Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIDGEWOOD HILLS FIFTH FILING - FDP200024 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSof F6rty "Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224 6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentrevlew July 24, 2020 John Beggs Russell + Mills 506 S College Ave Unit A Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Ridgewood Hills Fifth Filing, PDP190018, Round Number 5 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Ridgewood Hills Fifth Filing. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email at tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras, 970-416-2744, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 bbethuremharras@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 11/27/2019 11/27/2019: INFORMATION: I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/27/2019 11/27/2019: INFORMATION: As part of your resubmittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. Contact: Suzanne Bassinger Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/06/2020 07/23/20 FOR FINAL: Parts of the trail easement are within the ditch easement. Please provide a letter of intent that the ditch company agrees to allow this path to exist within their easement. RMS: This was provided prior to hearing. Department: Building Services Contact: Katy Hand, khand(a)fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/02/2019 12/02/2019: Submit a site -wide accessibility plan for review per CRS 9-5. This applies to townhouses. RMS: Comment noted. Department: Environmental Services Contact: Linda Hardin, Ihardin(a)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/20/2020 02/20/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: Final construction waste management plan and documentation for entire project required before C.O. See prior comments/holds for additional needs prior to C.O./L.O.C. RMS: Comment noted. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/02/2019 07/17/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. Response: Comment noted Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/02/2019 07/17/2020: FINAL -UPDATED: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Response: The changes have been addressed. Written responses to the redlines provided have been included with the FDP submittal. Please refer to those responses regarding items needing some 10 discussion. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Mark Fairchild, Century Link Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/20/2020 04/20/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: CenturyLink appreciates the opportunity to provide the Ridgewood Hills Fifth Filing with its future communication needs. In response to the request for a commitment to serve, CenturyLink will work with the developers on determining what the needs will be. Upon such determination, CenturyLink will undertake an analysis of the construction required and the cost to complete that construction. It is only at that point, and given the prevailing Terms and Conditions of the Local Terms of Service that CenturyLink will make a determination whether it can or cannot provide service. Response: Comment noted. Ownership will continue to coordinate as needed. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/20/2020 04/20/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: The services to be requested will be provided for under the prevailing Terms and Conditions of the Local Terms of Service posted on our CenturyLink web site at www.CenturyLink.com/tariffs. Response: Comment noted. Ownership will continue to coordinate as needed. Contact: Megan Harrity, Larimer County Assessor Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/21/2020 04/21/2020: FOR FINAL: Current ownership for the five parcels involved in this plat is listed below. It looks like the prelim plat has a signature block for a different owner than what we currently have on record. 9614413001 NEXTOP HOLDINGS LLC (.79) BETTER LAND LLC (.21) 9614413002 SHENANDOAH OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 9614413007 NEXTOP HOLDINGS LLC (.79) BETTER LAND LLC (.21) 9614000004 NEXTOP HOLDINGS LLC (.79) BETTER LAND LLC (.21) 9614000026 NEXTOP HOLDINGS LLC (.79) BETTER LAND LLC (.21) We currently have SHENANDOAH OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC and 11 NEXTOP HOLDINGS LLC (.79) and BETTER LAND LLC (.21) . These owners will need to sign if the current ownership does not change before the final plat is recorded. Response: The ownership information has been updated on the plat to reflect present conditions. Contact: Nate Ensley, FCLWD Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/03/2020 06/11/2020: we are OK having Galloway address the remaining comments when they generate final plans. Since we see no changes to water or sewer on this submittal (likely due to the previous statement), we will hold off on further comments until Galloway submits final construction plans for review. 03/03/2020: FOR HEARING: Please see attached Redlines Response: Comment noted. 12 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/21/2020: September Hearing: The August P&Z hearing does not look feasible. Staff would have to write the staff report and assemble all materials and a presentation for the Board, next week and two days into the following week. The magnitude of issues that need to be clearly presented warrants more time to prepare for an effective hearing. There will be new information from City Council on Wednesday morning that may affect scheduling discussions. For discussion at the meeting or afterward. RMS: Noted Contact: Kai Kleer, 970.416-4284, kkleera(D.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 10 When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not been addressed, when applicable. Please avoid using acknowledged, noted, or other non -descriptive replies. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/27/2019 11/27/2019: INFORMATION: This proposed project is processing as a Type 2 Project Development Plan. The decision maker for Type 2 is the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff would need to be in agreement the project is ready for Hearing approximately 3-5 weeks prior to the hearing. I have attached the 2020 P&Z schedule, which has key dates. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/27/2019 11/27/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: When you are ready to resubmit, please make an appointment with me at least 24 hours in advance. Submittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut-off for routing the same week. Department: Planning Services Contact: Clark Mapes, 970-221-6225, cmapes(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/21/2020: For Hearing: we will need to have a good idea of the material for the College Ave. walls. If an actual spec is not decided, the plan should indicate character. The stone block character in the rendering would be fine. Staff will follow up with the development team to confirm the approach. RMS: The walls will be natural in nature as depicted in the renderings and elevations. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/21/2020: For Final Plan: Some plant species may warrant minor adjustment for toughness, scale, and appropriate water demand groupings. RMS: The landscape plan indicates the proposed plants, all are typical for zone 5b or higher. Typical water uses area grouped to create hydrozones. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 12/03/2019 12/03/2019 FOR FINAL PLAN: Water conservation. the landscape plan will need to include a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use which cannot exceed an average of 2 15 gallons a square foot for the landscape. Please delineate hydrozones according to this section. 3.2.1(E)(3) Parking lot perimeter landscaping. a minimum of one tree per 40 feet is required within the 5-foot parking lot perimeter setback area. 3.2.1(E)(4) Additional landscaping is required around all parking lot perimeters to block at least 75% of light from vehicle headlights. Screening should be emphasized where parking areas are adjacent to street frontage and consist of a wall, planters, earthen berm, plant material, or a combination of such elements. These elements must have a minimum height of 30 inches and extend a minimum of seventy percent of the length of the street frontage of the parking lot and 70 percent of the lot that abuts any nonresidential use. Parking lot screening. The plan set should depict the parking lot screening as seen along streets and street -like private drives. Keep in mind that plant material used for the required screening shall achieve required opacity in its winter seasonal condition within three (3) years of construction of the vehicular use area to be screened. Parking lot landscape islands. Parking spaces cannot span more than 15 parking spaces without an intervening tree, landscape island or landscape peninsula. There are several instances around the proposed multi -family buildings where the project does not meet this requirement. 3.2.1(E)(5) Please provide calculations for interior parking space landscaping. The standard in this section requires at a minimum landscape area of 6% for all parking lots with less than 100 spaces and 10% for all parking lots with 100 spaces or more. Within this internal landscape area at least one canopy shade tree per 150 square feet is required. Regarding 3.2.1(E)(6) Screening, building elements with low visual interest such as garages, trash collection, open storage, service areas, loading docks and blank walls must be screened on all sides except where an opening is required for access. Please add additional landscaping around trash enclosures, ramp extending from college into site and along the rear side of the garages that front College Avenue, Regarding Tree Preservation and Mitigation. it appears that most of the mitigation trees will be located in the ROW is there any opportunity to provide the mitigation trees as evergreens along the College Avenue frontage? 3.2.1(F) RMS: Noted, the plans represent compliance and have been coordinated with staff during PDP. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/03/2019 06/17/2020 FOR FINAL: All lighting associated with multi -family, townhomes, and duplexes will need to be demonstrated on the lighting plan. This includes but is not limited to, building wall packs, parking lots, walkways, plazas or the landscape. Please include fixture details as well as photometrics. RMS: Lighting has been addressed — all non -user controlled lighting has been updated. 3 12/03/2019 FOR HEARING: Lighting: In the model elevations there appears to be lighting mounted to residential units that is not represented as part of the lighting plan. Please provide notes or specifications for the proposed lighting to ensure that it is fully shielded and down directional. RMS: Lighting has been addressed — all non -user controlled lighting has been updated. All lighting has been updated to meet the criteria. Department: Historic Preservation Contact: Maren Bzdek, 970-221-6206, mbzdekcDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/03/2019 12103/2019: FOR FINAL: The site plan indicates very close proximity between the existing historic bam on the neighboring parcel and the proposed improvements. It is important to create an appropriate buffer around the bam for its protection and to maintain an appropriate separation between the two. Federal guidelines for this scenario state that "new construction should be appropriately scaled and located far enough away from the historic building to maintain its character and that of the site and setting." This is particularly important for meeting the plan of protection requirement for historic resources, in section 3.4.7(E)(3) of the land use code. A plan of protection details the particular considerations and protective measures that will be employed to prevent short-term and long-term material damage and avoidable impact on the character of identified historic resources on the development site and within the area of adjacency from demolition, new construction, and operational activities. Satisfactory completion of this standard generally hinges on creating a meaningful buffer between any site disturbances/improvements and the historic resource(s). RMS: This has been addressed. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/03/2020 03/03/2020: FOR FINAL: Note that it is important to preserve views of the historic bam within the development. The six-foot wood fence shown on the plans will impact the visibility of this focal point. Please explore alternatives to mitigate this problem. Otherwise, it will fail to satisfy land use code Section 3.4.7, Table 1: "New construction shall not cover or obscure character -defining architectural elements, such as windows or primary design features, of historic resources on the development site, abutting or across a side alley." RMS: Fencing has been coordinated with staff, along the bam limits a shorter fence will be installed per the site plan details. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221.6567, mvirataanfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/02/2019 06/16/2020: before hearing: Carried forward as unresolved, but is understood as being worked on. Response: Correspondence was provided at time of PDP. We will continue to coordinate the FDP 4 construction documents with the ditch company for final approval. 05/05/2020: by hearing: Carried over as unresolved. The response indicated that the design engineer is working with the ditch company to obtain a notice of preliminary acceptance, which does not appear to have been provided at this time. 03/03/2020. FOR HEARING: Have we received a letter from Louden Irrigation for their OK in concept to the plan? This is required prior to a hearing. 12/02/2019: FOR HEARING: The plans appear to show work being done to an existing ditch owned by Louden Irrigation Ditch. It appears that the civil construction plans would need a signature block from the irrigation company, also the plat may need to have Louden Irrigation Ditch signing as well. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 06/16/2020 07/21 /2020: carried over for information only 06/16/2020: for final: At time of final, additional typical cross sections of College Avenue depicting grade as shown on Section A -A of Sheet C4.6 will be needed at 100 foot intervals along College Avenue as evidence of the sidewalk being installed in the ultimate location (where installed along the right-of-way). Response: The cross sections are provided within the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 06/16/2020 07/21/2020: carried over for information only 06/16/2020: information only: Where the sidewalk along College Avenue no longer follows the right-of-way approaching Triangle Drive, this area is considered interim and would be altered with the future widening of College Avenue. The payment of local street of sidewalk and parkway (and trees) would be needed along this section. Response: Comment noted. The owner will coordinate with staff regarding payment for inclusion within the development agreement. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 06/16/2020 07/21 /2020: carried over for information only 06/16/2020: for final: The placement of the signal poles for the signalization of Triangle Drive and College Avenue will need to be considered in more detail in light of the planned widening of College Avenue in the future to ensure cost considerations and eligibility of reimbursement. Response: Comment noted. We are working with City Traffic engineering and CDOT on the pole placement. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinsonna.fcgov.com Topic: General 5 Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/21/2020: SUMMARY OF ITEMS NEEDED FOR FINAL - Please plan to submit a signing and striping plan. Stop signs should also be shown on the landscape plan - ensure that there are no trees planted within 50 ft of the approach to a stop sign to ensure sign visibility. - The DA will need to address specifics (timing, construction, funding etc) on the signalization of College / Triangle. No certificates of occupancy can be granted until the signal is in place. - We'll need detailed signal plans. Please plan on adequate time for CDOT review / approval. Response: • The signage and striping plan is included within the Utility Plans. • Comment noted. We will work with staff regarding timing of the signal installation. The signal plans have been submitted to City and CDOT staff for review. We have received the first set of comments. Our traffic engineer is working with CDOT and City staff to clear these comments and obtain approval of the signal plan. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416-2418, wlamargue(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/03/2020 06/15/2020: AT FINAL COMPLIANCE: 05/04/2020: AT FINAL COMPLIANCE: Coordination will be required with Stormwater Utility, Environmental Planning, and the Development Team on Landscape goals and design of the detention basins to ensure all criteria is being met including any type of natural feature mitigation. Response: Comment noted. The development team has coordinated with Environmental Planning on required elements within the detention areas to achieve the environmental criteria, including plantings and topography. We will continue to work with staff to finalize the pond layout for these purposes. Please provide comment as it relates to the final drainage report and other stormwater criteria for inclusion in the subsequent FDP submittal. 03/03/2020: FOR HEARING: Additional discussion is required regarding the ground water report. City Criteria states that the bottom of a detention basin needs to be 2 feet above the ground water surface elevation. This requirement could be varied if it is determined that the basin bottom will be designed for wetlands. Coordination with Environmental Planning and Stormwater Utility is needed to determine how the detention basins will be designed and landscaped. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/04/2020 07/24/2020: AT FINAL COMPLIANCE: All Letter of Intents received. Final approval of the Utility Plans will be contingent on the completion and recording of all required easements by all the necessary third parties. Response: Comment noted. R 06/15/2020. FOR HEARING: Please submit the Letter of Intent when it is produced. 05/04/2020: FOR HEARING: The Stormwater Utility has learned that there is another interest and existing easement for the Robert Benson Lateral with the City Parks Department. A drainage easement will need to be obtained from City Parks for the northern outfall. Maintenance access will also need to be provided. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/04/2020 06/15/2020: AT FINAL COMPLIANCE: 05/04/2020: AT FINAL COMPLIANCE: On the western end of the Robert Benson Lateral, three storm sewer outfalls enter this area at a grade that is higher than the bottom of the channel which will be an erosion issue. Mitigation for this will be required and will be reviewed at final compliance. Response: Comment noted. We are continuing to work through the outfall design and coordinate with the reviewer on the temporary and permanent erosion control design. Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish(a fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/16/2020 07/22/2020: Carry forward for Final: Per conversations with the applicant team, responses in the comment letter, and as long as everyone is of the understanding that not only with the larger multi -family buildings, but also with the cottages or townhomes, there may definitely be the need to set more transformers and more vaults, both primary and secondary, if any or all of these residences are going to not have gas installed. This could definitely lead to modifications to the site for the placement of equipment and to meet the required clearances from other utilities and forestry, Light & Power will carry this issue forward to Final. 06/16/2020: FOR HEARING: Plans show 1 transformer per building with all meters ganged on one end of the building. The transformer is only able to accept 8 runs of 350kcmil max. It may be necessary to install 2 transformers per building just to get all of the secondary runs to fit in the transformer or the owner may have to provide a connection cabinet. Light & Power will have to set the largest single-phase transformer we carry to feed 48 small gas units. Will there be any additional loads coming off of these transformers? Garages, house meters, etc..? It may be necessary to set 2 transformers per building. This needs discussion. Response: The electrical engineer has determined the following regarding loading to the multi -family buildings: 'Based on our preliminary load calcs and the service sizes below, only one transformer per apartment building should be necessary. None are so large that more than one would be required. Preliminary electric service sizes are estimated at - A-24 Bldg 1200A, 208V13-phase 7 A-42 & A48 Bldgs: 1600A, 208V13-phase Clubhouse: 600A, 208V13-phase" Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Smith, ksmith(o)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/17/2020 07/17/2020: FOR FDP: Please find an alternative to the PCOWC wall mounted fixture. It is 4000K and code requires 3000k or less. RMS: The fixture has been updated. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/17/2020 07/17/2020: FOR FDP: There are some revisions to the proposed Wetland Monitoring Plan. The changes/edits will be conditions of approval. RMS: The revisions have been made. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/17/2020, READY FOR HEARING, provided a copy of the letter from the ditch company is submitted. RMS: The letter has been provided prior to hearing. Department: Parks Contact: Aaron Wagner, aawagnera()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 07/21/2020. FOR INFORMATION Parks and NAD have received the required Letters of Intent - Thank you. Parks and NAD are ready for hearing. RMS: Comment noted. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mrocheanfcgov.com Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/03/2019 7/21/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL. Continued through FDP Round 1. 6/19/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL — UNRESOLVED: Continued: Comment carried through FDP. In addition to showing street lights and stop signs, please also include utility vault locations on the plans. Forestry recommends placing trees at least 10-ft from these vaults. 619112020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL UNRESOLVED 3/3/2029: FOR FIN n1 40PROV41 I INIRES01 VED rnnt'ni, r:WArMation to the stati is of the ;n't'Al GAMMeRt. it doesn't appear that stop -"Zl... - 8 Topic: General Comment Number: 18.1 Comment Originated: 05/05/2020 7/21/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Continued through FDP Round 1. RMS: Landscape plan has been updated to ensure proper clearances. Comment Number: 23.1 Comment Originated: 06/19/2020 7/21/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL — UNRESOLVED Continued: This are still a handful of trees shown to be removed in grove 14 are shown to stay on the landscape plan. Molly emailed Darren Durroux the locations of the bubbled trees to be preserved, which are also shown on the redlines for reference. RMS: All mitigation plan trees and comments have been addressed. 6/19/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL On Sheet TR403 - some of the trees shown to be removed in grove 14 are shown to stay on the landscape plan. Please show these to remain and adjust mitigation numbers. Comment Number: 24.1 Comment Originated: 07/21/2020 7/21/2020: INFORMATION ONLY Thank you for clarifying Forestry mitigation requirements. Highlighting the table was very helpful! Department: Park Planning 9