The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNE PROSPECT & I-25 ODP - MA210006 - - TRAFFIC STUDYPROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC Prepared for: Land Acquisition and Management, LLC Traffic Impact Study Prospect/I-25 ODP Amendment January 25, 2021 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 2 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction …….…..…………………………………………………………...…….4 2 Existing Conditions …….………………………………………..…..……………...8 3 Project Travel Demand……………………………………………………..……….16 4 Future Traffic Projections…………………………………………..……………....19 5 Site Design and Auxiliary Lane ........……………...……………...………………25 6 Traffic Impact Analysis…….......................…………….…………..……………..26 7 Pedestrian Bicycle and Transit ........................................................................33 8 Conclusions………………………………………………………….………………..35 Appendices……….…………………………………………………………………….…36 Appendix A: Traffic Counts Appendix B: Level of Service Worksheets Appendix C: LCUASS Right-Turn and Left-Turn Warrants Appendix D: Pedestrian Bicycle Destination Area List of Figures 1 Project Location….……..……………...…………………………………….....……..5 2 Project Site Plan……..…………………………………………………………………6 3 Existing Traffic Volumes….......……………………………………….….....…..…10 4 Existing Intersection Configurations ……………..………………….…….…….11 5 Project Trip Distribution……....…………………………………………………….17 6 Project Traffic ………………………………………………….………..…...……....18 7 Background Traffic 2025……..……………………………………………...……..20 8 Background Traffic 2040 .................................................................................. 21 9 Total Traffic 2025 …………...………………………………………………..………23 10 Total Traffic 2040 …............…..……………………………………………………..24 11 2025 Intersection Configuration 2025 ............................................................. 27 12 2040 Intersection Configuration 2040 ..…………………………………..………30 13 Future Project Intersection Configurations on Prospect Road.................... 32 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 3 List of Tables 1 Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards…………………………………..…..12 2 Unsignalized Level of Service Definitions ……...…………….…………...…....13 3 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions .................................... 14 4 Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service…………….…....15 5 Estimated Project Trip Generation …………………………………….………....16 6 Future 2025 Intersection Level of Service…………………………………….....28 7 Future 2040 Intersection Level of Service…………………………………….....31 8 Pedestrian Level of Service ..............................................................................34 9 Bicycle Level of Service ....................................................................................34 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 4 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a study to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Prospect/I-25 Overall Development Plan (ODP) in the City of Fort Collins, Colorado. Rollins Consult LLC conducted the study as required by the City for the minor amendment application associated with the proposed ODP. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Prospect/I-25 ODP is located in the City of Fort Collins, east of Interstate 25 (I-25) and north of Prospect Road. The site is currently undeveloped land. This ODP will allow for industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The project site is comprised of approximately 115 acres. The site is surrounded by residential uses to the north and east, the currently being constructed Poudre School District schools and athletics complex to the east, commercial uses and vacant land to the south, and the interstate to the west. Figure 1 illustrates the project location and study area. The project site is depicted on Figure 2. The site was designed with a central east/west collector roadway and grid street system. Numerous parks are planned within the ODP. The project proposes the following land uses and transportation elements: • Approximately 80 acres of industrial use. This was assumed to support 984,000 square feet of industrial. • Just over 26 acres of commercial use which would accommodate 230,000 square feet of buildings. • Almost 10 acres of urban estate. This land use allows for a church that was assumed to be 106,000 square feet. • A bicycle and pedestrian trail that circulates adjacent to the western side of the site. This trail will connect to a future undercrossing of I-25. • The existing Carriage Parkway will be extended from its current location, south of Mulberry Street, south to Prospect Road. This connection complies with the City of Fort Collins Master Street Plan. • The ODP allows for access to Prospect Road between Carriage Parkway and McLaughlin Road. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 5 Figure 1 – Project Location N PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 6 Figure 2 - Project Site Plan 3523E57< B281DA5<3523E57< B281DA5<3523E57< B281DA5<3523E57 < B 2 8 1 D A 5 < 8E HIGH 6CH22/ 6I7E CG F257 C2//I16/I-25 I17E5CHA1GE C251E5 //C CG 3A5ADIG0 3523E57IE6 I I1D8675IA/ 73.48 AC5E6 CG II17E567A7E 25CA55I A G E 3 A 5 . : A <(C2//E C 7 2 5) 3523E57< B281DA5< I I1D8675IA/ 6.09 AC5E6 /A5I0E5 C2817< FA1 .I7CHE// 68BDI9I6I21 16 D.8. 80 AC 5 AC/D.8. 8E I 8E3523E57< B281DA5<8E 85BA1 E67A7E 9.49 AC5E6 8E /01 C/<DE6DA/E 216 D.8. 80 AC 2.7 D.8./AC 01 :A7E5DA/E /A5I0E5 C2817< 176 37 AC 4.75 D.8./AC B2;E/DE5 C5EE.E F257 C2//I16/I-25 I17E5CHA1GE C251E5 //C C /A5I0E5 C2817< CG 1303 F5217AGE H2/DI1G6 //C 35263EC7 52AD/ /A5I0E5 C2817< 52AD #44 (A57E5IA/) 3523E57< B281DA5<460· ² 660·I17E5CHA1GE 67</E (50' 6E7BACK =21E) 35263EC7 GA7E:A< 67</E (50' 6E7BACK =21E) E;I67I1G CACHE /A 328D5E 5E6E592I5 I1/E7 E;I67I1G A33A5E17 /A.E CA1A/ C2, DI7CH C21CE378A/ 675EE7 C211EC7I216 A6 5E48I5ED B< /8C 3.6.3(F), 7<3 F2;G529E 75AI/ C211EC7I21 E;I67I1G G5EE/E< :A7E5 EA6E0E17 327E17IA/ 75AI/ C211EC7I21 72 352326ED 6CH22/ 6I7E F8// 029E0E17 ACCE66 I17E56EC7I21 F8// 029E0E17 ACCE66 I17E56EC7I21 E;I67I1G B2;E/DE5 C5EE. B8FFE5 =21E F/22D:A< F250E5 F5217AGE 52AD A/IG10E17 (D2: DE92/9ED B< CD27) 80' I-25 /A1D6CA3E B8FFE5 80' I-25 /A1D6CA3E B8FFE5 F250E5 I/8E =21I1G B281DA5< 100 <EA5 F/22D3/AI1 50' 6E7BAC. =21E 50' 6E7BAC. =21E E526I21 B8FFE5 /I0I76 327E17IA/ F8785E 75AI/ 81DE53A66 A0E1DED I/8E =21I1G B281DA5< CG C200E5CIA/ 26.42 AC5E6 (10 AC. 0A; B/2C. 6I=E)CA55IAGE3A5.:A<(A57E5IA/)/01 F2; G529E F2;G529E 75AI/ I CG 8E /01CG CG CG E 8E /01 /018E E 32/ 01 FA1 FA1 FA1 C C2817< 52AD 5I17E567A7E 25E 35263EC7 5D 08/BE55< 52AD/ HIGH:A< 14 PROJECT SITE I A3352;I0A7E /2CA7I21 2F 675EE7 C211EC7I21 1A785A/ A5EA B8FFE5 =21E A3352;I0A7E /2CA7I21 2F BIC<C/E/3EDE675IA1 75AI/ A3352;I0A7E /2CA7I21 2F 75AI/ C211EC7I21 /A1D 86E A5EA B281DA5< F257 C2//I16 I-25 68BA5EA 3/A1 "AC7I9I7< =21E" 2D3 B281DA5< / 3523E57< /I1E 38B/IC 675EE7 29E5ALL DE9EL23ME17 3LA1 MI125 AME1DME17 35263EC7 / I-25 NORTH 0 100'200'400' 1603 OaNULGJH DULYH, SXLWH 100 FRUW CROOLQV, CO 80525 970-223-7577 6HEE7 1 2F 1 JA18A5< 8, 2021 REVISIONS:DATE: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ 1./A1D 86E6 A1D DE16I7IE6 DE3IC7ED 21 7HI6 29E5A// DE9E/230E17 3/A1 5E35E6E17 DE9E/230E17 I17E17I216 A7 7HI6 7I0E, H2:E9E5, 7HE A33/ICA17 5E6E59E6 7HE 5IGH7 72 CHA1GE /A1D 86E6 A1D/25 DE16I7IE6 I1 7HE F8785E C216I67E17 :I7H 7HE I, C, A1D 8-E =21I1G DI675IC76. A1< ADDI7I21A/ /A1D 86E6 127 A//2:ED I1 7HE A33/ICAB/E =21E DI675IC7 0867 BE A33529ED ACC25DI1G 72 7HE C5I7E5IA A6 6E7 F257H B< 7HE CI7< 2F F257 C2//I16. 2./A1D 86E A5EA6 A5E DE6IG1A7ED 21 7HI6 29E5A// DE9E/230E17 3/A16 A5E A3352;I0A7E. 3.38B/IC 675EE76 :I// BE DE6IG1ED 72 7HE "/A5I0E5 C2817< 85BA1 A5EA 675EE7 67A1DA5D6". 7HE ACCE66 32I176 6H2:1 21 7HI6 2D3 A5E A3352;I0A7E /2CA7I216 21/<. 35ECI6E /2CA7I216 2F ACCE66 32I176 :I// BE DE7E50I1ED A7 7HE 7I0E 2F 6I7E 63ECIFIC 352JEC7 DE9E/230E17 3/A16. 4.7HE A33/ICA17 :I// :25. :I7H 7HE CI7< A1D CD27 :I7H 5E63EC7 72 75A163257A7I21 I03529E0E176 I1 7HE A5EA. 5.2FF-6I7E I03529E0E176 0A< BE 5E48I5ED A7 7HE 7I0E 2F 6I7E 63ECIFIC 352JEC7 DE9E/230E17 3/A16 I1 25DE5 72 0EE7 /E9E/ 2F 6E59ICE F25 A// 02DE6 2F 75A163257A7I21. 6.6IGH7 DI67A1CE EA6E0E176 0A< BE 5E48I5ED A/21G 7HE 38B/IC 52AD:A<6 A7 7HE 7I0E 2F 6I7E 63ECIFIC 352JEC7 DE9E/230E17 3/A16. 7.3E5 /8C 6EC7I21 3.7.3(E)(1), A// 75A163257A7I21, :A7E5 A1D :A67E:A7E5, 67250 D5AI1AGE, E0E5GE1C< 6E59ICE6, A1D E/EC75IC 32:E5 FACI/I7IE6 6HA// 0EE7 7HE 0I1I080 5E48I5E0E176 F25 ADE48A7E 38B/IC FACI/I7IE6 A7 7HE 7I0E 2F 6I7E 63ECIFIC 352JEC7 DE9E/230E17 3/A16. 8.7HE A33/ICA17 AC.12:/EDGE6 7HA7 C855E17/< 7HE5E I6 12 ACCE37AB/E D5AI1AGE 287FA// DE6IG1 A1D :I// C217I18E 72 :25. :I7H 7HE CI7< A1D 27HE5 A335235IA7E AGE1CIE6 72 5E62/9E 67250:A7E5 A1D F/22D3/AI1 I668E6. 9.12 D5I9E:A< ACCE66 :I// BE A//2:ED 21 35263EC7 52AD. 10.7HI6 29E5A// DE9E/230E17 3/A1 6H2:6 7HE GE1E5A/ /2CA7I21 A1D A3352;I0A7E 6I=E 2F A// 1A785A/ A5EA6, HABI7A76, A1D FEA785E6 :I7HI1 I76 B281DA5IE6 A1D 7HE 352326ED 528GH E67I0A7E 2F 7HE 1A785A/ A5EA B8FFE5 =21E A6 5E48I5ED B< /A1D 86E C2DE 3.4.1(E). DE7AI/ED 0A33I1G 2F A 6I7E'6 1A785A/ A5EA6, HABI7A76, A1D FEA785E6 :I// BE 3529IDED A7 7HE 7I0E 2F I1DI9ID8A/ 3D3 68B0I77A/6. GE1E5A/ B8FFE5 =21E6 6H2:1 21 7HI6 2D3 0A< BE 5ED8CED 25 E1/A5GED B< 7HE DECI6I21 0A.E5 D85I1G 7HE 3D3 352CE66. 127E6 9ICI1I7< MA3LEGE1D LA1D 86E B5EAKD2:1 3A5CEL LA1D 86E 3E5CE17 2F 727AL 6I7E A5EA CG C200E5CIA/23%+/- 26.42 AC I I1D8675IA/69%+/- 79.57 AC 8E 85BA1 E67A7E 8%+/- 9.49 AC 727A/6 115.48 AC PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 7 STUDY SCOPE The scope of work for this study was developed in conjunction with the City of Fort Collins’s traffic engineering department. The base assumptions, technical methodologies, and geographic coverage of the study were all identified as part of the study approach. The study analyzes the potential project-generated traffic impacts on the adjacent street system. This study will focus on build out of the development looking at both the short and long range future years of 2025 and 2040. Additional traffic studies will be performed as each phase of development is proposed. The analysis of future year traffic forecasts is based on projected conditions both with and without the addition of the project traffic. The following transportation scenarios were analyzed for the AM and PM peak hours: • Existing Conditions – The analysis of existing traffic conditions provides a basis for the remainder of the study. The existing transportation system is described. Peak hour intersection operations are evaluated. • Project Travel Demand – The traffic generated by the Project will be estimated, distributed, and assigned to the transportation network. • 2025 and 2040 Background Conditions – Future traffic conditions are projected without the proposed Project for two future years: 2025 the long range year 2040. The traffic volumes on the roadway system will be factored for the 2025 conditions and will utilize future long range traffic projections to reflect conditions for 2040. • 2025 and 2040 Total Future Conditions – The traffic associated with the project will be projected and added to the Background traffic. The intersection operations will be determined. The study examined four existing and one future intersection within the study area. These were identified by the City of Fort Collins for inclusion in the study. The existing study intersections are listed below. 1. Carriage Parkway & Mulberry Street (SH 14) 2. Frontage Road (east of I-25) & Prospect Road 3. McLaughlin Road & Prospect Road 4. Main Street (CR 5) & Prospect Road The future intersection related to the ODP is: 5. Project Access Drive (Future) & Prospect Road PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 8 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The transportation system has numerous elements that are described in this chapter. The roadway network identified for this study is described and traffic volume information is presented for the study intersections. ADJACENT LAND USE North of the ODP is residential use. To the east is both residential and the currently under construction Poudre School District schools and athletics complex. South of the ODP is commercial and undeveloped land. Interstate 25 is to the west of the site. TRANSPORTATION NETWORK The primary roadways that serve the Project site are described below. Roadway designations were provided in the Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan, March 31, 2020. Roadway Network I-25 - This is a two-lane north-south interstate highway that serves the state from Wyoming to New Mexico. There are full interchanges at both Prospect Road and Mulberry Street. Currently, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is constructing improvements at the Prospect Road interchange as part of the North I-25 Express Lanes project. The current project includes adding express lanes on I-25 from Mulberry south to the Denver metro area. Ultimately this I-25 corridor will have three general purpose lanes and one express lane in each direction. Prospect Road – This is currently a two-lane east/west arterial road. The speed limit is posted at 35 mph directly adjacent to the project site and 45 mph to the east. There is no usable shoulder. Prospect Road is undergoing improvements on the north side associated with the future schools. This will include sidewalks and bike lanes on the north side of Prospect Road. The City’s 2014 Bicycle Master Plan – Full Build Network identifies Prospect as accommodating protected bike lanes. The buildout cross section would allow for four travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, with bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Frontage Road (east of I-25) - The north-south frontage road exists to the south of I- 25. The northern leg was removed as part of the North I-25 Express Lanes project. This is a two-lane road with very narrow shoulders. There is no posted speed limit within the study area. Carriage Parkway - is a north-south collector road that exists between Mulberry Street and the southern edge of the existing Clydesdale and Fox Grove residential areas. There are sidewalks on both sides separated from the street with a tree lawn. The PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 9 speed limit is posted at 30 mph. Carriage Parkway will be extended south to Prospect as part of the City’s Master Street Plan. It will be aligned with the Frontage Road. Mulberry Street - is an east-west state highway (SH 14). It is designated as a NR-A, Non-Rural Regional Highway at Carriage Parkway. Currently, it provides two travel lanes with a center striped median for left-turns. West of Carriage Parkway, Mulberry Street widens to four travel lanes. The speed limit is posted at 50 mph. There are paved shoulders on both sides of the street. The Master Street Plan identifies this as a future four-lane arterial from I-25 east to CR 5. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Recent intersection operations were evaluated for both the morning and evening peak hours. Intersection count and daily counts data were collected on Tuesday, October 15, 2020. The intersection counts were performed at Carriage Parkway at Mulberry Street, and the Frontage Road at Prospect Road. A daily count was conducted on Carriage Parkway south of Mulberry Street. Appendix A includes the intersection turning movement and daily count data. Traffic data was also obtained from the following traffic studies: • A Memorandum for Fox Grove, Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study, prepared February 12, 2019, by Delich Associates • The Prospect High School/Middle School Transportation Impact Study, prepared November 2019, by Delich Associates. The data from the Fox Grove memo was compared to recent counts at Carriage Parkway at Mulberry Street. This comparison was performed due to the current pandemic’s potential impact on travel patterns. The highest movement from both counts at this location was selected to represent existing traffic conditions. Any movements on Mulberry Street from 2019 were factored upward by 1% to represent 2020 conditions. Traffic counts for the Frontage Road at Prospect Road were compared to through volumes on Prospect from the High School traffic study. The highest volumes were selected to represent existing conditions. The peak hour traffic at the remaining intersections on Prospect Road at both McLaughlin Road and Main Street was taken from the High School study. The resulting estimated peak hour turning movements are provided on Figure 3. The current lane configurations of the study intersections are shown on Figure 4. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 10 Figure 3 – Existing Traffic Volumes PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 11 Figure 4 – Existing Intersection Configurations Intersection Level of Service Analysis Methodologies Transportation professionals evaluate intersections to determine how they are currently operating and will operate in the future. The methods employed can be found in the Transportation Research Board’s, 6th Edition, 2016 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Level of service (LOS) is based on a “graded” system from LOS A, very little to no delays, to LOS F which represents excessive delays and congestion. The City of Fort Collins has established guidelines for acceptable intersection operations. These are provided within the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 12 (LCUASS), originally adopted January 2, 2001, with updates effective September 19, 2016. The guidelines are provided in Table 1. Table 1 Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Unsignalized Intersection Peak hour levels of motor vehicle delay at unsignalized intersections were estimated using the method from Chapter 17 of the 2016 Highway Capacity Manual. The delays for the entire intersection and each of the constrained movements are reported. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between average control delay per vehicle and LOS for unsignalized intersections. Chapter 4 ± TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Section 4.5 Project Impacts Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards ± Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Page 4-27 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins Table 4-2 Loveland (GMA and City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Intersection Component Major Intersection1 Minor Intersection2 Driveway Overall (City Limits) LOS C LOS C No Limit Overall (GMAs) LOS D LOS D No Limit Any Leg LOS D LOS E No Limit Any Movement LOS E LOS F No Limit 1 Includes all signalized and unsignalized arterial/arterial and arterial/ major collector intersections. 2 Includes all unsignalized intersections (except major intersections) and high volume driveways 3 There are no LOS standards for I-25 Interchanges. 4 On State Highways, overall LOS D is acceptable. Table 4-3 Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Overall Any Approach leg Any Movement Signalized D1 E E2 Unsignalized Arterial / Arterial Collector / Collector E3 F4 Unsignalized Arterial / Collector Arterial / Local Collector / Local Local / Local D3 F4 Roundabout E 3,5 E54 E5 1 In mixed use district including downtown as defined by structure plan, overall LOS E is acceptable 2 Applicable with at least 5% of total entering volume 3 Use weighted average to identify overall delay 4 Mitigation may be required 5 Apply unsignalized delay value thresholds to determine LOS PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 13 Table 2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) Description A £10.0 No delay for stop-controlled approaches. B 10.0 and £15.0 Operations with minor delay. C >15.0 and £25.0 Operations with moderate delays. D >25.0 and £35.0 Operations with increasingly unacceptable delays. E >35.0 and £50.0 Operations with high delays, and long queues. F >50.0 Operations with extreme congestion, and with very high delays and long queues unacceptable to most drivers. Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2016. Signalized Intersections Peak hour levels of motor vehicle delay at signalized intersections were estimated using methods provided in Transportation Research Board’s 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. This operations analysis method uses various intersection characteristics (such as traffic volumes, lane geometry, and signal phasing) to estimate the average control delay experienced by motorists traveling through an intersection. Control delay incorporates delay associated with deceleration, acceleration, stopping, and moving up in the queue Table 3 summarizes the relationship between average control delay per vehicle and LOS for signalized intersections. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 14 Table 3 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) Description A £10.0 Free Flow or Insignificant Delays: Operations with very low delay, when signal progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green light phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. B >10.0 and £20.0 Stable Operation or Minimal Delays: Generally, occurs with good signal progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized. C >20.0 and £35.0 Stable Operation or Acceptable Delays: Higher delays resulting from fair signal progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Drivers begin having to wait through more than one red light. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D >35.0 and £55.0 Approaching Unstable or Tolerable Delays: Influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays result from unfavorable signal progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume to capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop. Drivers may have to wait through more than one red light. Queues may develop, but dissipate rapidly, without excessive delays. E >55.0 and £80.0 Unstable Operation or Significant Delays: Considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. High delays indicate poor signal progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume to capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Vehicles may wait through several signal cycles. Long queues form upstream intersection. F >80.0 Forced Flow or Excessive Delays: Occurs with oversaturation when flows exceed the intersection capacity. Represents jammed conditions. Many cycle failures. Queues may block upstream intersections. Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2016. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 15 Existing Intersection Conditions Using the HCM methodology, the weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection operations were determined. The results are provided in Table 4. As indicated in the table, each of the study intersections is currently operating at acceptable levels of service. The detailed analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table 4 Existing Weekday Peak-Hour Intersection Level of Service # Intersection Overall Movement AM Peak PM Peak Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Carriage Pkwy & Mulberry St Signal Overall 33.1 C 27.1 C EB LT 21.0 C 12.6 B EB T 13.4 B 35.5 D EB RT 9.4 A 4.4 A WB LT 10.8 B 18.4 B WB T 45.9 D 18.2 B WB RT 9.7 A 10.2 B NB LT 24.3 C 30.2 C NB T/RT 24.6 C 23.8 C SB LT 27.7 C 28.3 C SB T/RT 29.5 C 26.6 C 2 Frontage Rd & Prospect Rd T-Stop Control Overall 0.4 A 0.6 A NB L/T/R 11.5 B 11.9 B WB LT 7.6 A 7.9 A 3 McLaughlin Ln & Prospect Rd T-Stop Control Overall 0.1 A 0.2 A NB L/T/R 10.6 B 11.2 B WB LT 7.5 A 7.9 A 4 Main St & Prospect Rd All-Way Stop Control Overall 9.4 A 9.7 A EB 8.9 A 10.4 B WB 9.7 A 8.8 A NB 9.8 A 9.6 A SB 8.8 A 9 A Notes: 1. LOS calculations performed using Synchro which is based on the Transportation Research Board HCM 2016. 2. Average vehicle delay (in seconds per vehicle) is reported for both overall intersection and each constrained /STOP-controlled movement or approach. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 16 3 PROJECT TRAVEL DEMAND This chapter provides an overview of the project and a description of the travel demand methodology to estimate vehicle trip generation, distribution, and assignment of project- generated traffic along area roadways and intersections. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed Prospect/I-25 ODP Amendment allows for a mixture of land use. Figure 2 depicts large areas with use identified: • Industrial is identified in two areas: adjacent to Prospect are approximately 6.09 acres and central to the ODF is an additional 73.48 acres. These areas were assumed to accommodate 92,000 and 892,000 square feet respectively. • Commercial is identified adjacent to Prospect Road. The 26.42 acres were assumed to represent 230,000 square feet. • In the northeast part of the ODP, there are 9.49 acres of Urban Estate. This could accommodate 30 single family homes or a 106,000 square foot church. The church was selected because it would generate slightly more peak hour traffic. • The ODP includes the connection of Carriage Parkway south to Prospect Road. This roadway will also accommodate a planned connection to the high school. • There is a pedestrian and bike trail that is located on the western and southern areas of the site. This trail would link to trails on the west side of I-25 via an undercrossing at I-25. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The trip generation characteristics of the project were estimated using data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Table 5 provides the trip generation estimated for the project. As indicated in the table, the full buildout of the project is estimated to generate approximately 15,165 daily trips, 698 morning, and 1,452 evening peak hour trips. Table 5 – Estimated Project Trip Generation IN Out Total IN Out Total Parcel 1 - Industrial 130 892 KSF 3,006 289 68 357 75 282 357 Parcel 2 - Church 560 106 KSF 668 22 15 37 23 29 52 Parcel 3 - General Commercial 820 230 KSF 10,592 165 102 267 483 523 1006 Parcel 4 - Industrial 130 92 KSF 899 30 7 37 8 29 37 15,165 506 192 698 589 863 1,452 Based on ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition TOTAL BUILDOUT ITE Land Use Code Project Project Trip Generation Land Use Land Use Code Size Units Daily AM PM PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 17 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION | ASSIGNMENT The distribution of the project traffic onto the roadway system was based on: the existing peak hour traffic counts, the roadway network, the proposed land use, the location of the project within the region and the City of Fort Collins, traffic forecasts from the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization. The overall project trip distribution for each land use element is depicted on Figure 5. The resulting project assigned peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 6. Figure 5 – Project Trip Distribution PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 18 Figure 6 – Project Traffic PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 19 4 FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS Estimates of future traffic conditions both with and without the proposed project were necessary to evaluate the potential impact of the ODP on the local street system. The background base traffic scenario represents future traffic conditions without the addition of the project, while the total scenario represents future traffic conditions with completion of the proposed Prospect/I-25 ODP Amendment. The future years of 2025 and 2040 were analyzed. The development of these future traffic scenarios is described in this chapter. BACKGROUND 2025 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The background traffic projections reflect growth in traffic from ambient growth and approved projects in the area. The ambient growth reflects additional traffic due to regional growth both in and outside of the study area. The background traffic at the existing study intersections was based on the traffic projections from the two previously conducted studies. This includes: • Completion of the Poudre School District High/Middle School and athletics complex • Traffic from the completion of Serratoga Falls, Wild Wing, and Countryside Estates • Completion of the Fox Grove development Phases 1 and 2 • General growth within the area ranges from a total of 7 percent to 15.5 percent The resulting Background 2025 traffic projections for the study intersections are provided on Figure 7. BACKGROUND 2040 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The background traffic projections for the long range future year 2040 were also developed based on the previous findings of the traffic studies performed for the High School and Fox Grove Phase 2. This includes all of the projects identified for 2025. The growth factors applied to the peak hour volumes on Prospect ranged from 4.9 to 7.9 percent per year as provided in the high school traffic study. The future volumes for the intersections on Prospect were taken from the high school traffic study. The existing through volumes on Mulberry Street was factored by the 20 year growth factor of 1.49 as determined by CDOT. The resulting Background 2040 traffic projections for the study intersections are provided on Figure 8. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 20 Figure 7 – Background Traffic 2025 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 21 Figure 8 – Background Traffic 2040 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 22 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The total traffic projections include both the background plus project traffic. The project- generated traffic volumes from Figure 6 were added to the 2025 background traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 7 to develop background plus project peak hour traffic volumes. The resulting 2025 total traffic is depicted on Figure 9. It should be noted that north-south through movements at Carriage Parkway and Mulberry were increased slightly to account for high school traffic which can use Carriage Parkway to access the school. 2040 TOTAL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The total traffic projections include both the background plus project traffic. The project- generated traffic volumes from Figure 6 were added to the 2040 background traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 9 to develop background plus project peak hour traffic volumes. These total traffic projections also include an additional 500 daily trips on Carriage Parkway. The resulting 2040 total traffic is depicted on Figure 10. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 23 Figure 9 – Total Traffic 2025 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 24 Figure 10 – Total Traffic 2040 PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 25 5 SITE DESIGN AND AUXILIARY LANES CARRIAGE PARKWAY DAILY TRAFFIC The ODP was designed to allow for a north-south collector roadway. Carriage Parkway will be this primary roadway to serve the area. It is a designated collector street in the Master Transportation Plan. The total long range 2040 daily volumes are projected at 5,500 trips south of Mulberry Street and 11,750 trips north of Prospect Road. The southern area of Carriage Parkway should be designed as a two lane arterial street. AUXILIARY LANES An analysis was conducted to determine the need for auxiliary right-turn and left-turn lanes on the adjacent arterials at both the Project access locations and study intersections. The criteria for auxiliary lanes are based on the LCUASS guidelines. The warrants for the left and right turn lanes are provided in Appendix C. Based on the City’s criteria a: • eastbound left-turn lane and westbound right-turn lane are necessary at Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road. • eastbound left-turn lane is required at the proposed access drive and Prospect Road. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 26 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This chapter presents an analysis of the potential impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed Prospect/I-25 ODP Amendment on the local street system. The analysis compares the projected levels of service at each study intersection under future background and total conditions to estimate the incremental increase in the delay caused by the proposed project. This provides the information needed to assess the potential impact of the project using the significance criteria. SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA Threshold criteria were applied to determine if the growth in traffic due to regional growth/other projects and/or the proposed Project has a significant traffic impact at an intersection. If the future traffic projections for either Background (without Project) or Total (with Project) resulted in any portion of an intersection to exceed the LOS standards, this would be considered an impact. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2025 The future 2025 traffic projections at the study intersections were analyzed to determine their future operating conditions. The future 2025 intersection geometry is depicted on Figure 11. These were identified in the high school traffic study. The intersection operations for 2025 were analyzed with the auxiliary lane improvements described in the previous chapter for total traffic conditions. The operational results, for each of the study intersections, are provided in Table 6 for both the background and total traffic scenarios. Note that the results provided in Table 6 indicate both the overall delay/LOS for the intersection and the delay/LOS for each constrained movement and/or approach. At the intersection of Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road, the projected volumes indicate a traffic signal may be warranted. The improvement is included under total traffic conditions. The study results indicate that the intersection will operate acceptably. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 27 Figure 11 – 2025 Intersection Configurations PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 28 Table 6 - Future 2025 Intersection Level of Service # Intersection Movement AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Background Total Background Total Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Carriage Pkwy & Mulberry St Signal Overall 34.8 C 34.8 C 29.4 C 33.5 C EB LT 27.5 C 27.0 C 13.0 B 12.6 B EB T 12.1 B 14.3 B 40.2 D 47.4 D EB RT 8.6 A 10.5 B 9.7 A 11.2 B WB LT 9.7 A 10.3 B 24.7 C 38.5 D WB T 46.8 D 47.8 D 17.7 B 17.0 B WB RT 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.5 A 9.2 A NB LT 36.3 D 37.0 D 32.4 C 38.1 D NB T/RT 33.3 C 34.2 C 32.6 C 41.1 D SB LT 36.1 D 35.8 D 35.6 D 37.8 D SB L/T/R 38.4 D 38.3 D 36.4 D 38.7 D 2 Carriage Pkwy/Frontage Rd & Prospect Rd Stop Control/Signal Overall 0.3 A 32.3 C 0.5 A 25.4 C EB LT NA NA 49.8 D NA NA 39.4 D EB T/RT 0 A 6.6 A 0 A 15.5 B WB LT/T 8.1 A 41.5 D 8.9 A 34.7 C WB RT NA NA 14.5 C NA NA 22.1 C NB L/T/R 17.7 B 27.4 C 19 C 19.5 B SB T/LT NA NA 27.2 C NA NA 20.2 C SB RT NA NA 17.8 B NA NA 20.9 C 3 McLaughlin/HS Drive & Prospect Rd Signal Overall 21.0 C 23.3 C 13.9 B 14.4 B EB LT 13.8 B 14.5 B 11.0 B 11.1 B EB T/RT 7.2 A 7.2 A 12.7 B 13.2 B WB LT 10.1 B 9.9 A 16.8 B 18.2 B WB T 30.1 C 34.3 C 17.4 B 17.6 B WB RT 11.1 B 10.9 B 12.2 B 11.7 B NB L/T/R 15.7 B 16.2 B 9.4 A 10.4 B SB T/LT 18.6 B 19.4 B 10.7 B 11.8 B SB RT 16.7 B 17.3 B 10.0 A 11.0 B 4 Main St & Prospect Rd Signal Overall 16.5 B 17.3 B 15.0 B 15.7 B EB LT 28.2 C 30.7 C 24.2 C 26.2 C EB T 14.5 B 14.6 B 17.7 B 18.5 B EB RT 15.1 B 15.1 B 17.1 B 16.5 B WB LT 16.2 B 16.5 B 22.6 C 24.4 C WB T/RT 20.4 C 22.3 C 17.1 B 17.3 B NB LT 17.9 B 17.9 B 10.9 B 11.4 B NB T/RT 8.9 A 8.9 A 8.6 A 9.0 A SB LT 9.4 A 9.4 A 10.1 B 10.5 B SB T 8.9 A 8.9 A 8.2 A 8.5 A SB RT 10.2 B 10.2 B 8.3 A 8.7 A 5 Access Drive & Prospect Rd T-Stop Control Overall 0.3 A 0.3 A EB LT/T 9.7 A 8.6 A SB LT/RT 13 B 10.6 B 1. LOS calculations performed using Synchro which is based on the Transportation Research Board HCM 2016. 2. Average vehicle delay (in seconds per vehicle) is reported for both overall intersection and each constrained STOP-controlled movement or approach. 3. Delays greater than 50 seconds are rounded to the nearest second. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 29 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2040 The future 2040 traffic projections at each of the study intersections were analyzed to determine their future operating conditions. The 2040 intersection geometry is illustrated on Figure 12. The operational results, for each of the study intersections, are provided in Table 7 for both the background and total traffic scenarios. These are based on the high school traffic study and the anticipated roadway classifications within the Master Street Plan. The study results for 2040 indicate the study intersections will operate at acceptable levels. FUTURE YEAR 2025 AND 2040 IMPROVEMENT MEASURES The proposed improvement measures for both 2025 and 2040 include the following: • Provide an eastbound left-turn lane and westbound right-turn lane at Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road. • Signalize Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road. • Provide an eastbound left-turn lane at the proposed access drive and Prospect Road. The 2025 and 2040 intersection configurations for these two intersections on Prospect Road are illustrated on Figure 13. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 30 Figure 12 – 2040 Intersection Configurations PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 31 Table 7 - Future 2040 Intersection Level of Service # Intersection Movement AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Background Total Background Total Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Carriage Pkwy & Mulberry St Signal Overall 23.9 C 24.3 C 22.3 C 24.9 C EB LT 17.4 B 17.9 B 13.7 B 13.8 B EB T 15.1 B 17.7 B 26.4 C 32.4 C EB RT 12.0 B 14.4 B 13.0 B 15.2 B WB LT 12.5 B 13.2 B 16.8 B 20.0 C WB T 29.9 C 29.9 C 18.6 B 18.0 B WB RT 11.9 B 11.9 B 12.6 B 12.3 B NB LT 18.8 B 19.3 B 18.0 B 20.9 C NB T/RT 18.6 B 19.2 B 18.4 B 23.3 C SB LT 21.4 C 21.4 C 21.0 C 23.2 C SB L/T/R 22.7 C 22.8 C 21.4 C 23.7 C 2 Carriage Pkwy/Frontage Rd & Prospect Rd Stop Control/Signal Overall 0.8 A 26.2 C 0.8 A 19.5 A EB LT NA NA 40.6 D NA NA 11.3 B EB T/RT 0 A 7.9 A 0 A 11.2 B WB LT 8.8 A 16.1 B 10.6 B 17.8 B WB T 8.8 A 33.7 C 10.6 B 30.4 C WB RT NA NA 16.2 B NA NA 18.4 B NB L/T/R 23.8 C 22.1 C 27.7 C 15.2 B SB T/LT NA NA 21.0 C NA NA 15.5 B SB RT NA NA 13.4 B NA NA 17.3 B 3 McLaughlin/HS Drive & Prospect Rd Signal Overall 14.1 B 14.3 B 12.7 B 13.6 B EB LT 11.7 B 11.9 B 10.6 B 11.2 B EB T/RT 7.4 A 7.4 A 11.9 B 12.9 B WB LT 11.0 B 10.9 B 15.9 B 17.7 B WB T 17.1 B 17.5 B 15.2 B 16.0 B WB RT 11.9 B 11.8 B 12.4 B 12.8 B NB LT 16.5 B 16.9 B 10.8 B 11.1 B NB T/RT 14.4 B 14.7 B 9.2 A 9.5 A SB LT 16.9 B 17.2 B 11.1 B 11.4 B SB T/RT 15.9 B 15.3 B 9.6 A 10.0 A 4 Main St & Prospect Rd Signal Overall 36.8 D 38.9 D 25.7 C 29.0 C EB LT 27.3 C 29.6 C 32.0 C 35.8 D EB T 20.6 C 20.0 C 35.5 D 41.6 D EB RT 20.8 C 20.1 C 25.4 C 24.7 C WB LT 17.4 B 16.5 B 22.1 C 23.7 C WB T 49.9 D 51.0 D 24.8 C 25.9 C WB RT 20.4 C 19.4 B 20.7 C 20.3 C NB LT 46.8 D 54.6 D 19.4 B 18.7 B NB T 21.2 C 21.9 C 21.0 C 23.1 C NB RT 19.7 B 20.4 C 19.2 B 21.1 C SB LT 25.1 C 25.5 C 16.3 B 20.8 C SB T 32.1 C 32.6 C 21.4 C 27.5 C SB RT 44.4 D 45.8 D 21.1 C 27.1 C 5 Access Drive & Prospect Rd T-Stop Control Overall 0.4 A 0.3 A EB LT/T 11.8 B 9.6 A SB LT/RT 18.3 C 12.6 B 1. LOS calculations performed using Synchro which is based on the Transportation Research Board HCM 2016. 2. Average vehicle delay (in seconds per vehicle) is reported for both overall intersection and each constrained STOP-controlled movement or approach. 3. Delays greater than 50 seconds are rounded to the nearest second. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 32 Figure 13 – Future Project Intersection Configurations on Prospect Road PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 33 7 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE AND TRANSIT The City of Fort Collins has established pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit level of service definitions. They address several elements or quality indicators that impact the environments these users experience. Each modal choice is evaluated in this chapter. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The City’s Pedestrian Plan, February 15, 2011, describes the parameters to evaluate the pedestrian environment. The proposed project is within the “School Walking Area”. Within the school walking area, the City has established a LOS B for each of the elements listed below except for Visual Interest and Amenities at a LOS C. The elements identified as important to support a beneficial pedestrian environment are: 1. Directness 2. Continuity 3. Street Crossings 4. Visual Interest and Amenity 5. Security Each of these is described in depth in the Pedestrian Plan. The Plan requires that destinations within 1,320 feet of the Project are identified and analyzed for each pedestrian element. This area is depicted in Appendix D. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 8 along with the associated LOS for each element. The elements that could be assessed with an ODP will satisfy the LOS standards. It should be noted that The Street Crossing and Visual Interest will be determined when development proposals are submitted. Also, the ODP includes a pedestrian/bicycle trail that will be located in the western area of the site. This trail will connect to a future underpass at I-25. The future school will upgrade the portions of Prospect adjacent to the school with both sidewalks and bike lanes. Table 8 – Pedestrian Level of Service Destination Pedestrian Elements LOS Directness Continuity Street Crossing Visual Interest Security Standard LOS School Walk Area B B B C B Future High School Middle School A B TBD TBD B Residential North of ODP A to B B TBD TBD B TBD – To Be Determined when a development is proposed. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 34 BICYCLE NETWORK The bicycle network within the 1,320 foot area of the project site was evaluated for the destination to/from the future high school/middle school site. The bicycle analysis is for Continuity adjacent to the Project and these destinations. The results are provided in Table 9. Table 9 – Bicycle Level of Service Destination Type Continuity LOS Minimum Actual Proposed Future High School/ Middle School Institution C No Facilities A TRANSIT Currently, there is no public transit provided in the study area. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 35 8 CONCLUSIONS This study was undertaken to analyze the potential long range traffic impacts of the proposed Prospect/I-25 Development ODP Amendment in the City of Fort Collins. The following summarizes the results of this analysis: • The proposed ODP consists of numerous land use elements: industrial, commercial, and urban estate. The site is approximately 115 acres. The roadway system includes the connection of Carriage Parkway from its current terminus south to Prospect Road. A pedestrian/bicycle trail is planned that to will connect with a future I-25 underpass. • The site is located north of Prospect Road and east of I-25. This land is currently undeveloped. • The Project is expected to generate approximately 15,165 daily trips, 698 trips during the AM peak hour, and 1,452 trips during the PM peak hour. • Currently, the study intersections are operating at acceptable levels. • The ODP will require the following intersection improvements: o Provide an eastbound left-turn lane and westbound right-turn lane at Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road. o Signalize Carriage Parkway and Prospect Road. o Provide an eastbound left-turn lane at the proposed access drive and Prospect Road. • Under both future 2025 and 2040 background and total conditions, the intersections are projected to operate acceptably. • For the pedestrian and bicycle characteristics that are provided in the ODP, it is anticipated that the levels of service will be acceptable and exceed some standards. PROSPECT/I-25 ODP AMENDMENT | TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CITY OF FORT COLLINS Rollins Consult LLC | 36 APPENDICIES § Appendix A: Traffic Counts § Appendix B: HCM LOS Calculation Outputs § Appendix C: Figure and Table 4C-3 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices § Appendix D: Pedestrian/Bicycle Destination Area Appendix A - Traffic Counts www.idaxdata.com 01_FRONTAGE_E PROSPECT to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2020 Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM SB 0.0%0.25 TOTAL 5.0%0.80 TH RT WB 2.8%0.79 NB 11.8%0.61 Peak Hour: 7:00 AM 8:00 AM HV %:PHF EB 7.4%0.74 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound UT LT TH RT Interval Start E PROSPECT RD E PROSPECT RD FRONTAGE RD FRONTAGE RD 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT 0 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 7:15 AM 1 0 34 5 0 0 2 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 47 4 0 0 44 0 0 0 117 0 7:45 AM 0 1 51 12 0 0 3 0 0 0 102 0 7:30 AM 0 0 34 1 0 0 79 2 3 0 0 0 0 143 459 8:00 AM 1 0 19 4 0 2 47 0 4 0 0 1 01169003 0 3 34 0 0 4 0 0 0 76 438 8:15 AM 1 0 23 12 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 97 395 8:45 AM 0 0 31 15 0 0 2 0 4 0 79 415 8:30 AM 1 1 22 10 0 3 53 0 2 0 0 0 0 100 3520600000443001 1 3 247 0 0 Count Total 4 2 261 63 1 15 424 0 1 1 811 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West North South 7:00 AM 5 2 1 1 1 166 0 0 16 2 21 0 0 459 082700122 0 8 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 7:45 AM 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 0 0 7:15 AM 4 3 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000700 0 0 8:15 AM 4 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 5 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 3 2 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000110 0 0 Peak Hour 14 7 2 0 23 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0Count Total 27 16 3 0 46 0 0000000 0 0000 00 0N FRONTAGE RD E PROSPECT RD E PROSPECT RD FRONTAGE RDE PROSPECT RDFRONTAGE RD459TEV: 0.8PHF:0101300 247 3 251 1741 7281726022 166 1 190 256 1 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 01_FRONTAGE_E PROSPECT to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2020 Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM SB -- TOTAL 1.4%0.92 TH RT WB 1.2%0.86 NB 0.0%0.72 Peak Hour: 5:00 PM 6:00 PM HV %:PHF EB 1.6%0.83 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound UT LT TH RT Interval Start E PROSPECT RD E PROSPECT RD FRONTAGE RD FRONTAGE RD 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT 0 0 60 0 0 2 0 0 0 139 0 4:15 PM 0 0 63 5 0 0 4 0 3 04:00 PM 1 0 71 1 0 2 57 0 0 0 120 0 4:45 PM 1 0 61 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 133 0 4:30 PM 1 0 56 4 0 1 54 0 3 0 0 0 0 119 511 5:00 PM 0 0 83 6 0 0 56 0 2 0 0 0 00244007 0 1 55 0 0 3 0 0 0 154 526 5:15 PM 1 0 86 5 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 135 564 5:45 PM 0 0 62 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 156 549 5:30 PM 1 0 58 4 1 0 69 0 5 0 0 0 0 130 5750200000159005 1 2 239 0 0 Count Total 5 0 540 28 1 7 454 0 0 0 1,086 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 West North South 4:00 PM 3 3 1 2 0 289 0 1 30 0 20 0 0 575 01501100016 0 7 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 4:45 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 0 0 4:15 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 000310 0 0 5:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 Peak Hour 5 3 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0Count Total 14 8 1 0 23 1 0000000 0 0000 00 0N FRONTAGE RD E PROSPECT RD E PROSPECT RD FRONTAGE RDE PROSPECT RDFRONTAGE RD575TEV: 0.92PHF:0000000 239 2 242 3011 110152618016 289 0 307 256 2 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 02_CARRIAGE_E MULBERRY to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 5 4 Peak Hour Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2020 Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM 9:00 AM SB 3.1%0.80 TOTAL 9.7%0.95 TH RT WB 7.9%0.96 NB 2.4%0.82 Peak Hour: 7:15 AM 8:15 AM HV %:PHF EB 14.1%0.91 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound UT LT TH RT Interval Start E MULBERRY ST E MULBERRY ST CARRIAGE PKEY CAMINO DEL MUNDO 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT 0 0 180 0 0 25 0 0 5 294 0 7:15 AM 0 0 124 5 0 0 11 0 2 07:00 AM 0 0 107 5 0 0 164 0 0 10 361 0 7:45 AM 0 4 129 10 0 0 23 0 2 0 343 0 7:30 AM 0 2 126 1 0 2 195 0 1 0 1 0 7 367 1,365 8:00 AM 0 4 108 6 0 3 184 0 3 0 0 0 4011981017 0 5 162 0 0 15 1 0 9 329 1,400 8:15 AM 0 6 107 8 0 0 11 0 3 0 1 0 8 282 1,291 8:45 AM 0 3 92 13 0 0 23 0 4 0 313 1,370 8:30 AM 0 2 92 8 0 2 142 0 2 0 1 0 7 287 1,211010104011510021 0 6 757 1 0 Count Total 0 21 885 56 0 14 1,376 5 0 54 2,576 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West North South 7:00 AM 17 13 1 0 10 487 1 0 146 0 18 0 30 1,400 0760902022 0 31 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 7:45 AM 21 14 1 0 36 0 1 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 0 0 7:15 AM 17 14 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 15 13 1 0 29 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0003100 0 2 8:15 AM 19 21 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:00 AM 20 19 0 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 13 15 1 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 AM 17 15 3 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 5 Peak Hour 73 60 2 1 136 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0Count Total 139 124 8 1 272 0 4101000 0 0100 40 0N CARRIAGE PKEY E MULBERRY ST E MULBERRY ST CARRIAGE PKEYE MULBERRY STCAMINO DEL MUNDO1,400TEV: 0.95PHF:3002321101 757 6 764 4980 90768528022 487 10 519 863 0 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 02_CARRIAGE_E MULBERRY to to Two-Hour Count Summaries Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Total 1 1 1 1 0 1 4 1 10 3 Peak Hour Date: Thu, Oct 15, 2020 Peak Hour Count Period: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM SB 0.0%0.83 TOTAL 4.1%0.93 TH RT WB 4.4%0.94 NB 6.9%0.72 Peak Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM HV %:PHF EB 3.7%0.91 UT LT TH RT UT LT Rolling One HourEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound UT LT TH RT Interval Start E MULBERRY ST E MULBERRY ST CARRIAGE PKEY CAMINO DEL MUNDO 15-min TotalUTLTTHRT 0 5 155 1 0 23 1 0 3 410 0 4:15 PM 0 7 187 17 1 0 14 0 6 04:00 PM 0 15 204 16 0 1 149 0 0 6 417 0 4:45 PM 1 9 205 14 0 0 24 0 1 0 406 0 4:30 PM 0 6 209 11 0 6 154 0 2 0 0 0 9 392 1,625 5:00 PM 0 6 211 15 0 5 155 0 2 0 0 0 5011440011 0 0 168 1 0 13 0 0 6 416 1,631 5:15 PM 0 11 234 15 0 0 16 0 2 0 0 0 4 395 1,651 5:45 PM 0 4 163 18 0 0 20 0 3 0 448 1,673 5:30 PM 1 9 192 20 0 3 143 0 3 0 1 0 2 340 1,599010103021360012 0 12 621 1 0 Count Total 2 67 1,605 126 0 23 1,204 3 0 38 3,224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West North South 4:00 PM 18 11 0 1 32 859 3 0 133 0 20 0 19 1,673 0640801055 0 29 0 EB WB NB SB Total East 4:45 PM 8 7 0 0 15 3 4 0 Interval Start Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total 0 1 4:15 PM 24 18 1 0 0 0 4:30 PM 15 9 4 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0004200 0 0 5:15 PM 5 4 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 PM 7 8 1 0 16 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 5:45 PM 9 7 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 5:30 PM 9 8 1 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000000 0 8 Peak Hour 35 28 5 0 68 0 0 0 4 3 8 0 2Count Total 95 72 6 0 173 1 2437010 0 3400 21 0N CARRIAGE PKEY E MULBERRY ST E MULBERRY ST CARRIAGE PKEYE MULBERRY STCAMINO DEL MUNDO1,673TEV: 0.93PHF:1901203301 621 12 634 8680 80647267055 859 32 947 705 1 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location:CARRIAGE WAY S/O E MULBERRY ST Date Range:10/15/2020 - 10/21/2020 Site Code:01 Time NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 1 1 2 ------------------1 1 2 1:00 AM 0 1 1 ------------------0 1 1 2:00 AM 0 0 0 ------------------0 0 0 3:00 AM 6 3 9 ------------------6 3 9 4:00 AM 6 0 6 ------------------6 0 6 5:00 AM 22 3 25 ------------------22 3 25 6:00 AM 49 17 66 ------------------49 17 66 7:00 AM 81 20 101 ------------------81 20 101 8:00 AM 78 46 124 ------------------78 46 124 9:00 AM 76 29 105 ------------------76 29 105 10:00 AM 76 36 112 ------------------76 36 112 11:00 AM 80 57 137 ------------------80 57 137 12:00 PM 94 80 174 ------------------94 80 174 1:00 PM 65 40 105 ------------------65 40 105 2:00 PM 91 59 150 ------------------91 59 150 3:00 PM 94 61 155 ------------------94 61 155 4:00 PM 78 67 145 ------------------78 67 145 5:00 PM 66 78 144 ------------------66 78 144 6:00 PM 48 48 96 ------------------48 48 96 7:00 PM 31 39 70 ------------------31 39 70 8:00 PM 17 37 54 ------------------17 37 54 9:00 PM 14 18 32 ------------------14 18 32 10:00 PM 3 8 11 ------------------3 8 11 11:00 PM 4 5 9 ------------------4 5 9 Total 1,080 753 1,833 ------------------1,080 753 1,833 Percent 59%41%-------------------59%41%- 1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday. Thursday Friday Saturday 10/16/202010/15/2020 Mid-Week Average10/17/2020 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday 10/21/202010/20/202010/19/202010/18/2020 Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com 1 Appendix B Level of Service Worksheets EXISTING HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Recent AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 11 487 23 3 892 1 94 1 6 4 1 34 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 11 487 23 3 892 1 94 1 6 4 1 34 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 12 529 25 3 970 1 102 1 7 4 1 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 117 1001 848 392 982 832 424 50 347 364 8 298 ArriYe On Green 0.01 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.19 0.19 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 202 1414 1781 42 1550 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 12 529 25 3 970 1 102 0 8 4 0 38 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1616 1781 0 1591 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.3 15.7 0.6 0.1 43.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.7 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 15.7 0.6 0.1 43.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.97 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 117 1001 848 392 982 832 424 0 397 364 0 306 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.53 0.03 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.12 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 206 1001 848 499 982 832 424 0 397 459 0 306 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 20.6 12.9 9.4 10.8 20.1 9.7 24.1 0.0 24.5 27.7 0.0 28.6 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 25.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.1 5.5 0.2 0.0 22.2 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 21.0 13.4 9.4 10.8 45.9 9.7 24.3 0.0 24.6 27.7 0.0 29.5 LnGrp LOS C B A B D A C A C C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 566 974 110 42 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 13.4 45.7 24.4 29.3 Approach LOS B D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 25.5 4.8 50.4 9.5 21.0 5.7 49.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 16.5 5.5 45.0 5.0 16.5 5.5 45.0 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 2.3 2.1 17.7 5.8 3.7 2.3 45.9 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 33.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Recent PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 860 53 6 621 1 52 2 8 2 1 10 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 860 53 6 621 1 52 2 8 2 1 10 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 935 58 7 675 1 57 2 9 2 1 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 316 984 834 134 937 794 334 72 324 287 27 296 ArriYe On Green 0.03 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.20 0.20 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 296 1334 1781 134 1472 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 935 58 7 675 1 57 0 11 2 0 12 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1630 1781 0 1605 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.8 38.9 1.0 0.2 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.5 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 38.9 1.0 0.2 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.92 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 316 984 834 134 937 794 334 0 396 287 0 323 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.95 0.07 0.05 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.04 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 375 1026 869 237 1026 869 363 0 396 391 0 323 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 12.5 18.4 4.4 18.2 16.0 10.2 29.9 0.0 23.7 28.3 0.0 26.4 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 17.0 0.0 0.2 2.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.3 17.7 0.4 0.1 8.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 12.6 35.5 4.4 18.4 18.2 10.2 30.2 0.0 23.8 28.3 0.0 26.6 LnGrp LOS B D A B B B C A C C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1029 683 68 14 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 32.9 18.2 29.1 26.8 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.7 24.4 5.2 47.7 8.1 21.0 7.3 45.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 16.5 5.5 45.0 5.0 16.5 5.5 45.0 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 2.4 2.2 40.9 2.0 2.5 2.8 25.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 27.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRaG 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 5HFHQW AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.4 MRYHPHQW EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 NBL NB5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 166 22 6 384 8 7 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 166 22 6 384 8 7 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # 0 - - 0 0 - GUDGH, % 0 - - 0 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 180 24 7 417 9 8 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU1 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 0 0 204 0 623 192 6WDJH 1 - - - - 192 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 431 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.42 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.42 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1368 - 450 850 6WDJH 1 - - - - 841 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 655 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1368 - 447 850 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 447 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 841 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 650 - ASSURDFK EB :B NB HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0 0.1 11.5 HCM LO6 B MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW NBLQ1 EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 574 - - 1368 - HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.028 - - 0.005 - HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 11.5 - - 7.6 0 HCM LDQH LO6 B - - A A HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0.1 - - 0 - HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRa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cLaXJKOLQ RRaG & PURVSHcW RRaG 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 5HFHQW AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.1 MRYHPHQW EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 NBL NB5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 114 2 1 388 2 2 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 114 2 1 388 2 2 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # 0 - - 0 0 - GUDGH, % 0 - - 0 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 124 2 1 422 2 2 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU1 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 0 0 126 0 549 125 6WDJH 1 - - - - 125 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 424 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.42 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.42 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1460 - 497 926 6WDJH 1 - - - - 901 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 660 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1460 - 497 926 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 497 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 901 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 659 - ASSURDFK EB :B NB HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0 0 10.6 HCM LO6 B MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW NBLQ1 EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 647 - - 1460 - HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.007 - - 0.001 - HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 10.6 - - 7.5 0 HCM LDQH LO6 B - - A A HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6WK TWSC 3: McLaXJKOLQ RRaG & PURVSHcW RRa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aLQ SWUHHW & PURVSHcW RRad 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW PURVSHFW 12/30/2020 5HFHQW AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 PDJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQWHUVHFWLRQ DHOD\, V/YHK 9.4 IQWHUVHFWLRQ LO6 A MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 :B5 NBL NB7 NB5 6BL 6B7 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 28 49 35 1 173 2 137 31 1 1 65 69 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 28 49 35 1 173 2 137 31 1 1 65 69 PHDN HRXU FDFWRU 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 30 53 38 1 188 2 149 34 1 1 71 75 NXPEHU RI LDQHV 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ASSURDFK EB :B NB 6B OSSRVLQJ ASSURDFK :B EB 6B NB OSSRVLQJ LDQHV 1 1 1 1 CRQIOLFWLQJ ASSURDFK LHIW 6B NB EB :B CRQIOLFWLQJ LDQHV LHIW 1 1 1 1 CRQIOLFWLQJ ASSURDFK 5LJKW NB 6B :B EB CRQIOLFWLQJ LDQHV 5LJKW 1 1 1 1 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ 8.9 9.7 9.8 8.8 HCM LO6 A A A A LDQH NBLQ1 EBLQ1 :BLQ1 6BLQ1 9RO LHIW, % 81% 25% 1% 1% 9RO 7KUX, % 18% 44% 98% 48% 9RO 5LJKW, % 1% 31% 1% 51% 6LJQ CRQWURO 6WRS 6WRS 6WRS 6WRS 7UDIILF 9RO E\ LDQH 169 112 176 135 L7 9RO 137 28 1 1 7KURXJK 9RO 31 49 173 65 57 9RO 1 35 2 69 LDQH FORZ 5DWH 184 122 191 147 GHRPHWU\ GUS 1 1 1 1 DHJUHH RI 8WLO (;) 0.257 0.164 0.259 0.189 DHSDUWXUH HHDGZD\ (HG) 5.03 4.843 4.88 4.631 CRQYHUJHQFH, </N <HV <HV <HV <HV CDS 709 734 731 769 6HUYLFH 7LPH 3.094 2.914 2.945 2.698 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.26 0.166 0.261 0.191 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ 9.8 8.9 9.7 8.8 HCM LDQH LO6 A A A A HCM 95WK-WLOH 4 1 0.6 1 0.7 HCM 6WK AWSC 4: MaLQ SWUHHW & PURVSHcW RRad 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW PURVSHFW 12/30/2020 5HFHQW PM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 PDJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQWHUVHFWLRQ DHOD\, V/YHK 9.7 IQWHUVHFWLRQ LO6 A MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 :B5 NBL NB7 NB5 6BL 6B7 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 74 109 86 5 78 0 67 72 2 8 75 35 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 74 109 86 5 78 0 67 72 2 8 75 35 PHDN HRXU FDFWRU 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 80 118 93 5 85 0 73 78 2 9 82 38 NXPEHU RI LDQHV 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ASSURDFK EB :B NB 6B OSSRVLQJ ASSURDFK :B EB 6B NB OSSRVLQJ LDQHV 1 1 1 1 CRQIOLFWLQJ ASSURDFK LHIW 6B NB EB :B CRQIOLFWLQJ LDQHV LHIW 1 1 1 1 CRQIOLFWLQJ ASSURDFK 5LJKW NB 6B :B EB CRQIOLFWLQJ LDQHV 5LJKW 1 1 1 1 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ 10.4 8.8 9.6 9 HCM LO6 B A A A LDQH NBLQ1 EBLQ1 :BLQ1 6BLQ1 9RO LHIW, % 48% 28% 6% 7% 9RO 7KUX, % 51% 41% 94% 64% 9RO 5LJKW, % 1% 32% 0% 30% 6LJQ CRQWURO 6WRS 6WRS 6WRS 6WRS 7UDIILF 9RO E\ LDQH 141 269 83 118 L7 9RO 67 74 5 8 7KURXJK 9RO 72 109 78 75 57 9RO 2 86 0 35 LDQH FORZ 5DWH 153 292 90 128 GHRPHWU\ GUS 1 1 1 1 DHJUHH RI 8WLO (;) 0.217 0.375 0.125 0.174 DHSDUWXUH HHDGZD\ (HG) 5.089 4.611 5.003 4.881 CRQYHUJHQFH, </N <HV <HV <HV <HV CDS 700 775 710 729 6HUYLFH 7LPH 3.16 2.667 3.077 2.954 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.219 0.377 0.127 0.176 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ 9.6 10.4 8.8 9 HCM LDQH LO6 A B A A HCM 95WK-WLOH 4 0.8 1.7 0.4 0.6 BACKGROUND 2025 HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 11 500 43 5 1020 1 149 1 13 4 1 34 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 11 500 43 5 1020 1 149 1 13 4 1 34 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 12 543 47 5 1109 1 162 1 14 4 1 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 97 1129 957 444 1115 945 362 23 322 319 7 268 ArriYe On Green 0.01 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.17 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 107 1495 1781 42 1550 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 12 543 47 5 1109 1 162 0 15 4 0 38 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1601 1781 0 1591 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.3 17.3 1.3 0.1 62.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 2.2 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 17.3 1.3 0.1 62.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.97 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 97 1129 957 444 1115 945 362 0 345 319 0 275 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.48 0.05 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.14 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 155 1129 957 516 1115 945 362 0 345 393 0 275 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 26.9 11.8 8.6 9.7 21.3 8.7 35.4 0.0 33.1 36.1 0.0 37.3 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 6.2 0.4 0.0 30.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.9 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 27.5 12.1 8.6 9.7 46.8 8.7 36.3 0.0 33.3 36.1 0.0 38.4 LnGrp LOS C B A A D A D A C D A D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 602 1115 177 42 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 12.1 46.6 36.1 38.2 Approach LOS B D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.1 27.4 5.2 68.8 9.6 22.9 6.0 68.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.5 5.0 63.5 5.1 18.4 5.0 63.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 2.8 2.1 19.3 7.1 4.2 2.3 64.6 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 34.8 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 984 116 13 691 1 89 2 12 2 1 10 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 984 116 13 691 1 89 2 12 2 1 10 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 1070 126 14 751 1 97 2 13 2 1 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 330 1104 936 117 1076 912 390 48 309 319 23 258 ArriYe On Green 0.03 0.59 0.59 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.18 0.18 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 216 1402 1781 134 1472 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 1070 126 14 751 1 97 0 15 2 0 12 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1618 1781 0 1605 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.9 57.7 3.7 0.3 30.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.7 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 57.7 3.7 0.3 30.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.92 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 330 1104 936 117 1076 912 390 0 356 319 0 282 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.97 0.13 0.12 0.70 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.04 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 361 1127 955 173 1125 953 390 0 356 398 0 282 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 12.8 20.7 9.6 24.3 15.9 9.5 32.1 0.0 32.4 35.6 0.0 36.1 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.1 19.5 0.1 0.5 1.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.3 26.5 1.1 0.2 11.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 13.0 40.2 9.7 24.7 17.7 9.5 32.4 0.0 32.6 35.6 0.0 36.4 LnGrp LOS B D A C B A C A C D A D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1232 766 112 14 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 36.3 17.8 32.4 36.3 Approach LOS D B C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.8 27.7 6.2 66.7 9.5 23.0 7.8 65.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.5 5.0 63.5 5.0 18.5 5.1 63.4 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 2.8 2.3 59.7 6.6 2.7 2.9 32.0 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 29.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRaG 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 BDFNJURXQG 2025 AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.3 MRYHPHQW EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 NBL NB5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 349 23 7 724 9 8 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 349 23 7 724 9 8 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # 0 - - 0 0 - GUDGH, % 0 - - 0 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 379 25 8 787 10 9 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU1 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 0 0 404 0 1195 392 6WDJH 1 - - - - 392 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 803 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.42 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.42 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1155 - 206 657 6WDJH 1 - - - - 683 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 441 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 1155 - 204 657 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 204 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 683 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 436 - ASSURDFK EB :B NB HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0 0.1 17.7 HCM LO6 C MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW NBLQ1 EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 302 - - 1155 - HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.061 - - 0.007 - HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 17.7 - - 8.1 0 HCM LDQH LO6 C - - A A HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0.2 - - 0 - HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRa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th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 78 277 2 1 674 117 2 1 2 137 1 55 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 78 277 2 1 674 117 2 1 2 137 1 55 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 85 301 2 1 733 127 2 1 2 149 1 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 266 1046 7 578 802 680 211 115 163 532 3 461 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1856 12 1076 1870 1585 445 395 560 1431 11 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 85 0 303 1 733 127 5 0 0 150 0 60 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1868 1076 1870 1585 1401 0 0 1442 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 5.2 0.0 22.8 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 5.2 0.0 22.8 3.1 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.99 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 266 0 1053 578 802 680 489 0 0 536 0 461 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.91 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.13 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 299 0 1148 612 862 730 489 0 0 536 0 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 13.1 0.0 7.0 10.1 16.6 11.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 17.3 0.0 16.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 13.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 10.6 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.6 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 13.8 0.0 7.2 10.1 30.1 11.1 15.7 0.0 0.0 18.6 0.0 16.7 LnGrp LOS B A A B C B B A A B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 388 861 5 210 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 8.6 27.3 15.7 18.0 Approach LOS A C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 39.4 22.5 8.3 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 7.2 6.8 3.5 24.8 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.7 0.0 1.7 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 21.0 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 559 3 2 401 50 3 1 2 122 1 49 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 559 3 2 401 50 3 1 2 122 1 49 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 608 3 2 436 54 3 1 2 133 1 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 303 811 4 282 566 480 355 130 186 696 5 596 ArriYe On Green 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1860 9 810 1870 1585 646 346 496 1453 12 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 0 611 2 436 54 6 0 0 134 0 53 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1869 810 1870 1585 1487 0 0 1466 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 13.1 0.1 10.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 13.1 6.8 10.2 1.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.33 0.99 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 303 0 815 282 566 480 672 0 0 701 0 596 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.75 0.01 0.77 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.09 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 418 0 1482 519 1113 943 672 0 0 701 0 596 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 10.9 0.0 11.3 16.8 15.2 12.1 9.4 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 9.7 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 0.0 3.9 0.0 3.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 11.0 0.0 12.7 16.8 17.4 12.2 9.4 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 10.0 LnGrp LOS B A B B B B A A A B A A Approach Vol, Yeh/h 647 492 6 187 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 12.6 16.9 9.4 10.5 Approach LOS B B A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 25.4 22.5 6.4 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 15.1 4.4 2.6 12.2 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.7 0.7 0.0 2.3 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 13.9 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/03/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 113 128 155 40 358 55 325 75 19 18 103 198 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 113 128 155 40 358 55 325 75 19 18 103 198 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 123 139 168 43 389 60 353 82 21 20 112 215 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 255 676 573 444 572 88 604 718 184 717 935 793 ArriYe On Green 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 941 1870 1585 1072 1582 244 1053 1436 368 1291 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 123 139 168 43 0 449 353 0 103 20 112 215 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 941 1870 1585 1072 0 1826 1053 0 1804 1291 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 8.3 3.3 4.9 1.9 0.0 13.5 17.4 0.0 2.0 0.5 2.1 5.1 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.8 3.3 4.9 5.2 0.0 13.5 19.5 0.0 2.0 2.5 2.1 5.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 255 676 573 444 0 660 604 0 902 717 935 793 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.21 0.29 0.10 0.00 0.68 0.58 0.00 0.11 0.03 0.12 0.27 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 255 676 573 444 0 660 604 0 902 717 935 793 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 26.8 14.3 14.8 16.1 0.0 17.6 13.8 0.0 8.6 9.3 8.6 9.4 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 1.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.8 4.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 1.9 1.3 1.7 0.4 0.0 5.2 3.9 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 1.5 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 28.2 14.5 15.1 16.2 0.0 20.4 17.9 0.0 8.9 9.4 8.9 10.2 LnGrp LOS C B B B A C B A A A A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 430 492 456 347 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 18.6 20.0 15.9 9.8 Approach LOS B C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.0 28.0 37.0 28.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 32.5 23.5 32.5 23.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.5 23.8 7.1 15.5 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.0 1.3 1.7 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 16.5 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/03/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 187 289 207 52 192 33 151 127 50 68 130 123 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 187 289 207 52 192 33 151 127 50 68 130 123 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 203 314 225 57 209 36 164 138 54 74 141 134 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 372 625 529 284 519 89 651 675 264 671 987 836 ArriYe On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1135 1870 1585 866 1554 268 1104 1280 501 1191 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 203 314 225 57 0 245 164 0 192 74 141 134 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1135 1870 1585 866 0 1822 1104 0 1780 1191 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 10.9 8.7 7.2 3.7 0.0 6.7 5.8 0.0 3.7 2.3 2.5 2.8 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.6 8.7 7.2 12.4 0.0 6.7 8.3 0.0 3.7 6.0 2.5 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 372 625 529 284 0 609 651 0 939 671 987 836 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.50 0.42 0.20 0.00 0.40 0.25 0.00 0.20 0.11 0.14 0.16 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 456 763 646 348 0 743 651 0 939 671 987 836 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.61 0.61 0.61 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 23.4 17.3 16.8 22.3 0.0 16.7 10.0 0.0 8.1 9.7 7.8 7.9 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 2.8 3.5 2.4 0.7 0.0 2.5 1.3 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 24.2 17.7 17.1 22.6 0.0 17.1 10.9 0.0 8.6 10.1 8.2 8.3 LnGrp LOS C B B C A B B A A B A A Approach Vol, Yeh/h 742 302 356 349 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 19.3 18.1 9.7 8.6 Approach LOS B B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 38.8 26.2 38.8 26.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 29.5 26.5 29.5 26.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 19.6 8.0 14.4 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 1.6 2.1 1.3 1.2 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 15.0 HCM 6th LOS B TOTAL 2025 HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 11 500 77 63 1020 1 164 5 37 4 5 34 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 11 500 77 63 1020 1 164 5 37 4 5 34 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 12 543 84 68 1109 1 178 5 40 4 5 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 95 1062 900 453 1112 942 360 39 310 314 33 247 ArriYe On Green 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.04 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.17 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 179 1433 1781 192 1422 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 12 543 84 68 1109 1 178 0 45 4 0 42 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1612 1781 0 1614 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.3 18.7 2.6 1.6 62.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 2.3 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 18.7 2.6 1.6 62.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.88 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 95 1062 900 453 1112 942 360 0 349 314 0 280 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.51 0.09 0.15 1.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.15 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 162 1112 942 472 1112 942 360 0 349 388 0 280 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 26.4 14.0 10.5 10.2 21.4 8.7 35.9 0.0 33.5 35.8 0.0 37.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.2 26.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 7.0 0.8 0.6 30.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 27.0 14.3 10.5 10.3 47.8 8.7 37.0 0.0 34.2 35.8 0.0 38.3 LnGrp LOS C B B B D A D A C D A D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 639 1178 223 46 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 14.1 45.6 36.4 38.1 Approach LOS B D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.1 27.4 8.8 64.7 9.6 22.9 6.0 67.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.5 5.5 63.0 5.1 18.4 5.5 63.0 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 4.4 3.6 20.7 7.1 4.3 2.3 64.6 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 34.8 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 984 170 95 691 1 158 5 123 2 5 10 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 984 170 95 691 1 158 5 123 2 5 10 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 1070 185 103 751 1 172 5 134 2 5 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 345 1082 917 150 1107 938 371 12 325 240 88 193 ArriYe On Green 0.03 0.58 0.58 0.04 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.17 0.17 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 57 1536 1781 520 1144 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 1070 185 103 751 1 172 0 139 2 0 16 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1594 1781 0 1664 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.9 61.9 6.1 2.5 30.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 0.9 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 61.9 6.1 2.5 30.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.69 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 345 1082 917 150 1107 938 371 0 337 240 0 280 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.99 0.20 0.69 0.68 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.06 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 374 1082 917 153 1107 938 371 0 337 317 0 280 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 12.5 22.8 11.0 26.6 15.3 9.2 37.2 0.0 37.4 37.8 0.0 38.3 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.1 24.6 0.1 11.9 1.7 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.3 30.1 1.9 1.9 11.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 12.6 47.4 11.2 38.5 17.0 9.2 38.1 0.0 41.1 37.8 0.0 38.7 LnGrp LOS B D B D B A D A D D A D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1291 855 311 18 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 41.3 19.6 39.4 38.6 Approach LOS D B D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.8 27.7 9.3 68.0 9.5 23.0 7.8 69.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.5 5.0 63.5 5.0 18.5 5.1 63.4 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 10.3 4.5 63.9 7.0 2.9 2.9 32.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 33.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 2: Frontage Road/Carriage Parkwa\ & Prospect Road 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 348 373 23 7 730 32 9 9 8 14 6 127 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 348 373 23 7 730 32 9 9 8 14 6 127 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 378 405 25 8 793 35 10 10 9 15 7 138 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 412 1167 72 43 816 696 153 150 112 296 126 652 ArriYe On Green 0.18 0.67 0.67 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1743 108 5 1860 1585 430 650 486 990 546 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 378 0 430 801 0 35 29 0 0 22 0 138 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1851 1865 0 1585 1566 0 0 1535 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 14.0 0.0 9.0 10.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.0 0.0 9.0 38.0 0.0 1.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 5.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 0.01 1.00 0.34 0.31 0.68 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 412 0 1239 859 0 696 415 0 0 422 0 652 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.35 0.93 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.21 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 437 0 1265 859 0 696 415 0 0 422 0 652 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 26.5 0.0 6.4 24.8 0.0 14.5 27.1 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 17.1 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 23.3 0.0 0.2 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 10.2 0.0 2.7 18.6 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.8 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 49.8 0.0 6.6 41.5 0.0 14.5 27.4 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 17.8 LnGrp LOS D A A D A B C A A C A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 808 836 29 160 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 26.8 40.4 27.4 19.1 Approach LOS C D C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.3 64.7 25.3 20.7 44.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 19.5 61.5 19.5 17.5 39.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 11.0 7.1 16.0 40.0 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 32.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 2: Frontage Road/Carriage Parkwa\ & Prospect Road 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 368 589 17 4 472 53 16 25 12 68 27 563 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 368 589 17 4 472 53 16 25 12 68 27 563 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 400 640 18 4 513 58 17 27 13 74 29 612 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 438 978 28 41 583 496 170 260 112 444 164 851 ArriYe On Green 0.18 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1810 51 3 1863 1585 329 723 311 1045 455 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 400 0 658 517 0 58 57 0 0 103 0 612 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1861 1866 0 1585 1363 0 0 1500 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 13.5 0.0 22.6 1.8 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 26.2 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.5 0.0 22.6 23.6 0.0 2.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 0.01 1.00 0.30 0.23 0.72 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 438 0 1006 625 0 496 542 0 0 608 0 851 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.65 0.83 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.72 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 508 0 1280 824 0 667 542 0 0 608 0 851 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 20.3 0.0 14.7 29.3 0.0 22.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 15.7 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 19.2 0.0 0.8 5.4 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 5.2 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 7.2 0.0 8.3 10.7 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 9.2 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 39.4 0.0 15.5 34.7 0.0 22.1 19.5 0.0 0.0 20.2 0.0 20.9 LnGrp LOS D A B C A C B A A C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1058 575 57 715 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 24.5 33.4 19.5 20.8 Approach LOS C C B C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 36.9 53.1 36.9 20.5 32.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 19.1 61.9 19.1 19.5 37.9 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 24.6 28.2 15.5 25.6 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.5 0.0 0.5 2.5 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 25.4 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 78 292 2 1 708 117 2 1 2 137 1 55 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 78 292 2 1 708 117 2 1 2 137 1 55 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 85 317 2 1 770 127 2 1 2 149 1 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 252 1062 7 580 821 696 202 110 155 515 3 452 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.57 0.57 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1857 12 1061 1870 1585 428 387 543 1405 11 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 85 0 319 1 770 127 5 0 0 150 0 60 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1868 1061 1870 1585 1358 0 0 1416 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 24.8 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 24.8 3.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.99 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 252 0 1068 580 821 696 468 0 0 518 0 452 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.94 0.18 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.13 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 284 0 1126 594 845 716 468 0 0 518 0 452 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 13.7 0.0 7.0 9.9 16.9 10.8 16.2 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 16.7 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 17.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 12.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.6 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 14.5 0.0 7.1 9.9 34.3 10.9 16.2 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 17.3 LnGrp LOS B A A A C B B A A B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 404 898 5 210 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 8.7 31.0 16.2 18.8 Approach LOS A C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 40.6 22.5 8.4 32.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.3 7.6 7.3 3.5 26.8 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.9 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 23.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 628 3 2 455 50 3 1 2 122 1 49 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 628 3 2 455 50 3 1 2 122 1 49 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 683 3 2 495 54 3 1 2 133 1 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 292 858 4 256 621 526 337 123 176 667 4 569 ArriYe On Green 0.04 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1861 8 756 1870 1585 638 343 491 1457 13 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 0 686 2 495 54 6 0 0 134 0 53 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 0 1869 756 1870 1585 1472 0 0 1469 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 15.7 0.1 12.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 15.7 9.3 12.0 1.2 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.33 0.99 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 292 0 862 256 621 526 637 0 0 671 0 569 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.80 0.01 0.80 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.09 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 400 0 1417 435 1064 902 637 0 0 671 0 569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 10.9 0.0 11.5 18.2 15.2 11.6 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 10.6 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.0 2.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 11.1 0.0 13.2 18.2 17.6 11.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 11.0 LnGrp LOS B A B B B B B A A B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 722 551 6 187 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 13.1 17.0 10.4 11.6 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 27.6 22.5 6.5 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 17.7 4.6 2.6 14.0 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.2 0.7 0.0 2.6 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 14.4 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 113 143 155 40 392 55 325 75 19 18 103 198 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 113 143 155 40 392 55 325 75 19 18 103 198 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 123 155 168 43 426 60 353 82 21 20 112 215 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 230 676 573 432 580 82 604 718 184 717 935 793 ArriYe On Green 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 910 1870 1585 1057 1604 226 1053 1436 368 1291 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 123 155 168 43 0 486 353 0 103 20 112 215 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 910 1870 1585 1057 0 1830 1053 0 1804 1291 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 8.5 3.7 4.9 1.9 0.0 15.0 17.4 0.0 2.0 0.5 2.1 5.1 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.5 3.7 4.9 5.7 0.0 15.0 19.5 0.0 2.0 2.5 2.1 5.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 230 676 573 432 0 662 604 0 902 717 935 793 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.23 0.29 0.10 0.00 0.73 0.58 0.00 0.11 0.03 0.12 0.27 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 230 676 573 432 0 662 604 0 902 717 935 793 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 28.4 14.4 14.8 16.4 0.0 18.0 13.8 0.0 8.6 9.3 8.6 9.4 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 4.2 4.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.8 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 2.0 1.5 1.7 0.4 0.0 6.0 3.9 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 1.5 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 30.7 14.6 15.1 16.5 0.0 22.3 17.9 0.0 8.9 9.4 8.9 10.2 LnGrp LOS C B B B A C B A A A A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 446 529 456 347 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 19.2 21.8 15.9 9.8 Approach LOS B C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.0 28.0 37.0 28.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 32.5 23.5 32.5 23.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.5 25.5 7.1 17.0 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.0 1.3 1.6 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 17.3 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2025 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 187 358 207 52 246 33 151 127 50 68 130 123 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 187 358 207 52 246 33 151 127 50 68 130 123 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 203 389 225 57 267 36 164 138 54 74 141 134 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 342 645 546 250 556 75 638 661 259 657 967 819 ArriYe On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1076 1870 1585 808 1614 218 1104 1280 501 1191 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 203 389 225 57 0 303 164 0 192 74 141 134 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1076 1870 1585 808 0 1831 1104 0 1780 1191 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 11.9 11.2 7.0 4.1 0.0 8.4 5.9 0.0 3.8 2.3 2.6 2.9 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.3 11.2 7.0 15.3 0.0 8.4 8.5 0.0 3.8 6.1 2.6 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 342 645 546 250 0 631 638 0 920 657 967 819 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.60 0.41 0.23 0.00 0.48 0.26 0.00 0.21 0.11 0.15 0.16 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 343 647 549 251 0 634 638 0 920 657 967 819 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.54 0.54 0.54 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 24.7 17.6 16.3 23.9 0.0 16.7 10.4 0.0 8.5 10.2 8.2 8.3 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 3.0 4.5 2.4 0.7 0.0 3.1 1.3 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 26.2 18.5 16.5 24.4 0.0 17.3 11.4 0.0 9.0 10.5 8.5 8.7 LnGrp LOS C B B C A B B A A B A A Approach Vol, Yeh/h 817 360 356 349 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 19.9 18.4 10.1 9.0 Approach LOS B B B A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 38.1 26.9 38.1 26.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 33.5 22.5 33.5 22.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5 22.3 8.1 17.3 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.1 1.4 0.9 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 15.7 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK TWSC 5: PURVSHFW RRaG & AFFHVV DULYH 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 7RWDO 2025 AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.3 MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BL 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 24 371 763 2 1 6 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 24 371 763 2 1 6 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # - 0 0 - 0 - GUDGH, % - 0 0 - 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 26 403 829 2 1 7 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU2 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 831 0 - 0 1084 416 6WDJH 1 - - - - 830 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 254 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.84 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.84 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 797 - - - 211 585 6WDJH 1 - - - - 388 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 765 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 797 - - - 202 585 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 202 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 372 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 765 - ASSURDFK EB :B 6B HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0.8 0 13 HCM LO6 B MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BLQ1 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 797 - - - 460 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.033 - - - 0.017 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 9.7 0.2 - - 13 HCM LDQH LO6 A A - - B HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0.1 - - - 0.1 HCM 6WK TWSC 5: PURVSHFW RRaG & AFFHVV DULYH 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 7RWDO 2025 3M 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.3 MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BL 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 6 663 506 1 1 23 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 6 663 506 1 1 23 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # - 0 0 - 0 - GUDGH, % - 0 0 - 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 7 721 550 1 1 25 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU2 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 551 0 - 0 926 276 6WDJH 1 - - - - 551 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 375 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.84 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.84 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 1015 - - - 268 721 6WDJH 1 - - - - 541 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 665 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 1015 - - - 265 721 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 265 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 535 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 665 - ASSURDFK EB :B 6B HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0.2 0 10.6 HCM LO6 B MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BLQ1 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 1015 - - - 673 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.006 - - - 0.039 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 8.6 0.1 - - 10.6 HCM LDQH LO6 A A - - B HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0 - - - 0.1 2040 Background HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 11 726 43 5 1329 1 149 1 13 4 1 34 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 11 726 43 5 1329 1 149 1 13 4 1 34 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 12 789 47 5 1445 1 162 1 14 4 1 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 141 1586 707 297 1557 694 520 32 453 444 10 376 ArriYe On Green 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.01 0.44 0.44 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.24 0.24 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 107 1495 1781 42 1550 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 12 789 47 5 1445 1 162 0 15 4 0 38 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1601 1781 0 1591 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.3 11.9 1.3 0.1 29.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.4 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 11.9 1.3 0.1 29.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.97 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 141 1586 707 297 1557 694 520 0 486 444 0 386 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.50 0.07 0.02 0.93 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.10 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 233 1587 708 403 1587 708 520 0 486 552 0 386 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 17.2 14.9 11.9 12.5 20.1 11.9 18.4 0.0 18.5 21.4 0.0 22.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.1 4.0 0.4 0.0 11.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 17.4 15.1 12.0 12.5 29.9 11.9 18.8 0.0 18.6 21.4 0.0 22.7 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B A B C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 848 1451 177 42 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 15.0 29.9 18.8 22.6 Approach LOS B C B C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.9 27.4 5.0 38.2 9.5 22.8 5.6 37.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 2.5 2.1 13.9 7.0 3.4 2.3 31.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 23.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 1281 116 13 925 1 89 2 12 2 1 10 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 1281 116 13 925 1 89 2 12 2 1 10 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 1392 126 14 1005 1 97 2 13 2 1 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 265 1550 691 152 1484 662 538 65 423 446 33 363 ArriYe On Green 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.42 0.42 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.25 0.25 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 216 1402 1781 134 1472 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 1392 126 14 1005 1 97 0 15 2 0 12 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1618 1781 0 1605 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.8 27.0 3.6 0.3 17.1 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 27.0 3.6 0.3 17.1 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.92 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 265 1550 691 152 1484 662 538 0 489 446 0 396 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.90 0.18 0.09 0.68 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 322 1613 719 242 1613 719 555 0 489 562 0 396 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 13.4 19.4 12.8 16.6 17.6 12.6 17.8 0.0 18.3 21.0 0.0 21.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 7.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.3 10.5 1.1 0.1 6.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 13.7 26.4 13.0 16.8 18.6 12.6 18.0 0.0 18.4 21.0 0.0 21.4 LnGrp LOS B C B B B B B A B C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1554 1020 112 14 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 25.0 18.6 18.1 21.3 Approach LOS C B B C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.7 26.9 5.8 36.9 8.8 22.8 7.1 35.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 2.5 2.3 29.0 4.9 2.4 2.8 19.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 22.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRaG 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 BDFNJURXQG 2040 AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.8 MRYHPHQW EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 NBL NB5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 530 30 10 1105 30 20 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 530 30 10 1105 30 20 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - 0 - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # 0 - - 0 0 - GUDGH, % 0 - - 0 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 576 33 11 1201 33 22 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU1 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 0 0 609 0 1216 305 6WDJH 1 - - - - 593 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 623 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.84 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.84 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 966 - 173 691 6WDJH 1 - - - - 515 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 497 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU - - 966 - 171 691 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 171 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 515 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 492 - ASSURDFK EB :B NB HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0 0.1 23.8 HCM LO6 C MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW NBLQ1 EB7 EB5 :BL :B7 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 245 - - 966 - HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.222 - - 0.011 - HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 23.8 - - 8.8 - HCM LDQH LO6 C - - A - HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0.8 - - 0 - HCM 6WK TWSC 2: FURQWaJH RRaG & PURVSHcW RRa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th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 85 385 70 20 995 130 70 1 20 115 1 50 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 85 385 70 20 995 130 70 1 20 115 1 50 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 92 418 76 22 1082 141 76 1 22 125 1 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 301 1618 292 480 1403 626 505 21 470 537 9 481 ArriYe On Green 0.07 0.54 0.54 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3007 543 903 3554 1585 1349 69 1526 1388 29 1561 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 92 246 248 22 1082 141 76 0 23 125 0 55 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1773 903 1777 1585 1349 0 1596 1388 0 1589 Q SerYe(g_s), s 1.6 4.3 4.4 0.9 15.5 3.5 2.5 0.0 0.6 4.1 0.0 1.5 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 4.3 4.4 0.9 15.5 3.5 4.0 0.0 0.6 4.7 0.0 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 301 956 954 480 1403 626 505 0 491 537 0 489 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.77 0.23 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.23 0.00 0.11 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 335 1155 1152 563 1733 773 505 0 491 537 0 489 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 11.1 7.2 7.3 11.0 15.4 11.8 15.9 0.0 14.2 15.8 0.0 14.5 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.5 1.1 1.2 0.1 5.2 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 11.7 7.4 7.4 11.0 17.1 11.9 16.5 0.0 14.4 16.9 0.0 15.0 LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B A B B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 586 1245 99 180 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 8.1 16.4 16.0 16.3 Approach LOS A B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 36.0 22.5 8.4 27.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 6.4 6.7 3.6 17.5 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.8 0.5 0.0 5.6 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 14.1 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 12/30/2020 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 35 870 70 20 590 45 80 1 20 135 1 55 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 35 870 70 20 590 45 80 1 20 135 1 55 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 38 946 76 22 641 49 87 1 22 147 1 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 326 1418 114 262 1025 457 634 27 584 672 10 598 ArriYe On Green 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3331 268 552 3554 1585 1341 69 1526 1388 26 1563 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 38 505 517 22 641 49 87 0 23 147 0 61 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1822 552 1777 1585 1341 0 1596 1388 0 1589 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.6 10.7 10.7 1.6 7.4 1.1 2.1 0.0 0.4 3.5 0.0 1.2 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 10.7 10.7 5.8 7.4 1.1 3.3 0.0 0.4 3.9 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 326 756 776 262 1025 457 634 0 611 672 0 608 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.67 0.67 0.08 0.63 0.11 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.10 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 442 1436 1473 438 2154 961 634 0 611 672 0 608 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 10.4 10.8 10.8 15.8 14.5 12.3 10.4 0.0 9.1 10.3 0.0 9.3 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 3.0 3.1 0.2 2.3 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.4 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 10.6 11.9 11.8 15.9 15.2 12.4 10.8 0.0 9.2 11.1 0.0 9.6 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B A A B A A Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1060 712 110 208 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 11.8 15.0 10.5 10.6 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 24.5 22.5 6.5 18.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 12.7 5.9 2.6 9.4 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.2 6.5 0.6 0.0 4.2 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 12.7 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 120 190 175 65 570 95 435 125 35 40 150 240 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 120 190 175 65 570 95 435 125 35 40 150 240 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 130 207 190 71 620 103 473 136 38 43 163 261 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 211 685 581 446 657 557 514 656 556 419 424 359 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.23 0.23 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 130 207 190 71 620 103 473 136 38 43 163 261 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 4.2 7.1 7.8 2.3 28.9 4.1 14.5 4.6 1.4 1.6 6.6 13.7 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 7.1 7.8 2.3 28.9 4.1 14.5 4.6 1.4 1.6 6.6 13.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 211 685 581 446 657 557 514 656 556 419 424 359 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.30 0.33 0.16 0.94 0.18 0.92 0.21 0.07 0.10 0.38 0.73 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 211 685 581 465 675 572 514 656 556 455 424 359 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 22.1 20.3 20.5 17.2 28.3 20.3 24.9 20.4 19.4 25.0 29.5 32.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 5.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 21.6 0.2 21.9 0.7 0.2 0.1 2.6 12.2 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 2.0 3.1 2.7 0.9 15.7 1.4 5.4 2.0 0.5 0.7 3.1 6.1 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 27.3 20.6 20.8 17.4 49.9 20.4 46.8 21.2 19.7 25.1 32.1 44.4 LnGrp LOS C C C B D C D C B C C D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 527 794 647 467 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 22.3 43.2 39.8 38.3 Approach LOS C D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 36.1 8.7 37.5 19.0 24.9 10.0 36.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.1 28.9 5.1 32.9 14.5 19.5 5.5 32.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 6.6 4.3 9.8 16.5 15.7 6.2 30.9 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 36.8 HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/02/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Background 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 240 490 300 75 310 65 200 185 75 115 200 150 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 240 490 300 75 310 65 200 185 75 115 200 150 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 261 533 326 82 337 71 217 201 82 125 217 163 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 354 607 515 212 591 501 458 656 556 490 656 556 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.35 0.35 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 261 533 326 82 337 71 217 201 82 125 217 163 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 5.0 22.6 14.7 2.6 12.6 2.7 5.0 6.6 3.0 3.7 7.2 6.3 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 22.6 14.7 2.6 12.6 2.7 5.0 6.6 3.0 3.7 7.2 6.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 354 607 515 212 591 501 458 656 556 490 656 556 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.88 0.63 0.39 0.57 0.14 0.47 0.31 0.15 0.25 0.33 0.29 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 354 701 594 228 701 594 458 656 556 490 656 556 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.76 0.76 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 25.9 26.8 24.1 20.9 24.0 20.6 18.6 19.8 18.7 16.0 20.0 19.7 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 6.1 8.7 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.3 1.4 1.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 3.1 11.1 5.2 1.0 5.2 0.9 0.7 2.8 1.1 1.4 3.1 2.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 32.0 35.5 25.4 22.1 24.8 20.7 19.4 21.0 19.2 16.3 21.4 21.1 LnGrp LOS C D C C C C B C B B C C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1120 490 500 505 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 31.7 23.8 20.0 20.0 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 34.0 8.8 31.8 9.5 34.0 9.5 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 24.5 5.0 31.5 5.0 24.5 5.0 31.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 8.6 4.6 24.6 7.0 9.2 7.0 14.6 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 25.7 HCM 6th LOS C 2040 Total HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 11 726 77 63 1329 1 164 5 37 4 5 34 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 11 726 77 63 1329 1 164 5 37 4 5 34 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 12 789 84 68 1445 1 178 5 40 4 5 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 141 1430 638 332 1557 694 517 54 435 435 47 345 ArriYe On Green 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.24 0.24 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 179 1433 1781 192 1422 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 12 789 84 68 1445 1 178 0 45 4 0 42 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1612 1781 0 1614 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.3 12.9 2.5 1.6 29.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 1.5 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 12.9 2.5 1.6 29.1 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.88 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 141 1430 638 332 1557 694 517 0 489 435 0 391 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.55 0.13 0.20 0.93 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.11 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 233 1587 708 361 1587 708 517 0 489 543 0 391 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 17.7 17.3 14.2 12.9 20.1 11.9 18.9 0.0 18.8 21.4 0.0 22.2 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 9.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.1 4.5 0.8 0.6 11.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.6 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 17.9 17.7 14.3 13.2 29.9 11.9 19.3 0.0 19.2 21.4 0.0 22.8 LnGrp LOS B B B B C B B A B C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 885 1514 223 46 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 17.3 29.2 19.3 22.7 Approach LOS B C B C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.9 27.4 8.3 34.9 9.5 22.8 5.6 37.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 3.5 3.6 14.9 7.0 3.5 2.3 31.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 24.3 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summary 1: Carriage Parkway/Camino Del Mundo & Mulberry Street 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 33 1281 169 95 925 1 158 5 123 2 5 10 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 33 1281 169 95 925 1 158 5 123 2 5 10 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 36 1392 184 103 1005 1 172 5 134 2 5 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 278 1494 666 208 1573 702 517 17 449 377 120 265 ArriYe On Green 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.23 0.23 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 57 1536 1781 520 1144 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 36 1392 184 103 1005 1 172 0 139 2 0 16 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1594 1781 0 1664 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.9 29.5 6.0 2.5 17.4 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 29.5 6.0 2.5 17.4 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.69 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 278 1494 666 208 1573 702 517 0 466 377 0 386 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.93 0.28 0.50 0.64 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.04 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 329 1516 676 219 1573 702 517 0 466 485 0 386 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 13.6 21.8 15.0 18.2 17.1 12.3 20.5 0.0 21.7 23.2 0.0 23.5 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 10.6 0.2 1.8 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.3 12.4 1.9 0.9 6.1 0.0 2.4 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 13.8 32.4 15.2 20.0 18.0 12.3 20.9 0.0 23.3 23.2 0.0 23.7 LnGrp LOS B C B B B B C A C C A C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1612 1109 311 18 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 30.1 18.2 22.0 23.7 Approach LOS C B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.7 27.6 9.0 37.7 9.5 22.8 7.2 39.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 5.0 18.3 5.0 33.7 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 7.3 4.5 31.5 7.0 2.6 2.9 19.4 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 24.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approYed pedestrian interYal to be less than phase ma[ green. HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 2: Frontage Road/Carriage Pkw\ & Prospect Road 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 348 554 30 10 1111 32 30 29 20 14 26 127 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 348 554 30 10 1111 32 30 29 20 14 26 127 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 378 602 33 11 1208 35 33 32 22 15 28 138 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 418 2054 112 384 1319 588 203 191 112 200 346 729 ArriYe On Green 0.17 0.60 0.60 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3426 188 793 3554 1585 488 662 389 483 1202 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 378 312 323 11 1208 35 87 0 0 43 0 138 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1837 793 1777 1585 1540 0 0 1684 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 11.5 6.8 6.8 0.7 25.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 6.8 6.8 0.7 25.9 1.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 4.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.25 0.35 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 418 1065 1101 384 1319 588 506 0 0 546 0 729 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.92 0.06 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.19 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 456 1122 1159 392 1355 604 506 0 0 546 0 729 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 20.2 7.8 7.8 16.0 24.0 16.2 21.3 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 12.8 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 20.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 6.3 2.1 2.1 0.1 11.3 0.4 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.4 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 40.6 7.9 7.9 16.1 33.7 16.2 22.1 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.4 LnGrp LOS D A A B C B C A A C A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1013 1254 87 181 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 20.1 33.1 22.1 15.2 Approach LOS C C C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.5 52.5 27.5 18.3 34.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 20.5 50.5 20.5 15.5 30.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 8.8 6.1 13.5 27.9 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.3 3.8 0.5 0.3 1.8 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 26.2 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 2: Frontage Road/Carriage Pkw\ & Prospect Road 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 368 966 20 5 743 53 20 25 25 68 27 563 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 368 966 20 5 743 53 20 25 25 68 27 563 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 400 1050 22 5 808 58 22 27 27 74 29 612 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 473 1849 39 250 937 418 171 206 168 447 160 838 ArriYe On Green 0.19 0.52 0.52 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3559 75 526 3554 1585 291 601 491 1028 469 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 400 524 548 5 808 58 76 0 0 103 0 612 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1857 526 1777 1585 1383 0 0 1497 0 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 9.8 13.1 13.1 0.5 14.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 19.3 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.8 13.1 13.1 0.5 14.1 1.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.29 0.36 0.72 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 473 923 965 250 937 418 545 0 0 607 0 838 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.57 0.57 0.02 0.86 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.73 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 538 1014 1060 257 990 441 545 0 0 607 0 838 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 14.0 10.6 10.6 17.8 22.8 18.3 14.7 0.0 0.0 14.9 0.0 11.8 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 10.8 0.6 0.6 0.0 7.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 5.6 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 4.4 4.0 4.1 0.1 6.1 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 6.2 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 24.8 11.3 11.2 17.8 30.4 18.4 15.2 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 17.3 LnGrp LOS C B B B C B B A A B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1472 871 76 715 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 14.9 29.6 15.2 17.1 Approach LOS B C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.7 38.3 26.7 16.6 21.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.9 37.1 18.9 14.5 18.1 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 15.1 21.3 11.8 16.1 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.3 6.6 0.0 0.4 1.1 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 19.5 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 85 400 70 20 1029 130 70 1 20 115 1 50 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 85 400 70 20 1029 130 70 1 20 115 1 50 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 92 435 76 22 1118 141 76 1 22 125 1 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 295 1645 285 479 1426 636 499 21 465 530 9 475 ArriYe On Green 0.07 0.54 0.54 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3027 525 889 3554 1585 1349 69 1526 1388 29 1561 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 92 254 257 22 1118 141 76 0 23 125 0 55 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1776 889 1777 1585 1349 0 1596 1388 0 1589 Q SerYe(g_s), s 1.6 4.5 4.6 0.9 16.2 3.5 2.5 0.0 0.6 4.1 0.0 1.5 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 4.5 4.6 0.9 16.2 3.5 4.0 0.0 0.6 4.7 0.0 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 295 966 965 479 1426 636 499 0 486 530 0 484 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.26 0.27 0.05 0.78 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.24 0.00 0.11 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 328 1142 1141 550 1713 764 499 0 486 530 0 484 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 11.3 7.2 7.2 10.9 15.5 11.6 16.3 0.0 14.5 16.2 0.0 14.8 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.5 1.2 1.2 0.1 5.5 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.0 0.6 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 11.9 7.3 7.4 10.9 17.5 11.8 16.9 0.0 14.7 17.2 0.0 15.3 LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B A B B A B Approach Vol, Yeh/h 603 1281 99 180 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 8.0 16.8 16.4 16.6 Approach LOS A B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 36.6 22.5 8.4 28.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 18.0 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 6.6 6.7 3.6 18.2 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.9 0.5 0.0 5.5 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 14.3 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Signali]ed Intersection Summar\ 3: McLaughlin Road/High School DriveZa\ & Prospect Road 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 35 939 70 20 644 45 80 1 20 135 1 55 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 35 939 70 20 644 45 80 1 20 135 1 55 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 38 1021 76 22 700 49 87 1 22 147 1 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 307 1439 107 236 1060 473 635 27 596 674 10 610 ArriYe On Green 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 3353 250 514 3554 1585 1341 69 1526 1388 26 1563 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 38 541 556 22 700 49 87 0 23 147 0 61 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1777 1825 514 1777 1585 1341 0 1596 1388 0 1589 Q SerYe(g_s), s 0.7 12.5 12.5 1.8 8.6 1.1 2.2 0.0 0.4 3.7 0.0 1.2 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 12.5 12.5 7.8 8.6 1.1 3.4 0.0 0.4 4.1 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 307 763 784 236 1060 473 635 0 623 674 0 620 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.71 0.71 0.09 0.66 0.10 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.10 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 430 1299 1334 356 1886 841 635 0 623 674 0 620 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 11.0 11.7 11.7 17.6 15.3 12.7 10.7 0.0 9.4 10.7 0.0 9.6 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 0.2 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 0.2 3.6 3.7 0.2 2.8 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.4 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 11.2 12.9 12.9 17.7 16.0 12.8 11.2 0.0 9.5 11.4 0.0 10.0 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B A A B A A Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1135 771 110 208 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 12.9 15.9 10.8 11.0 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.0 25.9 24.0 6.5 19.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 19.5 36.5 19.5 5.5 26.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 14.5 6.1 2.7 10.6 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.3 6.9 0.6 0.0 4.3 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 13.6 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 AM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 120 205 175 65 604 95 435 125 35 40 150 240 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 120 205 175 65 604 95 435 125 35 40 150 240 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 130 223 190 71 657 103 473 136 38 43 163 261 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 197 706 598 448 688 583 497 635 539 414 415 352 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.15 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 130 223 190 71 657 103 473 136 38 43 163 261 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 4.1 7.6 7.6 2.2 30.8 4.0 13.9 4.7 1.5 1.7 6.7 13.8 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 7.6 7.6 2.2 30.8 4.0 13.9 4.7 1.5 1.7 6.7 13.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 197 706 598 448 688 583 497 635 539 414 415 352 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.95 0.18 0.95 0.21 0.07 0.10 0.39 0.74 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 197 706 598 466 696 590 497 635 539 450 415 352 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 22.1 19.8 19.8 16.4 27.7 19.2 26.2 21.2 20.1 25.4 29.8 32.6 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 7.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 23.3 0.1 28.4 0.8 0.3 0.1 2.8 13.2 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 2.0 3.3 2.6 0.8 16.9 1.4 6.9 2.0 0.5 0.7 3.2 6.3 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 29.6 20.0 20.1 16.5 51.0 19.4 54.6 21.9 20.4 25.5 32.6 45.8 LnGrp LOS C C C B D B D C C C C D Approach Vol, Yeh/h 543 831 647 467 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 22.4 44.1 45.7 39.3 Approach LOS C D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 35.1 8.7 38.5 18.4 24.5 9.5 37.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.1 28.4 5.1 33.4 13.9 19.6 5.0 33.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 6.7 4.2 9.6 15.9 15.8 6.1 32.8 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 38.9 HCM 6th LOS D HCM 6WK SLJQaOL]ed IQWeUVecWLRQ SXPPaU\ 4: MaLQ SWUeeW & PURVSecW RRad 01/10/2021 NEC I-25 at Prospect 12/30/2020 Total 2040 PM S\nchro 10 Light Report RR Page 1 MoYement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (Yeh/h) 240 559 300 76 364 65 200 185 75 115 200 150 Future Volume (Yeh/h) 240 559 300 76 364 65 200 185 75 115 200 150 Initial Q (Qb), Yeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat FloZ, Yeh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj FloZ Rate, Yeh/h 261 608 326 83 396 71 217 201 82 125 217 163 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent HeaY\ Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, Yeh/h 336 660 559 191 647 548 469 640 542 469 550 466 ArriYe On Green 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.29 0.29 Sat FloZ, Yeh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(Y), Yeh/h 261 608 326 83 396 71 217 201 82 125 217 163 Grp Sat FloZ(s),Yeh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q SerYe(g_s), s 5.0 28.1 15.1 2.7 15.8 2.8 7.3 7.1 3.2 4.4 8.3 7.3 C\cle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 28.1 15.1 2.7 15.8 2.8 7.3 7.1 3.2 4.4 8.3 7.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), Yeh/h 336 660 559 191 647 548 469 640 542 469 550 466 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.92 0.58 0.43 0.61 0.13 0.46 0.31 0.15 0.27 0.39 0.35 AYail Cap(c_a), Yeh/h 336 694 588 205 696 590 553 640 542 469 550 466 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.73 0.73 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Dela\ (d), s/Yeh 27.6 27.9 23.7 22.2 24.4 20.2 18.0 21.8 20.5 20.5 25.4 25.0 Incr Dela\ (d2), s/Yeh 8.1 13.6 1.0 1.6 1.4 0.1 0.7 1.3 0.6 0.3 2.1 2.1 Initial Q Dela\(d3),s/Yeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),Yeh/ln 3.8 14.5 5.3 1.1 6.7 1.0 2.8 3.1 1.2 1.7 3.8 2.8 Unsig. MoYement Dela\, s/Yeh LnGrp Dela\(d),s/Yeh 35.8 41.6 24.7 23.7 25.9 20.3 18.7 23.1 21.1 20.8 27.5 27.1 LnGrp LOS D D C C C C B C C C C C Approach Vol, Yeh/h 1195 550 500 505 Approach Dela\, s/Yeh 35.7 24.8 20.9 25.7 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.6 35.3 8.9 36.2 13.9 30.9 9.5 35.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Ma[ Green Setting (Gma[), s 5.1 28.4 5.1 33.4 13.7 19.8 5.0 33.5 Ma[ Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 9.1 4.7 30.1 9.3 10.3 7.0 17.8 Green E[t Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.7 0.2 1.1 0.0 2.1 Intersection Summar\ HCM 6th Ctrl Dela\ 29.0 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6WK TWSC 5: PURVSHFW RRaG & AFFHVV DULYH 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 7RWDO 2040 AM 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.4 MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BL 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 24 554 1147 2 1 6 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 24 554 1147 2 1 6 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # - 0 0 - 0 - GUDGH, % - 0 0 - 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 26 602 1247 2 1 7 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU2 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 1249 0 - 0 1601 625 6WDJH 1 - - - - 1248 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 353 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.84 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.84 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 553 - - - 97 428 6WDJH 1 - - - - 234 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 682 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 553 - - - 90 428 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 90 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 217 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 682 - ASSURDFK EB :B 6B HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0.9 0 18.3 HCM LO6 C MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BLQ1 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 553 - - - 279 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.047 - - - 0.027 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 11.8 0.4 - - 18.3 HCM LDQH LO6 B A - - C HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0.1 - - - 0.1 HCM 6WK TWSC 5: PURVSHFW RRaG & AFFHVV DULYH 01/08/2021 NEC I-25 DW 3URVSHFW 12/30/2020 7RWDO 2040 3M 6\QFKUR 10 LLJKW 5HSRUW 55 3DJH 1 IQWHUVHFWLRQ IQW DHOD\, V/YHK 0.3 MRYHPHQW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BL 6B5 LDQH CRQILJXUDWLRQV 7UDIILF 9RO, YHK/K 6 1043 778 1 1 23 FXWXUH 9RO, YHK/K 6 1043 778 1 1 23 CRQIOLFWLQJ 3HGV, #/KU 0 0 0 0 0 0 6LJQ CRQWURO FUHH FUHH FUHH FUHH 6WRS 6WRS 57 CKDQQHOL]HG - NRQH - NRQH - NRQH 6WRUDJH LHQJWK - - - - 0 - 9HK LQ MHGLDQ 6WRUDJH, # - 0 0 - 0 - GUDGH, % - 0 0 - 0 - 3HDN HRXU FDFWRU 92 92 92 92 92 92 HHDY\ 9HKLFOHV, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MYPW FORZ 7 1134 846 1 1 25 MDMRU/MLQRU MDMRU1 MDMRU2 MLQRU2 CRQIOLFWLQJ FORZ AOO 847 0 - 0 1428 424 6WDJH 1 - - - - 847 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 581 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 1 - - - - 5.84 - CULWLFDO HGZ\ 6WJ 2 - - - - 5.84 - FROORZ-XS HGZ\ 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 3RW CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 786 - - - 126 579 6WDJH 1 - - - - 381 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 522 - 3ODWRRQ EORFNHG, % - - - MRY CDS-1 MDQHXYHU 786 - - - 123 579 MRY CDS-2 MDQHXYHU - - - - 123 - 6WDJH 1 - - - - 372 - 6WDJH 2 - - - - 522 - ASSURDFK EB :B 6B HCM CRQWURO DHOD\, V 0.2 0 12.6 HCM LO6 B MLQRU LDQH/MDMRU MYPW EBL EB7 :B7 :B5 6BLQ1 CDSDFLW\ (YHK/K) 786 - - - 502 HCM LDQH 9/C 5DWLR 0.008 - - - 0.052 HCM CRQWURO DHOD\ (V) 9.6 0.1 - - 12.6 HCM LDQH LO6 A A - - B HCM 95WK %WLOH 4(YHK) 0 - - - 0.2 Appendix C LCUASS Left -Turn and Right -Turn Warrants Appendix D Pedestrian Bicycle Destination Area