HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 12/21/2023Page 1
OVERALL SITE and DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION
Commercial, Multi-Family and Subdivision Certification Form and Checklist
Project Name:
Date:
Building Permit Numbers:
(Commercial or multi-family)
Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Chapter 3, Section 3.0 to certify as-
built construction to the approved drainage and grading plans, please fill in all applicable items in this
Certification Form for Commercial, Multi-Family and Overall Single Family sites. NOTE: several items must be
verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted with the as-built grading
plan. (As-built elevations must be written in red next to the approved elevations.)
•Use “Yes” for items completed as described.
•Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified.
•If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below.
Attach an explanation or description of the as-built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but
shown on the approved construction plans.
Provide an as-built redline or Mylar drawing with the following:
I.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin - FCSCM Ch. 6 and 7
For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately:
A. Volume: As-built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and
volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage
volume.
1. Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state
of Colorado.
2.Both proposed and as-built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for
proposed and solid lines for as-built).
3.All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and
the as-built elevations are shown on the plan sheet.
4.Stage-storage-discharge tables are provided on a separate document.
5.Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92-
602(8) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal
(tinyurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include:
a.The cover sheet from the approved drainage report
b.The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report
c.As-built topographic survey
d.Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification
e.PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet
11/19
Wes Lamarque
12/21/2023
Talon Estates
12/15/23
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Fort Collins Approved Plans
Approved by:
Date:
Grading/Stormwater Certification Accepted
(Certificate of Occupancy Released)
Accepted by:
Date:
☐ Escrow was held for CO and is now released
Grading/Stormwater Plan Accepted
(Building Permit Released)
Accepted by:
Date:
Utility (Water/Sewer) Plan A pproved
(Building Permit Released)
Approved by:
Date:
Fort Collins Utilities R edlines
Please contact me to discuss re visions
or questions prior to resubmitting.
dmogen@fcgov.com or 970-305-7944
Reviewed by:
Date :
we
Page 2
B.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: Attached is as-built verification that there is
a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of
the detention pond. If there is a “soft pan” in the flow-line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2%
grade requirement.
1.Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable:
a. Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin.
There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow-line(s) of the detention basin. The flattest as-built grade
is .
b.Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin.
There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction
plans. (Show as-built spot elevations.)
c.Soft pan for low flow in detention basin.
•Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified
during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineer’s statement of
visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.)
o There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved
construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations,
bends, cleanouts, etc.)
o There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil
type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical
engineer.
NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-.
2. Side Slopes: The as-built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown.
Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed
is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re-
graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process.
3.Spillway: The following items must be field verified:
a.The location of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan.
b.The width of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan.
c.The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as-built plan.
d.A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway.
e.There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate
type: (riprap size “D50” gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried
riprap with inches of bury, etc.).
f.There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape
features, rocks, etc.
11/19
NE Note: There are sections of the pan that run at 0.3% instead of the
designed 0.4%. The concrete pan was inspected to see if these flatter
spots held water. There were no areas of the pan that held water.
These flatter areas are deemed acceptable.
Yes
N/A
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
Page 3
4.Outlet Structure:
a.The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of
the orifice.
b.The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of
rows and columns of holes.
c.The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate
so no water ponds in front of the plate.
d.The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans.
e.100-year overflow grate elevation is . (Elev. A on detail D-46)
f.The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is . (Elev. B on detail
D-46)
g.Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the
top and bolted at the bottom.
h.The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain
runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet.
II.Channels/Swales - FCSCM Ch. 8, Sec. 2.0 and Ch. 9, Sec. 5.0
A. Capacity: The as-built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet
or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project.
1.All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans.
2.Longitudinal slopes and side-slopes (cross-sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires
longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side-slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these
criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each
instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and
are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed.
3.As-built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations
shown on the approved construction plans.
4.All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction
plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used
as part of this verification.)
5.All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the
system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.)
6.The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved
construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on
the cross-sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.)
7.The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees,
shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.)
11/19
c
NE Note:
The pond, swale, and retaining walls were constructed within the
allowable ±0.2 tolerance. This means the primary swale along
the north and east side of the site has been assumed to have
capacity per design.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes 5102.25
Yes 5104.45
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page 4
III.Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 4.0
A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: The as-built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been
verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this
project.
1.All storm drain pipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the
approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.)
Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was
changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply
them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity
equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size.
2.The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The
acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans
must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet.
3.The as-built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of
the approved construction plans.
B.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: All pipes are installed in accordance with the
approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved
construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations.
2.All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met.
3.Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans
have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.)
IV.Concrete Pans - FCSCM Ch. 8, Sec. 2.0
A. Construction/Installation: All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans.
1.The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The
certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless
a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or
justification by separate document.
3.The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross-
section is “V” shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.)
4.The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4
inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide
documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved
construction plans.)
5.The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as-
built drawings.
11/19
Some pipes were designed at a flatter slope. These pipes are in
compliance with the approved plans. (See attached hydraflow analysis
Cannot
verify
Cannot verify
NE Note: There are sections of the pan that run at 0.3% instead of the designed 0.4%. The
concrete pan was inspected to see if these flatter spots held water. There were no areas of
the pan that held water. These flatter areas are deemed acceptable.
NE Note: The very east storm line that runs N-S was not analyzed
due to it being an existing line that was replaced and increased in
size. It was not analyzed in the original design thus can not be
analyzed and compared to anything in the certification.
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page 5
V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 3.0
A. Construction/Installation: All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction
plan. Indicate by writing “Verified” on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the
inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is other than the one on the approved
construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or
better capacity.
2.The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.)
3.The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as
indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans.
4.The as-built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan
and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide
justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation.
5.The as-built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or
justification is attached.
6.All Type C, R, 13 and 16 inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following designation (or
an equivalent): NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO POUDRE RIVER.
VI.Culverts - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 4.0
A. Construction/Installation: All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with
the approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as-built construction plans as correct.
2.The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is
indicated on the as-built plans.
3.The as-built invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built
construction plans.
4.The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as-built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to
the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative.
An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM).
VII.Sub-Drains
A. Construction/Installation: All sub-drains shown on the construction plans have been installed in
accordance with those plans and the construction specifications. Sub-drains installed with the sanitary
sewer are to be verified on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE:
Indicate any sub-drains installed after the plans were approved on the as-built plans.)
1.The size of the sub-drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as-
built plans.
2.The type of sub-drain, in particular the perforated and non-perforated sections of the drain, are
as indicated on the approved construction plans.
11/19
NE Note: The very east N-S storm line had a 5' Type R called out. There was also a tee
called out for the junction with the Pond's storm line. A double combination inlet and a 4'
storm manhole were installed instead. The engineering firm that did the original design is no
longer in business. They also did not analyze this storm line. It is safe to assume that the
double combo inlet is sufficient in place of the Type R due to there being more open area.
Both improvements that differ from the plans are deemed acceptable.
See
Note
Above
See Note Above
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 6
3.The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided.
4.The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are
accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations
marked.)
5.The backfill materials for sub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This
includes the type, depth and width.)
6.The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub-drain and the permeable backfill material unless
shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub-drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material
is accepted only if approved prior to installation.)
VIII.Curb Cuts
A. Construction: All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction
plans and construction specifications.
1.The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The curb cut openings tie into a downstream swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth
transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb
cut.
IX.Sidewalk Culverts & Chases
A. Construction/Installation: All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the
approved construction plans.
1.The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the
detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail.
3.The sidewalk culvert invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the
as-built plans.
4.The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s
detail.
5.There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no
obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert.
X. Site Grading - FCSCM Ch. 8
A. Construction: All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved
construction plans.
1.The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and
the as-built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as-built plans.
11/19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page 7
2.The as-built contours for “overlot grading” are shown on the as-built construction plans for all
common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the
situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be
required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site
Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is
backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.)
3.All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans and the slopes are stabilized.
XI.Permanent Erosion Control BMPs - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 7.0
A. Construction: All permanent erosion control BMPs have been installed per the approved
construction plans.
1.All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction
plans.
2.All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction
plans.
a.All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans.
XII.Post-Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Ch. 3, Sec. 2.0
A. Construction: All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from
drainage paths.
1.All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s).
2.All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas.
3.All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been
coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note
the area needing stabilization in the narrative.
XIII.Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Ch. 7
A.Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and
other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation.
B.Attached is verification of the rain garden and/or sand filter flat surface area(s) and ponding
volume(s). This verification includes survey of critical elevations.
C.Attached is verification of the underground infiltration required volume(s), weir elevations,
orifices, inspection ports and filtering fabric. This verification includes survey of critical elevations.
D.All visible LID design features were verified as part of the engineer's site visit.
11/19
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
11/19 Page 8
XIV.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs
A.The construction of other permanent BMPs not specifically addressed in this certification is in
accordance with the approved plan. This may include grade control structures, rundowns, bridges, stream
access/improvements, etc.
Please specify other permanent BMPs included on this site:
XV. Certification and Erosion Control Measures - FCSCM Ch. 3
A. All temporary erosion control measures shall be removed upon stabilization. If at the time of preparing
this certification there are any erosion control measures still remaining on the site, please note them in
the narrative and verify that they need to remain at this time. If in doubt as to the need for any control
measure, please consult with the Erosion Control Inspector at erosion@fcgov.com.
XVI.Statement of Compliance - FCSCM Ch. 3
A. This certification is signed and stamped. By signing this form, the engineer(s) attests that he/she has
visited and observed the site, and to the best of his/her knowledge, the as-built conditions of the drainage
facilities are as described in the above form and in the enclosed as-built plans.
B.Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and
prevent the release of any and all Stormwater Utility permit holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates
of Occupancy within this development.
XVII. Signature and Stamp by a Colorado-Registered Professional Engineer
Engineer’s contact information:
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Company:
Address:
PE Stamp
12/15/23
N/A
N/A
Cody Pape
ctpape19@gmail.com
9705685415
Northern Engineering
301 N. Howes St, Suite 100
Fort Collins, CO 80521
1
RE
C
O
R
D
_
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
MA
K
12
/
2
0
/
1
7
REC
O
R
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
2
RE
C
O
R
D
_
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
_
S
I
T
E
_
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
CT
P
11
/
1
6
/
2
3
1
RE
C
O
R
D
_
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
MA
K
12
/
2
0
/
1
7
REC
O
R
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
Project:
Date:
Pond No.:
5,102.60
5,106.60
7,775 cu. ft.
5,104.60 5,104.15
1.55 ft.
46,149 cu. ft.
5,106.25 5,106.26
Max. Elev. Min. Elev. cu. ft. acre ft cu. ft. acre ft
5,102.6 N/A 15 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
5,102.8 5,102.6 184 0.2 19.9 0.00 19.9 0.00
5,103.0 5,102.8 1,308 0.2 149.2 0.00 169.1 0.00
5,103.2 5,103.0 3,002 0.2 431.0 0.01 600.1 0.01
5,103.4 5,103.2 4,948 0.2 795.0 0.02 1,395.1 0.03
5,103.6 5,103.4 6,983 0.2 1,193.0 0.03 2,588.1 0.06
5,103.8 5,103.6 8,820 0.2 1,580.2 0.04 4,168.4 0.10
5,104.0 5,103.8 10,504 0.2 1,932.3 0.04 6,100.7 0.14
5,104.2 5,104.0 12,151 0.2 2,265.5 0.05 8,366.2 0.19
5,104.4 5,104.2 13,569 0.2 2,572.1 0.06 10,938.3 0.25
5,104.6 5,104.4 14,829 0.2 2,839.9 0.07 13,778.2 0.32
5,104.8 5,104.6 16,218 0.2 3,104.8 0.07 16,883.0 0.39
5,105.0 5,104.8 17,731 0.2 3,394.9 0.08 20,277.9 0.47
5,105.2 5,105.0 18,470 0.2 3,620.0 0.08 23,897.9 0.55
5,105.4 5,105.2 19,382 0.2 3,785.2 0.09 27,683.1 0.64
5,105.6 5,105.4 20,374 0.2 3,975.6 0.09 31,658.7 0.73
5,105.8 5,105.6 21,333 0.2 4,170.6 0.10 35,829.3 0.82
5,106.0 5,105.8 22,373 0.2 4,370.5 0.10 40,199.9 0.92
5,106.2 5,106.0 23,534 0.2 4,590.6 0.11 44,790.5 1.03
5,106.4 5,106.2 24,608 0.2 4,814.1 0.11 49,604.6 1.14
5,106.6 5,106.4 26,069 0.2 5,067.7 0.12 54,672.3 1.26
5,106.7 5,106.6 26,796 0.1 2,643.3 0.06 57,315.5 1.32
STAGE STORAGE CURVE
Contour Contour
Surface Area
(ft2)
Depth (ft)
Incremental Volume Cumulative Volume
Pond Stage Storage Curve
958-006
Fort Collins, CO
C. Pape
Elev at WQ Volume (AB):
Talon Estates
December 15, 2023
Pond Outlet and Volume Data
Outlet Elevation:
Water Quality Volume:
Elev at 100-yr Volume (AB):
Crest of Pond Elev.:
Storage and Water Quality Pond 2
Project Number:
Project Location:
Calculations By:Pond As-Built
Water Quality Depth:
100-yr Detention Volume:
Elev at WQ Volume (Design):
Elev at 100-yr Volume (Design):
1
Stormwater Facility Name:
Facility Location & Jurisdiction:
User Input: Watershed Characteristics User Defined User Defined User Defined User Defined
Selected BMP Type =EDB Stage [ft]Area [ft^2]Stage [ft]Discharge [cfs]
Watershed Area =9.72 acres 0.00 15 0.00 0.00
Watershed Length =870 ft 0.20 184 0.20 0.95
Watershed Length to Centroid =435 ft 0.40 1,308 0.40 1.34
Watershed Slope =0.020 ft/ft 0.60 3,002 0.60 1.65
Watershed Imperviousness =41.5%percent 0.80 4,948 0.80 1.90
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A =0.0%percent 1.00 6,983 1.00 2.13
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group B =100.0%percent 1.20 8,820 1.20 2.33
Percentage Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D =0.0%percent 1.40 10,504 1.40 2.52
Target WQCV Drain Time =40.0 hours 1.60 12,151 1.60 2.69
1.80 13,569 1.80 2.85
User Input 2.00 14,829 2.00 3.01
2.20 16,218 2.20 3.15
2.40 17,731 2.40 3.29
2.60 18,470 2.60 3.43
2.80 19,382 2.80 3.56
3.00 20,374 3.00 3.68
3.20 21,333 3.20 3.80
3.40 22,373 3.40 3.92
3.60 23,534 3.60 4.03
3.80 24,608 3.80 4.14
4.00 26,069 4.00 4.25
4.20 26,796 4.20 4.36
After completing and printing this worksheet to a pdf, go to:
https://maperture.digitaldataservices.com/gvh/?viewer=cswdif
Create a new stormwater facility, and attach the PDF of this
worksheet to that record.
Routed Hydrograph Results
Design Storm Return Period =WQCV 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 50 Year 100 Year
One-Hour Rainfall Depth =N/A 0.82 1.16 1.40 2.49 2.86 in
CUHP Runoff Volume =0.149 0.230 0.374 0.524 1.418 1.758 acre-ft
Inflow Hydrograph Volume =N/A 0.230 0.374 0.524 1.418 1.758 acre-ft
Time to Drain 97% of Inflow Volume =0.8 1.6 2.3 2.8 5.3 6.2 hours
Time to Drain 99% of Inflow Volume =0.8 1.7 2.3 2.8 5.6 6.4 hours
Maximum Ponding Depth =1.44 0.86 1.28 1.65 3.45 4.00 ft
Maximum Ponded Area =0.25 0.13 0.22 0.29 0.52 0.60 acres
Maximum Volume Stored =0.150 0.039 0.112 0.206 0.945 1.256 acre-ft
Once CUHP has been run and the Stage-Area-Discharge
information has been provided, click 'Process Data' to
interpolate the Stage-Area-Volume-Discharge data and
generate summary results in the table below. Once this is
complete, click 'Print to PDF'.
Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Sheet
Pond - As Builts
Talon Estates, City of Fort Collins
SDI-Design Data v2.00, Released January 2020
Location for 1-hr Rainfall Depths (use dropdown):
After providing required inputs above including 1-hour
rainfall depths, click 'Run CUHP' to generate runoff
hydrographs using the embedded Colorado Urban
Hydrograph Procedure.
SDI_Design_Data_v2.00_Pond_AB, Design Data 12/15/2023, 3:49 PM
Booleans for Message Booleans for CUHP
Watershed L:W 1 CUHP Inputs Complete
Watershed Lc:L 1 CUHP Results Calculated
Watershed Slope FALSE Time Interval
RunOnce 1
CountA 1
Draintime Coeff 1.0
User Precip 1
Equal SA Inputs 1
Equal SD Inputs 1
Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Sheet
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.1 1 10
FL
O
W
[
c
f
s
]
TIME [hr]
100YR IN
100YR OUT
50YR IN
50YR OUT
10YR IN
10YR OUT
5YR IN
5YR OUT
2YR IN
2YR OUT
WQCV IN
WQCV OUT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0.1 1 10 100
PO
N
D
I
N
G
D
E
P
T
H
[
f
t
]
DRAIN TIME [hr]
100YR
50YR
10YR
5YR
2YR
WQCV
SDI_Design_Data_v2.00_Pond_AB, Design Data 12/15/2023, 3:49 PM
ST
ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST
1
RECORD_DRAWING
MAK
12/14/17
1
RE
C
O
R
D
_
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
MA
K
12
/
1
4
/
1
7
REC
O
R
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
2
RE
C
O
R
D
_
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
_
S
I
T
E
_
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
CT
P
11
/
2
0
/
2
3
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
ST
ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST
1
RECORD_DRAWING
MAK
12/14/17