HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUPERTOTS AT OAKRIDGE WEST, 2ND FILING - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 23-87D - - MINUTES/NOTESi
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES
May 7, 1990
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at
6:33 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort
Collins, Colorado. Board members present included: Chairman Sanford Kcrn,
Jim Kiataskc, Bernie Strom, Jan Shepard, Laurie O'Dell, Rex Burns, Lloyd
Walker, and Alternate Joe Carroll.
Staff members present included Tom Peterson, Ted Shepard, Paul Eckman,
Sherry Albertson -Clark, Mike Herzig, Steve Olt, Kerrie Ashbeck and Georgiana
Taylor.
Board Members present at the May 4, 1990 workscssion included: Chairman
Sanford Kern, Jim Klataskc, Bernie Strom, Laurie O'Dell, Rex Burns, Alternate
Joe Carroll, Lloyd Walker and Jan Shepard.
AGENDA REVIEW
Planning Director Tom Peterson reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda.
The Consent Agenda included: Item 1 - Minutes of the March 26, 1990 meeting;
Item 2 - Oakridge Master Plan Amendment, #13-82AV; Item 3 - Convenience
Center at Oakridge PUD - Preliminary, #13-82AW; Item 4 - Oakridge West
Master Plan Amendment, #23-87C; Item 5 - Supertots at Oakridge West, 2nd
Filing - Preliminary, #23-871); Item 6 - Office Park at Oakridge 131h -
Preliminary, #13-82AX; Item 7 - Four Seasons 6th Filing PUD - Preliminary
and Final, #112-79L; Item 8 - Checker Auto at the Market Place PUD -
Preliminary and Final, #21-891); Item 10 - Raintree Village Shopping Center -
• Administrative Change, 0146-791; Item 11 - South Shields Veterinary Clinic
PUD - Final, #44-89B; Item 12 - Springbrook PUD - Preliminary and Final,
#7-90,A; Item 14 - Giant Video at Cimarron Plaza Administrative Change,
#78-81 F.
Member Carroll pulled Item #g, Checker Auto at the Market Place PUD from
the consent agenda.
Member Strom pulled Item #3, Convenience Center at Oakridgc PUD and
Item #5, Supertots at Oakridge West, 2nd Filing from the consent agenda.
Jeff King, 4430 Moss Creek Drive pulled Item #7, Four Seasons 6th Filing
from the consent agenda.
Member Shepard moi-ed to approve consent agenda items 1, 2, 4, and 6.
Member Strom seconded the motion. Motion was approved 7-0.
CONVENIENCE CENTER AT OAKRIDGE PUD - PRFLIMINARY, #13-82AW
Mark Smith, 5007 Saffron Court stated his concern was the gradual transition
of McMurray and Keenland into major streets as people use the convenience
center and want to cut over to Lemay Avenue. He stated he would like to
avoid seeing a light on Harmony Road and that Kccnland was a nice wide
street and on McMurray, that it was a natural way for people to stop at the
convenience store, hang a left and keep going through the residential area to
get to Lemay.
Mr. Shepard stated that it was the Harmony Road Corridor Plan that was
under debate right now in the Planning Department and it was in front of the
citizens right now for review. He encouraged him to come to the Planning
Department or tail Linda Riplcy or himself and they could get him involved
in the process now that was a review procedure that has not yet gone for any
formal review.
Member Strom stated that in looking at the plan and the architectural design,
he thought he was very pleased with it. It was a little unusual, but unusually
interesting and generally very nice. He had one concern with it which was
something he had evolved to in convenience centers and gas stations. The plan
showed a bronze metal fascia on the canopy which did not seem to him
appropriate in relation to the rest of the materials used in the center. He
stated that the canopies over the gas station areas arc generally the least
attractive and sometimes the most obtrusive features of some of these smaller
centers. He stated he would like to see them blended as much as possible with
the architecture of the center.
Membcr Strom stated he would like to add a condition we approve this with
the canopy materials to match the rest of the shopping center.
Mr. Shepard stated staff had no concern with the condition.
Mr. Frank Vaught, representative of Everitt Companies, stated they did not
have a problem with the condition. At this point the specific tenant for the
convenience store has not been identified and they would hold off on making
any final color considerations on the canopy fascia until final plans.
• Member Strom moved for approval of the convenience center with 2 conditions
shown in the staff report plus the 3rd condition that the canopy materials
match the color and materials of the rest of the center.
Member Burns seconded the motion.
Member Walker stated he could appreciate Mr. Smiths concerns with the traffic
situation and that it had to be recognized, as mentioned, that streets like
Kcenland and McMurray arc collectors. Keenland is not functioning as a
collector so there was a certain level of expectation about the traffic flow on
that and that it was way below what it was designed for. The reality was
that as the whole area develops the streets will get a little more traffic and
that he encouraged Mr. Smith to follow up on the traffic study.
Motiou was approved 7-0.
SUPERTOTS AT OAKRIDGE WEST 2nd Filing. #23-a7D
Member Strom stated his concern was circulation and how this particular use
would relate to other uses on the parcel.
Frank Vaught,
Vaught -Frye Architects
stated the
specific plan
for Supertots
addresses some
future
circulation that could extend
on to the south. Their idea
at this point
is that
Rule Drive as it
currently
exists on the
west side of
Lemay would
have a
curb cut on its
northern boundary that
would line up
with the one
•
into the
health care area
that would
then connect
back through
-3-
as a parking circulation area into the parking lot. He stated there would be
access from Rule back into the daycare area and visa versa. He stated they
were combining the curb cut with the existing church.
Member Strom stated his concern was what other kind of uses would be there
and with the access point on Lemay Avenue, it might be pulling alot of traffic
right by a daycare. He was concerned with the relationship of traffic and
children.
Mr. Vaught replied that what they had looked at on a very conceptual basis,
was office type uses and would not anticipate that because of the type cal'
entrance into the church and the daycare. It would be attractive to circulate
through that parking lot back into the office area but at this point they had
reserved the potential for the two to connect and if the use would change and
would be more intense than an office, or a more compatible use was
found, there may not be a desire to connect them at that point.
Member O'Dell stated she had the same concern and would hope that at the
time the southern piece was developed and also the piece to the west and the
southwest, that it was realty taken into consideration.
Member Strom moved for approval of Supertots at Oakridge West, 2nd Filing.
Member Klataske seconded the motion.
Member Strom commented that Staff and the Board keep an eye on the rest of
the property as it is developed to remember to take a look at the circulation
and the safety of the children in a daycare center and the process of any
approval after this.
Motion was approved 7-0,
FOUR SEASONS 6TH FILING POD. *112-7
-Mr. Jeff King, property owner, stated he had purchased property on Moss
Creek Drive and it was sold with the thought in mind that there would be a
storm drainage ditch located behind the property, basically a 50 ft. open space -
He stated they had met with Mr. Jones who represents the developer and staff
to discuss the plans of the drainage ditch and had no problems with that. He
stated since that meeting some things changed and the plat that is on file right
now indicates the ditch had been moved. His concerns were number one, he
felt as a property owner that the property was sold to him with the open
space in mind and he may have paid for it in the purchase of the property.
Number two was the concern that moving the ditch, there would still be some
water problems given the slope and the conditions on Moss Creek Drive. He
stated the action he was asking the Board to take was not to pass this item
but to allow time for discussion and negotiation with the developer and the
City to come to some resolution as to why this had changed all of a sudden
and to see if they could negotiate something contrary to what had been
proposed.
Sherry Albertson -Clark stated that she had conversed with Susan Duba Hayes,
the City's Storm Drainage Engineer who handled the project and has been
assigned to review all the Four Seasons area so she was very familiar with the
drainage basins- She stated Ms. Hayes' comments specifically regarding the
-4-