HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROVINCETOWNE P.U.D., FILING NO. 2, FIRST REPLAT - PDP - 73-82W - DECISION - CORRESPONDENCE-HEARINGSTD
3L ir
Provincetown PUD, Filing No: 2 First Replat
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 24, 2003
Page 4 of 4
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, First Replat, Project Development Plan, is
subject to administrative review and the requirements of the Land Use Code
(LUC).
B. The Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, First Replat, Project Development Plan,
satisfies the development standards of the LMN zoning district.
C. The Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, First Replat, Project Development Plan
complies with all applicable General Development Standards contained in Article
3 of the Land Use Code.
DECISION
The Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, First Replat„ Project Development Plan, Project
Development Plan #73-82W, is hereby approved by the Hearing Officer without
condition.
Dated this 25th day of April 2003, per authority granted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
Cameron GI 'ss
Current Planning Director
Provincetown PUD, Filing Nu. 2 First Replat
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 24, 2003
Page 3 of 4
FACTS AND FINDINGS
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
The zoning and land uses that surround the Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2,
First Replat, are as follows:
N: E — Transfort Facility
S: LMN — Single familiy residential (Provincetown PUD, Filing 2)
W: R2, FA-1 (Larimer County) — Undeveloped
E: LMN — Single familiy residential (Provincetown PUD, Filing 2)
This property was annexed into the City as part of the Halcyon Annexation in
December 1980.
The property was originally subdivided as Condo Blocks 1-3, the multi -family
portion of the Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2 final plan that was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board in January, 2001 for 141 residential dwelling units on
14 acres.
1. Compliance with Article 4 and the LMN Zoning District Standards:
There are no Land Use or Development Standards within the LMN Zoning
District that will be affected by the proposed replat. The Staff Report accurately
summarizes that no specific standards apply and no specific evidence was
presented to contradict the statements and conclusion of the staff report
concerning Article 4 or the LMN District Standards.
2. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards
The Project Development Plan complies with all applicable requirements of
Article 3 particularly the plat standards of Section 3.3.1. Easements dedicated on
the previous subdivision plat governing this property are not adversely affected
by this replat. Those portions of the utility, drainage and access easements
remaining after the vacation process, approved under this application, are
configured in a manner that maintains their respective functions. No evidence
was presented to contradict the statements and conclusion of the staff report
concerning compliance or to other refute the compliance with Article 3.
Provincetown PUD, Filing Nu. 2 First Replat
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
April 24, 2003
Page 2 of 4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published.
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 4:30 p.m. on April 24, 2003 in Conference Rooms C and D at
281 North College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
(3) a sign up sheet of persons attending the hearing; and (4) a tape recording of
testimony provided during the hearing. The LUC, the City's Comprehensive Plan (City
Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City are all considered part of the
evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Steve Olt, City Planner
From the Applicant:
Doug Nicoll, KB Home
From the Public:
None
Written Comments:
None
Comma-aty Planning and Environments. ervices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE: April 24, 2003
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
HEARING OFFICER:
Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, 1st
Replat, Project Development Plan
#73-83W
KB Home Colorado Inc.
8401 East Belleview, Suite 200
Denver, Colorado 80237
Manhard Consulting, LTD
c/o Karl Chesley, P.L.S.
Littleton, CO 80124
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to replat Condo Blocks 1-3, the multi -family
portion of the Provincetown PUD, Filing No. 2, for the primary purpose of vacating utility,
drainage and access easements, as necessary, to accommodate porch stoops and
building overhangs in numerous locations. The property is at the southwest corner of
Trilby Road and Autumn Ridge Drive.
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Approval
ZONING DISTRICT: LMN — Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020