Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHORELINE PUD - PRELIMINARY - 32-87 - - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES July 27, 1987 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:31 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins Colo- rado. Board members present included Dave Edwards, Sandy Kern, Laurie O'Dell, Bernie Strom, Sharon Brown, Linda Lang, Alternate Klataske, and Chairman Don Crews. Staff members present included Tom Peterson, Joe Frank, Debbie DeBesche, Ted Shepard, Rick Ensdorff, Mike Herzig, Jim Newell, Kari VanMeter and Renee Joseph. Legal representative was Steve Roy. Chairman Crews started the meeting by announcing Kari VanMeter as the new planner. He indicated Dave Edwards had been reappointed for a four year term. He stated Bernie Strom, who was last years alternate, had been appointed to a four year term. He introduced Jim Klataske as the new alternate. Tom Peterson gave the Consent Agenda which consisted of: Item 1, Minutes of the June 22, 1987 and the July 13, 1987 meeting; Item 2, #9-82T Fairway II, 1st Replat at Southridge Greens PUB, Amended - Preliminary; Item 3, #5-84C Prospect/Overland PUB - Amendment to Lots 1 & 3 - Preliminary and Final; Item 4, #32-87 Shoreline PUB - Preliminary and Final; Item 5, #53-85E Centre for Advanced Technology PUD, 3rd Filing - Preliminary and Final; Item 6 #65-82P Charleston at Fairbrooke PUD - Final; Item 7, #76-81D Pine - view PUD Phase I, Tract C -One Year Extension Request of Preliminary Approval; Item 8, #14-87,A Jewett Annexation and Zoning; Item 9, #29-86A,B Overland Hills Annexation and Zoning; Item 10, 038-83B Retirement Life- styles International - Rezoning; and Item 11, #45-87 Spaulding Lane Ven- tures Special Review - County Referral. Member Brown asked for clarification on Item 4, Shoreline PUD - Preliminary and Final. She stated the Board had received a memo referring to an addi- tional condition to the Preliminary. She inquired if the Board was voting on the Preliminary or Final. Joe Frank stated the Board would be reviewing the preliminary only. Item 4, Shoreline PUD - Preliminary and Final and Item 8, Jewett Annexation and Zoning were pulled from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Discussion Agenda. Member Kern pointed out an error in the June 22, 1987 minutes included on page 12. A quote by Lloyd Walker stated, "the project was too intensive use and he wanted to see litigation," should have been mitigation. Planning and Zoning Bard Minutes July 27, 1987 -5, 0 Page 2 10 ~0 VA_ Member Edwards moved to approve 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11 on the Consent Agenda. Member Kern seconded. Motion passed 7-0. SHORELINE PUD - PRELIMINARY 4*0-#4*k%L Member Edwards noted a perceived conflict of interest on this item and abstained from the vote. Ted Shepard gave staff description of the project. He commented there were five conditions attached to the preliminary approval and a sixth condition was added today, July '27, 1986. A separate memo was distributed to the Board members. He stated the sixth condition was discussed with the applicant and he is in full agreement with the condition. He added every- thing else in the memo is accurate and up-to-date. John Dengler stated he is the land planning consultant for the project. He states that the piece of property has a current plan that was approved for 28 townhome units of the same nature as the ones across the street at Harmony Cove. He stated the developer is planning to work around the existing utilities that were placed on the property and constructing a small single family subdivision of 12 units. He commented he has been working closely with the Natural Resources Department in order to save what natural features are existing in the area. He stated Gary Blue had a meet- ing with Bert Vermeulen and discussed some issues regarding the project. Bert Vermeulen stated he has several concerns: (1) the flaw in the drawing of the property showing an inlet that does not exist, (2) Lot #5; place a restriction that the house can only be one story, (3) the ditch currently in upper area of the drawing; build up of silt if a tube is put in, (4) the russian olive tree be protected on the lot by his property. John Dengler commented to Mr. Vermeulen's concerns. (1) He agreed the drawing was incorrect. He stated the drawing was completed before the survey was finished in that area. He stated the drawing will remain the same outside of the property. (2) He stated he had spoken to Gary Blue about the one story house and they are in agreement with the condition affecting Lot #5. (3) He commented the final landscape plan would reflect a reuse on the site for the russian olive trees. He stated the tree may not stay in its same location because of the ditch. (4) He stated Gary and himself had further discussed the issue of the ditch and concluded it would be best for the project not to have an active above ground ditch run- ning through the back yard of Lot #5. He stated the pipe would be kept as is on the plan. Chairman Crews inquired if the pipe could be put in with sufficient slope to alleviate the silt problem. John Dengler stated at this time there is no reason to believe there will not be proper drainage. He commented it will show up on final engineering plans to confirm this. ±�. ''Planning and Zoning B d Minutes July 27, 1987 Page 3 Ted Shepard stated staff is willing to go along with the condition that Lot #5 be restricted to a one story home. He commented another condition could be added stating an accurate survey of the drawing be required at final. He stated Storm Drainage prefers to have the ditch piped. Bert Vermeulen stated there is a contradiction regarding the ditch. He stated the pipe is currently running further than shown on the drawing; more of a straight course. He wanted to make sure that issue is addressed. He stated he preferred running the ditch in the same direction as it is now. He inquired if a restriction could be put in regarding changing the location of the drainage ditch. Ted Shepard stated the ditch is in a platted easement approximately 25 feet wide. He commented the ditch has to stay within that easement. He informed there is no way to move this drainage facility except within the existing easement. Chairman Crews inquired if there is an existing easement. Ted Shepard stated there is, 25 feet wide. It is located behind building envelope #5. Bert Vermeulen inquired where the easement continues after Lot #5. Ted Shepard commented looking at the building envelope for Lot #5, the envelope is skewed reflecting the 25 foot easement. He stated the easement is straight. He indicated staff is in agreement to add condition #9 regarding the relocation of the russian olive tree if necessary. Member O'Dell indicated she was concerned about the russian olive tree along with Bert Vermeulen. He stated if the tree is included in the buil- ding envelope for Lot #5 the lot is getting rather small. Member Brown inquired if there would be a problem with the russian olive being in the drainage ditch since another pipe would be constructed. Ted Shepard stated the tree would be relocated where it would not interfere with the drainage. Member Strom moved to approve Shoreline PUD - Preliminary with the five conditions included in the agenda, the sixth condition as stated in the memo, the seventh condition that Lot #5 be restricted to a one story home, the eight condition that an accurate survey of the Shoreline be included with the final, and the ninth condition that the russian olive tree be reused on the site. Member Kern seconded and stated it may be difficult for all these conditions to come true by looking at the map. Motion passed 7-0. JEWETT ANNEXATION AND ZONING Tom Peterson gave staff description of the project.