HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY CAMPUS - FDP - FDP180004 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
December 8, 2017
BHA Design
1603 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: Platte River Power Authority Campus, PDP170040, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Standard utility easements need to be dedicated and/or widened
along all ROW frontages. The existing 6-foot utility easement behind Danfield
ROW will need to be widened to 9 feet. The existing 6-foot easement along
Horsetooth will need to be widened to 15 feet. Along Timberline, a 15-foot utility
easement will need to be dedicated.
Response: The easements have been added.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are quite a few easements being dedicated with this
project. Please note that each easement is subject to a separate TDR Fee and
will require separate review and recording fees. The cost for plat review is
already included with the project fees. If the project still wishes to avoid
replatting, the Engineering Department would like to request a plan sheet be
added to the utility set which is an exhibit of all existing and proposed
easements for the site.
Response: A subdivision plat has been submitted to dedicate/vacate easements.
2
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: LCUASS sidewalk standards would require detached sidewalks
along all street frontages. Street Maintenance has also requested detached
walks to allow for better winter sidewalk snow clearing. Please provide
detached walks or provide a variance request in accordance with 1.9.4 of the
LCUASS.
Response: A variance request has been submitted and approved.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Please add City signature blocks to the lower right-hand corner of
each sheet in the utility plan set.
Response: Corrected.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: LIGHTING PLAN: Please clarify the color temperature for the
following fixtures in the lighting schedule: H1, H2, V1, WA1, PB1 and PC1.
Response: Color temperature has been added in descriptions and is 3000K for all fixtures.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: LIGHTING PLAN: Please add a column for mounting height to the
lighting schedule.
Response: Mounting height for each fixture is indicated in luminaire locations schedule on sheet 2 of 2
under column labeled “MH”.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: LANDSCAPE PLAN: It's not clear how all of the tree mitigation will
be accomplished. Are some of the shrubs being used for mitigation? Or will
some payment-in-lieu be used to meet the mitigation requirements? Please
clarify.
Response: The amount of new trees provided has been increased to meet tree mitigation requirements.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: UTILITY PLANS: Under Erosion Control Notes on sheets C5.07,
C5.08 and C5.09, please replace note #7 with the following: "Temporary
seeding shall be utilized in the event that a graded area is exposed longer than
30 days. The site shall be seeded with the appropriate seed mix and installation
method specified on the approved landscape plans."
Response: The note has been revised.
3
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Tree Mitigation Plan
For additional clarity on Sheet 4, please show all trees to be removed marked
with a “X” on the symbol. Please use a unique symbol for trees to remain.
On Sheet 5, please add a column that details if the tree is to be removed or to
be retained. The “reason for removal” column should explain why the project
needs to remove the tree (ex: building footprint, grading, etc).
Please place a cloud around the perimeter tree groves which are to be
preserved and protected.
Please explain why some trees on the Tree Mitigation Summary are “grayed
out”.
Response: Symbols for each tree have been provided that indicate trees to be removed and trees to
remain. Reason for removal column has been added. Tree groves to remain have been clouded.
Colors in Tree Mitigation Summary have been corrected.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Lindens do not typically survive or thrive in parking lot islands. Please consider
using a different species in these areas, such as ‘Shademaster’ Honeylocust.
Response: Tree species in the parking lot have been revised
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Please provide species diversity percentages in the plant list. The percentages
should be derived from the total number of trees on-site.
Response: Diversity percentages have been provided.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Thank you for providing 139 upsized mitigation trees in the plant schedule.
Please address how the remaining 37 mitigation trees will be provided, whether
it be fitting additional trees on-site, planting off-site or making a payment in lieu
to City Of Fort Collins Forestry.
Response: Addition trees have been provided to meet mitigation requirements.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
There appears to be some discrepancies with the number of trees that are
listed in the plant list versus how many are accounted for on the Landscape
4
plans.
CEOC - missing (2) trees from the landscape plans
POAC - one extra tree shown on landscape plans
ULAC - one extra tree shown on landscape plans
SYPE - missing (3) trees from landscape plans
PIPO - missing (1) tree from landscape plans
Response: Labels have been corrected.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
There are two unlabeled trees on sheet 1. Please label these trees and update
the plant list accordingly.
Response: Labels have been corrected.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Please incorporate a mixture of Plains cottonwood within the proposed
Lanceleaf cottonwood groves to provide increased species diversity. City
Forestry recommends replacing some Lanceleaf Cottonwood with Plains
Cottonwood.
Response: Plains Cottonwood have been provided.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Please adjust street tree locations to provide for proper tree/utility separation.
10’ between trees and public water, sanitary, and storm sewer main lines
6’ between trees and public water, sanitary, and storm sewer service lines
4’ between trees and gas lines
For example, there are a few ornamentals in close proximity to the storm sewer
line on sheet 1.
Response: Appropriate separation has been provided
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
There appears to be one Lanceleaf Cottonwood proposed near the parking lot
on sheet 2. Please consider another species for this location such as Bur Oak.
Response: Tree species has been revised.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/4/2017:
Please consider transplanting the 9 transplantable trees back on-site,
especially the memorial trees. Add a note that says: Transplanting trees #53,
72, 73, 93, 105, 110, 115, 116, and 117 shall follow the recommendations of a
qualified tree transplanting contractor in terms of size, staking, mulching, and
irrigation. Additionally, please display the transplanted locations with a bolded,
capital “T” on the landscape plans.
Response: Transplanting trees is proving to be difficult considering construction phasing and finding a
permanent location on site that is not affected by construction.
5
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/5/2017:
During the tree inventory session, the City Forester identified some rare native
plants, including Turbinella Oak and Mahonia. Forestry is interested in having a
discussing with PRPA if these plants will be impacted and possibly
transplanting them to a public property.
Response: Forestry has coordinated with PRPA regarding transplanting native plants.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Jonathon Nagel, , jnagel@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/29/2017
11/29/2017: The Community Recycling Ordinance (No. 109 2016) requires that
all business and multifamily complexes subscribe to recycling service that is at
minimum 1/3 of their overall service capacity(total bin capacity x number of
weekly pickups, include both trash and recycling when calculating overall
service capacity). In general recycling containers must be at least 50% the size
of proposed trash containers to meet this requirement. Please make sure
proposed containers meet this requirement and that adequate space is
provided in all enclosures.
Response: Platte River currently utilizes (and will continue to utilize) a trash compactor for their trash
needs. This is an approximate 40 yards compactor and only emptied 3 – 4 times per year. Recyling
containers will be two - 3 yard containers that would be on a more frequent schedule.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/29/2017
11/29/2017: Land Use Code 3.2.5 requires that all trash and recycling
enclosures provide a pedestrian entrance that is separate from main service
gates. Consider using a door less pedestrian entrance which will provide safer
and more efficient access for employees.
Response: Pedestrian access has been provided on the trash enclosure.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/07/2017
12/07/2017: Please provide drawings of proposed trash/recycling enclosures
showing overall dimensions, widths of service gates and required pedestrian
entrance along with proposed containers (include capacities). As discussed,
expanding the gate to the exterior wall in front of the recycling dumpster will
provide easier servicing.
Response: The trash enclosure will be part of a larger utility enclosure and will house one – 40 yard trash
compactor and two – 3 yard recycle containers. The arrangement for this is included in the attached
enlarged plan and elevations.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/07/2017
12/07/2017: Be sure to discuss truck access with hauler. As discussed
consider reducing the size of the median adjacent to the enclosure to make
truck turn around easier.
Response: Turning diagrams have been developed and reviewed with the trash hauler (Waste
Management) who has indicated the propsed layout will work.
6
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Clint Reetz, 970-221-6326, creetz@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Any changes to the existing electric capacity and or meter location
may initiate electric development and system modification charges. Please
coordinate power requirements with Light and Power Engineering. A link to the
fee estimator is below:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investme
nt-development-fees/electric-development-fee-estimator?id=3
Response: Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Please issue the power requirements via a commercial service
information form (C-1 form). Also a one line diagram for the commercial meter
will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to
the C-1 form is below:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-f
orms-guidelines-regulations
Response: C-1 form will be provided.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
Please contact Light & Power Engineering at 221-6700 if you have any
questions. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development
charge processes, and use our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Response: Noted
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS
EAE to be dedicated on the plat or by separate document. Currently, the limits
of the EAE are not fully represented and labeled on the plans, especially as it
relates to the north portion of the site.
Response: A subdivision plat has been submitted to dedicate the EAE. Easements are shown on the
plat and Utility Plans.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: FIRE LANE SIGNAGE
The limits of the fire lane shall be identified by red curbing and/or by signage.
Fire lane signage locations and/or red curbing to be identified to the Horizontal
7
Control Plan. Refer to LUCASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign type, placement,
and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. Signage
required at 70' - 100' intervals. Posting of additional fire lane signage may be
determined at time of fire inspection.
Response: Fire lane signage has been added to the Horizontal Control Plans.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: WATER SUPPLY
Hydrant placement plan meets minimum standards. Should this be a private
hydrant system, further PFA review and comment will be needed.
PRIVATE HYDRANT SYSTEM:
The installation of private hydrants is not preferred and requires special
approved and permitting by the fire marshal. Private fire hydrants shall be
inspected annually and have an approved maintenance plan in place as per IFC
507.5.3 prior to FDP approval. Fire hydrants must be the type approved by the
water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. The Development
Agreement will need to include an approved private hydrant maintenance
agreement. Annual test reports are to be provided to PFA and maintained
readily available for inspection on site.
Response: The hydrant system is intended to be private. Hydrants have been provided per City of Fort
Collins standard details and per recommended spacing.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: FIRE CONTAINMENT
Any building over 5000 sq. ft. shall be fire contained (or sprinklered). This also
applies to any garages or outbuildings.
Response: With the exception of the Pool Car Garage (which is less than 5,000 sf) all new buildings on
the campus will be sprinklered. The existing Microwave Building will remain un-sprinklered and is less
than 5,000 sf.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: GATING
Electric access gates shall be equipped with either a Knox KeySwitch to enable
gate activation or equipped with an Opticon activation system. Visit
www.knoxbox.com for electric gate access details. Code language provided
below.
> IFC D103.5: Gates securing fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all
of the following criteria:
1. The minimum gate width for vehicle access shall be 20 feet.
2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one
person.
4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times
and replaced or repaired when defective.
8
5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire
department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall
be approved by the fire code official. Gates must have a Knox Gate Key Switch
that fits the Knox Key system for Poudre Fire Authority.
6. Gate design and locking device specifications shall be submitted for
approval by the fire code official prior to installation.
7. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with
UL 325 and have a means of emergency, manual operation during power
loss.
9. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and
installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F 2200.
Response: Vehicle gates will be designed per these requirements.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: ADDRESS POSTING &
WAYFINDING
> Addresses shall be prominently posted on buildings and where otherwise
needed to aid in wayfinding. Monument signage may be needed at
intersections to assist with navigation within the campus.
> The HQ Building will require the address posted with a minimum of 10"
numerals (on a contrasting background) so as to be visible from E Horsetooth
Rd.
> All other buildings not separately addressed shall be posted with their own
unique identifiers (minimum of 6" in height).
> An address and wayfinding plan will need to be submitted to PFA for review
and approval at FDP.
Response: The entire campus will be addressed as 2000 E. Horsetooth Road. The following wayfinding
strategy will be used (see attached Wayfinding Plan):
• Address numerals will be placed on the south face of the Pool Car garage facing onto Horsetooth
Road
• An address monument sign will be placed at the Danfield Ct. campus entry with the Horsetooth
address displayed.
• Alphanumeric building indentifiers will be installed at locations shown on Wayfinding Plan
• “You Are Here” campus plan graphic showing buildings by identifier will be placed at Horsetooth
entry, Danfield entry and at the secure gates between HQ and Outbuilding areas
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: PHASING PLAN
For planning purposes, no portion of the phasing plan shall be allowed to create
a dead-end condition over 660' in length without providing for a second point of
access.
Response: Noted
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
9
12/06/2017: Our fundamental comment is that for a corner lot, there is a heavy
emphasis on the access and overall aesthetics facing Horsetooth Road but
there appears to less access and less aesthetics facing Timberline Road. For
example, along Timberline Road, there is a fence along the building’s east
elevation and no connecting walkway.
Response: Connecting walkway and additional landscaping have been provided.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Regarding this fence, it’s not clear as to its function or purpose. Is
this the same type of fence that is utilized for security around the perimeter of
the campus? Also, it’s not clear as to the function of the space that is being
enclosed. Staff recommends that the design team reconsider how the
headquarters building, the pond and the open part of the campus relates to
Timberline Road in a manner that is more welcoming, especially for a
quasi-public agency.
Response: The fence is used as a secure perimeter for the campus.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Regarding the connecting walkway out to Timberline Road, this
can be mitigated by enhancing the pedestrian walkway around the pond. As
noted at Conceptual Review, a walkway should be provided around the pond.
Such access is no less secure than the public access via Horsetooth Road.
Circumnavigating a pond is a natural inclination for pedestrians and provides an
opportunity for repose for employees.
Response: A trail around the pond has been provided
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Please provide details of the existing fence along the west
property, the proposed perimeter security fence and the fence, if any, along
Timberline.
Response: Fence details have been provided.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Regarding trash and recycling containers, be sure that such
containers are always paired so trash does not end up in the recyclables and
vis versa.
Response: PRPA utilizes a trash compactor and will have recycling containers next to it. See layout of
trash enclosure.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Please note that within the parking lot / equipment laydown area,
the parking spaces shown are not counted towards the maximum allowable
number of parking spaces.
Response: Parking within the laydown area have not been counted towards the parking numbers. A
note has been added noting this.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
10
12/06/2017: On the Landscape Plan and Lighting Plan, there are numerous
parking lot islands that also include parking lot light fixtures. Overtime, the
illumination from these fixtures will significantly degrade due to the maturing
foliage. Please relocate the fixtures out of the islands so the illumination in the
parking lot will remain consistent over time.
Response: Light fixture locations have been adjusted to avoid conflicts with trees. The area around the
underground detention has not been revised as we were limited on available space for light foundations.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: On the Landscape Plan, the ratio between the numbers of
Evergreen Trees being removed compared to the number of new being planted
is dramatically imbalanced. Staff recommends that a higher number of new
Evergreen Trees be planted and the number of Evergreen Trees being
removed be reduced. For example, on the Tree Mitigation Plan there is a
cluster of Evergreens that are scheduled to be removed and yet there seems to
be no conflict with proposed improvements should these trees remain. These
are tree numbers 170 – 180. Every effort should be made to preserve these
trees.
Response: Additional evergreen trees have been provided.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: On the Lighting Plan, there are two fixtures where the Kelvin
temperature is not specified. As per the other fixtures, these should be
specified to be no higher than 3,000 degrees Kelvin.
Response: This has been corrected.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/06/2017
12/06/2017: Enlarged and rendered architectural perspectives for the HQ
building will be needed for the public hearing.
Response: Rendered architectural perspectives have been provided.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/07/2017
12/07/2017: For all buildings to be demolished, a Demolition Permit must be
obtained from the City's Building Inspection Department. Please be aware that
a component of this permit is a permit from the Colorado Department of Public
Health and the Environment - Air Quality Division. This state permit requires the
extent of any possible asbestos to be determined and evaluated for any
mitigation measures necessary for removal.
Response: Noted
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Overall Existing Conditions Plan: The access roadway from
Danfield Court is now owned by PRPA? Is there a utility easement in place for
the offsite private waterline infrastructure? If not, a utility easement will need to
11
be dedicated. In addition, we have the same question about drainage – with
PRPA now owning the access roadway from Danfield Court, there appears to
be roadway stormwater that will now drain onto the offsite property. PRPA will
need to have an easement on that offsite property for drainage conveyance.
Response: Platte River Power Authority does own the drive from Danfield Court. An easement for
access and utilities does exist and has been submitted to the City. A letter of intent has been submitted
with this submittal from the property owner at 3405 South Timberline Road regarding a pending drainage
agreement between the property owner and Platte River Power Authority.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Overall Phasing Plan: Are the phase hatch patterns backwards?
I’m having a hard time following what utility work and grading work is to occur in
each phase. Perhaps as phase 1 demo and installation plan separate from a
phase 2 demo and installation plan would be helpful. We will require more
detailed information on the phasing of the site improvements at final.
Response: The Phasing Plan has been corrected and additional phasing has been shown throughout the
Utility Plan set.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Overall Grading Plan: It appears as though you may be planning to
regrade the access roadway from Danfield Court. You will need to show that you
are not increasing the amount of runoff to the offsite parcel. In addition, if this
area is regraded then it will be required to be treated for water quality; however,
a variance to the criteria may be supported for this location because the
impacts may be minimal or negligible. Let’s discuss.
Response: The roadway is designed to be reconstructed. Calculations have been provided
demonstrating that flow rates are not increase to this basin (Basin OS3). In addition,a variance request
has been submitted with this submittal regarding water quality treatment of this basin.
Topic: Drainage Report
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: LID Section: For this project site, we will accept the wet pond as
an acceptable form of LID. This is a unique situation for this project site
because it appears as though the majority of the area draining to the wet pond
is pervious and a small basin relative to the size of the pond. Please include
some discussion regarding this in the report. Please note that wet ponds are
not always appropriate or allowed to be utilized as an LID treatment method.
Response: The requested language has been added to the report.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Runoff coefficients table: Please utilize the Fort Collins criteria
manual, Table RO-11 for runoff coefficients and Table RO-12 for Cf, frequency
factor requirements.
Response: The table has been corrected.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Time of Concentration table: Please utilize the Fort Collins criteria
12
manual to calculate the time of concentration. The overland flow equation is
redlined into the report. I believe you are using the UD standard.
Response: The table has been corrected.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Water Quality table: I believe that basin OS2 should also be
included in the WQCV calculations. Please update.
Response: The table has been corrected.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Please review the redlined copy of the report for other minor
comments.
Response: The redlines have been addressed.
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/05/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design
Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of
the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The
Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of
FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received
materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet
City Criteria. Please submit an Erosion Control Report as none was included in
the recently received materials and is required to be submitted to meet City
Criteria. Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as
none was included in the recently received materials and is required to be
submitted to meet City Criteria. Based upon the area of disturbance, State
permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should
be pulled before Construction Activities begin. If you need clarification
concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented
above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015
jschlam@fcgov.com
Response: The redlines have been addressed and additional items submitted with this first final
submittal.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Please adjust text size, so that text will fit in symbols. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
13
12/04/2017: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched
areas. See redlines.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Response: Errors have been addressed.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: Please remove the references for the 6' Utility Easements
between Lots 1 & 2, Collindale Industrial Park. These easements were vacated
in 1995.
Response: The sheet index, redlines, and references to the vacated easements have been corrected.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are matchline numbering issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: The railroad name shown is incorrect. It is the Union Pacific
Railroad. See redlines.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Errors have been addressed.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: The railroad name shown is incorrect. It is the Union Pacific
Railroad. See redlines.
Response: Errors have been addressed.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
14
12/05/2017: Traffic Study shows additional 40 employees while PDR response
shows same number of employees and square footage decreases. Please
clarify in an addendum the actual changes to traffic.
Response: Actual changes to traffic have been documented in the addendum.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/05/2017: Plans show removal of 2 access locations which is supported by
the City. The TIS does not discuss how existing trips will be allocated. In the
addendum please clarify weather the conclusions of the study change with the
existing trips redistributed.
Response: This has been addressed in the addendum
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/05/2017
12/05/2017: Please label the bus stop on Horsetooth.
Response: Bus stop has been labeled on the site plan
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/28/2017
11/28/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Response: Irrigation plans will be provided.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/04/2017
12/04/2017: No bicycle parking spaces have been provided for the north area
of the site near the warehouse/shop areas to service the employees working out
of the aforementioned areas.
Response: Bike parking has been added near the warehouse