Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSite Certifications - 01/05/201812/15 Page 1 OVERALL SITE and DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION Commercial, Multi-Family and Subdivision Certification Form and Checklist Project Name: Date: Building Permit Numbers: (Commercial or multi-family) Per the requirement in Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) Volume 1, Section 6.11, please fill in all applicable items in this Certification Form for Commercial, Multi-Family and Overall Single Family sites. NOTE: several items must be verified during construction. A copy of the approved grading plan must be submitted with the as-built grading plan. (As-built elevations must be written in red next to the approved elevations.) •Use “Yes” for items completed as described. •Use “N/A” for items that are not applicable to the site being certified. •If any blanks are “No,” attach an explanation referencing the item number below. Attach an explanation or description of the as-built condition for any items listed or for anything not listed but shown on the approved construction plans. Provide an as-built redline or Mylar drawing with the following: I.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Certification - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.10 For multiple detention basins on a site, provide the following for each basin separately: A. Volume: As-built topographic verification is attached at 1-foot (or less) contour intervals and volume verification calculations for the water quality capture volume and the 100-year detention storage volume. 1. Detention basin topography was prepared by a professional land surveyor registered in the state of Colorado. 2.Both proposed and as-built contours are shown on the same plan sheet (dashed lines for proposed and solid lines for as-built). 3.All critical spot elevations as shown on the approved construction plans have been verified and the as-built elevations are shown on the plan sheet. 4.Stage-storage-discharge tables are provided on a separate document. 5.Verification that designed drain time is in compliance with Colorado Revised Statute § 37-92- 602(8) is attached and has been uploaded to the Statewide Compliance Portal (tinyurl.com/COCompliancePortal) for approval. Uploaded documents must include: a.The cover sheet from the approved drainage report b.The stamped certification page from the approved drainage report c.As-built topographic survey d.Stamped certification page from the Overall Site & Drainage Certification e.PDF output from the Stormwater Detention and Infiltration Design Data Speadsheet 12/15 Page 2 B.Water Quality and Quantity Detention Basin Grading: Attached is as-built verification that there is a minimum 2% positive fall into the concrete trickle pans or flow-line(s) from all areas in the bottom of the detention pond. If there is a “soft pan” in the flow-line, all areas still must meet the minimum 2% grade requirement. 1.Low Flow: Choose one of the following detention basin low flow options as applicable: a. Turf swale for low flow path in detention basin. There is a minimum 2% grade in the flow-line(s) of the detention basin. The flattest as-built grade is . b.Concrete pan for low flow in detention basin. There is a concrete pan installed that meets the grades as shown on the approved construction plans. (Show as-built spot elevations.) c.Soft pan for low flow in detention basin. •Verify and document the soft pan material gradation, trench width and depth - to be verified during construction by engineer. Picture documentation is preferred or engineer’s statement of visual inspection and compliance. (Choose one below.) o There is a soft pan with an underdrain installed that meets the design on the approved construction plans. (Show the underdrain grades, bedding material, geotextile, spot elevations, bends, cleanouts, etc.) o There is soft pan installed without an underdrain but there is a type A or B soil. The soil type must be documented by supplying verification from a registered professional geotechnical engineer. NOTE: Spot elevations are to be within 0.2 ft. +/-. 2. Side Slopes: The as-built side slopes of the detention basin have been calculated and are shown. Indicate the side slope with an arrow and a numerical value (e.g., 6.25:1). The maximum slope allowed is 4:1. Small areas of 3:1 may be acceptable, but slopes steeper than 3:1 must be stabilized or re- graded. Provide documentation if a variance was granted for steeper slopes during the design process. 3.Spillway Certification: The following items must be field verified: a.The location of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. b.The width of the spillway is indicated on the as-built plan. c.The elevation(s) of the spillway is shown on the as-built plan. d.A concrete ribbon defines the location and grade of the spillway. e.There is downstream scour protection in the spillway as per the construction plans. Indicate type: (riprap size “D50” gradation and bedding type, geotextile, buried riprap with inches of bury, etc.). f.There are no obstructions in the spillway, such as trees, bushes, sidewalks, landscape features, rocks, etc. 12/15 Page 3 4.Outlet Structure Certification a.The orifice plate for the approved release rate is installed with the correct size and location of the orifice. b.The orifice plate for the water quality outlet is installed with the correct hole size, number of rows and columns of holes. c.The bottom hole on both the water quality and quantity outlets are at the bottom of the plate so no water ponds in front of the plate. d.The well screen is the correct material and is installed as shown on the construction plans. e.100-year overflow grate elevation is . (Elev. A on detail D-46) f.The top elevation of the water quality capture volume is . (Elev. B on detail D-46) g.Overflow grate is made of the correct material, has the correct bar spacing, is hinged at the top and bolted at the bottom. h.The bottom of the outlet box has no obstructions or misalignments that will cause it to retain runoff water and is sloped at 2% towards outlet. II.Channels/Swales - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sect.3&4 A. Capacity: The as-built capacity of all the major channels and swales has been verified. They meet or exceed capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All swales are located within the drainage easements as shown on the construction plans. 2.Longitudinal slopes and side-slopes (cross-sections) have been verified. Design criteria requires longitudinal slopes of 2% min. (on vegetated swales) and side-slopes no steeper than 4:1. If these criteria are not met, the certification engineer will write a justification and propose mitigation for each instance or have the issues corrected. If variances to these criteria have previously been approved and are shown on the construction plans, no justification is needed. 3.As-built spot elevations on channels/swales are shown that correspond to spot elevations shown on the approved construction plans. 4.All permanent erosion control measures are installed as shown on the approved construction plans (e.g., drop structures, riprap, TRMs, etc.). (Include pictures and verification of the materials used as part of this verification.) 5.All pans, curbs, storm pipes or other appurtenances appropriately tie into each other in the system. (Pictures at tie-in points suggested.) 6.The minimum freeboard is provided for all channels and swales as shown on the approved construction plans or as identified in the approved drainage study. (Show the freeboard provided on the cross-sections as on the construction plan set or attached as separate documentation.) 7.The low flow portion of all channels or swales is clear of obstructions. (No landscaping, trees, shrubs, sod, etc. infringe on the low flow portion of channels or swales.) 12/15 Page 4 III.Storm Pipes (aka storm drains) - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 4 A. Storm Drain Pipe Capacity: The as-built capacity of all pipes installed on this project has been verified and meets or exceeds the capacity requirements shown in the approved drainage study for this project. 1.All storm drain pipe sizes and materials have been verified and are in conformance with the approved construction plans. (Indicate on the plan and profile sheets that they have been verified.) Material and size substitutions must be approved prior to installation. If a pipe size or material was changed during construction, the certification engineer must attach the approval documents or supply them with this certification. Approval documents must include a calculation documenting the capacity equivalency (equal or greater) of the substituted size. 2.The longitudinal slope of the pipe is as shown on the approved construction plans. The acceptable minimum slope is 0.4%. All slopes flatter than the designed slope on the construction plans must be justified with capacity calculations on an attached sheet. 3.The as-built invert elevations have been verified and are shown on the plan and profile sheets of the approved construction plans. B.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements: All pipes are installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The minimum cover requirements for all pipes have been met as shown on the approved construction plans. These will be called out in critical locations. 2.All encasements and clearances as specified on the approved construction plans have been met. 3.Any specific joint types or construction methods specified on the approved construction plans have been met. (List on a separate sheet and attach to this certification.) IV.Concrete Pans - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.1.3.4 A. Construction/Installation: All concrete pans have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The concrete pans are the correct size/width as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The longitudinal slopes of the pans are as shown on the approved construction plans. The certification engineer must justify or mitigate longitudinal slopes less than the minimum of 0.4% unless a flatter slope was approved and is shown on the approved construction plans. Provide mitigation or justification by separate document. 3.The cross-section of the pan is as shown on the construction plans. (Specifically, the pan cross- section is “V” shaped and meets the side slope shown on the detail.) 4.The concrete pans are a minimum of 6 inches thick without reinforcement and a minimum of 4 inches thick with a minimum of 6X6-W14xW14 reinforcement per detail D20B and D20C. (Provide documentation of the reinforcement used if different than shown on the details or on the approved construction plans.) 5.The spot elevations shown on the concrete pan(s) have been verified and are shown on the as- built drawings. 12/15 Page 5 V. Storm Drain Inlets - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.6, Sec. 3 A. Construction/Installation: All storm drain inlets have been constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size and type of inlets are consistent with the inlets shown on the approved construction plan. Indicate by writing “Verified” on each inlet on the plan sheet or list on a separate document the inlet number(s), type and size (length). If the inlet installed is other than the one on the approved construction plan detail sheet, provide the name and source of the detail with justification for equal or better capacity. 2.The size of the inlet opening is consistent with the approved detail. (Check height and width.) 3.The elevation of the grate (if applicable) is at the elevation shown on the street profile or as indicated by a spot elevation on the construction plans. 4.The as-built invert elevations of all pipes entering and leaving the inlet are shown on the plan and profile sheets within construction tolerance of 0.2 feet. If substantially different, provide justification and capacity calculations to show the capacity is not affected or propose mitigation. 5.The as-built size of the inlet box is as shown on the construction plans or an explanation or justification is attached. 6.All inlet covers are stenciled or stamped with the following designation: NO DUMPING – DRAINS TO POUDRE RIVER. VI.Culverts - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.9 A. Construction/Installation: All culverts have been constructed and/or installed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.All culvert sizes have been verified as indicated on the as-built construction plans as correct. 2.The culvert material type for all culverts installed is as on the approved construction plans and is indicated on the as-built plans. 3.The as-built invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built construction plans. 4.The culvert headwalls or wing walls have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans. Headwalls or wing walls may be needed in the as-built conditions onsite if the slopes adjacent to the culvert are greater than 4:1. Please note areas needing stabilization in the certification narrative. An alternative to consider is a turf reinforcement mat (TRM). VII.Sub-Drains A. Construction/Installation: All sub-drains shown on the construction plans have been installed in accordance with those plans. Sub-drains installed with the sanitary sewer are to be verified on the sanitary sewer plan and profile sheets of the construction plans. (NOTE: Indicate any sub-drains installed after the plans were approved on the as-built plans.) 1.The size of the sub-drains are as approved on the construction plans and are indicated on the as- built plans. 2.The type of sub-drain, in particular the perforated and non-perforated sections of the drain, are as indicated on the approved construction plans. 12/15 Page 6 3.The cover requirements per the construction plans are provided. 4.The cleanouts have been installed at the locations shown on the construction plans and are accessible for cleaning. (Cleanouts can be buried a maximum of 6 inches deep with their locations marked.) 5.The backfill materials for sub-drains are as shown on the approved construction plans. (This includes the type, depth and width.) 6.The geo-textile liner completely wraps the sub-drain and the permeable backfill material unless shown otherwise on the approved construction plans. (Sub-drain pipe wrapped in a sock filter material is accepted only if approved prior to installation.) VIII.Curb Cuts A. Construction: All curb cut openings are constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width) of the curb cut opening is as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The curb cut openings tie into a downstream swale, pipe, or other appurtenances with a smooth transition and there no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow downstream of the curb cut. IX.Sidewalk Culverts & Chases A. Construction/Installation: All sidewalk culverts have been installed at the locations shown on the approved construction plans. 1.The size (width and length) of the culverts are as shown on the approved construction plans. 2.The cover plate is a minimum 5/8-inch galvanized plate bolted to a galvanized angle iron per the detail shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 3.The sidewalk culvert invert “in and out” elevations have been verified and are indicated on the as-built plans. 4.The sidewalk culvert opening is as shown on the approved construction plans or per the City’s detail. 5.There is a smooth transition both on the inlet and outlet ends of the sidewalk culvert with no obstructions such as riprap or sod impeding the flow into or out of the sidewalk culvert. X. Site Grading A. Construction: All common open spaces have been graded in accordance with the approved construction plans. 1.The grading on all common open spaces bordering private lots has been verified as correct and the as-built rear lot corner elevations have been shown on the as-built plans. 12/15 Page 7 2.The as-built contours for “overlot grading” are shown on the as-built construction plans for all common open spaces, tracts, outlots, etc. If not in compliance, please attach a narrative describing the situation for noncompliance and when it may be corrected. An escrow for overlot grading may be required. (NOTE: Residential Lot Grading Certification is a separate process from this Overall Site Certification. It is understood that residential lots will be brought to final grade once the foundation is backfilled so they may be lower than the plan shows at this Overall Site Certification stage.) 3.All turf reinforcement mats (TRMs) have been installed as shown on the approved construction plans and the slopes are stabilized. XI.Riprap - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7, Sec.4.4.4.3 A. Construction: All riprap has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. XII.Permanent Erosion Control Fabric - FCSCM Vol.1, Ch.7 A. Construction: All fabric has been installed in the locations and sizes indicated on the approved construction plans. 1.All fabric was installed per the details on the approved construction plans. XIII.Post-Construction Site Cleanup - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.7 A. Construction: All construction debris and obstructions of any kind have been removed from drainage paths. 1.All construction debris has been removed except in staging area(s). 2.All ruts have been smoothed out in all construction areas. 3.All areas needing reseeding have been identified and future stabilization goals have been coordinated with the Erosion Control Inspector and in accordance with FCSCM Vol.2 Chapter 12. Note the area needing stabilization in the narrative. XIV.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs - FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.8, Sec.2 & FCSCM Vol.2, Ch.12 A.The construction of channel drop structures is in accordance with the approved plan both in location, horizontal dimensions and cross-section. XV.Certification of LID and Water Quality Facilities - FCSCM Vol.3, Ch.4 A.Attached are the During Construction Inspection Checklist for Low Impact Development (LID) and other items to be verified during construction, along with pictures and other required documentation. 12/15 Page 8 XVI. Certification and Erosion Control Measures A. All temporary erosion control measures shall be removed upon stabilization. If at the time of preparing this certification there are any erosion control measures still remaining on the site, please note them in the narrative and verify that they need to remain at this time. If in doubt as to the need for any control measure, please consult with the Erosion Control Inspector at 970-221-6700. XVII.Statement of Compliance A. This certification is signed and stamped. By signing this form, the engineer(s) attests that he/she has visited and observed the site, and to the best of his/her knowledge, the as-built conditions of the drainage facilities are as described in the above form and in the enclosed as-built plans. B.Failure to properly disclose all known information could result in the rejection of this certification and prevent the release of any and all Stormwater Utility permit holds on Building Permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy within this development. XVIII.Signature and Stamp by a Colorado-Registered Professional Engineer Engineer’s contact information: Name: Email: Phone: Company: Address: PE Stamp 12/27/17 2/14/17 Page 1 CERTIFICATION OF LOT GRADING Pursuant to Fort Collins City Code § 26-544 & City Land Use Code § 3.3.2 (e) Date: Address: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Permit Application #: Larimer County Parcel #: Larimer County Reception #: (on development agreement) I, (print) , a Colorado registered professional engineer, verify that construction of all stormwater facilities and grading is complete and hereby submit this certification. Please answer the following questions by initialing the appropriate response. For each question initialed “No,” attach an explanation detailing how this will affect stormwater drainage for this lot and any adjacent lots. 1.Certification includes attached Stormwater-approved grading plan. (NOTE: City’s Building Department does not approve grading plans). 2.Certification includes the attached as-built survey dated (must be within 60 days of the date the certification is submitted) accurately and truthfully depicting elevations for: Top of foundation/finished floor Finished grade on each side of the structure Quarter points along each lot line (not more than 50 feet apart) Break points/high points Swales Berms Retaining walls Air conditioning pads Window wells Any other appurtenance(s) within an easement 3.All elevations are within a 0.2 foot tolerance of the approved grading plan. 4.The top of foundation is at least 6 inches above the highest grade surrounding the structure. 5.There is a minimum grade of 5% away from the structure within the first 5 to 10 feet adjacent to the residence. 6.All slopes meet or exceed the minimum requirement of 2% (1% is acceptable on single family lots when the swale is draining the runoff from only two adjoining properties) and are not steeper than 33% (3:1). 7.All flow lines of stormwater drainage swales are a minimum of 6 inches below the elevation of ground adjacent to the structure and will direct drainage as shown on the Stormwater-approved grading plan. 8.All downspout locations and discharge directions are shown on the as-built survey. Runoff is directed into an appropriate drainage system or lot line swale, and it is not directed onto neighboring properties. No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes SB only 3% on the west side per the approved grading plan * see explanation below SB SB SB SB SB SB SB 2/14/17 Page 2 9.A smooth transition with no vertical offset (step) in grade is provided at the lot line to all adjacent properties. 10.The grading of this lot does not adversely affect neighboring properties or City infrastructure. 11.Landscaping has been completed prior to survey. If not, please indicate who will be responsible for completing landscaping: 12.Final site cleanup has been completed. 13.I personally visited the site as part of the certification process, and in my professional opinion, the as-built survey is an accurate representation of the site conditions.. No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 14.Based on this information, I certify that (check one): □The elevations and drainage patterns of the lot/site are in substantial conformance with the City approved drainage and grading plan for the property (information attached). □The elevations and drainage patterns of the lot/site as measured are in general conformance with the City approved drainage plan with exceptions (information attached). In my professional judgment the elevations and grading of the lot/site as constructed are functionally adequate and equivalent to the specifically approved drainage plan, and will affect stormwater drainage on and off the lot/site in a manner consistent with the approved drainage plan. Name: Email: Phone: Company: Address: NOTE: A complete certification must be submitted at least two weeks prior to a request for a Certificate of Occupancy for the lot/site, including, but not limited to, drawings of the lot/site showing the approved design and as-built surveyed elevations of all structures, drainage and grading features, written information/explanation of discrepancies, and other information necessary to confirm the above certification to: Email (preferred) WaterUtilitiesEng@fcgov.com Mailing Address Fort Collins Utilities ATTN: Water Utilities Engineering 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Questions? 970-221-6700 PE Stamp Sign and date 12/27/17 * per survey there is one shot that is only 0.4' below top of foundation; however, based on site visit it is believed the actual ground is a minimum of 0.5' below TOF but this shot was due to the build up of landscape mulch in the corner adjacent to the porch. SB SB SB SB SB DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CHECKLIST To be completed by Construction Superintendent This checklist is to be completed during construction and included with the Overall Site and Drainage Certification. •Use “Yes”for items completed as described. •Use “N/A”for items that are not applicable to the site being certified, •If any blanks are “No,”attach an explanation referencing the item number below. I.Compaction A.All berms and embankments meet the compaction requirements as specified in the project geotechnical report or comply with the City’s standard,which is “soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 2%below to 2%above optimum moisture content and compacted to 95%of the Maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D698).”Compaction requires verification during construction. Provide testing log from contractor/engineer. II.Storm Drain Pipe Installation Requirements A.’’The pipe trenches have been compacted in accordance with Section 02225-3.07.A.1.of the Fort Collins Development Construction Standards (e.g.,the trenches in the roadways are to be 95%of maximum density and all other areas are to be at 90%,both in accordance with ASTM D698). Iii.Riprap -FCSCM Vol.1,Ch.7,Sec.4.4.4.3 A.“‘The riprap bedding is a granular bedding of the gradation and thickness indicated on the approved construction plans. B.“‘A filter fabric was installed instead of granular bedding and is the material shown on the approved construction plans or was an approved equal.Provide documentation for an approved equal. C.‘The riprap is the gradation shown on the approved construction plans with a D50 of D.The riprap thickness is as shown on the approved construction plans and extends to the horizontal limits shown. E.‘The riprap is buried to the depth indicated on the approved construction plans.(A minimum of 6 inches of soil is required.) IV.Permanent Erosion Control Fabric -FCSCM Vol.1,Ch.7 A.‘‘All fabric was installed per manufacturer’s specifications. V.Certification of Other Permanent BMPs -FCSCM Vol.2,Ch.8,Sec.2 &FCSCM Vol.2,Ch.12 A.All cut-off walls have been installed in accordance with the approved construction plans.(Cut-off walls are required for irrigation ditch crossings of storm drain pipes and at the end of flared end sections.) 12/15 Page 1 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Payers Item/Activity I Yes I No I N/A I Documentation/Submittal Requirements Excavation Post-excavation infiltration rates are consistent with design infiltration capacity (for “full or partial infiltration”designs) Lmer Impermeable liner meets design specifications Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall V Impermeable liner is not exposed V Any penetrations of the impermeable liner have been sealed V and checked for water-tightness. Concrete Cut-Off Wall Meets specifications for:]V -Dimensions J V ] -Reinforcement ./ -Footings V rain System Underdrain pipe is per design specifications V At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral -—V Cleanout pipe is not perforated L Cleanout covers are installed and watertight f V Underdrain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric V Underdrain orifice plate installed at outlet structure V Underdrain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or V water test egate Base coarse (e.g.,*2/4)has 90%fractured faces — Bedding coarse te.g.,$S9)is thoroughly washed ——V Sub-base materials are installed and compacted according to V manufacturer’s specifications ProtectionDu iLconstrucVon PICP area is protected from construction site sediment, including runoff from the upstream catchment and V construction equipment traffic Close Out Upstream catchment is stabilized prior to diverting runoff V into PICP system 12/15 Page 2 Bioretention Cells Item/Activity I Yes I No I N/A I Documentation/Submittal Requirements Excavation Heavy equipment did not travel over bioretention cell during V excavation Bottom of cell was “ripped”after excavation V Photograph before/after “ripping” Bottom of cell is flat and level —.-V Photograph Excavated area is protected/surrounded by sediment/runoff V Photograph control BMP5 during construction Inlet Overflow inlet elevation is set above bioretention media per plan (typically 12 inches) Overflow inlet invert elevation is at least 3 inches below V Measure/record distance between inlet and top of containment wall/berm (to direct overflow into inlet)——containment wall/berm Upstream catchment drains to inlet V Forebay Forebay is installed according to design specifications Forebay has flat,concrete bottom Outlet Structure/Overflow Outlet structure/overflow elevation is confirmed Measure/record distance from overflow to top of media filter Impermeable Liner Impermeable liner meets design specifications [—- —V Impermeable liner attached to concrete perimeter wall V Impermeable liner is not exposed ——V Underdrain System Underdrain pipe is per design specifications ——V At least one cleanout is provided per underdrain lateral —V Cleanout pipe is not perforated ti Cleanout covers are installed and watertight ——V Underd rain is NOT wrapped in geotextile fabric ——V Underd rain orifice plate installed at outlet structure ——V Underd rain integrity tested after backfilling using TV and/or V water test 12/15 Page 3 Filter Media Filter media composition is per design specifications V Filter media was “machine mixed”by supplier prior to delivery V Filter media installed flat and level V Other Structural Components Containment wall/berm is continuous and level fV Landscaping Final landscaping does NOT include sod fi Final landscaping (wood/rock mulch)is flat and level V Vegetation is planted according to landscape design V specifications Verify that weed barrier is not installed —V Temporary irrigation installed If N/A,then verify that permanent irrigation is installed to establish/maintain vegetation Close Out Upstream catchment stabilized prior to diverting runoff into V bioretention cell Name:RodneyJ Rogers Title:Senior Estimator Email:R.Rogers@Saundersheath.cnm Phone:970,221.4195 Company:Saunders Heath Construction Address:141 Racquette Drive Ft Collins,CD 80524 Port ColLins 12/15 Page 4 SK Y L I N E D R I V E SK Y L I N E D R I V E A A SWALE SECTION A-A 0 10' 2010510 SCALE: 1" = 12 1 8 W . A s h , S u i t e A Wi n d s o r , C o l o r a d o 8 0 5 5 0 Ph o n e : ( 9 7 0 ) 6 7 4 - 3 3 0 0 Fa x : ( 9 7 0 ) 6 7 4 - 3 3 0 3 C O N S U L T I N G G R O U P I N T E R W E S T PR E P A R E D F O R PROJ. NO. DA T E : SC A L E ( H ) : SC A L E ( V ) : CH E C K E D B Y : DE S I G N E D B Y : PR O J E C T N A M E HA B I T A T F O R H U M A N I T Y - S K Y L I N E H O U S E UT I L I T Y & G R A D I N G P L A N 11 / 0 7 / 1 6 1" = 1 0 ' N/ A SB RA 1291-025-00 3 of 5 HA B I T A T F O R H U M A N I T Y 40 0 1 S . T A F T H I L L R O A D FO R T C O L L I N S , C O 8 0 5 2 5 PH O N E : 9 7 0 . 2 2 3 . 4 5 2 2 NOTES: 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, AND WATER CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS POWER AND OTHER "DRY" UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS CURRENT AT THE DATE OF APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE LOCAL ENGINEER. 2. ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET BELOW FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AND SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC (SDR 35) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. LIMITS OF STREET CUT SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LIMITS ARE TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY CITY ENGINEER INSPECTOR. ALL REPAIRS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STREET REPAIR STANDARDS. 5. CITY OF FORT COLLINS LIGHT & POWER (L&P) SHALL INSTALL PRIMARY LINE FROM CONNECTION POINT TO ELECTRIC VAULT, SECONDARY LINES FROM VAULT TO METER, AND BUILDING METER. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH FORT COLLINS METER GROUP FOR METER LOCATION. CONTACT CITY OF FORT COLLINS LIGHT & POWER FOR THEIR CURRENT REQUIREMENTS. LEGEND PROPOSED ASPHALT PATCH PROPOSED CONCRETE 6. ANY DAMAGED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EXISTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS STREETS, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, DESTROYED, DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE REPLACED OR RESTORED TO CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARDS AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE PRIOR TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO AND THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL DISTURBED GROUND IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED WITH OWNER APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL. 8. THE EXTENT OF EROSION CONTROL PROTECTION SHALL BE OBSERVED AND ADJUSTED AS NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS AND THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN TO SUPPLY SUFFICIENT EROSION PROTECTION AND MINIMIZE DOWNSTREAM WATER POLLUTION. UTILITY PLAN GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION (TYPE I) W/ TRAFFIC MARKER VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL CONCRETE WASHOUT (CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE) Re v i s i o n s No . Da t e De s c r i p t i o n By RECORD DRAWING THIS RECORD DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED, IN PART, BASED UPON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY OTHERS. WHILE THIS INFORMATION IS BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE, INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP AND THE CERTIFYING ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS RECORD DRAWING DUE TO ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO IT AS A RESULT OF INCORRECT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP AND THE CERTIFYING ENGINEER. THOSE RELYING ON THIS RECORD DOCUMENT ARE ADVISED TO OBTAIN INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF ITS ACCURACY. DATE: DENOTES RECORDED DATA PER 12/27/17 KING SURVEYOR 12/27/17