Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPOUDRE VALLEY PLAZA P.U.D. - FINAL - 30-95B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATION (24)I CAS PER SPEC) IM 6C E _ -" ent O r• C NOTE: PLANT ALL SHRUBS 50 THAT THEIR CENTERS ARE A MNRN9 A' PROM EDGE5 OF PAVEMENT. SPACE SHRUBS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS MULCH AB F'ER SPEC. FORM SAUCER WIT7- 4' CONTINJOUS RIM s " SCORE ROOT 5ALL OF CONTAIN" r �') RANTS VERTICALLY WTH KNIFE. ^^y CUT ANY SPIRALING ROOTS WHERE Y EMERGE FROM SOIL BALL. SPECIFIED PLANTING t' •� I I I I- MIX. WATER TO SETTLE, DO NOT TAMP 1 SHRUB PLANTING NOTES: PRUNE DEAD OR DAMAGED WOOD AT TIME OF PLANTING. REGULARLY SCHEDULED PRNING 5Y CERTIFIED AR50RIST TO 5EG11 THE FOLLOWPKa SEASON BEFORE END OF WARRANT'rATIANTENANCE PERIOD. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, AND/OR RU55ER FROM AROUND TOP OF 5ALL. FEEL BACK BURLAP, AND REMOVE AT LEAST TOP 2/3 OF WIRE 54SKE7 FROM AROUND ROOT BALL. PLANT 50 THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS 2' A.50VE FIN15�4 GRADE. • 2 STRAND TWISTED GAL. (GJT WIRE WITH GRO!"METED STRAPS G .,�. • 6' STEEL. 0 2 STAKES PER TREE x DRIVEN CMIN. IB•) FIRMLY INTO S B3R ADE PRIOR TO 5ACKFILLNG '•: THREE WRAP, FROM BOTTOM To TS• MN. .TOP OF FIRST BRANCH. SECLRE W/ ELECTRICAL TAPE, NO STAPLES. EARLY &-Rfw,A`L, REMOVE SPECIFIED PLAA'T'h!' MIX U WATER TO BET-,--, DO NOT TAMP a "Y DECIDUOUS TREES W{ICµ'ARE WEAK RNI5W GRADE *CALF,, NOT TO aCALE CAS PER SPEC.) - -_._—. t .n_,—_ _ .-_ -_ _. }i•, nR• •'1Q _ LOIJANT I Y o c_:. p Iri_M"r ECIDIOUS TREES 5 Cak_9ur_--' - cw macocar ave- VER-_-GR N REr T LA -EVERGR N NR �_+✓SX%3!.-m$i�._ � r' i u r'�a I, :'aF'�a ` I ' ' cc n tl In �• I sr r• r^ CG IJJnIt•>e- OIo Ge.d ✓I::_ Jtuh'cer WI'ton Ca @t I o Jm' erce Gnlrera is 'O�d Gla ( erw ror;-0atails lotanrt 5 6 'a• r A'-ao•ead _ s eaa T. cunt. . Gort. t I t etabllsned rr C L. estd IIe Gont: QECIQIOUS _'^K--1='ae ""t►t Kh- _.5w,41cla SF ',I_ea Fceoe! _. atuls "Iles Klm' 3e:rem to onica T'rcebe'' IS' ht. eorrt. '5 cent tabl!eY+ed c In Gr.. tabllshsd In ccnt. P Rg :3'aee =e '3ags R..astar-�,Pe-ovleicta M16canthA sln !e Ceor'rua - atrlei'ufolta f» -- ------i-- --- DO NOT FORM SAUCER IN IRRIGATED AREAS ffm)wn�'Ilm LOOSE ROOT B.4L%. OR ARE BEING 11_'_r_ _ R1 ,,, R_YwINDY SITES 3 X BALL DIA _-FOkj_YR ONLY. Ini'lint IQ TDCC' PANT LIST - _ � ___ C.�Nf� I ;yFda. _ _ 1. ANe•- '•tPM_ _ - � 'IUAi�. ' � _c- NU . M.; I r•h. .. kECIRIOUS TREES ��'aWJrom '-'C :rorrlesaGecksc;r Gataeo.:e crux -gall: Inee-rs ;I Im4e --- _COmmtit8t8 11 Imo' Cdl. 13'15 - - _. I SC5 l.Ge ..oloradc - - Ice* un e �6. M'—+=-e - EVERGR N SHRUBS ✓,vsa• =.uoroe :2%na C-1crulle ''W:o�'ee+'� B -� 'i_sr•�ad Ss I r•- t c!'eMd cci �ti=_�4n�ep�Qary Carnet - J w aablr'.a •.^_.a:'ae�__�_•� C�rcet � t o!I ;r OG 'ne• Cd Gca - Ar�eerw arrerele 'Old Gad '3 . •!r-'P-$.-i-� - spread-� wort Isatab:Isred In eer:• "—'GOrd'ber'LL Cr• �lanco� CC. _ anber c •n`J-+c.cen _G+npa: c7carp:.e Gera !• 'Hdn..ccc icwivwrvm trcur, --�?a :6 M115 cen. t9' rr•. 'S �eataOl'sroO :• ccr�;. —eetacl-* :n ccrt - ab cc+r. iTe.oe`� `AE' G _ Graae 5R �dOe R:ee'ar ^-- 7 iecarha slneneraV— ;15 9 r.t---Tn_ --- Co t. c_. ...er0 ✓Takla atri OIICITO:b r�Lr'GhOr, B� �CuGse. 8-_ue AVTa 6�-- ( ^t �GCAk. eatAOliarNd Ip Gent. —1_— HIiFC ed'� e;•i'reny � . �_t--- '1 COrt. setabllerad t'n Cont. � No Text HORSETOOTH ROAD tOLA -ROJECT I TWEET I i I T � I C- . RELOCATED BTREET ... .. P1!%IECT � BICJI I —1 I I I. I � �I I I r m I I I I I I R I 39 4 ' �- ENVEWA LOPE I �q�+ ZSI PAD V I �bmmm SF. I IF I I I { aP L O .r 0 lap O IR O R bP 9P 74 O 1 r W RESIDENTIAL 6T STREET LKaHT gP SP R R 4-320' 6MCE — —�— -- — — —, RACK I I T-24 I ,,, � BUILDING .o� ENVELOPE r PAD 'D'j =bmmm 9F. I I s C.J OL -- — — —J O R a t ^ LIC7NT (TYP.) le: ` , ` (I4'-14' HIGH POLE) v J T� 22P j b O R. JT a 22P O O T� lip r I O PEDESTRIAN LrPTW3 (Im' HIGH POLE) R" LT R h❑ c o u- r� o a o a RACK BUILSN FACE rs �p t° gI�ILDING ENVELOPE PAD V R l- GARAGE WITS — R IV, trrLLy Mem. CT BIWV //N�o��aF�cMto 2 a'f M ALuv � •T/i+�rc/�ce.�.E c �i►i/_ ef�! � r��N �« � �V ���. C/1110 CC ACMI6 �� • ^—'� _ NOTE: PLANT ALL SHRJ65 50 THAT THEIR CENTERS ARE A MNIMUM 4' FROM EDGES OF: PAVEMENT. SPACE SHIdtBS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS Cr. MJLCH AS PER SPEC. � 5 Al FORM SAUCER WITH 4' CONTINUOUS RIM '. (AS PER SPEC) a u SCORE ROOT GALL OF CONTAINE PLANTS VERTICALLY WIT" KNIFE, CUT ANY SPIRALING ROOTS WHER J, ,,, �Dti •� EME%aE FROM SOIL BALL N w SPECIFIED PLANTING J ICI I1=1I1=1 MIX. WATER TO SETTLE. DO NOT TAMP gAU 170 FORM P-3 SHRUB PLANTING NOTES: PRIAE DEAD OR DAMAGED WOOD AT TIME CF PLANTING. REGULARLY SCHEDULED PANNG BY CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO BEGIN THE FOLLOWW. SEASON BEFORE END OF WdRRANTYRUINTENMKE PERIOD. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, AND/OR 1015MR FROM ARGIND TOP OF BALL, PEEL BACK BURLAP, AND REMOVE AT LEAST TOP 2/3 OF WIRE BASKET BRAN d ROOT BALL.. _==� > acxE PLANT 90 TWA T"AT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS 2ABOVE FN ISH GRADE. e 2 STRAND TWISTED GA!- C1)Y WIRE WITH _ C-ROMMTED STRAPS 31 MIN- s &' STEEL T-POET 2 STAKES PER TREE DRIVEN (MIN- IB') FIRMLY INTO SUBGRADE PRIOR To MACKFILLNG TREE LLR.AP, FRCM BOTTOM TO i2' MIN. TOP OR. FIRST BRANCH. SECLIIM W) - ELECTRICAL TAPE No STAPLES, 1 APPLY LATE .NFALL,•,p�ryOVE - _ EARLY SPRG Cp".... (— SPECIFIED PLANTING r WATER TO SETTLE, DO NOT TAMP FINISH GRADE OC E. NOT to eCALE D IDIDU TREES .. _ _B ICak Sur cw macroodrve • cal. VERGRE N TREKS - .. ricra .. Ab. Ill , etm. - - _V.ERGREEN SHRUBS- .>rC^Ea IJLs�n'Y1olsr• GeSoio !a;�- r o.d �L'�J,.Mioelr iJil:On Cer ¢t - hr'- Fl'4ih- I ur11p ! rn dQ Old' unl ¢r,q P1pr;;Antalla tOrll' 6r 4'r :4'-eorxdd : eprsad CGM.. ¢Ort. t bllehsd .r corn . —A tls d coot' OECIDICIUS SHRUBS - - - I — EF .z+'_ea_FlceGa= a etule "lies Kim' 5 trees Ie on:Cd 'Frcebe' 1' 13 is' nt. +5' I'•r.. _ coot. '5 cG�C tebn: l!shed In co. tabll&had I'l ccr_ PER3EK — �:a ��sr_e Ya» ,__ -Q_1. ���e Seale!• - MI1Gam_hue alryne':=¢cr!r�a • i'rI. ovlak:.4 a:r+ PClfolle _ 1j• ht. �.0 ^n:, "I cua. 4$' .0 - tacit hed in con +8—'. 1 -MILLI; CAB PER SPEC.) DO NOT FORM SAUCER IN IRRIGATED AREAS III II �I II_ • I-�i�j-—IIy-II ONLY DECIDUOUS TREES WH';CH AREIIaEyyK j I I -I III I�I�rT -AN LOOSE ROOT BALLS. OR ARE BEING ^ P_M?£J M PA(LTICULAR'.Y WIND" Si'E8 r�EQ-ItRE STAKNG..,9TAKE FOR 1 YR ONLY. 3 K BALL DIA f)FC:11)I Ins to To�� _+._._. '-.�MN,' 1.l hlkl•+. c IAN i'_ NAM r . I ��. __�M _J^orn :nprrlsea'COekscw trataeO::s Cr_,a-eLe II' In�•q'6--T�---Y;S• �I,� I',.'.lB �J —__—�.dyfddy !3� ru d COmrt:�ta:d I ndal MABr- V£RCzRE€ T- r -'Sc•LGe T-- 'C5^o.oredc �lOea EVERGREEN SHRUBS p„ngms - 6 h,, - As '+-•-� Il '4•^ s B :4' sc•ead S h t Car _ ' - Jwtberw seb:ra 'Garda-� r.• .. i•1• - . ¢et o:lsiteInc : � Jta"; erw cTlrer�Ie Old _.. d' 3 s 'saaa_Qrl�•Gdr; d-1 reatebllav+ed Ir1 eGr Cam.-�alte'r•u Hancode - mnrlOriearo�e r Crera:.:c :�ar•Geca �8 — l c• M. ICVlburrum trIGc✓n 'Cc^rce GLUR +y {15- mt.. �05 cent. �5 GCot.. Iee:eollsMed In .eorr.. >LOc"e�GG In con: I =•�-P_— llnber!' C:.el� .1ne!IGdn CC�Icd Gt - —L d :sraee MlacartNA 6~111Ia - ��•5' M. M =,tl Z' oz. — 5R Leo¢.¢r0.•:akli a.r,n I:c:fo!Is BJ %^aaea_9:r.s Ayme —_ %—%+t—_—_r�I Gcnt. �etaC i~ In a _ My;FCI^y+char f0'+d¢rv+rsre i' nt. '1 cart_ au:ebllN+¢d In GPM, Per Tree Type the Plan has been modified as follows": A. Evergreen Trees have been reduced from 17 to 13 B. Large Deciduous Trees have increased from 88 to 95 C. Small Ornamental "frees have increased from 29 to 38 • Tree counts are exclusive of plantings done by the City of Fort Collins Forestry Department in parkways on Shields and llorsetooth. Sincerely, 1IM SELL DESIGN Inc. T4d --t// Fred Haberecht 2. Pad 'B' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts (1) Austrian Pine were: (1)Bur Oak • (1) Austrian Pimm 3. Pad'C' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts • (1) Mayday Tree were: • (1) Colorado Spruce No Trees • (4) Cockspur Hawthorn 4. The intersection of Horsetooth b) Revised Final Landscape and Century Plan tree counts were: a) As shown on the Final • (4) Colorado Spruce Landscape Plan tree counts • (3) Hackberry were: (1) Austrian Pine • (I) Colorado Spruce • (2) Mayday Tree • (1) Cockspur Hawthorn (2) Honeylocust 5. Pad'E' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts • (4) Crabapple were: (1)Bur Oak • (2) Bur Oak • (7) Columnar English Oak • (3) Cockspur Hawthorn • (1) Honeylocust (8) Serviceberry • (2) Hackbeny • (4) Serviceberry 6. Pad`F' b) Revised Final Landscape a) Revised Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: Plan tree counts were: 9(2) Crabapple • (3) Cockspur Hawthorn • (3) Austrian Pine • (3) Bur Oak • (1) Bur Oak • (4) Serviceberry • (6) Columnar English Oak (1) Colorado Spruce • (1) Honeylocust (2) N iobe Weeping • (2)Hackberry Willow • (3) Serviceberry • (2) Narrowleaf Cottonwood December 30 , 1998 RE: Poudre Valley Plaza. Revisions to the Final Landscape Plan as they relate to the requested Administrative Change. Revisions to the Final landscape Plan have been made in the field. Changes relate to • Shrub Planting • Tree Planting • Irrigation • Parking • Project Signs Revisions were necessary because of the following factors: • Building configurations on Pads `A', `B', `C','E'&'F' were modified from the plan originally submitted. • Utility conflicts • Program modifications In detail the modifications are shown on the attached plans, and resulted in the following changes: A. Planting in the parking lots remains unchanged, $r-,i*1rking spacesrewminn unchanged, but tile%/configuration has changed slightly in front &WIwag 1k.$ C. A small Sculpture plaza has been proposed for the intersection of Shields and Horsetooth, and the sign and planting in this area have been moved to the south, D. The total number of project signs remains unchanged, and one location has been substantially changed. See plan as it refers to the "Sculpture Plaza". E. Quantities of shrubs have increased in number for Pads `A', `B', `C', `E'&'F'. F. Trees have been planted in the parkway areas of Shields and Horsetooth - These trees have been planted by the City Forestry Department. Trees Per Pad Area have Changed as follows: Pad `A' a) As shown on the Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: • (3) Austrian Pine • (3) Colorado Spruce • (1)BurOak • (3) Cockspur I lawthorn b) Revised Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: • (2) Austrian Pine • (1)Bur Oak • (3) Cockspur Hawthorn • (3) Native River Birch • (9) Gambel Oak - N5 Per Tree Type the Plan has been modified as follows*: A. Evergreen Trees have been reduced from 17 to 13 B. Large Deciduous Trees have increased from 88 to 95 C. Small Ornamental Trees have increased from 29 to 38 • "free counts are exclusive of plantings done by the City of Fort Collins Forestry Department in parkways on Shields and Horsetooth. Sincerely, JIM SELL DESIGN Inc. c Fred Haberecht — 2. Pad `B' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts • (1) Austrian Pine were: • (1)Bur Oak • (1) Austrian Pine 3. Pad `C' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts (1) Mayday Tree • (1) Colorado Spruce were: No Trees • (4) Cockspur Hawthorn 4. The intersection ofllorsetooth b) Revised Final Landscape and Century Plan tree counts were: a) As shown on the Final • (4) Colorado Spruce Landscape Plan tree counts • (3) Hackberry were: . (1) Austrian Pine • (I) Colorado Spruce • (2) Mayday Tree • (1) Cockspur Hawthorn • (2) Honeylocust 5. Pad 'E' b) Revised Final Landscape a) As shown on the Final Plan tree counts were: Landscape Plan tree counts • (4) Crabapple were: (1) Bur Oak • (2) Bur Oak • (7) Columnar English Oak • (3) Cockspur Hawthorn 0(1) Honeylocust • (8) Serviceberry (2) Hackberry. (4) Serviceberry 6. Pad `F' b) Revised Final Landscape a) Revised Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: Plan tree counts were: • (2) Crabapple . (3) Cockspur I-tawthom • (3) Austrian Pine • (3) Bur Oak • (1) Bur Oak • (4) Serviceberry • (6) Columnar English Oak • (1) Colorado Spruce • (1) Honeylocust • (2) Niobe Weeping • (2)Hackberry Willow • (3)Serviceberry • (2) Narrowleaf Cottonwood December 30 , 1998 RE: Poudre Valley Plaza. Revisions to the Final Landscape Plan as they relate to the requested Administrative Change. Revisions to the Final Landscape Plan have been made in the field. Changes relate to: • Shrub Planting • Tree Planting • Irrigation Parking • Project Signs Revisions were necessary because of the following factors: • Building configurations on Pads `A', `B','C','E'&'F' were modified from the plan originally submitted. • Utility conflicts • Program modifications In detail the modifications are shown on the attached plans, and resulted in the following changes: A. Planting in the parking lots remains unchanged. 13. Parking spaces remain unchanged, but there configuration has changed slightly in front building fd''15. C. A small Sculpture plaza has been proposed for the intersection of Shields and Horsetooth, and the sign and planting in this area have been moved to the south, D. The total number of project signs remains unchanged, and one location has been substantially changed. See plan as it refers to the "Sculpture Plaza". E. Quantities of shrubs have increased in number for Pads' A','B','C','E'&'F'. F. Trees have been planted in the parkway areas of Shields and forsetooth - These trees have been planted by the City Forestry Department. Trees Per Pad Area have Chaneed as follows: Pad `A' a) As shown on the Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: • (3) Austrian Pine • (3) Colorado Spruce • (1)Bur Oak 0 (3) Cockspur I lawthorn b) Revised Final Landscape Plan tree counts were: • (2) Austrian Pine (1) Bur Oak • (3) Cockspur Hawthorn • (3) Native River Birch • (9) Gambel Oak - 45 community image." Your proposed change detracts from the quality of the community image established in the approved configuration. • Section 4.19 Neighborhood Commercial District subsection (E)(1)(a) of the LUC states that the development plan shall contribute to "a cohesive, continuous, visually related and functionally linked pattern within existing or approved development plans within the contiguous Neighborhood Commercial District area in terms of street and sidewalk layout, building siting and character and site design." Your proposed change is less compliant to this standard than the approved design. • Figure 1 in Section 3.2.1(E)(5) of the LUC shows a diagram with shaded areas that specify the landscaped areas that an applicant must include to "meet the interior landscaping requirements." This diagram clearly identifies a landscaped peninsula terminating the view of a major drive spine. 2) Your minor amendment application proposes an entryway to be placed outside the building envelope of pad "B." The location of this entryway seems to be the reason for the change in configuration of the parking lot peninsula. Staff will not grant you permission to build outside of the building envelope if by doing so, it creates non-compliance with standards in other review criteria. Staff will however grant you permission to build this entryway outside the building envelope if it does not create non- compliance in other standards (including but not limited to compromising the integrity or configuration - of the peninsula). Perhaps this can be done by moving this entryway to the north-east corner of the pad "B° building. 3) The only problem with the landscaping changes that are proposed is that the Water/Wastewater department has specified a condition to their approval of the minor amendment that you show water and sewer services & fire line on landscape plan and adjust landscaping to provide normal separation distances. An administrative hold has been put on pad B. In order for you to pull a building permit for pad B one of two things must happen. You must either propose to build it according to the approved plan, or get approval of a minor amendment, at which time the hold on your project will be cleared. You do not need to reapply for a minor amendment, but in order to continue with this application, you do need to submit a plan that satisfies the concerns expressed in this letter. If you disagree with this decision, you have the right to appeal and such request should be in writing and submitted to the Current Planning Department within fourteen (14) days of the date of mailing. Please contact me at 970.221.6206 if you should have any questions or concerns related to this decision. Sincer y, Troy J ne VV City P anner cc: Zoning Department Engineering Department Planning File #30-95B Poudre Valley Plaza B 2 r. A. Community Planning and Environmental Services Current Planning City of Fort Collins May 5, 1999 Ken Snee Wheeler Construction Services 1027 W. Horsetooth Rd., Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80526 SUBJECT: Minor Amendment — Poudre Valley Plaza Building "B" Dear Mr. Snee: This letter is in response to your Minor Amendment application dated April 19, 1999. In that application, you requested that the City approve changes to an approved site development plan for: 1) change in parking lot layout to accommodate building design/function, 2) provide landscape design for building particularly on the west side. The Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) Section 2.2.10 allows an applicant/developer to make minor amends of an approved site specific development plan as long as the development application, as so amended, continues to comply with LUC standards, at least to the extent of its original compliance. Staff reviewed your application for compliance with the original LGDS standards and the LUC standards and for possible adverse effects your proposal may have on the overall Poudre Valley Plaza PUD development. Upon review of your application, your application is hereby denied based on the following: 1) You are proposing to put two parking spaces at the end of a major access view corridor where the original approved plans called for a landscaped peninsula. Your proposed change is at the western end of the major tree lined east -west access drive that comes off of Century Drive. The original configuration of the peninsula at this visual terminus satisfies both LDGS and LUC standards, however the new configuration satisfies neither. The standards are not satisfied as follows: • LDGS Section A-2.2 Building Placement and Orientation states in the FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS subcategory that building configurations must be designed "with an understanding of their implications for shaping outdoor space." Your proposed change clearly does not take the shaping of outdoor space into account as well as the approved configuration does. • LDGS Section A-2.13 Landscape states in the PURPOSE subcategory, "The effectiveness of the landscape plan will be evaluated considering the interrelationships between landscape elements like plant material and grading; and hardscape elements such as paving, walls, fences and other site amenities. All of these components should work together to create a landscape plan that enhances both the project and the neighborhood." Your original approved configuration provided an aesthetic interrelationship between hardscape elements and landscape elements. Your proposed configuration has addressed this issue inadequately. • LDGS Section A-2.13 Landscape states in the ENHANCEMENT subcategory, "Landscaping should contribute to visual continuity in a neighborhood and help to create a positive 281 worth College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 Community Planning and Environmental Services Current Planning City of Fort Collins May 21, 1999 Ken Snee Wheeler Construction Services 1027 W. Horsetooth Rd., Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80526 SUBJECT: Minor Amendment — Poudre Valley Plaza Building "B" Dear Mr. Snee: This letter is in response to your Minor Amendment application dated April 19, 1999. In that application, you requested that the City approve changes to an approved site development plan for: 1) change in parking lot layout to accommodate building design/function, 2) provide landscape design for building particularly on the west side. The Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) Section 2.2.10 allows an applicant/developer to make minor amends of an approved site specific development plan as long as the development application, as so amended, continues to comply with LUC standards, at least to the extent of its original compliance. Staff reviewed your application for compliance with the original LGDS standards and the LUC standards and for possible adverse effects your proposal may have on the overall Poudre Valley Plaza PUD development. Upon review of your application, your application is hereby approved. Anyone wishing to appeal this decision has the right to do so. Such request should be in writing and submitted to the Current Planning Department within fourteen (14) days of the date of approval. You have the right to proceed with the project during the appeal period at your own risk. Please contact me at 970.221.6206 if you should have any questions or concerns related to this decision. fincerely VV T y Jo es C y P nner cc: Zoning Department Engineering Department Planning File #30-95B Poudre Valley Plaza B 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 Minor Amendment f,x.F�1�1�10� /N lliKKlNcv ✓,nyw Description of the change and reason(s) for the ret�ttest o Y/ ` D C Des Ir-IV To �d,✓1 7i e5lro 7E)AI T/o�c/ �� 'r�r,r, v e_v, J A-7 LJESr fit'')1)cs-r�-i Approvals Planning Date:_✓ -_ I Building Inspections Action: Q n P n n � 199 �( Date: Action: Date: Other (if applicable) BY: .'..11CM.� / CERTIFICATION 1 certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in (ding this apphcatian I am al_ncting with the knowledan ge, consent, andYt'� �� ttt` real authority of the owners of le real the ed to property y (including all dtthe property whi Ihaving I S ISal subi ct of interest saPpl'ca[ion) witl without who oproperty, as f tconsent aned in nd autholled n rity the request, eq es ed action cion 1-2 of the city Code; and tould not I,i , , 1-2 of common areas legally connect , lawfully be accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, I hcreby permit City officials to enter upon the property (o[ the purpose of inspection and, if necessary, for posting a public notice on the proper . Name (PRINT):, eG -- - -"I... Late Project Name:-6r JaDiH& " Project Location (Street Address): Project Description: General Information: List all owners having a legal/equitable interest in the property. (Attach separate sheets if necessary) Owner's Name(s): Street Address: /0- City/State///Zip:T0Te7- C.D/hm of 80546 Telephonek9?0) a21' S- 9�n� Pa>(ir�toc Rued S/u/4� Current planning 1 rt -� Application Former_:+ ootl � z ------------ 19Zr4 Land Use Information: N Gross Acreage/Square rootage: * `f,COO SF Existing Zoning. Proposed Use: -02!Eic6" Total Number of Dwelling Units: Vll9 Total Commercial Floor Area: _ 8. 58y Applicant's/Consultant's Name: i Name of firm: )l/t m- &-lL (,©XSTQuGT/oAi �G�Y/CES Who is to be the lead contact? E x/EG� 60 Street Adtlress: Ae) 7 CZ O256-7�b 77Y Sly City/State/Zip: ')': 601)1IA6 CO Be S"� 3q Tclephone�`T��io7o75 - q� Fax�`i10 o�i� J%p� Please indicate Type of Request the type of application submitted by checking the box Preceding Annexation Petition with initial Zoning submittal requirements for cacti approprlate request(s). Additional handouts ate available explaining of the following review Processes. REQUESTED ZONE: FEE: $I,O40.00 ] � Preliminary Subdivision Plat RezoningPetition RE i4 QUESTED ZONE: FEE: 11,312.00 FEE: $856.00 t EJ Final Subdivision Plat Overall Development Plan (ODP) FEE: $2,176.00 FEE: $1,400.00 + $.50 for each Al'O label Minor Ammndment Project Development Plan (PDP)vvitbmu Subdivision Plat FEE: FEE: 8168.00 $1,472.00 + $.50 for each APO label Major Amendment Project Development Plan (PDP)wilb Subdivision Plat 8.00 Non- FEE: $2,128.00 + $.5o for each APO label Non$2,8-Conforming f-1 Non -Conforming Use Review LJ Final Plan without Subdivision Plat FEE: $1,216.00 FEE: $2,808.00 Vacation of ROW or Ea Final Plan with Subdivision Plat FEE: $3,896.00 EJ Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) FEE: $1,472.00 + 1/2 of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat fee and .50 for each APO label Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) FEE: $2,808.00 +1/2 of the Final Subdivision Plat fee NOTE: PDP's and Final (Preliminary and Final PUD's) may be submitted as a combined application subject to the Final Plan fee. scment Certification on reverse si(le must be signed.