.0% 2.0% 5. 7 % 4.4% 10:1 4.9 % 78.00 TC 78.0 0 TC 77.8 3 BW/ T W / T C 78.0 0 TC 77.9 4TC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 75.9 0 FL 75 . 9 0 FL 1.3% 1.8 % 76.1 5 FL 76.6 9 TBC 4.8% 1. 8 % GR D : 7 8 . 7 5 FF : 7 8 . 0 0 GR D : 7 8 . 7 5 FF : 7 8 . 0 0 12 . 9 % 13 . 4 % 78.4 1 TBC 78.4 2TBC 77. 9 2 TC 77.91 TC 76.94 FL 77.4 4 TBC TC: 7 7 . 8 9 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 8 . 0 0 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 8 . 0 0 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 7 . 8 9 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 77.8 4 TC 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 77.6 0 TC 2.0% LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4978.00 77.7 9 TBC / T C 3.3%77.7 4 TBC / T C 3.0% 7.2% 76.0 9 BW 77.83 TW/TC 77.9 4 TC 2. 0 % 4.1% 76.2 0 FL 2.5% 76.7 0 TBC 77.73 TBC 77.2 3 FL 77.8 2 TC6:1 8:1 2. 0 % 10 : 1 3. 1 % 2.0%0.6 % 1.9 % 76.7 0 FL TBC : 7 7 . 7 2 FL:7 6 . 7 4 TBC : 7 7 . 2 8 FL:7 6 . 8 2 77.99 77. 9 2 4978.07 77 . 9 7 77.87 76. 1 0 76. 2 9 76.7 7 77.8 6 77. 8 6 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 2 78 . 0 7 78 . 1 2 77 . 9 1 77.78 77.3 1 77.8 9 78.3 6 78 . 0 7 78 . 1 2 77 . 9 8 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 7 77 . 9 8 78 . 0 7 77 . 9 0 78 . 0 7 77. 7 7 77. 8 8 77. 7 5 77. 6 3 76.6 4 76. 7 9 77.3 0 76.7 8 77.2 1 76.6 9 75. 9 2 76.0 8 75 . 9 5 75. 4 5 77.00 77. 4 6 1.4% 1.7% 4.5 % 4.5% 2.7% 1.7% 2.8% 2.8% 2.3% 2.4% 1. 8 % 2. 5 % UD UD UD GRD : 7 7 . 7 5 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 GRD : 7 7 . 7 5 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 GR D : 7 7 . 7 5 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 7 . 7 5 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC: 7 7 . 6 9 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 TC:7 7 . 1 2 FF:7 8 . 0 0 77.62 TBC 77.6 2 TBC TC: 7 6 . 7 3 FF: 7 8 . 0 0 76.5 5 BW 5. 2 % 14 . 1 % 77.00 TW/G R D 14 . 1 % 76.9 3 TW : 8 1 . 5 0 BS: 7 7 . 9 2 74.5 3 1.0% 76.9 3 3.5% 2. 0 % 4. 3 % 4.9% 2. 0 % 3.5% 2. 0 % 75.0 0 FL 75.4 7 BW 74.9 3 TP 1. 7 % 75.5 1 BW TW:81.50 BW/TC:74.94 4.7% TW:81.50 TC:78.00 75.1 2 TP TW:77.75 GRD:77.75 TW:77.75 GRD/TW:77.00 TW : 8 1 . 5 0 BW / T C : 7 5 . 0 0 TW : 8 1 . 5 0 BS: 7 7 . 9 2 TW:81.50 TC:78.00 77. 9 0TC 77. 8 3TC 77.9 0TC 77.2 2 HP/ F L 74.8 0 74.6 0 FL 1. 5 % 2. 0 % 1.0% 1. 9 % 1.0% 2.0% 1. 8 % 2. 0 % 1.3% 2.8% 3.3% 4.3 % 2.0% 74.81GRATE 78.0 0 TC77.9 3 TC78.0 0 TC 77. 7 8 75. 5 2 74. 9 0 74.95 77. 8 6 77. 8 9 78. 0 1 1. 2 % 74.85 74. 5 8 1.4%77. 1 9 78.0 7 FF 78.07 78.07 77.73 77.73 78 . 0 5 78 . 0 5 78 . 0 5 78 . 0 5 78.07 78 . 0 6 74 . 9 5 78.05 75. 3 7 77.73 77.73 4978.07 78. 0 7 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 7 78. 0 7 78 . 0 7 78 . 0 7 77 . 6 5 77 . 4 0 77 . 4 0 77.7 3 76. 5 8 76 . 7 5 77. 2 7 77.6 1 77. 1 3 77 . 7 2 1. 7 % 3.6% 4.0% 3.5% 2.5 % 5.0% 74. 6 3 76. 8 7 76. 8 8 75. 1 0 2. 0 % TC:7 9 . 0 0 FF:7 9 . 0 0 2.1% 3.2% TS:78.77 BS:78.26 TW: 7 9 . 5 0 BW: 7 8 . 2 1 TW: 7 9 . 5 0 TC:7 9 . 0 0 TW : 7 9 . 5 0 TW:7 9 . 5 0 BW:7 8 . 5 0 TS:7 8 . 8 5 BS:7 8 . 3 5 79.0 0 FF 78.8 6 78.2 4 78 . 9 8 78.9 8 78.9 8 79.4 7 79. 4 9 79.4 2 79. 4 7 78.9 4 78.82 78.22 79 . 4 9 78.2 2 2.5 % CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 010 10 20 30 1 INCH = 10 FEET ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C401 GRADING DETAILS INTERSECTION OF SERVICE ACCESS AND WALNUT STREETA PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN MATCH GRADES INTO BOTTOM OF EXISTING CONCRETE STEP. PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STEP. PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING STORM INLET AND MATCH FLOWLINE GRADE INTO EXISTING INLET RIM ELEV. = 4977.48 9-FT TRANSITION FROM 6" CURB/GUTTER TO 0" CURB/GUTTER BEGIN 8-FT TRANSITION FROM 6" CURB/GUTTER TO 0" CURB/GUTTER 0" VERTICAL CURB AT SOUTHEAST SIDE OF EX. INLET INSTALL RETAINING CURB AGAINST EXISTING BUILDING (SEE DETAIL 007 ON SHEET C600). PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. END RETAINING CURB MATCH INTO EXISTING SIDEWALK AT NEAREST CONCRETE JOINT BEGIN RETAINING CURB 20' WIDE DRIVEWAY SEE DETAIL 402 ON SHEET C604 PROPOSED WALL WITH WEEP HOLES (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING TREE & TREE GRATE WA L N U T S T R E E T (1 0 0 ' R O W ) 326 WALNUT STREET 326 WALNUT STREET PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB PROPOSED GENERATOR (RE: MEP) PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING SWITCH GEAR EXISTING PROPERTY LINE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AROUND EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD. MATCH TOP BACK OF CURB INTO EXISTING TOP OF PAD. PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE STEP (RE: ARCHITECT) INTERSECTION OF SERVICE ACCESS AND OLD FIREHOUSE ALLEYB PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING TREE PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING TRANSFRORMER SHAPE CURB AROUND EXISTING LIGHT POLE. PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING LIGHT POLE EDGE OF ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVIDE BETWEEN UPPER AND LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS (RE: ARCHITECT) PRESERVE & PROTECT EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) RD 10" RCP ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEVATION 4972.76. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. 77.71 (77.90) 1.8% (1.8%) UD LEGEND: C RD T NOTES: MATCH INTO EXISTING FLOWLINE MATCH INTO EXISTING FLOWLINE MATCH INTO EXISTING INLET PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER MATCH INTO EXISTING INLET MATCH INTO EXISTING FLOWLINE PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER MATCH INTO EXISTING MATCH INTO EXISTING JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T CHESTNUT STREET INTERSECTION OF CHESTNUT AND JEFFERSON STREETSC PROPOSED OUTFALL CURB AND GUTTER SOUTH CORNER OF HOTELD EAST CORNER OF HOTELE PROPOSED SEAT WALL (TYP. - RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 8" RCP ROOF DRAIN AT INVERT ELEVATION 4971.00. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION. PROPOSED PLANTER BOX (TYP. - RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) RD PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB PROPOSED INLET (SEE SHEET C300) EDGE OF ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED WALL (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED 5'x5' CONCRETE LANDING WITH 6" STEP (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED WALL WITH WEEP HOLES (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED WALL (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED EDGE OF RAISED DECK (RE: ARCHITECT) MATCH INTO PROPOSED LOADING DOCK (RE: ARCHITECT) C C C C RAIN GARDEN (SEE SHEET C403 FOR GRADING) RAIN GARDEN (SEE SHEET C403 FOR GRADING) RAIN GARDEN (SEE SHEET C403 FOR GRADING) RETAIL SPACE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS - SEE NOTE 13) T T UTILITY EASEMENT 1 1 1 RAIN GARDEN (SEE SHEET C403 FOR GRADING) RAIN GARDEN (SEE SHEET C403 FOR GRADING) 1 2 1 2 KEY NOTES: 3 3 LOWER FINISH FLOOR ELEV = 4978.00 1 1 2 2 2 2 THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING 2 2 1' WIDE CURB CUT INVERT = 4976.99 P-Strm-Hotel-D 4966 4970 4975 4980 4966 4970 4975 4980 9+75 10+00 11+00 11+25 PR S T O R M M H D CO N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G ST O R M S E W E R ( C O R E & S E A L ) ST A 1 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 RI M 4 9 7 6 . 8 ± IN V . I N 4 9 6 7 . 3 0 ( S W ) IN V . I N 4 9 6 8 . 0 7 ( W ) IN V . I N 4 9 7 2 . 6 5 ( N ) IN V . I N 4 9 7 0 . 5 0 ( W ) IN V . O U T 4 9 6 7 . 3 0 ( N E ) (PR O P O S E D S T O R M S E W E R ) 6 7 . 3 7 L F 1 5 " R C P @ 8 . 0 0 % CO N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G EX I N L E T D 2 ( C O R E & S E A L ) ST A 1 0 + 6 7 . 6 9 FL . E L 4 9 7 5 . 4 ± IN V . O U T 4 9 7 3 . 4 6 ( E ) (PROP O S E D U N D E R D R A I N ) 7 1 . 4 8 L F 6 " P V C @ 2 . 7 1 % 49 7 5 . 2 0 49 7 6 . 8 9 48 6 9 . 4 8 48 7 0 . 6 1 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 49 7 3 . 3 5 66.2 5.85 % SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W WWWWWWWWW S S D S TRAFFIC VAULT VAULT ELEC CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR VAULT ELEC CONTROL IRR GG EE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W W W W W CONTROL IRR VAULT ELEC W W W W W STSTSTSTSTSTST W W CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR ST ST D UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UDUDUD PR STORM MH D GRATE: 4976.83 N: 131102.91 E: 195641.04 INV IN: 4967.30 24" RCP INV IN: 4968.07 15" RCP INV IN: 4972.65 6" PVC INV IN: 4970.50 6" PVC INV OUT: 4967.30 24" RCP 67.37 LF 15" R C P @ 8 . 0 0 % ////////////////////////////// UD UD UD UD UD UD FIELD SURVEY BY: CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 0 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20 20 40 60 WAL N U T S T R E E T ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C402 STORM SEWER D PLAN & PROFILE PR O P O S E D S I D E W A L K LEGEND: ST NOTES: STORM SEWER D STORM SEWER PROFILE SCALE : 1" = 10' HORZ. 1" = 1' VERT. EXISTING STORM INLET GRATE: 4975.42 EX. INV OUT: 4973.46 12" RCP FINISH GROUND EXISTING GROUND UD CH E S T N U T S T R E E T MOUNTAIN STREET APPROXIMATE LOCATION & DEPTH OF EXISTING GAS 1 UNDERDRAIN TIES INTO 15" RCP UNDERGROUND 4969.48 4970.61 4976.89 66.2 5.85% 4975.20 4973.35 2 2 2 2 2 THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 77.77 FL 77. 4 9FL 77. 6 6 TBC 77.1 6 FL 76.04 77.40 TC 76.5 7FL TBC:78.27 GRD:77.76 TBC : 7 8 . 3 6 GRD : 7 7 . 8 6 77.8 6HP/ F L 77.4 0 FL TBC : 7 7 . 9 0 GRD : 7 7 . 4 0 76.01 76.10 76.9 4 FL TBC:77.45 GRD:76.69 77.27 TC 76.67 FL 76. 4 3GRD 76. 7 7GR D 77.1 8 TC 76.5 5GRD 77.3 0 TC 77.5 0 TC76.6 1 77 . 4 0 GR D 77.0 2 GRD 77. 6 1 TBC 77.1 0 FL 76.0 7 77.1 7 TBC 2.9% 2.0% 2.0% 1. 1 % 2.0% 3.6% 1. 3 % 2.8 % 4:1 4:1 4:1 5:1 5:1 10:1 5:1 4:1 2.0% 7.9 % 5:1 11:1 7:1 1. 0 % 1.8 % 77. 1 8 76.6 6 76. 9 1 76.5 1 76.5 3 76. 4 2 76 . 6 377. 3 4 77 . 1 0 77. 5 7 77 . 1 0 77 . 1 0 77. 2 4 1. 4 % 77 . 5 7 77. 7 3 77.81 1.5 % 1. 5 % 78 . 2 6 77 . 5 6 78.28 77.85 77. 4 2 77. 8 8 3.4 % 2.5% 77.40 76.93 77. 2 077 . 1 8 77 . 2 7 77. 1 6 76.7 4 76 . 6 1 /HP UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD (75 . 4 2 ) INV 75.90 FL 75.6 7 GRD 76.40 FL TBC:76 . 9 0 GRD:7 6 . 4 0 76.52 FL/HP TBC:77 . 0 2 GRD:7 6 . 5 2 TBC:7 6 . 8 8 GRD:7 6 . 3 8 TBC : 7 6 . 5 6 GRD : 7 6 . 0 6 76.38 FL 76.06 FL 75.05 75.12 75.02 FL 75.1 0 FL 76.13 FL TBC:76 . 6 3 GRD:7 6 . 1 3 75.1 8FL 76.28 FL TBC:76 . 7 8 GRD:7 6 . 2 7 74.98 75.12 74.96 FL 75.30 GRD 75.37 GRD TC: 7 6 . 1 4 GRD : 7 5 . 6 4 75.4 3 GRD 76. 2 6 TC 76.3 6 TC 75. 8 6GRD 76.1 2 TC 76.0 5 TC 76.1 7 TC 75.9 4 FL 76.4 4 TBC TBC : 7 6 . 4 0 GRD : 7 5 . 6 5 75.4 8 GRD 74.8 6GRD 75.8 6 TC 75.9 3 TC 74.93 GRD 75.5 5GRD 76.0 5 TC 75.9 8 TC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 1.8 % 2.0% 7.0% 2. 2 % 2.0% 2.0% 1.8 % 4:1 4:1 4:1 4:1 9.4% 10:1 12:1 5:1 10:1 11 . 7 % 9:1 1. 0 % 1. 0 % 0. 5 % 8: 1 75.9 9 75.4 1 75.2 7 76 . 1 8 75 . 8 1 75. 8 1 77 . 7 4 76.06 77 . 7 4 76 . 0 6 77. 7 6 76.06 76. 2 5 76 . 2 5 76. 1 576 . 1 5 76.12 76. 1 2 75.3 8 75. 2 0 76. 2 0 76 . 6 3 76 . 9 2 76 . 4 2 76.46 76.63 76.70 76.46 76.32 76.26 75.96 77.07 76.74 77.14 76.81 76.96 76.63 76.82 76.49 75. 6 2 75.11 75.26 76. 3 7 75. 9 6 1.0% 1. 3 % 2.0 % 2.0 % 76.76 76.43 UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 5.4 % 2.9 % 2. 1 % 77.6 0TC 76.9 3 FL 76.7 5 FL 76.5 5FL TBC / T C 77.6 0TC/ G R D 77.5 3TC/ G R D 77.4 7 TC/G R D 77.4 0TC/ G R D 77.4 0TC/ G R D 77. 4 4FL/ T C 77.4 8TC 77.4 8 TBC / G R D 76.8 9 GRD 77.1 4 GRD 77.4 3TC 77.3 4 TC 77.0 5 GRD TBC : 7 7 . 0 5 GRD : 7 7 . 0 5 76.3 4 76.3 3 76.3 3 76.4 7 76.31 FL 76.6 9 76.46 FL 76. 5 4 FL 76.5 7 FL 77.1 2TC 76.5 2 GRD 77.1 7 TC 76.58 GRD TBC:7 7 . 2 5 GRD: 7 6 . 7 5 TBC:7 7 . 4 8 GRD: 7 6 . 9 2 76.8 6 FL TBC:7 7 . 4 3 GRD: 7 7 . 1 0 77. 0 8 FL TBC:7 7 . 5 8 GRD:7 7 . 0 8 77. 3 1 FL TBC : 7 7 . 8 1 GRD : 7 7 . 3 1 TBC : 7 7 . 9 3 GRD : 7 7 . 4 4 2. 0 % 4.4% 2. 0 % 0. 7 % 1.4% 2. 0 % 8: 1 8:1 7:1 6:1 7:1 6:1 10 : 1 8:1 9: 1 8: 1 2.4 % 5. 8 % 2. 2 % 2.6% 2.2 % 6.3 % 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 9: 1 8:1 7: 1 1.0% 7:1 77 . 3 0 77 . 6 3 77 . 0 1 76 . 7 7 76 . 5 6 77 . 1 2 76 . 8 1 76 . 8 0 76 . 6 4 75.97 76.43 76. 3 3 75. 6 8 75. 8 0 75. 6 4 76. 2 1 77.2 0 76.7 1 77.4 5 77.0 5 77.4 9 77.5 9 77.2 2 77 . 7 8 77 . 2 1 77. 0 3 76. 3 6 TB C : 7 7 . 5 0 GR D : 7 7 . 2 6 76 . 5 5 78 . 9 1 TC: 7 7 . 5 8 GRD : 7 7 . 3 7 TC : 7 7 . 5 9 GR D : 7 7 . 3 7 76. 5 5 78 . 9 7 76 . 5 9 78. 8 5 TC : 7 7 . 5 8 GR D : 7 7 . 2 8 TC : 7 7 . 5 6 GR D : 7 7 . 3 8 TC : 7 7 . 5 6 GR D : 7 7 . 3 2 78 . 6 8 76. 1 6 76.55 78. 5 9 77 . 4 7 78 . 0 6 77 . 6 2 2.8 % 76.9 2 TC/G R D TBC : 7 7 . 4 3 GRD : 7 6 . 9 3 76.9 3 FL 8.0% 76. 8 8 77. 3 2 76. 8 4 TC: 7 6 . 8 7 GRD : 7 6 . 6 2 ST ST ST ST ST UD UD UD UD 2. 8 % TBC : 7 3 . 5 8 GRD : 7 3 . 0 8 TBC : 7 3 . 4 4 GRD : 7 2 . 6 9 TC:7 3 . 3 6 GRD : 7 2 . 8 6 TBC : 7 3 . 4 7 GRD : 7 3 . 1 6 TBC : 7 3 . 3 5 GRD : 7 2 . 6 0 72.9 2 FL 73.1 4 FL/H P 73.0 9 FL 72.9 7 FL 73.0 8 FL 72.8 1 FL 72.8 9FL 72.0 1 72.0 2 72.00 72. 8 5FL 72.9 4 FL 2.1% 1.2 % 1.0% 1.2 % 1. 2 % 1.0% 5.0% 4:1 2.4 % 5.3% 1.3%4:1 5:1 5: 1 72 . 7 7 73. 3 0 76. 3 7 73. 0 5 73. 1 7 73. 1 6 3.5% 73. 0 7 HP / 0.6 % 0. 9 % 0.6% 2.0% 3. 0 % 73 . 5 7 73 . 0 3 73 . 0 8 73 . 0 8 73. 6 7 73. 4 0 73 . 8 0 73 . 1 8 73. 1 3 72. 9 3 71.8 6 73. 1 8 74. 1 7 73 . 0 8 1.0% 73. 1 4 FL6.0% UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 73.44 FL 73.29 FL 73.5 3 FL 73.3 2 FL 73.5 1 FL 73.8 0 FL 73.4 4 FL/H P 73.7 8 FL 73.3 7 FL 73.1 9 FL 1. 6 % 2. 0 % 1.7 % 2.0% TBC : 7 4 . 3 0 GRD : 7 3 . 8 0 TBC : 7 4 . 2 7 GRD : 7 3 . 7 7 TBC : 7 4 . 0 1 GRD : 7 3 . 2 6 TBC : 7 3 . 9 4 GRD : 7 3 . 4 4 TBC : 7 4 . 0 1 GRD : 7 3 . 5 3 TBC : 7 4 . 0 1 GRD : 7 3 . 4 2 TBC : 7 3 . 8 3 GRD : 7 3 . 3 0 TBC : 7 3 . 7 9 GRD : 7 3 . 0 4 TBC : 7 3 . 6 9 GRD : 7 3 . 1 9 TBC : 7 3 . 8 7 GRD : 7 3 . 3 5 73.86 FL/HP TBC : 7 3 . 9 3 GRD : 7 3 . 3 8 73.38 FL 72.26 FL 72.5 8 72.5 8 72.4 0 72.4 0 72.4 0 72.4 04: 1 1. 6 % 5:1 4:1 3:1 4:1 5:1 5:1 4:1 5:1 5:1 4: 1 4. 3 % 1.0 % 0.8% 1.2% 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.4 % 2.1 % 0.6%0.6% 1.8 % 1.8 % 2.1 % 3.4 % 3.4% 73 . 2 9 73. 5 1 73. 3 4 73.46 73. 3 4 73.3 8 73 . 7 6 73 . 1 7 73 . 8 4 73 . 2 4 73. 9 6 73. 4 7 73. 5 5 73 . 8 4 73 . 4 2 73. 7 0 73. 5 4 73. 6 1 73. 8 0 73.4 4 73. 6 8 73.9 0 74 . 1 1 73 . 6 7 74 . 4 73 . 9 2 73 . 9 0 74. 3 73. 9 2 74. 1 8 73. 7 8 73. 6 2 71.80 0. 4 % 2.5 % 0.5% 1. 7 % 3.4 % 1.4 % 1. 4 % 72 . 6 072. 6 0 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD 76.9 2 TC/G R D TBC : 7 7 . 4 3 GRD : 7 6 . 9 3 74.8 0 74.4 1FL/H P 74.0 6 FL 74.3 0 FL 75.1 0 TBC / G R D 74.1 8 FL 1.2%2.0% 2. 0 % 3.3% 4.3 % 2.4% 2.1 % 9.4 % 74. 6 1 FL 2.0%2.0% 74.8 3 TBC : 7 5 . 8 3 GRD : 7 5 . 3 3 TBC : 7 5 . 6 0 GRD : 7 5 . 1 6 TBC : 7 5 . 5 5 GRD : 7 5 . 0 5 TBC : 7 5 . 2 5 GRD : 7 4 . 7 5 TBC : 7 6 . 2 3 GRD : 7 5 . 7 3 TBC : 7 6 . 7 8 GRD : 7 6 . 2 8 76.2 9 TC/G R D 75. 6 4TC/ G R D TBC : 7 4 . 8 0 GRD : 7 4 . 3 0 74.3 4 FL TBC : 7 4 . 8 4 GRD : 7 4 . 3 4 TBC : 7 4 . 6 8 GRD : 7 3 . 9 3 TBC : 7 4 . 5 6 GRD : 7 4 . 0 6 76.2 8 FL 76.6 9 FL 75.7 3 FL 75.6 0 FL 74.5 3 75.4 0 FL 74.4 4FL 75.8 3FL 75.0 5 FL 74.3 9 73.2 2 74.3 1FL 75.3 0GRD 75.5 7 TC 75.2 7TC 74. 9 9 GRD 76.1 7 TC/G R D 76.4 2 TC/G R D 76. 6 0TC/ G R D 74.6 0 FL 74.7 5 FL TBC : 7 5 . 9 0 GRD : 7 5 . 1 5 4. 3 % 2. 0 % 1. 0 % 7:1 6.3 % 5:1 7:1 7:1 5:1 8.1% 6:1 8.1% 7:1 7.7% 2.6% 14 . 6 % 7.3% 7.1% 1. 8 % 5.8% 4.1% 8.0% 10.6% 5:1 5:1 5:1 6:1 4: 1 1. 0 % 2.2 % 2.2 % 2.7% 2.2 % 2. 0 % 8.6 % 7.8% 3.2% 3.0% 3.2 % 74 . 0 974. 1 9 74 . 3 2 74 . 4 0 74. 4 0 74. 6 9 74. 0 1 74. 6 0 73. 8 2 73 . 4 4 74. 9 0 74. 5 2 74 . 8 2 74 . 4 0 74 . 4 2TC 74 . 5 8 74. 6 3 1.0%2.0% 74 . 7 6 75 . 1 0 75 . 3 9 74 . 8 7 75. 6 6 75. 8 0 76. 3 1 76. 6 8 1. 3 % 1. 5 % 75. 2 6 74. 7 4 75 . 5 8 75 . 1 3 75. 8 6 75. 3 2 2.7% 2.8% 75. 2 8 75. 7 8 76. 7 6 76. 8 4 74. 7 9 74 . 3 1 75 . 5 6 TC: 7 7 . 3 1 GRD : 7 5 . 4 4 TC: 7 7 . 3 0 GRD : 7 4 . 9 3 GRD : 7 6 . 6 2 TC: 7 6 . 2 8 GRD : 7 5 . 8 8 TC : 7 6 . 5 4 GR D : 7 6 . 2 7 TC : 7 5 . 8 3 GR D : 7 5 . 5 7 75 . 9 3 75 . 3 5 76 . 8 2 76. 8 674 . 9 7 75. 7 2 75. 2 4 TC: 7 5 . 1 5 GRD : 7 4 . 9 5 1. 7 % 74. 8 8 74 . 9 0 74 . 1 1 6" 2.0' 6" 3"2" TOP BACK OF CURB TOP OF FINISH LANDSCAPING MATERIAL TO BE PLACED 3" BELOW FLOWLINE ONLY AT CURB CUTS. FLOWLINE CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 0 1 INCH = 6 FEET 6 6 12 18 ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C403 RAIN GARDEN GRADING NORTH RAIN GARDEN ON WALNUT STREETRG1 WA L N U T S T R E E T (1 0 0 ' R O W ) 77.71 (77.90) 1.8% (1.8%) UD LEGEND: RD T NOTES: PROPOSED HOTEL PR O P O S E D S I D E W A L K SOUTH RAIN GARDEN ON WALNUT STREETRG2 WA L N U T S T R E E T (1 0 0 ' R O W ) PR O P O S E D SI D E W A L K PROPOSED WATER METER PROPOSED 9" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE END 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED TREE WELL (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED CONCRETE STEPS (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) TRANSITION FROM 6" TO 9" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE TRANSITION FROM 9" TO 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 75.94 GRATE ELEV = 76.94 INV OUT = 73.64 (6" PVC - SE) INV IN = 73.74 (6" PVC - NW) RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" PROPOSED 12" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE END 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED EDGE OF RAISED DECK (RE: ARCHITECT) BEGIN 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE TRANSITION FROM 6" TO 12" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 74.90 GRATE ELEV = 75.90 INV OUT = 72.60 (6" PVC - SE) INV IN = 72.70 (6" PVC - NW) RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" PROPOSED 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE PROPOSED PLANTER (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - TYP.) EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 76.22 GRATE ELEV = 77.05 INV OUT = 73.82 (6" PVC - S) INV IN = 74.02 (6" PVC - N) RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 10" PROPOSED 18" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 74.17 GRATE ELEV = 75.00 RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 10" INV OUT = 69.50 (10" HDPE - SE) INV IN = 70.25 (8" HDPE - W) INV IN = 70.25 (10" HDPE - NW) INV IN = 71.97 (6" PVC - SW) PROPOSED SIDEWALK CHESTNUT STREET HOTEL ACCESS DRIVEWAY HOTEL ACCESS DRIVEWAY PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 73.18 GRATE ELEV = 74.18 RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" INV OUT = 70.98 (6" PVC - NE) INV IN = 71.08 (6" PVC - NW) INV IN = 71.08 (6" PVC - SE) PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 72.51 GRATE ELEV = 73.51 RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" INV OUT = 70.17 (6" PVC - NE) INV IN = 70.27 (6" PVC - NW) INV IN = 70.27 (6" PVC - SW) INV IN = 70.27 (6" PVC - SE) PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 72.29 GRATE ELEV = 73.29 RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" INV OUT = 69.65 (6" PVC - NE) INV IN = 69.75 (6" PVC - NW) INV IN = 69.75 (6" PVC - SW) INV IN = 69.75 (6" PVC - SE) PROPOSED 12" NYLOPLAST INLET FINISH GROUND = 71.90 GRATE ELEV = 72.90 RAIN GARDEN DEPTH = 12" INV OUT = 69.10 (PVC 6" - NW) INV IN = 69.20 (PVC 6" - SW) INV IN = 69.92 (PVC 6" - NE) WEST RAIN GARDEN ON CHESTNUT STREETRG4 RAIN GARDENS AT ENTRANCE TO PARKING GARAGERG5 PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE CHESTNUT STREET RAIN GARDENS AT OLD FIREHOUSE ALLEY ON CHESTNUT STREETRG6 OLD FIREHOUSE ALLEY CHESTNUT STREET PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB RAIN GARDEN AT INTERSECTION OF CHESTNUT & JEFFERSON STREETSRG3 EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 2' WIDE CURB CUT PROPOSED 2' WIDE CURB CUT PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 4 HAMDAN V-CUTS (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED OUTFALL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED OUTFALL CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED OUTFALL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED OUTFALL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 2' FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED HOTEL PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED 6" VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED PLANTER (RE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - TYP.) PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER 3.2% 3.2 % PROPOSED 6" THICKEN CONCRETE EDGE RD RD T T TT TYPICAL HAMDAN V-CUT PR O P O S E D RA I S E D D E C K (R E : A R C H I T E C T ) PROPOSED HOTEL 1 1 1 1 73.61 76.16 73.61 9.4" 75.00 75.83 72.45 72.49 11.5" 72.12 71.78 68.88 68.99 69.70 14.6" 73.48 72.67 70.19 70.29 70.29 70.34 9.2" 71.80 72.60 16.8" 69.61 69.68 69.72 69.70 73.62 74.74 16.6" 69.18 69.13 61.72 CONNECT STORM PIPES INTO WYE. CONNECT WYE INTO NYLOPLAST INLET 10" 12" 73.38 74.12 8.6" 71.09 71.15 70.86 76.74 75.44 73.78 73.53 12.7" THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING 1.5' WIDE CURB CUT 4965 4970 4975 4980 4965 4970 4975 4980 9+75 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 13+25 6.69 LF 8" PVC @ 1.21% 21.54 LF 8" PVC @ 1.21% CO N N E C T T O E X I S T I N G I N L E T (C O R E A N D S E A L ) ST A : 1 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 FL : 4 9 7 3 . 2 6 IN V I N : 4 9 6 9 . 5 8 8 " P V C ( S W ) PROPOSED 90° PVC BEND STA: 10+06.69 INV IN: 4969.66 8" PVC (NW) INV OUT: 4969.66 8" PVC (NE) PR O P O S E D 2 2 . 5 ° P V C B E N D ST A : 1 2 + 2 5 . 7 4 IN V I N : 4 9 7 2 . 3 1 8 " P V C ( W ) IN V O U T : 4 9 7 2 . 3 1 8 " P V C ( S E ) PR O P O S E D A R E A I N L E T ST A 1 2 + 4 7 . 2 8 GR A T E 4 9 7 5 . 7 ± IN V . O U T 4 9 7 2 . 5 7 ( E ) 1.5" WATER SERVICE @ STATION 12+27.25 TOP OF PIPE ELEV. 4970.744 6" FIRE SERVICE @ STATION 12+32.67 TOP OF PIPE ELEV. 4970.744 18 . 8 " 19 . 6 " 219.05 LF 8" PV C @ 1 . 2 1 % PROPOSED 8"x8"x6" PVC TEE STA: 10+11.57 INV: 4969.72 8" PVC (NW) INV: 4969.89 6" PVC (NE) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 0 + 3 4 . 4 2 IN V : 4 9 7 0 . 0 0 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 0 . 1 6 6 " P V C ( N E ) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 0 + 5 7 . 2 6 IN V : 4 9 7 0 . 2 7 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 0 . 4 4 6 " P V C ( N E ) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 1 + 1 0 . 3 4 IN V : 4 9 7 0 . 9 2 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 1 . 3 5 6 " P V C ( N E ) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 1 + 4 0 . 3 4 IN V : 4 9 7 1 . 2 8 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 1 . 4 4 6 " P V C ( N E ) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 1 + 7 0 . 3 4 IN V : 4 9 7 1 . 6 4 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 1 . 8 1 6 " P V C ( N E ) PR O P O S E D 8 " x 8 " x 6 " P V C T E E ST A : 1 2 + 0 0 . 3 4 IN V : 4 9 7 2 . 0 1 8 " P V C ( N W ) IN V : 4 9 7 2 . 1 7 6 " P V C ( N E ) EXISTING GROUND FINISH GROUND 49 6 9 . 6 7 49 7 3 . 2 0 1.12% 222.1 1.12%18.0 1.12%5.8 49 7 2 . 4 3 49 7 5 . 7 7 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS C TW:81.50 BS:77.92 78.0 0 TC 77.9 0 HP TW:81.50 TS/TC:77.85 TW:81.50 BW:75.80 TW:81.50 BW/TP:75.49 TW : 8 1 . 5 0 TC: 7 8 . 0 0 TW:81.5 0 TC:77.9 3 78.0 0 TC TW:81.50 BW/TC:75.00 TW:81.50 BS:77.92 78.0 0TC 77.9 0TC 77.8 3GRA T E 77. 9 0TC 77.9 0 TC 77.7 7 GRA T E 77.7 5 GRA T E77.8 4 TC 77.8 5 TC 78.0 0 TC 77.9 3 HP78.0 0 TC 78.0 0 TC 77.8 6 GRA T E 78.0 0 TC 78.0 0 TC 77.9 3 HP78.0 0 TC 1. 4 % 1.5% 1. 2 % 1.0% 1.4% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.6 % 1.9% 2.0%1.8% 2.0%2.0% 1.7 % 1.9% 1.7 % 1.5% 1.9 % 2.0 % 1.4% 1.8% 1.0%1.0% 1.0% 1.6% 2.0% 1.5% 1.5% 1.7 % 1.3 % 1.1 % 78.0 0 TC 77.9 7 TC 78.0 0 TC 1. 4 % 78.0 0HP 77 . 9 3 HP 1.0% 77.87 TC 2.0% 78.0 0 TC 2.0% 1.0% 77 . 9 6 78. 0 5 77.99 78. 4 8 79.5677.8977.89 78.0 1 79.56 78. 0 5 77.93 77. 7 7 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /78. 0 6 76.3175.85 78. 0 9 78. 0 4 77. 8 7 77. 9 1 78. 0 2 77. 9 3 77. 9 8 76.05 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /77. 9 2 78. 0 1 77. 8 8 77 . 8 6 77 . 8 9 78 . 0 7 78.0578.05 78.0578.05 78 . 0 5 77 . 7 3 77 . 7 3 UD UD 78.0 0 TC 2. 0 % 2. 0 % 78.0 0 TC 77.7 5 TC 78.0 0 TC 78.0 0 TC 2. 0 % 2. 0 %77.7 5 TC 2. 0 % 77.61 FL 77.61 FL 2.2%2.2% 77.6 5 TC 77.9 0 TC 77.9 0 TC77.9 0 TC 77.6 5 TC 77.8 1 FL 77.8 6 FL 77.8 9FL/T C 77.94 FL/TC 77. 9 8 77 . 9 0 77. 9 0TC 77 . 8 9 77. 8 5 77. 9 8 77. 8 4 77. 9 0 77.7 4 77. 7 9 77. 8 7 77. 7 6 77.7 4 78. 0 1 78. 0 1 77. 8 8 77. 9 1 77. 8 9 77.9 7 CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 010 10 20 30 1 INCH = 10 FEET ISS. #DESCRIPTION DATE ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER copyright 2015 PARKING GARAGE OWNER 4240 ARCHITECTURE INC 3507 RINGSBY COURT SUITE 117 DENVER, CO 80216 t: 303.292.3388 f: 303.292.3113 ARCHITECT 21129.00 FCMWC, LLC 2725 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AVE STE 200 LOVELAND, CO 80538 t: 970.962.9990 WALNUT STREET 354, LLC 262 E MOUNTAIN AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 t: 970.490.2626 NORTHERN ENGINEERING, INC 200 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 CIVIL RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 LANDSCAPE f: 970.221.4159 t: 970.568.5415 t: 970.484.8855 WA L N U T S T & C H E S T N U T S T FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 4 WA L N U T - C H E S T N U T SU B D I V I S I O N S E C O N D F I L I N G PARKING GARAGE MYLAR SUBMITTAL 15 APR 2016 HOTEL OWNER / DEVELOPER MINOR AMENDMENT 16 DEC 20161 RECORD DRAWINGS 9 MAY 20182 C404 JEFFERSON ST. STORM SEWER & GRADING DETAILS 77.71 (77.90) 1.8% (1.8%) UD LEGEND: C RD T NOTES: RAISED PATIO BAR GRADINGB 1 PROFILE OF STORM SEWER ALONG JEFFERSON STREETA 1 2 3 1 2 KEY NOTES: 3 1 PROPOSED RETAINING/SEAT WALL (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) PROPOSED STORM SEWER (SEE SHEET C300) PROPOSED RETAINING/SEAT WALL (RE: ARCHITECT) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE (SEE SHEET C300) 1 1 ENTRYWAY AT MEETING ROOMSC PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB PROPOSED 6" OUTFALL CURB 2 2 2 STORM INLET GRATE = 4977.93 INVERT OUT = 4976.48 STORM INLET GRATE = 4977.77 INVERT OUT = 4976.07 STORM INLET GRATE = 4977.84 INVERT OUT = 4976.49 STORM INLET GRATE = 4977.78 INVERT OUT = 4976.04 THESE RECORD DRAWINGS, PRODUCED BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ARE BASED IN WHOLE, OR IN PART, UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. RECORD DRAWING 2 1' WIDE CURB CUT INVERT = 4975.00 1' WIDE CURB CUT INVERT = 4975.55 From:Cole Evans To:Theresa Connor; Brian Hergott; Dan Mogen Cc:Nick Haws; Fred Wegert; Andy Reese; Shane Boyle; Ken Sampley; Fran Arceo; Ken Mannon; Josh Birks; Marshall Johnston; Patrick Kanouff; jordan@bohemiancompanies.com; Fran Arceo Subject:RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Date:Monday, November 26, 2018 10:32:43 AM Hope all had a good Thanksgiving! From both the Hotel and Chestnut Parking, LLC (BOCO), we are good and accept the as-built condition. Brian has signed off for the City and that is all 3 ownership entities. Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else. Dan – can you let me know when we can get the escrow released? Thank you all. Cole W Evans McWhinney 970-685-1882 From: Theresa Connor [mailto:TConnor@fcgov.com] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:28 PM To: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Marshall Johnston <Marshall.Johnston@mcwhinney.com>; Patrick Kanouff <patrick@bohemiancompanies.com>; jordan@bohemiancompanies.com; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Thank-you Cole and Brian. Can you confirm that you two represent the total Ownership Group? Should we be looking for the acceptance from anyone at the Hotel or the Bohemian Foundation? Thank-you for getting this back to us. Theresa From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 10:53 AM To: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Marshall Johnston <Marshall.Johnston@mcwhinney.com>; Patrick Kanouff <patrick@bohemiancompanies.com>; jordan@bohemiancompanies.com; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan On behalf of FCMWC, LLC, I have fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering. Also, as an update to the rock. We are gearing up for this work on 11/20. We delayed this a couple days due to the impending weather this weekend and also give me a little extra time to get the permit into the City for this work. I have spoken with Belinda about this if you want to follow up but we are on the books. Thanks. Cole W Evans McWhinney 970-685-1882 From: Brian Hergott [mailto:bhergott@fcgov.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 3:00 PM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, Having confirmation that McWhinney is moving forward with replacing the wood mulch with rock mulch in the exterior drainage areas on November 19, 2018 and having fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18. Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Theresa Connor Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 3:41 PM To: Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Josh, Ken, Brian and Cole – When the Ownership Group is ready to accept the certification of the stormwater system, we will need an email from each representative confirming that they have reviewed the Overall Site and Drainage Certification provided by Northern Engineering and accept the conditions. If one representative from each entity of the Ownership Group could email us with the verbiage below, we will compile the records to prepare to close out the project. Cole – I’m not sure if you will represent the Hotel and the Condo Association or how that will work – but will look to you to provide us direction. Josh, Ken or Brian – we will let you choose who will represent the City. We suggest the following language be emailed to Dan Mogen: “I have fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18 – if there has been revisions since then, please use the correct revised date. Please let me know if I am off base, out of the loop or if you have any questions. Thank-you, Theresa From: Josh Birks Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:45 AM To: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Thanks! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:08 AM To: Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Yes I will get that over today. Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 25, 2018, at 9:02 AM, Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> wrote: Cole, Can you provide some documentation…a letter, contract, etc. that indicates the work is imminent? If so, I think yes we could look at accepting the cert and closing out. Cheers, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:00 AM To: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel All Since we are working on the work, can we begin to close this out and accept the cert? Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 22, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> wrote: Nick, Dan, The City would be comfortable with signing off on the site certification if the wood mulch in the exterior drain areas is switched out to rock as discussed. We feel this would reduce the standing water on level one of the parking garage after a rain event by preventing the drains from getting clogged. We would like to see the Garage Condo association revaluate this standing water issue in another year and if needed make the recommended sidewalk modifications to reduce the water entering from the street. Cheers, Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services <image001.jpg> O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 8:53 AM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, I see that you’ve cc’d ownership, so we will let them respond directly. The site civil requirements have been satisfied. The referenced exception resides within the structure, and is the responsible charge of the architect and plumbing engineer. Northern remains willing and able to assist in any way we can, but we cannot certify items outside of our area of practice. I know ownership had suggested a site meeting to get everyone together at the same time. We are certainly amenable to participating. Please let us know if anything else within Northern’s direct purview is needed. Thanks, Nick Haws, PE, LEED AP President, CEO <image004.png> 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5414 O: 970.221.4158 M: 970.690.0927 www.northernengineering.com From: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:20 PM To: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Hi Fred, I wanted to get back to you quickly as I’m preparing to be out of the office for the next week. It’s been a little bit since I heard an update on this project and where things stand with the garage conditions, but I’m still at the point of needing to have ownership accept these conditions. I looked thru the certification here quickly, and it doesn’t appear that was included. Can you please let me know where the ownership conversation is at this point? Dan Mogen, EI, CFM Development Review Engineer Stormwater Engineering & Development Review Division City of Fort Collins Utilities (970)305-5989 dmogen@fcgov.com From: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:13 PM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com> Subject: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, Attached is the most recent version with updated language for the site certification for the Downtown Hotel and Chestnut Street Parking Garage. This includes all the appropriate attachments. Frederick S. Wegert, PE Project Engineer NORTHERN ENGINEERING 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5408 O: 970.221.4158 Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/wegert www.northernengineering.com Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. From:Cole Evans To:Brian Hergott; Dan Mogen Cc:Nick Haws; Theresa Connor; Fred Wegert; Andy Reese; Shane Boyle; Ken Sampley; Fran Arceo; Ken Mannon; Josh Birks; Marshall Johnston; Patrick Kanouff; jordan@bohemiancompanies.com; Fran Arceo Subject:RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Date:Thursday, November 15, 2018 10:52:56 AM Dan On behalf of FCMWC, LLC, I have fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering. Also, as an update to the rock. We are gearing up for this work on 11/20. We delayed this a couple days due to the impending weather this weekend and also give me a little extra time to get the permit into the City for this work. I have spoken with Belinda about this if you want to follow up but we are on the books. Thanks. Cole W Evans McWhinney 970-685-1882 From: Brian Hergott [mailto:bhergott@fcgov.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 3:00 PM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, Having confirmation that McWhinney is moving forward with replacing the wood mulch with rock mulch in the exterior drainage areas on November 19, 2018 and having fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18. Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Theresa Connor Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 3:41 PM To: Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Josh, Ken, Brian and Cole – When the Ownership Group is ready to accept the certification of the stormwater system, we will need an email from each representative confirming that they have reviewed the Overall Site and Drainage Certification provided by Northern Engineering and accept the conditions. If one representative from each entity of the Ownership Group could email us with the verbiage below, we will compile the records to prepare to close out the project. Cole – I’m not sure if you will represent the Hotel and the Condo Association or how that will work – but will look to you to provide us direction. Josh, Ken or Brian – we will let you choose who will represent the City. We suggest the following language be emailed to Dan Mogen: “I have fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18 – if there has been revisions since then, please use the correct revised date. Please let me know if I am off base, out of the loop or if you have any questions. Thank-you, Theresa From: Josh Birks Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:45 AM To: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Thanks! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:08 AM To: Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Yes I will get that over today. Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 25, 2018, at 9:02 AM, Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> wrote: Cole, Can you provide some documentation…a letter, contract, etc. that indicates the work is imminent? If so, I think yes we could look at accepting the cert and closing out. Cheers, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:00 AM To: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel All Since we are working on the work, can we begin to close this out and accept the cert? Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 22, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> wrote: Nick, Dan, The City would be comfortable with signing off on the site certification if the wood mulch in the exterior drain areas is switched out to rock as discussed. We feel this would reduce the standing water on level one of the parking garage after a rain event by preventing the drains from getting clogged. We would like to see the Garage Condo association revaluate this standing water issue in another year and if needed make the recommended sidewalk modifications to reduce the water entering from the street. Cheers, Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services <image001.jpg> O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 8:53 AM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, I see that you’ve cc’d ownership, so we will let them respond directly. The site civil requirements have been satisfied. The referenced exception resides within the structure, and is the responsible charge of the architect and plumbing engineer. Northern remains willing and able to assist in any way we can, but we cannot certify items outside of our area of practice. I know ownership had suggested a site meeting to get everyone together at the same time. We are certainly amenable to participating. Please let us know if anything else within Northern’s direct purview is needed. Thanks, Nick Haws, PE, LEED AP President, CEO <image004.png> 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5414 O: 970.221.4158 M: 970.690.0927 www.northernengineering.com From: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:20 PM To: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Hi Fred, I wanted to get back to you quickly as I’m preparing to be out of the office for the next week. It’s been a little bit since I heard an update on this project and where things stand with the garage conditions, but I’m still at the point of needing to have ownership accept these conditions. I looked thru the certification here quickly, and it doesn’t appear that was included. Can you please let me know where the ownership conversation is at this point? Dan Mogen, EI, CFM Development Review Engineer Stormwater Engineering & Development Review Division City of Fort Collins Utilities (970)305-5989 dmogen@fcgov.com From: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:13 PM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com> Subject: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, Attached is the most recent version with updated language for the site certification for the Downtown Hotel and Chestnut Street Parking Garage. This includes all the appropriate attachments. Frederick S. Wegert, PE Project Engineer NORTHERN ENGINEERING 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5408 O: 970.221.4158 Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/wegert www.northernengineering.com Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. From:Brian Hergott To:Dan Mogen Cc:Nick Haws; Theresa Connor; Fred Wegert; Andy Reese; Shane Boyle; Ken Sampley; Fran Arceo; Ken Mannon; Cole.Evans@McWhinney.com; Josh Birks; Brian Hergott Subject:RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Date:Wednesday, November 07, 2018 2:59:42 PM Dan, Having confirmation that McWhinney is moving forward with replacing the wood mulch with rock mulch in the exterior drainage areas on November 19, 2018 and having fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18. Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Theresa Connor Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 3:41 PM To: Josh Birks ; Cole Evans Cc: Brian Hergott ; Nick Haws ; Dan Mogen ; Fred Wegert ; Andy Reese ; Shane Boyle ; Ken Sampley ; Fran Arceo ; Ken Mannon Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Josh, Ken, Brian and Cole – When the Ownership Group is ready to accept the certification of the stormwater system, we will need an email from each representative confirming that they have reviewed the Overall Site and Drainage Certification provided by Northern Engineering and accept the conditions. If one representative from each entity of the Ownership Group could email us with the verbiage below, we will compile the records to prepare to close out the project. Cole – I’m not sure if you will represent the Hotel and the Condo Association or how that will work – but will look to you to provide us direction. Josh, Ken or Brian – we will let you choose who will represent the City. We suggest the following language be emailed to Dan Mogen: “I have fully reviewed and accept the as-built conditions described in the Overall Site and Drainage Certification for Walnut-Chestnut Subdivision Filing 2 (Downtown Hotel Parking Garage) dated September 20, 2018 completed by Northern Engineering.” The latest version I have of the certification is 9/20/18 – if there has been revisions since then, please use the correct revised date. Please let me know if I am off base, out of the loop or if you have any questions. Thank-you, Theresa From: Josh Birks Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:45 AM To: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Thanks! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:08 AM To: Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Cc: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Yes I will get that over today. Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 25, 2018, at 9:02 AM, Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> wrote: Cole, Can you provide some documentation…a letter, contract, etc. that indicates the work is imminent? If so, I think yes we could look at accepting the cert and closing out. Cheers, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSH BIRKS Economic Health & Redevelopment Director City of Fort Collins 970-221-6324 office From: Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:00 AM To: Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> Cc: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com>; Fran Arceo <Fran.Arceo@theelizabethcolorado.com>; Ken Mannon <KMANNON@fcgov.com>; Josh Birks <JBirks@fcgov.com> Subject: Re: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel All Since we are working on the work, can we begin to close this out and accept the cert? Cole W Evans 970-685-1882 On Oct 22, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com> wrote: Nick, Dan, The City would be comfortable with signing off on the site certification if the wood mulch in the exterior drain areas is switched out to rock as discussed. We feel this would reduce the standing water on level one of the parking garage after a rain event by preventing the drains from getting clogged. We would like to see the Garage Condo association revaluate this standing water issue in another year and if needed make the recommended sidewalk modifications to reduce the water entering from the street. Cheers, Brian Hergott, CCCA, LEED AP BD+C Facilities Project Manager Operation Services O: 970.221.6804 F: 970.221.6534 C: 970.237.1213 E: bhergott@fcgov.com W: www.fcgov.com From: Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 8:53 AM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, I see that you’ve cc’d ownership, so we will let them respond directly. The site civil requirements have been satisfied. The referenced exception resides within the structure, and is the responsible charge of the architect and plumbing engineer. Northern remains willing and able to assist in any way we can, but we cannot certify items outside of our area of practice. I know ownership had suggested a site meeting to get everyone together at the same time. We are certainly amenable to participating. Please let us know if anything else within Northern’s direct purview is needed. Thanks, Nick Haws, PE, LEED AP President, CEO 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5414 O: 970.221.4158 M: 970.690.0927 www.northernengineering.com From: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:20 PM To: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com>; Brian Hergott <bhergott@fcgov.com>; Shane Boyle <SBOYLE@fcgov.com>; Ken Sampley <KSampley@fcgov.com>; Theresa Connor <TConnor@fcgov.com> Subject: RE: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Hi Fred, I wanted to get back to you quickly as I’m preparing to be out of the office for the next week. It’s been a little bit since I heard an update on this project and where things stand with the garage conditions, but I’m still at the point of needing to have ownership accept these conditions. I looked thru the certification here quickly, and it doesn’t appear that was included. Can you please let me know where the ownership conversation is at this point? Dan Mogen, EI, CFM Development Review Engineer Stormwater Engineering & Development Review Division City of Fort Collins Utilities (970)305-5989 dmogen@fcgov.com From: Fred Wegert <fred@northernengineering.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:13 PM To: Dan Mogen <dmogen@fcgov.com>; Cole Evans <Cole.Evans@mcwhinney.com> Cc: Andy Reese <andy@northernengineering.com>; Nick Haws <nick@northernengineering.com> Subject: Drainage Certification for Downtown Hotel Dan, Attached is the most recent version with updated language for the site certification for the Downtown Hotel and Chestnut Street Parking Garage. This includes all the appropriate attachments. Frederick S. Wegert, PE Project Engineer NORTHERN ENGINEERING 301 N. Howes Street, Suite 100 | Fort Collins, CO 80521 D: 970.568.5408 O: 970.221.4158 Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/wegert www.northernengineering.com Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast. Disclaimer The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast.