HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS SECOND AND HARMONY PUD AT THE VILLAGES AT HARMONY WEST LOT ONE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL - 3 90E, F - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSG I_ A S I:•I? A
C C;•I A i I:
March 3, 1992
Kirsten Whetstone, Project Planner
City of Fort Collins
281 North College
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580
Re: The Villages at Harmony West Overall Development Plan Amendment,
and:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints
Fort Collins 2 and Future Wards, Fort Collins, Colorado Stake
Preliminary and Final PUD
Dear Kirsten:
The following is an itemized response to the City of Fort Collins review comments
dated February 21, 1992:
Item 1. The name changes have been made as per your request.
Items We have no intention of moving or disrupting the existing ditch that
2, 3, 4, would require an easement change, crossover agreement, or
& 6. improvements to the ditch bed and banks. Review and approval
rights by the ditch company's Board of Directors is understood.
Item 5. The Owner shall take responsibility of weed control in the proximity of
the landscaping shown along the bank. This will enable the Pleasant
Valley Ditch Company maintenance personnel to avoid spraying
church landscaping with herbicides.
Item 7. The trail is now indicated on the ODP.
Item 8. The base plan for the ODP has been modified as per your
instructions.
Item 9. Certifications are included on the ODP.
Item 10. Harmony Road access points are now indicated. We do not have
information for the locations of intersections on Regency of
Wakerobin Lane.
Item 11. Cross -access points from the west extension of tract C to Tracts D 1
and D2 have been shown. These would only be utilized for uses other
than single family residential or duplex residential units which would
have driveway access directly from Regency Drive. Any developed
uses of Tracts D 1 and/or D2 shall not be permitted to utilize the
parking area of Tract C to access Harmony Road. This could be
controlled through signage and/or speed bumps.
Item 12. The policies of the LDS Church specifically prohibit schools or day-
care centers from being conducted in their church facilities. I have
been told by Rick Ensdorf that it would be highly unlikely that a
median would be constructed at this location on Harmony Road. The
intent of the west extension of Tract C is to allow east -bound access
on Harmony Road via Regency Drive in the event that a median is
constructed.
Items The ODP notes have been modified to permit access from Harmony
13& 14 Road. The planning notes listed in item 14 have been included.
Item 15. Land uses for Tracts D 1 and D2 have been modified to match Land
Development Guidance System categories.
•
Item 16. The building has been reviewed for fire sprinkler requirements; the
building does not require a fire sprinkler system.
Item 17. The lot sizes have been included on the plat.
Item 18. Utility easements as requested have not been added at this time, but
they will be on the final drawings.
Item 19. The plat has been revised to show cross -access agreements.
Item 20. Note: The cross access easement is provided only to be utilized for
uses other than single family residential or duplex residential units
which would have driveway access directly from Regency Drive.
Item 21. A signature block for the Pleasant Valley Ditch Company has been
provided.
Item 22. A street design to the extent necessary to determine that the grades
of our project will work has been prepared by The Engineering
Company.
Item 23. Harmony Road is an improved road with curb and gutter which
increases the value of the land and is reflected in the purchase price
paid by the Owners. We understand the concept and requirement of
Street Oversizing Fees, but we do not understand the purpose or
basis for requiring the Owner to also pay for Harmony Road
improvements. Please submit City statutes which clearly define what
is intended with these funds; would they offset the Street Oversizing
fees? Unless this is the case, we regard payment of both the Street
Oversizing fee and the improvement costs of Harmony Road as being
double -charged.
Items Lots 2 & 3 shall be improved by the Owner with the culverting of the
24 & ditch which will greatly enhance the build ability of these two sites.
25. The Engineering Company is currently working with the City Storm
Item 26
Item 27
Item 30.
Item 31
Item 32
Item 33
Item 34
Water staff to develop a plan; information shall follow at a later date.
Therefore the requested improvements of street trees and sidewalks
are not included in our revisions.
Revisions have been made on the Utility plans and Plat in response to
comments on those documents.
The City may make a request to the LDS Church for shared parking
for trail users, however the liabilities involved would make approval of
the request doubtful without complete indemnification of the LDS
Church by the City of Fort Collins for those who would use the
parking in conjunction with the trail. The issue of Sunday use would
also have to be addressed.
Zoning and parking notes have been corrected. The standard
landscape notes are included in the project specifications which are a
legal part of the contract documents. It is our objective to not list this
information twice and therefore the notes are not included on the
drawings.
The handicapped parking has been relocated to align with the ramps.
The City trail will be shown on the final site plans.
A parking table shall be included on the final drawings.
The sign is indicated on the south building elevation. There is no
monument sign.
Lots 2 and 3 are off -lots intended for resale. Therefore improvements
of these lots, beyond the culverting of the drainage ditch should
rightfully be the responsibility of the future purchaser. Please
remember the discussion of these two lots at the Conceptual Review
indicated it was optional to plat - or not plat - this property at this
time, and acceptance of the "full -platting option" would not require
L�
development fees for the undeveloped property. Likewise, the
undeveloped property should not be required to be developed!
Item 35. The Blue Spruce at the east entrance balances the color, texture, and
density of the spruces planted at the west entrance and it is planted
60' away from the future alignment of Harmony Road. This should not
present a sight/distance problem.
Item 36. A three variety blend of Kentucky Bluegrass was chosen for the lawn
areas because of its visual appeal and its ability to withstand foot -
traffic. Our specifications call for grass seed containing: 70% Crested
Wheat, 15% Tall Fescue, 10% Rye, and 5% Bluegrass to be used for
the temporary lawn area at Harmony Road. There is a $50,000
landscape/irrigation budget for this project. Our estimates indicate we
are at the maximum, and the addition of planting beds would exceed
our budget and increase our maintenance.
Item 37. Additional elevations have been added to reflect all four elevations.
The heights of the building and steeple are shown by corresponding
"elevation heights" with 100' representing ground level. The building
will be roofed with an asphalt shingle in a gray -blue or black. The
brick shall be two tones of light gray. Stucco areas are intended to be
an off-white.
Item 38. The storage building and adjoining trash enclosure shall be brick to
match the building.
Item 39. The steeple is constructed of white fiberglass with a five foot square
base tapering in an elongated pyramid to a peak 38 feet above the
base at a total height of 68 feet above the ground. Due to its narrow
profile and its location on the site, no objectionable shadow shall be
cast by the steeple.
Item 40. The following is a project directory:
E)kAVoW eAT-,& 6� iSgEgfIt
AA - 3 PA t1sT 06(, 2('U
3 PR
�_-- _-- HARMONY KOAYJ _--
TNC S c.� cs coNS UG'1 cry wl �It ����6 �(A5S
FIVE (:�oT SQ0AIZE 6AS6 lRFEE-IN� IN At) ElDfJC141159 ►�'(RAr'I»
To A ( RK 3g Fe-�� AP,6VE THE 6 S� Al- A-F6-Mt. Ne-I jHT
(og I~�� ArtoV� ��UNO. DUB ITS IJAf.�oH�.
Ap,1D tT S LOGS j � � N G`�1 (�f"E 51'� � N a at3,� Lz7 to►� /k/�i.,� S(-�,,,)
S N'PclL [�E: CAST I5Y TNT
•
Glaser Associates Architects
215 Jefferson Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Contact: Kevin Mielbeck
(303) 493-3020
Flatirons Surveying, Inc.
5717 Arapahoe Road
Boulder, CO 80303
Contact: Steven Sellars
(303) 443-7001
Terracon Consultants SE, Inc.
1609 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Contact: Lester Litton
(303) 226-5611
The Engineering Company
2310 East Prospect
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Contact: Rick Pickard
(303) 484-7477
MKF Landscape Design
2005 Evergreen Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Contact: Mary Ferris
(303) 493-1255
Wernsman Engineering
710 11th Avenue
Suite L-60
Greeley, CO 80631
Contact: Steve Wernsman
Architect
Surveying
Soils/Testing
Civil
Landscape
Structural
0 •
(303) 353-4463
ACFC Engineering Associates Mechanical
2535 Sherman Hill Road
Laramie, WY 82070
Contact: Jere' Hamilton
(307) 766-2324
Electrical Systems Consultants Electrical
212 West Mulberry Street
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Contact: Mike Wellenc
(303) 224-9100
Spectrum Professional Services Sound Engineer
Suite 806
175 East 400 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Contact: David Drommond
(800) 678-7077
Very truly yours,
GLASER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS
Carl J. Glaser, AIA
cc: Steve Streeter, LDS Church