The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIDGEWOOD HILLS FIFTH FILING - FDP200024 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN1 a I I II ' II I 0 / �'� �xxxxx �y III oI M$ v' I x X , \ }IF SEESHEET 401_ jp(SEESHEET401 - SEESHEET402 ,I a \ \ I II SEE. SHEET40F2 l \ I SEE SHEET 403 SEE SHEET 464 v I II ' L M I� S 5 1 \ 1 I � / I o `� IF F. I I / / I o \r�l I l 1 v II I I > I I I I I I I ULF I I I I �w I I J I I I i IM I J V., _y, _ _ .. o �y _ SEE SHEET 404 - -�-� SEE SHEET 405 I �_- III I I I I I I I I I I I I III III hI I I I I IIII I II I i I L------------------� 0 60' 120' 240' NORTH TREE PROTECTION NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND WITHIN ANY NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED UNLESS NOTED ON THESE PLANS FOR REMOVAL. 2. WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED EXISTING TREE, THERE SHALL BE NO CUT OR FILL OVER A FOUR -INCH DEPTH UNLESS A QUALIFIED ARBORIST OR FORESTER HAS EVALUATED AND APPROVED THE DISTURBANCE. 3 ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PRUNED TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS FORESTRY STANDARDS TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A BUSINESS THAT HOLDS A CURRENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS ARBORIST LICENSE WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE 4 PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION, BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES WITH SUCH BARRIERS TO BE OF ORANGE FENCING A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT SECURED WITH METAL T POSTS NO CLOSER THAN SIX 6 FEET FROM THE TRUNK OR ONE-HALF % OF THE DRIP LINE WHICHEVER IS GREATER THERE SHALL BE NO STORAGE OR MOVEMENT OF EQUIPMENT MATERIAL DEBRIS OR FILL WITHIN THE FENCED TREE PROTECTION ZONE 5. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANT SHALL PREVENT THE CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL OR THE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL SUCH AS PAINTS, OILS, SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MOTOR OIL OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL HARMFUL TO THE LIFE OF A TREE WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. 6. NO DAMAGING ATTACHMENT WIRES SIGNS OR PERMITS MAY BE FASTENED TO ANY PROTECTED TREE. 7. LARGE PROPERTY AREAS CONTAINING PROTECTED TREES AND SEPARATED FROM CONSTRUCTION OR LAND CLEARING AREAS ROAD RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE OFF," RATHER THAN ERECTING PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND EACH TREE AS REQUIRED IN SUBSECTION G 3 ABOVE. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PLACING METAL T-POST STAKES A MAXIMUM OF FIFTY 50 FEET APART AND TYING RIBBON OR ROPE FROM STAKE -TO -STAKE ALONG THE OUTSIDE PERIMETERS OF SUCH (u) ( ) AREAS BEING CLEARED. 8. THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES, IRRIGATION LINES OR ANY UNDERGROUND FIXTURE REQUIRING EXCAVATION DEEPER THAN SIX (6) INCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY BORING UNDER THE ROOT SYSTEM OF PROTECTED EXISTING TREES AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES. THE AUGER DISTANCE IS ESTABLISHED FROM THE FACE OF THE TREE (OUTER BARK) AND IS SCALED FROM TREE DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT AS DESCRIBED IN THE CHART BELOW: TREE DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (INCHES) AUGER DISTANCE FROM FACE OF TREE (FEET) 0-2 1 3-4 2 5-9 5 10-,4 10 15-19 12 Over 19 15 9. ALL TREE REMOVAL SHOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED OUTSIDE OF THE SONGBIRD NESTING SEASON (FEB 1 - JULY 31) OR CONDUCT SURVEY OF TREES ENSURING NO ACTIVE NESTS IN THE AREA. 10. ALL OFFSITE TREES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. It i { ) PROTECT EXISTING TREE XREMOVE EXISTING TREE Tree Inventory and Mitigation Information: College and Triangle Drive Species Stems Trees OBN Condition Forestry Mitigation Enviornmental MOigaton Action Notes RusAA,a IXIH 1• FAR o.0 6--hubs ow MulR RUSLAx WVF FUR OO 6 NulF 5 3-3• Mlw,s rubs move IAN R a ..RF 6nrt,.amrvb,,lrenenweee R.me. Russ ou. rs• FAR oo xm 11-nxna l - 1. FAR IF nxl.mrvb, III- COr30Nw000 3 a FUR oo tCoxonweed Remove xabexmeigxiontnrs..Ilh,nwpllxw Eor sio. PIPnP, aq us lAy A... < alive nru s .move trtmitlptien:tMaiswitnin-AW zer Wzaprimkrwrtlxxl to .1. s a... FLM VI' F a 0.0 Pill- 1a 1.tgaton:Inr-thn-12 or apr oxrywmla» to kmpM pixe, CRArRwxlpw r.xg• PppR 33 P,mxt earloxw000 3 .• woo o.0 1 en.�weed Rxnow 1x t 111, wmmwen,nd lawx, aIAIPF-1-to INAPM puce cormrMwo 6• AN.- l.o Rxnow RE IFar P. bsep 1. Pkea SIERPIN HIM 6s 1331' Rlwxul-PPI 13.0 6nrtlwwrube I I.1 nweed Protxt 6CRACRw ILOw. xabnxmnlgrtlen:txs sunsn nwrt Mdierwlap,er tywrt angle Mep-n plxe. 13 g-la• FAR , li CW3ONW000 11 147 FAR z.5 Pa,_ C- FAIR 14 corroxwooR 1s• FAR Plus z.0 PI -I 6rs,3 COROMW00D 3 6d3• 0g10 DA 11 Prota<a 0L0PSRUCF 1. 10 PPIW N.- i FAIR PR 000 \mullMamnRMw vu«a '• F .R� proemoxvet 21 .R.Puir Plus PI-1 eorloxwow s :+• FAR o0 6nx,r<. Nonwem�nxwl Rxno. skM nwrtlMdlo.wlapxoritrwxlantl,oEeepinplxe. -WILLOAfi• FAR N. 10 Remove ._.M 1 N. FA a_o lsnxwe ouenwoaF em nm..x F.... n„ w,lnwxixtl 3o,w3anel-Iwrx..... ii-nrxr,d-l. tlx. 35 6ro.ell .... FAR NuIs 35 3o,w3 and lb.I,egxmn III- ng.11duk<ornex. rwe lx AN M1 11F. usA oo m.I nxR nine L<Onon R,mow I. wlm-1-3wwl.ndtnelmr- dN<nNE ,<,.,nea,wuellk<ornao<. u6AAIFIXWF 15• AR I- 37 RPA HIM 3' 0.0 6nxnes ryes ow F. 39 mo 40 RLRE-ovir s e ww o0 1pononwootl snrt1-ti xmNxTrn,4145 Rxnoe R1RNN1 «IVEF. FAIR PLUS 5mn.sbry 1 ow a3 RUSSWI ou. AI• FARPLus 0.0 SNEreNrvbs Remo. IF R0551N1 «1NF dl• FAREN. 0,0 S Remew 49 RussuviIX s » L• FAR Plus Is P.- so u ANAameolF 1• ocn o.a xoNeon r,e<I,on,ke DEAD 00 NPrmtxt iroelsofl0ta 12 i,rARANMAPLE 3- F.P.- 0.0 13 6an13 wNOIWOm 1L x-zg fA0190w s.0 ,xe Remva oamA RFM0vAl0F lxglg'sron/mEPsmkav�apsu mwxla„dlor w3a�»�n+gxbn dt<liN_gxw el k<amder iRn sa0r erilvRrt-trt rein t. WA n0xe. CO3IONW000 III FAIRMNuS 40 Prvsxs Cl1mIMWOw K• P00%XAIMO 00 oFouonwaotls Remove ,oI-I.Ta Fbi, a etmrsIn 1--r-1c PPF, npotllu b.s-n1-Rilo dd„IvproptMtrunY Trae,o betabm tlown'm r tantlnm pones nun ederlYto 56 RIRANI«NE 9• FAR Plus oo Remm. w11WWOw 13a F FAR- 10,11 waod,sornamemaum. 3l -is, IxsaR alxgl e•siFIMREEs. s<or var eusurpx ,lib, n<e porrt nmana ElOn ntl n'g �nb^„�smli e. eeurM,adamo�be Na,urs enelNFmie;idR nussux IXrvF z FAR 0.0 Protxt 15 W 63 Plus 11-1 xmi,irxien-loin-,,s� hwmwnitepinwa.5RxkVM nlNn,uni 1. H0N 4- R.NNA FAIR IRIppR me. lu-LNur-r l 36 I3.rvb xdmMnxem.mee,b36 Tree Inventory and Mid,,Wn Information (south site of Triangk starting hom east Triangle west to Avondale) seml<s tem Trees I DEI C-l.1-metal Mtigrtlan xsnxn WA WA 31 WA11 .may ..NNry WA WA s Ni11 1 WA ,man swxnpwnitewb WA WA I kir l WA reran am w tew WA WA I WA ,ern bwwt WA WA 6 kb,lw I WAsl man bu.oak WA WA I I,'I.s I WA rman $6 bweM WA WA 7 tWTinw I WA Rgnmw Nxmxn WA N/A 1 .1, Fill WAs. , an .Nu1 r WA WA s EN, 3slo N/A rean xxl0arry 10, WA bir Is WA rxxn -TREE WImiN LIRRIS xrroruwngAltw 1.o NIA Forestry Mklgatbn Enviornmental M0lgatlon TtGA MITIGATION 31 130 shrubs, 20 mukFstemtttrees, and 25 coonwoods rusryse�lls FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. oo/JB Checked By- PM/CR Sheet Name OVERALL TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet TR1 00 c1n ' - 401 403 402 YI 404 III � I �657405 II _I L I,I i SEE SHEET401 SEE SHEET402 E'I� TREE MITIGATION LEGEND: PROTECT EXISTING TREE XREMOVE EXISTING TREE Q S W 11' � �� G7 REMOVE DEAD � I �I TREE GROVE, TYP. PROTECT EX. TREES, TYP. 14 II 13 12 i 11 TREES, TYP. F REMOVE 7 STEMSITREES ---- - [ I WITHIN GROVE 10 0000 REMOVE TREES WITHIN GROVE PARKS ACCESS EASEMENT TO I BE CLEAR OF ALL TREES PROTECT IN PLACE � ALL TREES WITHIN OUTLINE. UTLINE TYP. I \ I III i I1l i SYMBOL INDICATES LARGE SHRUB, AND WERE NOT INVENTORIED, TYP. L_I____SEE SHEET401 [ i SEE SHEET402 30' 0 15' 30' 60' NORTH u— LL C/) O O 0 ry rusryseills FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. DD/JB Checked By: PM/CR Sheet Name TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet TR401 MAP KEY , , `� A `, " i `. A Ili � � A \ � 'SYMBOL INDICATES LARGE SHRUB, TREE MITIGATION LEGEND: \ 38 \ , AND WERE NOT INVENTORIED, TYP. SEE SHEET 401 1 � ,, � � �. � � � ��v ' �,�� ,,., '� ,v �� I II ''�,�, �� ! ��'�!I'�a� �—, — — — — — — — — — — — , _ — -_ 37 _ — — I I - i .— — — — — - � PROTECT EXISTING TREE REMOVE EXISTING TREE R SEE SHEET 402 ,� 401 403 _ 402 1 �II� I III TI ' III I I, I � _ I ii' I I IIII I II I� I ,I I I I I. i /�`�/ 1 III 1 _ A / 405 W hII 1 I �'., I II ' I � � ' ' � I 1 � I 1 •� 1 I I 1 1� 1 I I I M o l o / 1 ` I IIII II � I I IIII i I' � ✓`' I II vII i I I I ,, I � 111 II I III WIW UJ� IV� /) � � � � I WSW --- �,'�� - �v ��II W � � I � � I I p � , � �I i 39 .� II —` �---- � � ,_ � � • p � I I I� d��1'11I II I W II IIIII A41 SYMBOL INDICATES LARGE SHRUB, I llil AND WERE NOT INVENTORIED, I UE ,' ,' U UE -"� � _ — / / / -- �� _ - ---- -- -- ----- -- -- -- -- ------ ---- -- o �I�I��i L II i IIII I 43 T - --E42,-- II ---- -------- --- -------- -------- ---- ��u, � _ � IIII , , I � �- _- I J� � � 4 1 I � III I � I I II � I io d i I i /r 45 III Lj 1 I� 1 --- -- 001, �% I. 1 / '� - ----- - - - - i _ I � , I "004 / / / �' - 6 / AIN i I � I 30' 0 15' 30' 60' NORTH I I I , rusryseills FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. DD/JB Checked By: PM/CR Sheet Name TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet TR402 MAP KEY 403 i M I N � I � FIF— LJJ I LJJ LL] I Lu C) I cn wIw UIU) ,_ - -- TREES LCN UDED WITHIN GROVE IL I REMOVE PORTION OF GROVE -±513-8"TREES/STEMS- 1 /PROTECf EX., TREES, TYP. r p ! \ 56 v �� J� A � � VA �� ,' � � � � LARGE SHRUB, WAS NOT \ _ INVENTORIED, TYP. � it \ �54 PROTECT EX.. TREES, TYP. � I i I SEE SHEET 403 SEE SHEET 404 46 �------ f If "29% I PROTd'CT EX. TREES, TYP. \\ G16 PROTECT EX. TREES, TYP. e 1 i PROTECT EX. ! - TREES, TYP: " I I / ! 57 V - PROTECT EX TREES, TYP: ! TREE MITIGATION LEGEND: I/-'1 I`-') PROTECT EXISTING TREE XREMOVE EXISTING TREE u— V J O O W 0 0: rusryseills FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. DD/JB Checked By' PM/CR Sheet Name TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet Qo%; TR403 30' 0 15' 30' 60' NORTH MAP KEY C 401 1 I1 403,,pl, 402 a�. � r 4041,1 405 q I .^► 30' 0 15' 30' 60' NORTH "........ JCC JfICC I `Fult ________ -PROTECT EX TREES,TYP. - - -SEE SHEET 405 aMel 1X9111*163111[a1*10 XREMOVE EXISTING TREE u- O O 4� 0 ry rusryse�lls FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. oo/JB Checked By- PM/CR Sheet Name TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet TR404 MAP KEY 401 ;, y �I 403 # 402 a 404 405 58 TREE MITIGATION LEGEND: PROTECT EXISTING TREE REMOVE EXISTING TREE .r - PROTECT EX.TREES, TYP. - --- SEE SHEET 404 � �v SEE S �. ---- - - - V �-� ` PROTECT EX. TREES, TYP. SEE SHEET 405- SEE S ,-------- - PROTECT EX. - TREES, TYP. � , r r � � � � _ — - --- - - — PROTECT EX. ��'' - - - - -� r _ TREES TYP 5/ / / / ,T 1 PROTECTTT EX. r r r TREES,TYP. PROTECT tX. TREES, TYP. I V ' +26 8' TREES IN i / l� ! / GROVE % REMOVE PORTION OF GROVE - -' � + 26 8" TREES/STEMS -FL r' r r '\v r 48 70 6" TREES IN i I _ G13 GROVE � - - PROTECT EX. / PROTECTEX. -'TREES, TYP. / / ,' �� TREES, TYP. / r / 47 / ; -- 'S�% r � A " \ 0 C EX. ------ .o `--- ° \° TREES, TYP. --PROTECT EX. TREES, TYP. �3 / G13 / ° 0 r r r r r r r r r' r / PROTECT EX. 3 / TREES, TYP. RD--- PROTECT EX. Q TREES, TYP. 0 0-- 52 51 50 ' RO ECT "- - / TREES, TYP. / r 49 I / PROTECT EX. TREES, TYP. l -- -----" -"" --- �; ——--- — — —-- �— — ` --- -- --—�-- T _ - - - - - - - - - - - - ss i5S� ss SS �— o--- —_- — SS� _ _ _ S" —� __ ---_— — �— _- -- — -- — -- - — — — — — X — —_X—_--_— — —=XX — _ � X X X X X _X x X X .► 30' 0 15' 30' 60' NORTH I rusryseills FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL Date, OCTOBER2020 Drawn By. Do/JB Checked By: PM/CR Sheet Name TREE PROTECTION PLAN Sheet TR405 Ridgewood Hills Fifth Filing Existing Tree Removal Feasibility Letter 07.01.2020 Russell + Mills Studios The current site exists as an undeveloped lot. The proposed development proposes 357 dwelling units and associated infrastructure meeting LUC requirements. The existing trees range from fair to poor/dead. As these trees were volunteers and natural. The tree species include Russian Olive (invasive species), Siberian Elm, Crack Willow, Cottonwood, Blue Spruce, Pear, Juniper, Plum, White Pine, Tatarian Maple, and Honey Locust. There are 16 groves of trees with varying stems, and 57 single trees. There will be 6 groves removed, and 36 trees removed to allow for earthwork, utilities installation, and associated infrastructure. The trees removed are predominately Russian Olive, Crack Willow, Siberian Elm and five (5) dead trees. Tree #1, Russian Olive, 3", Fair The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot access driveway, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #2, Russian Olive, 1-3", Fair The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot access driveway, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #3, Russian Olive, 3-9", Fair - The tree is in conflict with the proposed pool, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #4, Siberian Elm, 8", Fair - The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot, retaining wall, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #5, Crack Willow, 6 stems, 6-11", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot, retaining wall, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #6, Russian Olive, 2-6", Fair The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot, retaining wall, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the tree. Tree #7, Russian Olive, 5", Fair The tree is in conflict with the proposed ditch access easement for the City of Fort Collins Parks. Tree #8, Crack Willow, 26", Poor The tree is in conflict with the proposed retaining wall, storm outfall pipes, and will be impacted by adjacent grading operations. Tree #G1, Cottonwood Grove, 3 trees @ <6", Fair The grove is in conflict with the proposed ditch access easement for the City of Fort Collins Parks. Tree #G2, Russian Olive Grove, 8 trees @ <11", Fair -Poor The grove is in conflict with the proposed ditch access easement for the City of Fort Collins Parks. Tree #G4, Cottonwood Grove, 2 trees @ 4", Good The grove is in conflict with the proposed ditch access easement for the City of Fort Collins Parks. Tree #10, Cottonwood, 6", Fair - The tree is in conflict with the proposed storm pipe and outfalls, there is a substantial amount of grading at the eastern edge of the trees to accommodate the future College Avenue Roadway expansion. Tree #G5, Russian Olive Grove, 8 trees @ <11", Fair+ The grove is in conflict with the proposed ditch access easement for the City of Fort Collins Parks. Tree #G7, Cottonwood Grove, 3 trees @ 4-13", Dead The grove is dead. Tree #19, Plum, 12", Dead The tree is dead. Tree #23-32, Russian Olive, 10 trees @ <11", Fair+ The trees are in conflict with the proposed parking lot, building, garage, underground utilities, and a substantial amount of grading will occur within the dripline of the trees. Tree #G9, Cottonwood Grove, 5 trees @ 2-4", Fair The tree grove is in conflict with grading for detention. Tree #33, Crack Willow, 6", Fair The tree is in conflict with grading for detention. Tree #34, Siberian Elm, 4 stems, no rating The tree is in conflict with a proposed trail, and will have extensive amount of grading within the dripline. Tree #G10, Siberian Elm + Russian Olive Grove, 13 SIB stems 2-7", 6 RUS stems <11", Fair The tree grove is in conflict with a proposed trail, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have an extensive amount of grading within the driplines. Tree #35, Cottonwood, 7 stems @ 2-8", Fair+ The trees are in conflict with a proposed trail, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have extensive amount of grading within the driplines. Tree #G11, Cottonwood Grove, 11 trees @ 3-23", Fair+ The tree grove is in conflict with a proposed trail, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have an extensive amount of grading within the driplines. Tree #G12, Russian Olive + Siberian Elm Grove, 15 stems @ <11", Fair/Dead The tree grove is in conflict with a proposed trail, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have an extensive amount of grading within the driplines. Most of the grove is dead. Tree #36, Russian Olive, 15", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with a proposed, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have an extensive amount of grading within the dripline. Tree #37, Siberian Elm, 3", Poor The tree is in conflict with a proposed, roadway that connects to triangle dr. and will have an extensive amount of grading within the dripline. Tree #38, Siberian Elm, 13 stems @ >11", Fair - The tree is in conflict with grading for the multi family building, and will have substantial amount of grading within the dripline. Tree #39, Russian Olive, 12", Fair The tree is in conflict with grading and construction of the ditch that will be piped within the dripline. Tree #40, Russian Olive, 16", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with grading and construction of the ditch that will be piped within the dripline. Tree #41-45, Russian Olive, 5 trees @ <11", Good The trees are in conflict with a proposed trail, roadway that connects to triangle dr., detention grading effecting the driplines. Tree #46, Russian Olive, <11", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with a proposed building, and will be removed due to the ditch being piped. Tree #47, Russian Olive, <11", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with grading for detention and wetland mitigation efforts. Tree #48, Russian Olive, <11", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with grading for detention and wetland mitigation efforts. Tree #G13, Cottonwood Grove, 118 stems @ 2-24", Fair/Good (partial removal) The grove will be partially removed due to the construction of townhome buildings, roads, sidewalks, utilities, and grading for said infrastructure. The southern portion of the grove will be protected in place. Tree #55, Cottonwood, 46", Poor/Hazard The tree is a hazard tree. Tree #G14, Cottonwood Grove,124 stems @ 2-18", Fair/Good The grove will be partially removed due to the construction of a road, sidewalks, utilities, and grading for said infrastructure. The northwestern and southeastern portions of the grove will be protected in place. Tree #56, Russian Olive, 9", Fair+ The tree is in conflict with grading for the ditch, regional trail, and buildings. Tree #58, Honeylocust, 4", Fair -/Poor The tree is in conflict with grading a retaining wall. Tree #S7, Bur Oak, 7", Fair - The tree is in conflict with the proposed parking lot access. Although the tree is not in direct path of the drive approach, it is approximately 10 ft from the edge of curb and may present sight distance issues for vehicles making right turns onto Triangle.