HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 11/29/2023Page 1
OVERALL SITE and DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION
Commercial, Multi-Family and Subdivision Certification Form and Checklist
Project Name:
Date:
Building Permit Numbers:
(Commercial or multi-family)
Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Chapter 3, Section 3.0 to certify as-
built construction to the approved drainage and grading plans, please fill in all applicable items in this
Certification Form for Commercial, Multi-Family and Overall Single Family sites. NOTE: several items must be
verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted with the as-built grading
plan. (As-built elevations must be written in red next to the approved elevations.)
•Use “Yes” for items completed as described.
•Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified.
•If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below.
Attach an explanation or description of the as-built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but
shown on the approved construction plans.
Provide an as-built redline or Mylar drawing with the following:
I.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin - FCSCM Ch. 6 and 7
For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately:
A. Volume: As-built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and
volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage
volume.
1. Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state
of Colorado.
2.Both proposed and as-built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for
proposed and solid lines for as-built).
3.All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and
the as-built elevations are shown on the plan sheet.
4.Stage-storage-discharge tables are provided on a separate document.
5.Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92-
602(8) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal
(tinyurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include:
a.The cover sheet from the approved drainage report
b.The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report
c.As-built topographic survey
d.Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification
e.PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet
11/19
Woodspring Suites
11/17/2023
B2005327
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Wes Lamarque
11/29/2023
Page 2
B.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: Attached is as-built verification that there is
a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of
the detention pond. If there is a “soft pan” in the flow-line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2%
grade requirement.
1.Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable:
a. Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin.
There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow-line(s) of the detention basin. The flattest as-built grade
is .
b.Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin.
There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction
plans. (Show as-built spot elevations.)
c.Soft pan for low flow in detention basin.
•Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified
during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineer’s statement of
visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.)
o There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved
construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations,
bends, cleanouts, etc.)
o There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil
type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical
engineer.
NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-.
2. Side Slopes: The as-built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown.
Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed
is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re-
graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process.
3.Spillway: The following items must be field verified:
a.The location of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan.
b.The width of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan.
c.The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as-built plan.
d.A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway.
e.There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate
type: (riprap size “D50” gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried
riprap with inches of bury, etc.).
f.There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape
features, rocks, etc.
11/19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 3
4.Outlet Structure:
a.The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of
the orifice.
b.The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of
rows and columns of holes.
c.The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate
so no water ponds in front of the plate.
d.The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans.
e.100-year overflow grate elevation is . (Elev. A on detail D-46)
f.The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is . (Elev. B on detail
D-46)
g.Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the
top and bolted at the bottom.
h.The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain
runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet.
II.Channels/Swales - FCSCM Ch. 8, Sec. 2.0 and Ch. 9, Sec. 5.0
A. Capacity: The as-built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet
or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project.
1.All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans.
2.Longitudinal slopes and side-slopes (cross-sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires
longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side-slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these
criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each
instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and
are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed.
3.As-built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations
shown on the approved construction plans.
4.All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction
plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used
as part of this verification.)
5.All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the
system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.)
6.The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved
construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on
the cross-sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.)
7.The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees,
shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.)
11/19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 4
III.Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 4.0
A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: The as-built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been
verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this
project.
1.All storm drain pipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the
approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.)
Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was
changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply
them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity
equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size.
2.The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The
acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans
must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet.
3.The as-built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of
the approved construction plans.
B.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: All pipes are installed in accordance with the
approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved
construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations.
2.All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met.
3.Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans
have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.)
IV.Concrete Pans - FCSCM Ch. 8, Sec. 2.0
A. Construction/Installation: All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans.
1.The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The
certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless
a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or
justification by separate document.
3.The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross-
section is “V” shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.)
4.The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4
inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide
documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved
construction plans.)
5.The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as-
built drawings.
11/19
See pipe joint submittal
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 5
V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 3.0
A. Construction/Installation: All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction
plan. Indicate by writing “Verified” on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the
inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is other than the one on the approved
construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or
better capacity.
2.The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.)
3.The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as
indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans.
4.The as-built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan
and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide
justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation.
5.The as-built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or
justification is attached.
6.All Type C, R, 13 and 16 inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following designation (or
an equivalent): NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO POUDRE RIVER.
VI.Culverts - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 4.0
A. Construction/Installation: All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with
the approved construction plans and construction specifications.
1.All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as-built construction plans as correct.
2.The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is
indicated on the as-built plans.
3.The as-built invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built
construction plans.
4.The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as-built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to
the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative.
An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM).
VII.Sub-Drains
A. Construction/Installation: All sub-drains shown on the construction plans have been installed in
accordance with those plans and the construction specifications. Sub-drains installed with the sanitary
sewer are to be verified on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE:
Indicate any sub-drains installed after the plans were approved on the as-built plans.)
1.The size of the sub-drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as-
built plans.
2.The type of sub-drain, in particular the perforated and non-perforated sections of the drain, are
as indicated on the approved construction plans.
11/19
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 6
3.The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided.
4.The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are
accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations
marked.)
5.The backfill materials for sub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This
includes the type, depth and width.)
6.The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub-drain and the permeable backfill material unless
shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub-drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material
is accepted only if approved prior to installation.)
VIII.Curb Cuts
A. Construction: All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction
plans and construction specifications.
1.The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The curb cut openings tie into a downstream swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth
transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb
cut.
IX.Sidewalk Culverts & Chases
A. Construction/Installation: All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the
approved construction plans.
1.The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans.
2.The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the
detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail.
3.The sidewalk culvert invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the
as-built plans.
4.The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s
detail.
5.There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no
obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert.
X. Site Grading - FCSCM Ch. 8
A. Construction: All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved
construction plans.
1.The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and
the as-built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as-built plans.
11/19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Page 7
2.The as-built contours for “overlot grading” are shown on the as-built construction plans for all
common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the
situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be
required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site
Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is
backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.)
3.All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction
plans and the slopes are stabilized.
XI.Permanent Erosion Control BMPs - FCSCM Ch. 9, Sec. 7.0
A. Construction: All permanent erosion control BMPs have been installed per the approved
construction plans.
1.All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction
plans.
2.All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction
plans.
a.All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans.
XII.Post-Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Ch. 3, Sec. 2.0
A. Construction: All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from
drainage paths.
1.All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s).
2.All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas.
3.All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been
coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note
the area needing stabilization in the narrative.
XIII.Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Ch. 7
A.Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and
other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation.
B.Attached is verification of the rain garden and/or sand filter flat surface area(s) and ponding
volume(s). This verification includes survey of critical elevations.
C.Attached is verification of the underground infiltration required volume(s), weir elevations,
orifices, inspection ports and filtering fabric. This verification includes survey of critical elevations.
D.All visible LID design features were verified as part of the engineer's site visit.
11/19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
No
Yes
11/19 Page 8
XIV.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs
A.The construction of other permanent BMPs not specifically addressed in this certification is in
accordance with the approved plan. This may include grade control structures, rundowns, bridges, stream
access/improvements, etc.
Please specify other permanent BMPs included on this site:
XV. Certification and Erosion Control Measures - FCSCM Ch. 3
A. All temporary erosion control measures shall be removed upon stabilization. If at the time of preparing
this certification there are any erosion control measures still remaining on the site, please note them in
the narrative and verify that they need to remain at this time. If in doubt as to the need for any control
measure, please consult with the Erosion Control Inspector at erosion@fcgov.com.
XVI.Statement of Compliance - FCSCM Ch. 3
A. This certification is signed and stamped. By signing this form, the engineer(s) attests that he/she has
visited and observed the site, and to the best of his/her knowledge, the as-built conditions of the drainage
facilities are as described in the above form and in the enclosed as-built plans.
B.Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and
prevent the release of any and all Stormwater Utility permit holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates
of Occupancy within this development.
XVII. Signature and Stamp by a Colorado-Registered Professional Engineer
Engineer’s contact information:
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Company:
Address:
PE Stamp
11/17/2023
Scourstop Transition Mat
Yes
Emily Felton
emily.felton@kimley-horn.com
970-658-8084
Kimley-Horn
3801 Automation Way Suite 210
Fort Collins, CO 80525
kimley-horn.com 3801 Automation Way, Suite 210, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970 822 7911
November 17, 2023
Wes Lamarque
Fort Collins Utilities
222 Laporte Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
RE:Woodspring Suites, Fort Collins As-Built Design Conformance
Dear Mr. Lamarque,
This letter serves as an explanation of the as-built condition deviations from the Construction Documents for
Woodspring Suites prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and approved by the City of Fort Collins.
Item 5.A:
The Number 13 Combination Inlet along the east side of the site was originally designed to be along a straight curb
line. The inlet was constructed to have a bump out at the inlet, tapering into the inlet on each side as shown in the
picture below. This new alignment is not anticipated to negatively impact inlet capacity as it does not decrease the
allowable spread distance or impact the functionality of the inlet itself.
Item 5.A.4:
The as-built invert elevations of various storm pipes have greater variance than the allowable tolerance of 0.2 feet from
the design elevation. It is not anticipated to negatively impact the drainage design as the slope of the pipes increased
allowing the pipes to still have capacity for the proposed flows, see attached Flowmaster calculation for pipe capacity.
Item 12.3:
Areas northwest of the proposed screening wall have been identified as seeded areas that will be required to be
stabilized in the future. This area is planned to be stabilized with hydroseed per FCSCM Volume 2, Chapter 12 on
11/18/2023.
Item 13.C:
As-Built elevations of structures have been provided within the attached document, but additional information related
to the filtering fabric elevation were not obtained upon installation. The contractor has provided the as-built volume as
designed, as well as the attached letter from the manufacturer stating the system was properly installed.
Please contact me at (970) 822-7911 or emily.felton@kimley-horn.com should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Emily Felton, P.E.
Worksheet for Inlet A Pipe As-Built
Project Description
Manning
FormulaFriction Method
Full Flow
DiameterSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficient
ft/ft0.009Channel Slope
in18.2Normal Depth
in18.2Diameter
cfs10.21Discharge
Results
in18.2Diameter
in18.2Normal Depth
ft²1.8Flow Area
ft4.8Wetted Perimeter
in4.5Hydraulic Radius
ft0.00Top Width
in14.7Critical Depth
%100.0Percent Full
ft/ft0.009Critical Slope
ft/s5.67Velocity
ft0.50Velocity Head
ft2.01Specific Energy
(N/A)Froude Number
cfs10.98Maximum Discharge
cfs10.21Discharge Full
ft/ft0.009Slope Full
UndefinedFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depth
ft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream Depth
N/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss
%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise
%0.0Normal Depth Over Rise
ft/s0.00Downstream Velocity
ft/s0.00Upstream Velocity
in18.2Normal Depth
in14.7Critical Depth
ft/ft0.009Channel Slope
ft/ft0.009Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
11/15/2023
FlowMaster
[10.03.00.03]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
CenterAB Pipe Sizing Calculations.fm8
Worksheet for Inlet B Pipe As-Built
Project Description
Manning
FormulaFriction Method
Full Flow
DiameterSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficient
ft/ft0.009Channel Slope
in13.7Normal Depth
in13.7Diameter
cfs4.82Discharge
Results
in13.7Diameter
in13.7Normal Depth
ft²1.0Flow Area
ft3.6Wetted Perimeter
in3.4Hydraulic Radius
ft0.00Top Width
in10.9Critical Depth
%100.0Percent Full
ft/ft0.010Critical Slope
ft/s4.70Velocity
ft0.34Velocity Head
ft1.49Specific Energy
(N/A)Froude Number
cfs5.18Maximum Discharge
cfs4.82Discharge Full
ft/ft0.009Slope Full
UndefinedFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depth
ft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream Depth
N/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss
%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise
%100.0Normal Depth Over Rise
ft/sInfinityDownstream Velocity
ft/sInfinityUpstream Velocity
in13.7Normal Depth
in10.9Critical Depth
ft/ft0.009Channel Slope
ft/ft0.010Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
11/15/2023
FlowMaster
[10.03.00.03]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
CenterAB Pipe Sizing Calculations.fm8
Worksheet for Inlet A Pipe After MH As-Built
Project Description
Manning
FormulaFriction Method
Full Flow
DiameterSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficient
ft/ft0.005Channel Slope
in23.2Normal Depth
in23.2Diameter
cfs15.03Discharge
Results
in23.2Diameter
in23.2Normal Depth
ft²2.9Flow Area
ft6.1Wetted Perimeter
in5.8Hydraulic Radius
ft0.00Top Width
in16.9Critical Depth
%100.0Percent Full
ft/ft0.007Critical Slope
ft/s5.12Velocity
ft0.41Velocity Head
ft2.34Specific Energy
(N/A)Froude Number
cfs16.17Maximum Discharge
cfs15.03Discharge Full
ft/ft0.005Slope Full
UndefinedFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depth
ft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream Depth
N/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss
%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise
%0.0Normal Depth Over Rise
ft/s0.00Downstream Velocity
ft/s0.00Upstream Velocity
in23.2Normal Depth
in16.9Critical Depth
ft/ft0.005Channel Slope
ft/ft0.007Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
11/15/2023
FlowMaster
[10.03.00.03]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
CenterAB Pipe Sizing Calculations.fm8
Worksheet for After WQ Pipe As-Built
Project Description
Manning
FormulaFriction Method
Full Flow
DiameterSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficient
ft/ft0.007Channel Slope
in23.6Normal Depth
in23.6Diameter
cfs18.16Discharge
Results
in23.6Diameter
in23.6Normal Depth
ft²3.0Flow Area
ft6.2Wetted Perimeter
in5.9Hydraulic Radius
ft0.00Top Width
in18.5Critical Depth
%100.0Percent Full
ft/ft0.008Critical Slope
ft/s5.96Velocity
ft0.55Velocity Head
ft2.52Specific Energy
(N/A)Froude Number
cfs19.54Maximum Discharge
cfs18.16Discharge Full
ft/ft0.007Slope Full
UndefinedFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depth
ft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream Depth
N/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss
%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise
%0.0Normal Depth Over Rise
ft/s0.00Downstream Velocity
ft/s0.00Upstream Velocity
in23.6Normal Depth
in18.5Critical Depth
ft/ft0.007Channel Slope
ft/ft0.008Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W
Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
11/15/2023
FlowMaster
[10.03.00.03]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution
CenterAB Pipe Sizing Calculations.fm8
Denver Pipe Plant
8311 W. Carder Court
Littleton, CO 80125
303.791.1600
LETTER OF
SUBMITTAL
To:Dominant Dirtwork, LLC
6618 W County Road 38E
Loveland, CO 80538
Attn:Devin Goins
Date:6/7/2022
Job No:
Re:Woodspring FTC
Fort Collins, CO
We are sending you:Attached Under separate cover via:the following items:
Shop Drawings Prints Plans Certifications
Copy of Letter Change Order Samples Other
Copies Date Number Revision Description
1 6/7/2022 Product Certification Sheet for RCP
1 6/7/2022 RCP Data Sheet
1 6/7/2022 Rubber Gasket Details (4 sheets)
1 6/7/2022 Pipe Lubricant Details
These are transmitted as checked below…
For Approval Approved As Submitted Resubmit Copies For Approval
For Your Use Approved As Noted Submit Copies For Distribution
As Requested Returned For Corrections Return Corrected Prints
For Review and Comment Other
For Bids Due ,20 Prints Returned After Loan To Us
Remarks…
We do hereby certify that all reinforcing steel and incorporated into our concrete products has been manufactured
In the United States of America from raw materials originating in the United States of America.
Copy to:Signed:Mark Walter
Copy to Project File.
Specification Certificate
Foley Products Company hereby certifies that the
30”CLASS 3 GASKETED RCP
furnished to
Dominant Dirtwork, LLC
for their job at
WOODSPRING FTC,Fort Collins, Colorado
will fully comply with ASTM specifications No.C-76 & C-443 for
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
Except the length tolerances of ASTM C 76, paragraph 12.4
RCP, elliptical RCP, flared end sections, and box culvert to be supplied with concrete meeting CDOT Class 0 sulfate
resistance.The engineer shall confirm that this level of sulfate resistance is adequate to meet project requirements and
notify Foley Products Company if a higher level of sulfate resistance is needed.
Foley Products Company
By Mark Walter
Denver Pipe Plant
8311 West Carder Court
Littleton, Colorado 80125
303.791.1600
Circular Reinforced Concrete Pipe
Standard Specifications Joint Specifications Joint Specifications
(Manufacturing) (Rubber Gasket) (Flexible Sealant)
• ASTM C76 • ASTM C443 • ASTM C990
• AASHTO M170 • AASHTO M315 • AASHTO M198
SIDE VIEW END VIEW JOINT VIEW
Pipe
I. D.
(inches)
Bell
O.D.
(inches)
Wall Thickness
(inches)
Section
Length
(feet)
Section Weight
(tons)
Waterway Area
(square feet)
12 20.0 2.00 7.5 0.5 0.8
15 23.8 2.25 8.0 0.6 1.2
18 27.6 2.50 8.0 0.7 1.8
24 35.6 3.00 8.0 1.1 3.1
30 42.5 3.50 8.0 1.6 4.9
36 50.3 4.00 8.0 2.2 7.1
42 58.5 4.50 8.0 3.1 9.6
48 66.3 5.00 8.0 3.6 12.6
54 69.5 5.50 8.0 5.1 15.9
60 75.5 6.00 8.0 6.1 19.6
66 81.5 6.50 8.0 7.2 23.8
72 87.5 7.00 8.0 8.1 28.3
78 94.5 7.50/8.25 8.0 8.4/9.4 33.2
84 101.5 8.0/8.75 8.0 9.64/10.6 38.5
90 108.5 8.50/9.25 8.0 11.0/12.1 44.2
96 114.0 9.00/9.75 8.0 12.4/13.5 50.3
108 128.0 10.00/10.75 8.0 15.5/16.7 63.6
120 142.0 11.00/11.75 8.0 18.9/20.2 78.5
• RCP strength classification requirements to be determined by a qualified engineer
• Additional information available upon request, product data subject to change without notice
• Pipe to be produced with concrete meeting CDOT Class 2 sulfate resistance. The engineer shall confirm that
this level of sulfate resistance is adequate to meet project requirements and notify Foley Products Company if a
higher level of sulfate resistance is needed.
• 48” and larger to be supplied with lift anchors.
Gainesville Plant Fort Worth Plant
1627 Oakbrook Parkway 4624 Martin Luther King Fwy. Suite
200
Gainesville, Ga. 30507 Fort Worth, Tx. 76119
Phone (770) 718-9403 Phone (817) 536-1214
Fax (770) 718-1851 Fax (817) 536-7003
Pipe Joint Lubricant Usage Tables
DS Profile Rubber Gaskets
Approximate Usage per 100 Joints
Only lubricant approved and manufactures
expressly for Profile gaskets on concrete pipe or
manholes should be used.
Delta Lubricants
#711 General Purpose Lube
#SA-2 Sub Aqueous(Under Water) Lube
#C1-A Economy Lube
#27-A Potable Lube
All types are available in 1 gallon and 3-1/2
gallon pails.
*Note: 1 gallon= 8lbs of product; 3-1/2 gallon= 30lbs of product
Profile Gasket Installation Instructions
1. Pipe should be handled with extreme caution to avoid chipping of the spigot or bell sealing
surfaces.
2. Carefully clean spigot end including the seating area for the gasket.
3. Place the DS profile gasket on the step of the spigot section, making sure the white stripe is
facing forward toward the end of the spigot. Equalize the rubber gasket stretch by running a
smooth, round object, inserted between the gasket and spigot, around the circumference several
times.
4. Remove all dirt and foreign matter from the inside surface of the bell and apply liberally
lubricant to the inner surface of the bell.
5. Align bell and spigot of pipes to be jointed. Before homing the joint check that the gasket is in
contact with the entry taper around the entire circumference.
6. Push pipe carefully until the spigot is all the way home.
Rinker Materials
PIPE
DIA.
LBS/
100
JOINTS
PIPE
DIA.
LBS/
100
JOINTS
12” 24 48” 108
15” 32 54” 120
18” 40 60” 136
21” 48 66” 146
24” 56 72” 156
27” 62 78” 174
30” 68 84” 192
33” 74 90” 216
36” 80 96” 240
42” 96 102” 252
Gainesville Plant Fort Worth Plant
1627 Oakbrook Parkway 4624 Martin Luther King Fwy.
#200
Gainesville, Ga. 30507 Fort Worth, Tx. 76119
Phone (770) 718-9403 Phone (817) 536-1214
Fax (770) 718-1851 Fax (817) 536-7003
DATA SHEET
Our #711 pipe joint lubricant effectively lubricates pipe and pipe gaskets for safe
and efficient assembly of all types of pipe except potable water lines. Delta #711 is a
soft, non-water dispersible paste. It is a stable blend of vegetable oil, soaps, petroleum oils,
clays, and water.
Features:
• Non-Water Dispersible
• Consistency: Stable from 10 to
110°F
• Amber/ Tan Stable Paste
• Will not support bacteria growth
• Contains no phosphates
• Bio Degradable
• No objectionable odor
Packaging:
Available in 1 gallon(8lb), 3-1/2 gallon(30lb), and 5 gallon(40lb) Containers
Product Data:
• Form: Paste
Petroleum Content: ∼30%
• Flash Point: >220°F
• Weight: ∼10 lbs/ gallon
• Total Base Number: 40-60 mg
KOH equivalent/ gram
• % NVM: ∼94 by weight
• Flash Point: >220°F
• Odor: Bland
• Phosphates: None
• Water Dispersibility: Trace
• Penetration: 320-350 @ 77°F
• Petroleum Content: ∼30%
• Weight: ∼10 lbs/ gallon
• Total Base Number: 40-60 mg
KOH equivalent/ gram
#711 Pipe Joint Lubricant
www.stormtech.com│20 Beaver Road│Suite 104│Wethersfield│Connecticut│06109│888.892.2694│fax 866.328.8401
August 19th, 2023
Re: StormTech Installation on the Woodspring Suites Fort Collins
To Whom it May Concern:
Periodic inspection of the StormTech underground detention systems installed on this
project that took place on several days in June of 2022. Based on our observation of the
installed system and provided pictures, we found:
· A preconstruction meeting was held with the utility contractor.
· All chambers appeared to be connected and spaced properly.
· All end caps appeared to be installed in the correct location.
· A manifold system was laid out and installed to function properly.
· The stone backfill material used was sized in accordance to our recommendations.
· Appropriate geotextile fabric was installed to protect the integrity of the system.
· The Isolator Row was constructed according to specification, as visible at the time it
was observed.
If you have any questions, please call me at 303-349-7555.
Regards,
Jerome Magsino
Jerome Magsino, P.E.
Engineered Products Manager
Advanced Drainage Systems
Phone: 303-349-7555
e-mail: jerome.magsino@adspipe.com
VERIFIED
VERIFIED
VERIFIED
VERIFIED
1/19 Page 1 of 2
DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST
To be completed by Construction Superintendent
This checklist is to be completed during construction and included with the Overall Site and Drainage Certification.
• Use “Yes” for items completed as described.
• Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified.
• If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below.
Project Name: Woodsprings Suites Date: 10/30/23
Building Permit Numbers: B2005327
I. Compaction
A. Yes All berms and embankments meet the compaction requirements as specified in the project geotechnical report or comply with the
City’s standard, which is “soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 2% below to 2% above optimum moisture content
and compacted to 95% of the Maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).” Compaction requires verification during construction.
Provide testing log from contractor/engineer.
II. Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements
A. Yes The pipe trenches have been compacted in accordance with Section 02225-3.07.A.1. of the Fort Collins Development Construction
Standards for Water, Wastewater, Stormwater (e.g., the trenches in the roadways are to be 95% of maximum density and all other areas
are to be at 90%, both in accordance with ASTM D698).
III. Energy Dissipation and Erosion Protection - FCSCM Chapter 9, Section 7.0
A. Riprap
1. N/A The riprap bedding is a granular bedding of the gradation and thickness indicated on the approved construction plans.
2. Yes A filter fabric was installed instead of granular bedding and is the material shown on the approved construction plans or was an
approved equal. Provide documentation for an approved equal.
3. N/A The riprap is the gradation shown on the approved construction plans with a D50 of .
4. N/A The riprap thickness is as shown on the approved construction plans and extends to the horizontal limits shown.
5. N/A The riprap is buried to the depth indicated on the approved construction plans. (A minimum of 6 inches of soil is required.)
B. Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7
1/19 Page 2 of 2
1. Yes All fabric was installed per manufacturer’s specifications.
IV. Other Permanent BMPs
A. N/A All cut-off walls have been installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. (Cut-off walls are required for irrigation ditch
crossings of storm drain pipes.)
V. Extended Detention Basins
A. N/A Installation of this facility was verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater Inspector at the point of installation of the water quality
control box(es). Provide date of inspection and name of inspector:
Included certification sheet(s):
Please check the appropriate box(es) for the Low Impact Development
(LID) facilities found on this site and complete the corresponding
certification sheets.
☐ Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers
☐ Bioretention Cells (Rain Gardens)
☐ Sand Filters
☐ Vegetated Buffers
☒ Underground Infiltration
☐ Other LID – For certification of Dry Wells, Tree Filters,
Constructed Wetland Channels & Ponds, etc., contact City Staff
to determine requirements to exhibit the LID facility has been
constructed and functions as intended per the approved
drainage report.
*Please provide photographic documentation of the installation of all
stages of all LID facilities.
**Please contact the City Stormwater Inspector at
stormwaterinspection@fcgov.com to discuss inspection requirements
for each LID facility and request inspections.
***All facilities being certified must be “clean” – free of sediment &
construction debris – prior to certification or acceptance of the facility.
Completed by:
Name: Greg Watt/Marcus Gutierrez
Title: Project Manager/Superintendent
Email: marcusg@builtbygenesis.com
Phone: 719-492-8291
Company: Genesis Construction
Address: 4420 Madison Ave. Suite 100
Kansas City, MO 64111
1/19 Page 1 of 2
Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers
was held with City-Stormwater
Inspector to discuss installation, inspection, checklist, and ☐ ☐ ☒ location (i.e. DCP, initial erosion control
Sub-surface inspection(s):
verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater Inspector at the
point of installation of the outlet, underdrain, geomembrane
layer, and sub-base courses (per design in Final Plan
☐ ☐ ☒
inspector’s name
Surface inspection(s):
inspection by a City-Stormwater Inspector at the point of ☐ ☐ ☒ inspector’s name
Excavation
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Impermeable Liner
Impermeable liner meets design specifications ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Impermeable liner is buried with no exposure ☐ ☐ ☒
Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed
and checked for water-tightness ☐ ☐ ☒
Edge Restraint and Concrete Cut-Off Wall
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide specification of installation
Concrete cut-off wall meets design specifications for: ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide specification of installation
- Dimensions ☐ ☐ ☒
- Reinforcement ☐ ☐ ☒
- Footings ☐ ☐ ☒
Underdrain System
Underdrain pipe meets design specifications ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
1/19 Page 2 of 2
Cleanout pipe is solid (not perforated/slotted) ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Cleanout covers are installed and watertight ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify the underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify there is no orifice plate on the underdrain outfall ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or
water test ☐ ☐ ☒
Aggregate
- Has 90% fractured faces
- Is thoroughly washed (virtually free of fine sediment) ☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
- Has 90% fractured faces
- Is thoroughly washed (virtually free of fine sediment) ☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
- Has 90% fractured faces
- Is thoroughly washed (virtually free of fine sediment)
- Is dry screened
- Is installed to the required design depth and to the top
☐ ☐ ☒
record depth installed
☐ ☐ ☒
Protection During Construction
including runoff from the upstream catchment and
construction equipment traffic ☐ ☐ ☒ otherwise protected to prevent
construction runoff from entering the
Close Out
☐ ☐ ☒
Paver height offsets are no more than 1/4” between adjacent
units & surface contains no deformations ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 1 of 3
Bioretention Cells (Rain Gardens)
was held with City-Stormwater
Inspector to discuss installation, inspection, checklist, and ☐ ☐ ☒ location (i.e. DCP, initial erosion control
Underdrain and basecourse inspection(s):
facility was verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater
Inspector at the point of installation of the outlet, underdrain,
geomembrane layer, and base course (per design in Final Plan
☐ ☐ ☒
inspector’s name
Pea gravel and BSM inspection(s):
was verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater Inspector at
the point of installation of the pea gravel and bioretention ☐ ☐ ☒ inspector’s name
Excavation
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff
control measures during construction ☐ ☐ ☒
Intake
☐ ☐ ☒
Forebay
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
There is a minimum 3” drop at the forebay entrance ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Forebay will drain fully and not hold standing water ☐ ☐ ☒
Outlet Structure/Overflow
Emergency overflow elevation is confirmed
☐ ☐ ☒ overflow to top of media filter; provide
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 2 of 3
Overflow inlet invert elevation is at least 3 inches below
containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet) ☐ ☐ ☒ inlet and top of containment wall/berm;
☐ ☐ ☒
Impermeable Liner
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Impermeable liner is buried with no exposure ☐ ☐ ☒
Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed
and checked for water-tightness ☐ ☐ ☒
Underdrain System
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Cleanout pipe is solid (not perforated/slotted) ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Cleanout covers are installed and watertight ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify the underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify there is no orifice plate on the underdrain outfall ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or
water test ☐ ☐ ☒
Filter Media and Aggregate
- meets design specifications
☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
#8, #89, or #9):
- meets design specifications
☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
- meets design specifications
☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide load ticket
BSM is installed flat and level ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Other Structural Components
Containment wall/berm is continuous and level ☐ ☐ ☒
Landscaping
1/19 Page 3 of 3
Verify final landscaping is free of sod ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Vegetation is planted according to landscape design
specifications and final landscaping plan ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
Temporary irrigation installed
☐ ☐ ☒ irrigation is installed to establish/maintain
Close Out
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 1 of 1
Vegetated Buffers
Buffer area was sectioned off to eliminate site disturbance and
compaction during construction ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Soils in the buffer area have been amended ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 1 of 3
Sand Filters
was held with City-Stormwater
Inspector to discuss installation, inspection, checklist, and
☐ ☐ ☒ location (i.e. DCP, initial erosion control
Underdrain and basecourse inspection(s):
facility was verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater
Inspector at the point of installation of the outlet, underdrain,
geomembrane layer, and base course (per design in Final Plan
☐ ☐ ☒
inspector’s name
Pea gravel and filter media inspection(s):
facility was verified via inspection by a City-Stormwater
Inspector at the point of installation of the pea gravel and filter
☐ ☐ ☒ inspector’s name
Excavation
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff
control measures during construction ☐ ☐ ☒
Intake
☐ ☐ ☒
Forebay (If Applicable)
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
There is a minimum 3” drop at the forebay entrance ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Forebay will drain fully and not hold standing water ☐ ☐ ☒
Outlet Structure/Overflow
Overflow inlet elevation is set above sand filter media per plan
(typically 1 to 3 feet) ☐ ☐ ☒
containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet) ☐ ☐ ☒ inlet and top of containment wall/berm;
1/19 Page 2 of 3
Overflow path and check dams, if used, are armored to protect
from erosion and maintain elevations ☐ ☐ ☒
Impermeable Liner (If Applicable)
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed
and checked for water-tightness ☐ ☐ ☒
Underdrain System
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Cleanout pipe is solid (not perforated/slotted) ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Cleanout covers are installed and watertight ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify the underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Verify there is no orifice plate on the underdrain outfall ☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or
water test ☐ ☐ ☒
Filter Media
- meets design specifications
- is installed to the required design depth
☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
- meets design specifications
☐ ☐ ☒ record depth installed
☐ ☐ ☒
Other Structural Components
Containment wall/berm is continuous and level ☐ ☐ ☒
Landscaping
Verify final landscaping is free of sod ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒ Provide photograph
Vegetation is planted according to landscape design
specifications and final landscaping plan ☐ ☐ ☒
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 3 of 3
Temporary irrigation installed
☐ ☐ ☒ irrigation is installed to establish/maintain
Close Out
☐ ☐ ☒
1/19 Page 1 of 2
Underground Infiltration
A
pre-construction meeting was completed with the
☒ ☐ ☐ meeting
Onsite meeting 6/17/22
was held with City-Stormwater
Inspector to discuss installation, inspection, checklist, and
☒ ☐ ☐ location (i.e. DCP, initial erosion control
Inspection(s):
inspection by a City-Stormwater Inspector at the point at which
the chambers had been laid/prior to backfilling.
☒ ☐ ☐ inspector’s name for approved for
backfill.
Excavation
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
Impermeable Liner
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed
and checked for water-tightness. ☒ ☐ ☐
Aggregate
compacted according to design and manufacturer’s
☒ ☐ ☐ business, no way to
Underdrain System
1/19 Page 2 of 2
Underdrain pipe meets design specifications ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
Cleanout pipe is solid (not perforated/slotted) ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
Cleanout covers are installed and watertight ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
Verify the underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
Verify there is no orifice plate on the underdrain outfall ☒ ☐ ☐ Provide photograph
Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or
water test ☐ ☒ ☐
Manifold system
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
At least one inspection port has been provided for each Isolator
Row (located in middle third of each row) ☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐
Underground Detention Chambers
All chambers were installed per approved Utility Plans and
manufacturer’s specifications ☒ ☐ ☐
Close Out
☒ ☐ ☐
☒ ☐ ☐