Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 02/07/2019Accepted 2/7/2019 WL WL - verified these were installed. 12/15 Page 1 DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST To be completed by Construction Superintendent This checklist is to be completed during construction and included with the Overall Site and Drainage Certification. •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. I.Compaction A.All berms and embankments meet the compaction requirements as specified in the project geotechnical report or comply with the City’s standard, which is “soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 2% below to 2% above optimum moisture content and compacted to 95% of the Maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).” Compaction requires verification during construction. Provide testing log from contractor/engineer. II.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements A.The pipe trenches have been compacted in accordance with Section 02225-3.07.A.1. of the Fort Collins Development Construction Standards (e.g., the trenches in the roadways are to be 95% of maximum density and all other areas are to be at 90%, both in accordance with ASTM D698). III. Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A.The riprap bedding is a granular bedding of the gradation and thickness indicated on the approved construction plans. B.A filter fabric was installed instead of granular bedding and is the material shown on the approved construction plans or was an approved equal. Provide documentation for an approved equal. C.The riprap is the gradation shown on the approved construction plans with a D50 of . D.The riprap thickness is as shown on the approved construction plans and extends to the horizontal limits shown. E.The riprap is buried to the depth indicated on the approved construction plans. (A minimum of 6 inches of soil is required.) IV. Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A.All fabric was installed per manufacturer’s specifications. V. Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.All cut-off walls have been installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. (Cut-off walls are required for irrigation ditch crossings of storm drain pipes and at the end of flared end sections.) 12/15 Page 2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Post-excavation infiltration rates are consistent with design infiltration capacity (for “full or partial infiltration” designs) Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed and checked for water-tightness. Meets specifications for: -Dimensions -Reinforcement -Footings Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test Base coarse (e.g., #2/4) has 90% fractured faces Bedding coarse (e.g., #89) is thoroughly washed Sub-base materials are installed and compacted according to manufacturer’s specifications PICP area is protected from construction site sediment, including runoff from the upstream catchment and Close Out 12/15 Page 3 Bioretention Cells Heavy equipment did not travel over bioretention cell during excavation Bottom of cell was “ripped” after excavation Photograph before/after “ripping” Bottom of cell is flat and level Photograph Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff control BMPs during construction Photograph Overflow inlet elevation is set above bioretention media per plan (typically 12 inches) Overflow inlet invert elevation is at least 3 inches below containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet) Measure/record distance between inlet and top of containment wall/berm Upstream catchment drains to inlet Forebay is installed according to design specifications Forebay has flat, concrete bottom Outlet structure/overflow elevation is confirmed Measure/record distance from overflow to top of media filter Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall Impermeable liner is not exposed Underdrain pipe is per design specifications At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral Cleanout pipe is not perforated Cleanout covers are installed and watertight Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or water test 12/15 Page 4 Filter Media Filter media composition is per design specifications Filter media was “machine mixed” by supplier prior to delivery Filter media installed flat and level Other Structural Components Containment wall/berm is continuous and level Landscaping Final landscaping does NOT include sod Final landscaping (wood/rock mulch) is flat and level Vegetation is planted according to landscape design specifications Verify that weed barrier is not installed Temporary irrigation installed If N/A, then verify that permanent irrigation is installed to establish/maintain vegetation Close Out Upstream catchment stabilized prior to diverting runoff into bioretention cell Signature: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Company: Address: *) ' + ( % *) ' + ( & *)'+(&*)'+(% & ) + 3 4 2 - * / ' 0 . 1 * / 6 (/055,*4%3 (>FJC<+CDF(C@@>BE&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- )8F;(>FJ*B=>B;;D )8F;68F;D%68EF;I8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;2FCDAI8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;08D?E%1;9D;8F>CB )8F;3D8<<>9*B=>B;;D )8F; )8F;*BH>DCBA;BF8@0@8BB;D )8F; -8D>A;D(CGBFJ&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- -8D>A;D(CGBFJ*B=>B;;D )8F; 96>:3; =2 ? - 1 / * * * * ( @ G G ? - 1 / + - * * ? 5 I @ M F H D J ? < E C C K 5 M D J ? 3 J ' A L F G K J ? ; E @ J C - % . ? - 1 / + - * * 8 7 * + ( B M D & 8 I @ B F H D * + & + + ) , * ) , * + 0 - 2 - . 2 * 1 ; : & 7 4 RECORD DRAWING 12/13/2018 (AS-BUILT DATA PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 4939.02 4934.57 4937.98 4936.80 4938.82 4942.75 4939.0 4938.80 4941.08 4941.85 4942.29 4941.08 4935.44 4937.24 4935.73 4935.66 4934.73 4934.19 4933.77 4933.86 4933.03 4932.40 4931.98 4931.86 4931.23 4930.38 4931.044931.26 4942.0 4942.0 7 4939.3 6 4937.4 4 4936.7 8 4936.1 4 4935.1 4 4935.3 5 4932.8 5 4931.9 6 4931.2 2 4931493249334934493549364937 & ) + 3 4 2 - * / ' 0 . 1 * / 6 (/055,*4%3 (>FJC<+CDF(C@@>BE&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- )8F;(>FJ*B=>B;;D )8F;68F;D%68EF;I8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;2FCDAI8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;08D?E%1;9D;8F>CB )8F;3D8<<>9*B=>B;;D )8F; )8F;*BH>DCBA;BF8@0@8BB;D )8F; -8D>A;D(CGBFJ&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- -8D>A;D(CGBFJ*B=>B;;D )8F; ;7A<4= @3 B - 2 0 * * * * ( C J J B - 2 0 + - * * B 6 L C Q I K G M B > H F F N 6 Q G M B 4 M ' D O I J N M B = H C M F - % / B - 2 0 + - * * > : * . ( E Q G & 8 C J J 9 C L P F M N ? C R 6 F N C I J & + + ) + - ) , * + 1 . 3 , + 3 , * = < & 8 5 RECORD DRAWING 12/13/2018 (AS-BUILT DATA PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 4934.99 4933.60 4933.59 4933.31 4933.16 4934.48 4934.49 4933.91 4934.57 4933.82 4935.54 4935.52 4935.63 4935.604935.76 4935.78 4935.73 4935.63 4934.93 4934.95 4934.90 4934.30 4934.29 4934.35 4933.38 4933.60 4932.50 4932.57 4932.48 4932.47 .,&&,*/(%)& &- + % ( ' & , ( % ) & & ) + 3 4 2 - * / ' 0 . 1 * / 6 (/055,*4%3 (>FJC<+CDF(C@@>BE&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- )8F;(>FJ*B=>B;;D )8F;68F;D%68EF;I8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;2FCDAI8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;08D?E%1;9D;8F>CB )8F;3D8<<>9*B=>B;;D )8F; )8F;*BH>DCBA;BF8@0@8BB;D )8F; -8D>A;D(CGBFJ&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- -8D>A;D(CGBFJ*B=>B;;D )8F; :7A;4= ('7513-2.,9702+3.+3-86..64:2+3.*'.75+21.62+3.+3-86..64:2+3. *( ('86..64:2+3.:.78,92,/2564/12.*'86..64:2+3..+78,92,/2564/12. %50+7.*&%50+7.)& %50+7.)&%50+7.*& @3 B - 2 0 * * * * ( C J J B - 2 0 + - * * B 6 L C P I K G M B > H F F N 6 P G M B 4 M ' D O I J N M B = H C M F - % / B - 2 0 + - * * > 9 * , ( E P G & > ' 9 < ? * + & + + ) + - ) , * + 1 . 3 * 2 3 - 0 = ; & 8 5 RECORD DRAWING 12/13/2018 (AS-BUILT DATA PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 4929.60 4929.17 4929.83 4930.15 4930.53 4931.09 4930.45 4929.634930.08 4930.62 4941.94 4941.51 4936.34 4939.69 4939.74 4939.21 4938.57 4938.83 42((206-%/( 3% 1 - , / * 3 4 2 ( ( 4 42((206-%/( .( ' - % 2 1 - % & ( 42((206-%/( )% - - + % 2 5 ( 3 4 6 % 7 & ) + 3 4 2 - * / ' 0 . 1 * / 6 (/055,*4%3 (>FJC<+CDF(C@@>BE&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- )8F;(>FJ*B=>B;;D )8F;68F;D%68EF;I8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;2FCDAI8F;D4F>@>FJ )8F;08D?E%1;9D;8F>CB )8F;3D8<<>9*B=>B;;D )8F; )8F;*BH>DCBA;BF8@0@8BB;D )8F; -8D>A;D(CGBFJ&(C@CD8:C 43,-,370-'.'001/5'- -8D>A;D(CGBFJ*B=>B;;D )8F; ;8B<5> (':,84361:;9//;,6.;9//97=4,6/)'0,442,9</:;=,>,6.;9//97=4,6/*'5/.4,984,-/,6.;9//97=4,6/ *)( %82,:/)&%82,:/)&%82,:/+& A4 C - 3 1 * * * * ( D K K C - 3 1 + - * * C 7 M D Q J L H N C ? I G G O 7 Q H N C 5 N ' E P J K O N C > I D N G - % / C - 3 1 + - * * ? : * , ( F Q H & ? ' : = @ * , & + + ) + - ) , * + 2 . 4 + * 4 . 0 > < & 9 6 RECORD DRAWING 12/13/2018 (AS-BUILT DATA PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 4933.91 4933.16 4933.42 4933.59 4933.66 4934.14 4933.61 4929.17 4933.31 4932.31 4932.04 4931.81 4932.39 4931.79 4931.38 4931.72 4932.43 4931.37 4935.40 4935.13 4934.844935.49 4935.80 A W e s t r i a n C o m p a n y Know what's City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL DateCity Engineer DateWater & Wastewater Utility DateStormwater Utility DateParks & Recreation DateTraffic Engineer Date DateEnvironmental Planner Date Larimer County, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL Larimer County Engineer Date KEY MAP ESPALIER & TREE ROW LANES STORM LINE PLAN (PHASE 3) STORM LINE PROFILE STA 9+50.00 TO 18+40.00 X: \ 3 9 7 0 0 0 0 . a l l \ 3 9 7 1 3 0 0 \ D r a w i n g s \ S h e e t D w g s \ A s - b u i l t s \ P h a s e 3 & 5 \ 3 9 7 1 3 0 0 D P . d w g , S t o r m P l a n a n d P r o f i l e , 1 1 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 8 5 : 1 3 : 0 6 P M , F C …7200 South Alton Way, Suite C400 Centennial, CO80112 303-740-9393 x Fax 303-921-7320 …130 East Kiowa Street, Suite 400 Colorado Springs, CO80903 719-593-2593 x Fax 303-921-7320 ‹2900 South College Avenue, Suite 3D Fort Collins, CO80525 970-491-9888 x Fax 303-921-7320 MEMORANDUM JR Engineering, LLC has completed a conceptual drainage analysis for lots 1-6 in the 5th phase of filing 2, of the Kechter Farm project. The following is a summary of the findings discovered while performing a conceptual drainage analysis of the proposed Kechter Farm project in order to determine if the lots in the northwest corner of the site can be graded as garden lots and have rear yard storm runoff drain onto the City of Fort Collins property to the northwest of Kechter Farm; similar to the northeast corner of the Mail Creek drainage basin D3. If lots 1-6 were graded to garden lots (see attached conceptual drainage exhibit), the runoff from the back half of the lots would drain west to the on-site open space tract and be collected in a swale, from there flows would be routed north to the northwest property corner and onto the City of Fort Collins property to the northwest of the site, see the attached exhibits. This drainage pattern would be similar to that of the Mail Creek Crossing drainage. According to the Mail Creek Crossing Drainage report completed by Northern Engineering in December 2013, runoff from Basin D3 drains to the back of the lots into swales and onto the City of Fort Collins property at the northeast property corner (see Mail Creek drainage exhibit drainage node D3). Historically, the entire Mail Creek site drained to the northeast corner of their site and with the majority of the proposed condition flows draining elsewhere, the proposed minor and major storm event flows entering onto the City of Fort Collins property are considerably less than the historic flow rate. The Mail Creek Crossing report states that the historic flow rates at the property corner were 9.7 cfs in the 2-year event and 44.4 cfs in the 100- year event. The Mail Creek developed basin D3 generates 1.8 cfs in the 2-year event and 7.8 cfs in the 100-year event at the same property corner. See attached excerpts from the Mail Creek Drainage Report. This proposed basin from Kechter Farm creates 0.6 cfs in the 2-year event and 2.6 cfs in the 100-year event. Directly adding these storm flows to the 100 year runoff created from the Mail Creek Crossing site, we get 10.4 cfs in the 100-year event. This new combined basin of D3 and lots 1-6 generate 100-year flow rates within 1 cfs of the historic 2-year event at this location. The grading of the 6 Kechter Farm lots into garden style lots would create a minor increase in runoff onto the City of Fort Collins property, the total developed basin draining to the City’s property is significantly less runoff than the historic condition. In fact, the developed condition drainage basin essentially would meet the City’s requirement of 100-year developed flow rate down to the historic 2-year event, without detention necessary. Additionally, the water quality for this minor change is handled in the proposed natural swale and the grass buffer on the City of Fort Collin’s property. Thus, we request approval to revise Kechter Farm, Filing 2, Phase 5, Lots 1-6 from A to garden style grading. Sincerely, Tim Halopoff , PE To:Shane Boyle From:Tim Halopoff, PE Date:June 8, 2016 Subject:Kechter Farm-Conceptual Drainage Revision Analysis (Filing 2, Phase 5, Lots 1-6) Subdivision:Kechter Farm Filing 2 Project Name:Kechter Farm Location:Fort Collins Project No.: Calculated By:BAB Checked By:0 Date:6/6/16 A 0.65 95%0.22 31.9%5%0.43 3.3%35.2% TOTAL 0.65 35.2% COMPOSITE PERCENT IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS 39713.00 Basin ID Total Area (ac) Roofs Lawns/ Grass Basins Total Weighted % Imp. (%)Area (ac)Weighted % Imp. (%).% Imp. (%) Area (ac)Weighted % Imp. (%).% Imp. (%) X:\3970000.all\3971300\Excel\Drainage\Drainage_Calcs_3971300_v2.0.xlsm Page 1 of 1 6/7/2016 Subdivision:Kechter Farm Filing 2 Kechter Farm Location:Fort Collins BAB 0 6/6/16 A 0.65 0.95 0.22 0.32 0.25 0.43 0.17 0.49 0.61 TOTAL 0.65 0.49 0.61 C100= 1.25* Basin Total Weighted Runoff Coeff Basins Total Weighted Runoff Coeff. C2 COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS Total Area (ac)Basin ID 39713.00 Basins Total Weighted Runoff Coeff. C100 Runoff Coeff.Area (ac) Lawns, Heavy Soils (Type C) Runoff Coeff.Area (ac)Weighted Runoff Coeff. Roofs Weighted Runoff Coeff. X:\3970000.all\3971300\Excel\Drainage\Drainage_Calcs_3971300_v2.0.xlsm Page 1 of 1 6/7/2016 Subdivision:Kechter Farm Filing 2 Project Name:Kechter Farm Location:Fort Collins Project No.: Calculated By:BAB Checked By:0 Date:6/6/16 FINAL BASIN D.A. Hydrologic Impervious C2 C100 L S o t i L t S o K VEL.t t COMP.t c TOTAL Urbanized t c t c ID (ac) Soils Group (%)(ft)(%)(min)(ft)(%)(ft/s)(min)(min)LENGTH (ft)(min)(min) A 0.65 C 35%0.49 0.61 60 2.0%32.1 300 2.0%7.0 1.0 5.1 37.2 360.0 14.8 14.8 NOTES: t c =t i +t t (Equation 6-2) t i = (1.87*(1.1 -C*Cf)*(L)^0.5)/((So)^0.33) L= length of overland flow ( 500' max) C= runoff coefficient Cf= Frequency adjustment factor t i = overland (initial) flow time (minutes)K S = Average Slope along the overland flow path, ft/ft 2.5 t t =L/(60K*(So)^0.5 (Equation 6-4)5 t t = channelized flow time (minutes)7 S = waterway slope, ft/ft 10 V t = travel time velocity (ft/sec) = K*So^0.5 15 20 First Design Point Time of Concentration: t c =(18-15*i )+L/(60*(24*i +12)*(So)^0.5)(Equation 6-5) i = imperviousness (expressed as a decimal) t c is lesser of Equation 6-2 and Equation 6-5. For Urbanized basins a minimum t c of 5.0 minutes is required. For non-urbanized basins a minimum t c of 10.0 minutes is required. (URBANIZED BASINS)DATA INITIAL/OVERLAND (Ti) TRAVEL TIME (Tt) STANDARD FORM SF-2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUB-BASIN tc CHECK 39713.00 Table 6-2. NRCS Conveyance Factors, K Nearly bare ground Grassed waterway Paved areas and shallow paved swales Type of Land Surface Heavy Meadow Tillage/field Short pasture and lawns X:\3970000.all\3971300\Excel\Drainage\Drainage_Calcs_3971300_v2.0.xlsm Page 1 of 1 6/7/2016 Project Name:Kechter Farm Subdivision:Kechter Farm Filing 2 Project No.: Location:Fort Collins Calculated By:BAB Design Storm:Checked By:0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET De s i g n P o i n t Ba s i n I D Ar e a ( A c ) Ru n o f f C o e f f . tc ( m i n ) C* A ( A c ) I ( i n / h r ) Q ( c f s ) tc ( m i n ) C* A ( A c ) I ( i n / h r ) Q ( c f s ) Sl o p e ( % ) St r e e t F l o w ( c f s ) De s i g n F l o w ( c f s ) Sl o p e ( % ) Pi p e S i z e ( i n c h e s ) Le n g t h ( f t ) Ve l o c i t y ( f p s ) tt ( m i n ) REMARKS 1 A 0.65 0.49 14.8 0.32 1.87 0.6 DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) 2-Year 39713.00 6/6/16 X:\3970000.all\3971300\Excel\Drainage\Drainage_Calcs_3971300_v2.0.xlsm Page 1 of 1 6/7/2016 STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) Project Name:Kechter Farm Subdivision:Kechter Farm Filing 2 Project No.: Location:Fort Collins Calculated By:BAB Design Storm:Checked By:0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET De s i g n P o i n t Ba s i n I D Ar e a ( A c ) Ru n o f f C o e f f . tc ( m i n ) C* A ( A c ) I ( i n / h r ) Q ( c f s ) tc ( m i n ) C* A ( A c ) I ( i n / h r ) Q ( c f s ) Sl o p e ( % ) St r e e t F l o w ( c f s ) De s i g n F l o w ( c f s ) Sl o p e ( % ) Pi p e S i z e ( i n c h e s ) Le n g t h ( f t ) Ve l o c i t y ( f p s ) tt ( m i n ) REMARKS 1 A 0.65 0.61 14.8 0.40 6.53 2.6 39713.00 PIPE 100-Year DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET 6/6/16 X:\3970000.all\3971300\Excel\Drainage\Drainage_Calcs_3971300_v2.0.xlsm Page 1 of 1 6/7/2016